Quote:
Originally Posted by Redlambs
It meant both actually.
|
Ok, so we actually agree.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redlambs
Arrogant, brainless, nonsense.
I don't expect you to agree, however I expect that you should at least try to debate on proper grounds without just assuming people's motives. You do it a lot, hence why debates involving you always lead down a shit path.
|
Hey, I'm always happy to hear what you're saying. Don't expect me to sugar coat it if I disagree. Besides, if you recall, I said I didn't understand other people's motives, and it turns out that we actually agree.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redlambs
Look, you obviously know your stuff, but what makes you ignorant is the assumptions you make. I'm involved in part of the underground refurbishment and I'm not assuming it will always go up at all, BUT it will always be there and always be at an inflated level.
|
I thought you might be involved, which is why I was surprised when you said that the maintenance would always be high. I don't understand how can it always be at an inflated level if it doesn't always go up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redlambs
My point, which you clearly misunderstood, is that forcing money out of car drivers (for example) to pay for an already pretty well funded public transport system which is failing for reasons not just due to financing is a pretty shit fix. Hence one of the reasons why the man is voted out.
|
You should have said so. I would agree with part of that, but not the implicit assumption that fixing the finances won't fix a lot of the problems. And hence that forcing more money out of people in general won't solve many problems.