View Single Post
Old 18th December 2001, 21:09   #171 (permalink)
Marching
Active Admin
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Posts: 27,237
[quote]Originally posted by Davo:
<strong>Marchy

Wasn't wassiname convicted on evidence re the bitemark? Clear evidence that he was involved...

Such conclusive evidence was not available against the others....doesn't mean they weren't involved....you must have some doubts yourself??</strong><hr></blockquote>

Clifford was resposible for the bite and other evidence proves he carried out the beating. No evidence was offered against the others and as I said Najeib could not say that Woodgate or Bowyer were at the scene. What more do you want?
I trust the jury to have carefully considered all possibilities and there verdict is based on the facts.
Surely thats enough.

By the way does my FAO Marchy thread not get a response from you?

Marching is offline   Reply With Quote