Quote:
Originally Posted by The Hairdryer
Sure, when you posted the Issuance of an ITC (International Transfer Certificate) for a Professional earlier you convientely left out clause 5 which states that you can register a player with out the permission of his former club.
and clause seven, which again suggest you don't need official documentation. (A fax is not a legal document)
.
See two possible ways that United could have secured Mikel's registration without any documentation, forged or not, from Lyn.
|
Surely this post is a pisstake. You can't be serious. Having read the FIFA transfer regulations the best way for you can come up with for United to legally get Mikel's registration is to hope that nobody at the Norwegian FA responds to your request for an ITC for 30 days? And you said I was clutching at straws.
Just how are you going to get the Noggies to not respond to your request for Mikel's ITC? Send them all on a round the world cruise and then send in your request?
By the way, your second option (clause 7) for legally registering Mikel still relies on the forgery from Lyn. It just lets you work off a fax of the ITC rather than the original paperwork. The only way you would get that is for still for Lyn to lie to the the Norwegian FA and say that the contract situation with is all fine and dandy. That won't stand up in court.
That just leaves you with only your first option for legally getting Mikel's registration - that of hoping the Norwegian FA take more than 30 days to respond to your request for an ITC.
This thread has come a long way. At the start it was
United had a legally binding contract with Mikel regardless of what Lyn did. Chelsea can fuck themselves. Now thanks to The Hairdryer you're at
maybe if the Norwegian FA didn't respond to our request for an ITC in 30 days we could legally register him.
Good luck with that.