View Single Post
Old 7th May 2008, 17:46   #41 (permalink)
Team Brian GB
Celery chucker at the Bridge.
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by holyland red View Post
Horrible as the results of that incident were, I think you'll find differences in methodology:

Irgun leader Menachem Begin stressed his desire to avoid civilian casualties and said three telephone calls were placed, one to the hotel, another to the French Consulate, and a third to the Palestine Post, warning that explosives in the King David Hotel would soon be detonated.

On July 22, 1946, the calls were made. The call into the hotel was apparently received and ignored. Begin quotes one British official who supposedly refused to evacuate the building, saying: "We don't take orders from the Jews."1 As a result, when the bombs exploded, the casualty toll was high: a total of 91 killed and 45 injured. Among the casualties were 15 Jews. Few people in the hotel proper were injured by the blast.2

In contrast to Arab attacks against Jews, which were widely hailed as heroic actions, the Jewish National Council denounced the bombing of the King David.3

For decades the British denied they had been warned. In 1979, however, a member of the British Parliament introduced evidence that the Irgun had indeed issued the warning. He offered the testimony of a British officer who heard other officers in the King David Hotel bar joking about a Zionist threat to the headquarters. The officer who overheard the conversation immediately left the hotel and survived.4

1. Menachem Begin, The Revolt, (NY: Nash Publishing, 1977), p. 224.

2. J. Bowyer Bell, Terror Out Of Zion, (NY: St. Martin's Press), p. 172.

3. Anne Sinai and I. Robert Sinai, Israel and the Arabs: Prelude to the Jewish State, (NY: Facts on File, 1972), p. 83.

4. Benjamin Netanyahu, ed., "International Terrorism: Challenge And Response," Proceedings of the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism, July 2*5, 1979, (Jerusalem: The Jonathan Institute, 1980), p. 45.
Be that as it may, I was of the understanding there was intelligence before hand of the bombing (but that as obvious as that), however you cannot be surprised when or attempt to shift responsibility when a bomb you are responsible for detonates and kills people.

I wasn't aware that Irgun were acting on their own accord and not that of the Israeli higher echelons,though that is what is ironic about this situation as the case is the same today with Palestinians taking it upon themselves to attack Israel, but Israel then using it against the Palestinian authorities (though Hamas running the administration now destorts that) when it was employed by Israel successfully.


However I didn't wish to hijack the thread with the issue of Palestine, so congratulations for this evening and have a good one.
Team Brian GB is offline   Reply With Quote