Archive for the ‘World Cup 2010’ Category

World Cup Memories

July 17th, 2010 by Church o Choccy

The final whistle of a World Cup final provokes some extreme reactions.  As you’d expect on the pitch it’s almost certain to send half the players into rapturous ecstasy and the other half to a bottomless pit of inconsolable despair.  Beyond that the crowd will be similarly split but the effects go even further still.  For those of us whose favoured teams had been knocked out long before the final or who watched the tournament from a relatively neutral standpoint the final whistle represents the end of a completed story.  The full stop at the end of a particularly epic and enthralling novel.  Many more greeted it with the kind of unbridled relief that one would expect to be exclusively found in the emotions of a North Korean prison camp survivor whose just been told to go home.  That is, unbridled relief that lasts about as long as it takes one of their football loving associates to inform them how close the new season is.  And that pre season friendlies are kicking off this week.  But after taking a day or so to reflect, intellectualise and meditate on the events of this past month of global football, I thought I’d attempt to translate my almost zen like considerations onto the page.  Which is my own way of covering up the mediocrity and predictable nature of a post World Cup blog.

As the tournament kicked off amid lip synching hi-hopera stars and all the delights of an opening ceremony the first divisive argument of the tournament began.  It was not whether Maradona would be able to pull a group of talented individuals together as a team, nor whether France’s opponents should be allowed one deliberate handball per game in a bizarre rule change known colloquially as “the luck of the Irish law”.  It wasn’t even whether Emile Heskey’s inclusion in a World Cup squad for a third time represented a warning sign of some impending apocalypse.  It was the vuvuzelas.  Or “that bloody noise” depending on which side of the argument you took, for everyone took a side in this argument.  Even those who didn’t watch the World Cup but had simply passed a television with a game on had an opinion.  Though in that case when people complained of “a horribly annoying noise that droned on and on until I blocked my ears with my hands and ran screaming from the building” it was hard to tell whether they were referring to vuvuzelas or Andy Townsend.  In any case, in the great marmite style war of the vuvuzela I landed very early on in the camp supporting the weird conical plastic tubes.  While I understand some of the arguments against them, the main one being that they drown out any sort of chanting or singing, I thought they added a special feel and atmosphere to this World Cup;  a unique sound for a unique tournament.  It’s not that I’d like to hear the premiership taken over by the sound forevermore, I genuinely believe that football chants are one of the best forms of mass improvised comedy in the world, but World Cup 2010 had a soundtrack, and I liked it.

As the great Vuvu-debate waged on the actual football began to take centre stage.  South Africa battled bravely against the odds and though they didn’t make the knockout stages they did proudly fight and manage a famous victory against the awful French team.  The French team provided comic relief for everyone and a reported player strike was the cherry on the calamitous cake that was their tournament.  Although I’d have liked to have seen the strike go further so that Domenech had to draft in a team of French scabs willing to play the final game while highly paid megastars surrounded the entrance to the stadium and peppered them with insults.  However France’s display was so dismal that their ridiculous antics couldn’t even win them the comic relief of the tournament award.  Step forward Diego Maradona.  Barging through the tournament and its press conferences like a coked up megalomaniac so convinced of his own superiority that he looked a little dejected whenever someone addressed him without first bowing and beginning “My Lord…” he did what Maradona does best – he created headline after headline.  After reading critical words supposedly from UEFA President Michel Platini and Brazil legend (and great rival for the title of “Best Player Ever” in an ongoing argument that constantly ignores the only sensible answer of George Best) Pele, he delivered his response by telling Pele to “go back to the museum” and taking Platini down a peg or two by informing him of the simple truth that he is French!  “We all know what the French are like and Platini is French. He thinks he is better than the rest.” exclaimed the tournament jester before the next day receiving a letter from that very Frenchman explaining that the comments attributed to him were false.  This prompted him to the equally hilarious retraction “I want to apologise if I offended Michel Platini. But I don’t want to apologise to Pele.”  Maradona’s team were eventually knocked out by the counter attacking speed and style of the exciting young German team in a game that saw a deserved defeat for Argentina but one that hurt a little, knowing we may never see Diego in a World Cup final press conference.  Doubtlessly naked, painted in the blue and white of Argentina and excitedly informing the world’s media that he’s raised a small private army and intends to declare war on the opposition should they win.

