Quote:
Originally Posted by devilish
If Giggs was young then yes, we dont need Messi. I mean whats the point of spending 40m on a winger when you would already have 2 world class articles (a young Ryan + Ronaldo) + 2 fabulous wingers as back up (Nani and Park)? Same here why should we get Veloso when we already have 5 quality central midfielders?
|
I think you missed what I was saying
We achieved winning the Premiership without Veloso ,you said. So I said we also did it without Messi (One of the best players in the world......) Get it? :t'was a joke:
Quote:
Originally Posted by devilish
Same here why should we get Veloso when we already have 5 quality central midfielders?
|
If SAF felt Veloso would improve the squad then why not? Fletcher is never going to be a first team regular and we have yet to see how SAF is going to develop Anderson, will he be a central midfielder of a more advanced player? that's still to be answered. Scholes has 2 years in your opinion, I agree, but I wouldnt mind Veloso being brought in to either get into the first team squad or add depth when Scholes retire's.