Thread: Phillip Lahm
View Single Post
Old 28th June 2008, 12:05   #145 (permalink)
rooney__10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,272
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Indian Chief Torn Rubber View Post
Exactly. Saying Gazza isn't an attacking fullback because he doesn't posses the ball skills of a Cafu is like saying Bekcham wasn't a winger in his hey day at OT, because he didn't have Giggs or Ronaldo's natural ball skills.
Bullshit really. Theres no such thing as an attacking full back or defensive fullback. It's either your a good one or your shit. It is how a team plays and the tacticts employed by the management which constitutes whether you attack or defend. Every fullback has to have the attacking ability and if tactics dictate you to attack then you will either be good at it or shit at it.

In my opinion if your a fullback that doesn't attack then your not a fuckin fullback, you need to have attacking ability if yor a fullback. Tactics will determine how much you attack well in the purest sense anyway.
rooney__10 is offline   Reply With Quote