But Maradona and the self destructive French team were not the only sources of column inches for those journalists seeking controversy or rumour, the North Koreans saw to that.  As you might have expected from a country so paranoid and clandestine in its international affairs the World Cup saw the arrival of a team so removed from the rest of the world that the stories began almost immediately.  Were the North Korean fans in the stadiums actually paid Chinese actors?  Had four of the North Korean team secretly escaped during a training camp in South Africa in order to defect to the South?  And would a seven-nil thrashing by Portugal see their entire team stripped naked and beaten live on television back in Pyongyang?  The truth seemed remarkably straightforward in the end.  Most of the misinformation and rumour proved to be inherently false or embellished and the simple truth was that a team primarily made up of the best players the North Korean army had to offer came to a World Cup as massive underdogs.  In fact, of all the fairy tales and exaggerated stories circling around the team none was as good as the one that happened on the pitch, in their first game at least, where a spirited and disciplined performance saw them lose out narrowly to Brazil in an exciting game that finished 2-1.  In truth, despite the comfortable victories of Portugal and the Ivory Coast over the Dear Leader’s footballing representatives, the fact that they managed to keep all three games in the single figures may be considered a miracle by some.  The North Korean team, I think everyone agrees, provided fantastic entertainment.  Whether it was their star striker’s national anthem induced girl-tears or the look on the goalkeeper’s face as Portugal stopped counting how many they’d put past him, the North Korean World Cup was one fantastic work of tragicomedy from the outset.

And so after the group stages, the occasional shock result and a ball that seems at times to have been designed by a bitter man sitting in a dark laboratory and cursing the fact that his wife left him for a goalkeeper, his house was burned down by a goalkeeper and his dog had been raped, live on the internet, by a goalkeeper, the tournament got fully underway .  England got knocked out by a Germany team that played football with such pace and precision that, for a moment, it looked like they might go all the way.  Of course, after a dismal tournament of which a scrappy one-nil victory over Slovenia was the highlight the English were happy to exit early so long as they had an excuse of some kind.  This time it was Frank Lampard’s wrongly disallowed goal that enabled them to ignore the 89 minutes of the game they played terribly for, and indeed the three previous games, in order to be able to announce that they were harshly done by.  “We was robbed” has now become such a common phrase amongst English fans that many other nationalities, unfamiliar with the language, have naturally assumed that the word “robbed” in English, means “shit”.

England might have had a case had their exit resembled that of Ghana, the last African team left in the World Cup who were denied a last minute of extra time goal by a the hand of Uruguayan Luis Suarez.  Asamoah Gyan fluffed the resulting penalty and after an ending like that no team would have been able to conquer a penalty shoot out.  In one of those harsh twists of football the sending off of the offender and award of a penalty kick that favours the wronged team in 99% of scenarios wasn’t enough to deny Uruguay a place in the semi finals.  A cruel and painful way to leave a tournament, Ghana can take a huge amount of hope from the youth of their team, the open, attacking way they played the game and the success they achieved in the absence of their best player, the injured Michael Essien.

In the end it was left to Spain to win a tense, at times brutal, final.  The game hung in the balance until the 115th minute when Andres Iniesta managed to achieve every player’s boyhood dream and score the winning goal in the World Cup final.  In all honesty Spain deserved the win.  Opening blip against the Swiss aside they were the best team in the tournament by a country mile.  They may not have played with the counter attacking verve of the Germans or the stylish flicks-and-tricks skill of the Argentines but they were far and away the best team.  They dominated possession, organised themselves fantastically as a defensive unit and demonstrated the simple truth of football from schoolboy five a side level to World Cup Finals; the team that passes the ball best usually wins the game.  The Spanish passing was, at times, mesmerising.  Pinpoint accuracy, the vision to use all areas of the field and super human consistency made this team worthy champions.  Ironically, while Iniesta receives all the praise due to a player who wins his team the World Cup, it was his Barcelona midfield teammate, Xavi, who impressed the most, controlling the midfield, finding space and helping the team find its steady, rhythmic passing game amongst even the best opposition.

