Quote:
Originally Posted by Keyzer Soze
That does not really make sense because the whole point is to have Scholes for his playmaking ability and work rate alongside two others. When were attacking Scholes is usually the catalyst and leaves the ball winning or deep lying position to Carrick or Hargreaves.
|
I was responding to a post which put Scholes in a starting 11 that would ask him to do a lot of ballwinning. Post #8, see above. My claim would be that Scholes can be a capable ball winner only under the circumstancea where we set out to play defensively for 90 minutes. Outside of those tactical conditions, ballwinning is far from his strength, and not something he tends to do while at the same time looking to act as playmaker. Would you disagree, or was there a misunderstanding there?