Quote:
Originally Posted by Cupid Stunt
I think you missed what I was saying  We achieved winning the Premiership without Veloso ,you said. So I said we also did it without Messi (One of the best players in the world......) Get it? :t'was a joke: |
I know its a joke (or at least I hoped so) but there again I used your example to highlight the fact that too many cooks spoil the broth, a say which isnt quite popular in this part of forum.
Quote:
|
If SAF felt Veloso would improve the squad then why not? Fletcher is never going to be a first team regular and we have yet to see how SAF is going to develop Anderson, will he be a central midfielder of a more advanced player? that's still to be answered. Scholes has 2 years in your opinion, I agree, but I wouldnt mind Veloso being brought in to either get into the first team squad or add depth when Scholes retire's.
|
If SAF wanted Veloso then we will get him. Stating that I doubt that we need him expecially since we already have Scholes long term successor in Anderson.