And it’s Xavi who would win my player of the tournament if “Ben’s player of the tournament” actually meant anything to anyone other than me.  But it doesn’t, so I’m giving it to Kim Myong-won, the North Korean striker the team attempted to slip under Fifa’s radar by registering as a goalkeeper, only to find out he was then only eligible to play as a goalkeeper.  Well done, Kimmy (for that is how I shall affectionately refer to him in my imaginary award ceremony), you deserved it son.

  • Share/Bookmark

Same old Ingurland?

June 13th, 2010 by Raees

 

 

Typical.. just typical, we just never seem to learn. New manager, a supposedly great one at that and yet we are treated to the same stinking pile of horsehit we’ve been subjected to for the past 6 years of following England.

Since Euro 2004… where we were treated to a young ball-playing pacey covering centre-back  Ledley King in defence alongside an enthusiastic John Terry, a Scholes and a half decent version of Beckham in an england team.. as well as a world class finisher in Owen and a phenomenon in Wayne Rooney.. we have not produced a technically accomplished team since, one that is capable of taking the breath away with a spell of quality posession or ability to unlock even the greatest of defences.

Damn Rooney’s metatarsel because that Euro 2004 team was our best team since France 98 and arguably our best since 1990, with a rampaging young Wayne Rooney capable of dribbling, yes ‘DRIBBLING’ and scoring any type of goal from anywhere.. we outplayed a very decent France side and were unlucky to lose 2-1 and we went on to play some quality football before inevitably losing on penalties to Portugal. If Wayne had stayed fit during the whole tournement.. I think we could’ve won it.

By 2006… the true world class quality players of the era, your Owens, your Scholes and Beckhams, Campbells … had all seen better days and in Scholes case refused to play again, so there was a gaping hole waiting to be filled and in my opinion it is still waiting to be filled. The likes of Gerrard and Lampard, the Defoe’s of this world just lack the technical gravitas to match up to the worlds elite and whilst it can be covered up in club football by surrounding them with technically gifted foriegn players, when they’re left exposed and without support in an england shirt.. their deficiencies are laid bare for all to see.

The catylyst for 2004, Rooney… just isn’t the same beast any more and despite many lauding his new found efficiency in front of goal, he is more weighty and less nimble of foot to take two or three men on and create something out of nothing. He is more a 2002 World Cup Ronaldo on a good day… rather than a Ronaldo phenom of 1998, in his own way just as good but with such a lack of technical talent and ability to control a game from the rest of the side, its not what this current side needs, this side would benefit more from a dribbling younger Wayne Rooney, but you have to make do with what you’ve got, we have to create a side which suits the current version of Rooney and I don’t think we’re trying hard enough.

Problems with the current side

As I have alluded to, the biggest problem is the lack of control England can assert over any given game when under pressure, when trying to stamp your authority on a game… the best way to do this is through your midfield who with snappy accurate one touch passing and good movement on the ball can help keep posession and keeping feeding the ammunition for quality attacking movements.

 

There is also the problem of our defence which looks alot more rocky than it has in past tournements, defending is usually our biggest strength when it comes to big tournements.. but at the moment our defence looks threadbare. Furthermore the goalkeeping conundrum and our inability to pick mentally sound keepers who thrive on the big occasion has also repeatedly cost us.

A final problem we have is unintelligent wingers, they don’t have the subtle skills to beat a quality fullback from a standing start or the confidence to take the pressure off the side by creating a counter attack out of nothing  (turning a man in our own half and going past 1/2 players and attacking space) and our current batch of widemen rely alot on the rest of the team keeping possesion and providing the magic in the team… which based on our current midfield is simply not going to happen… C.Ronaldo,Messi , Robben or even Robinho and Ribery they evidently are not.

Possible solutions to our problems

Instead of going back to the same old tactics, the same old inhibition which has plagued the english game since 1966 but was momentarily relieved through the exploits of Gazza and furthermore Rooney in 2004…  we need to be bold and get as many technically gifted mentally strong players on that pitch as is possible… because sitting back and playing cautiously is simply not good enough and with our defence as creaky as it is… it doesn’t seem a sensible ploy, especially if playing for draws equals playing for penalties later on in the competition.

What do I think could be a decent solution? I propose a three man midfield, just like I’m sure many of you have advocated… however I want to see one based on guile, creativity… ball-retention, one which makes the team appear more continental rather than a team which bases its attacking movements on Bolton. I’d like to see a midfield with Barry-Gerrard and Joe Cole just in front of them as a link man behind Rooney and the midfield.

