Quote:
Originally Posted by Nucks
Bullshit. Hargreaves has been filling in at RB because NOBODY else on the team is fit enough to do it. Even if Hargreaves was far and away our best CM he'd STILL be filling in at RB. Now, if we didn't already have depth at CM we might not have that luxury, but we in fact do, so he does.
|
Arguable. He's the only player who's played at rightback for any length of time. If he was our best CM, he wouldn't be playing rightback, thats not arguable, its a fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nucks
He also has had his best games for us this season centrally. Just because when he got into the attack in those games he occasionally floated wide doesn't mean he played as a winger as some here would have you believe. He played centrally for us in those games. He made attacking runs wide left, down the middle and wide right. Yet for whatever reason the people who claimed he was shit and not worthy just cannot let their arguments go.
|
Gimme the games, I've seen every game this season. He's been playing out wide over the last while and florished because of it. Thats a good thing, but it doesn't negate the fact he's been absolute gash in the majority of the games he's played in the middle.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nucks
You were wrong, get the fuck over it already, the whole reluctantly conceding he is a great player but still "shite" centrally is pathetic and extremely transparent.
|
I said all along that he should play, just not ahead of Carrick, who's clearly a better central midfielder than he is. I was saying he should do what Gattuso does for Milan, for us. i.e. play just to the right of somebody who can pass the ball. As for the pro-hargreaves idiots being right, please don't be silly.