Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick 0208 Ldn
If he truly cared about the environment and the health of people, and wasn't simply init for the money, he would create a large pedestrianised zone or put in place a curfew would he not?
Just another earner.
|
You keep nonchalently repeating the corruption charge, but I still see no evidence.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redlambs
Hardly.
Then you should have gone to specsavers.
|
Right, so anecdotal evidenced is fine... except when it contradicts your anecdotal evidence. Brilliant.
Quote:
|
Plus, what about the downright unfair penalty system he uses too? I'd like to know how that one can be defended.
|
What's so unfair about it? If you fuck up, you still have a whole day to pay only a tenner. If you forget that, you still have 14 days to pay 40 quid. I've fucked up a few times, but I blamed myself for my own mistake, rather than a system that gives me time to correct it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redlambs
That's plain stupid. So he raises money for the public transport by trying to force cars off the road? And what would happen if he succeeded, where's the money coming from next?
You do realise that you can't just refurbish once, it's a forever ongoing situation? You can't keep dragging money from the working class with bollocks charges and raising council tax, then pretend it's benefiting them. You have to look at better, more self-sufficient ways. One of those ways is to change the structure.
Besides, the fact he is being voted out proves what the majority thinks, and right or wrong, Ken should have listened and stopped bullshitting. The man clearly has his own interests at heart more than anyone else's.
|
All the voting out proves is that he's been in office two terms, no-one likes a politician around for long.