RedCafe.net - View Single Post

crappycraperson · 11th May 2008, 02:35

mmmm I have always thought Flintoff was a better batsman than bowler. Don't think he is their best bowler as well. He has never been a very attacking bowler.

stats back me up as well

http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/engl...yer/12856.html

11th May 2008, 02:35	#9 (permalink)
crappycraperson "Resident cricket authority" Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: <Insert something funny here> Posts: 11,206	mmmm I have always thought Flintoff was a better batsman than bowler. Don't think he is their best bowler as well. He has never been a very attacking bowler. stats back me up as well http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/engl...yer/12856.html