Barry for his defensive deficiencies.. has alot more mobilty on the ball than any either Lampard or Carrick, he is also more accustomed to being a deep-lying playmaker than both and is a very confident player, always looking to be purposeful on the ball. His reading of the game is good, his tracking back pace is not that great but in tandem with Gerrard I think the latter could cover for him if need be and I’m confident that both share a mutual respect and understanding between each other.

If Joe Cole is to play (I’ll come to him later), then there can only be one midfield spot remaining and its a straight choice in my opinion between Stevie G and Fat Frank… based on the performances in the friendlies and our first game, the man in current possession of the shirt is obviously the captain Steven Gerrard who looks pumped up and ready to stamp his name on this tournement. He has scored a goal, his defensive work has been excellent and even his communication and leadership on the pitch seems like its moving in the right direction. He may not be the most technically gifted player and his playmaking leaves alot to be desired, but I believe by surrounding him with two more talented natural pass and movers in Barry and J.Cole, we can allow Gerrard to be himself rather than labour him and the team as a result with giving him the responsibility of running the game.

The crucial player to Englands hopes, if there are any… is Joe Cole, he is the one player we have who would’nt look out of place in any european team and whilst he has lost the zip of youth… in a central role, he can still move into pockets of space and help with the linking and construction of attacking movements. Sticking him on thw wing however as Capello is intent on doing is a recipe for disaster as he simply does not have the pace to be effective there and if England are to face a top side and setting up to counter… A Joe Cole on the wing is unlikely to make much happen and can easily be nullified. His role in this current side is crucial I feel and I just pray to god.. that second half v Japan is replicated for the rest of the tournement, everything seemed to click albeit for 20 paltry minutes against the might of Japan.

Whilst I feel we have the players hopefully to fix the midfield, with the right selections… I’m less confident about our centre-backs, they all look laboured and past their best, if we are pressing high up the pitch with such slow defenders we are asking for trouble. If we play uber-defensive later on in the tournement we may stand a chance against the big teams, but I would’ve liked to have seen Dawson play in the friendlies so we could guage if he can hack International Level. He has alot more speed than any of the other centre-backs we have got and I have a feeling that he may sneak into the team if we continue to look so vulnerable to pace. Fingers crossed though that Terry and whomever partners him can handle the fort…. one little thing that will help the defence no end, is by sorting out the last line of defence, the goalkeeping position…

 

Since before the tournement started, I’ve been a big supporter of Joe Hart and could not see the sense in picking Green or James ahead of this young kid who is not tarnished by bad memories. Green ever since he came into the England side has been awful for his club and nerves have plagued his club performances with uncharacteristic errors and as for Calamity, how many more times do we have to pick consistent failures before we are left with our trousers between our legs. Joe hart has the personality and the cockiness about him to relish his chance on the international stage, he wants it bad and I believe the time has come for England to take a bold approach to the goalkeeping situation.

How do we solve the wingers situation, frankly we’ve left ourselves no options… the most intelligent wideplayer we had in Adam Johnson, wasn’t considered ready for this years World Cup, so we can do nothing but offer advice to either Lennon and SWP as we don’t have options to replace them. What we can do is make things easier for them… by allowing Gerrard and Joe Cole to be the main magic players apart from Rooney, we can simplify the job for Lennon and SWP by placing them either side of Rooney and ordering them to simply provide width and create space for our dovetailing midfielders. In a 4-4-2, with Lampard and Gerrard, our central midfield is so pedestrian and the whole set up so long ball… it places way too much pressure on our wide players who with limited touches of the ball have to be responsible for creating all our goalscoring chances, we need to make the job simpler for them and instead burden the creative side of the game on the shoulders of Joe Cole and Gerrard, who can do this to optimum effect through the middle.

Conclusion

So there it is, a run through from past problems and what currently plagues us and a possible solution… after that English performance v the Americans, I am fast losing hope… is Capello really a pragmatist who will go for the best team regardless of hurting peoples feelings and going against his own original beliefs, or is he a stubborn mule who refuses to admit he was wrong with his caveman tactics and follow all England managers of the past since 1966 and rely on English grit and competitiveness rather than focus on playing other teams off the pich and seeking to assert sustained control over a game and thus bringing the best out of Rooney.

That 66 team had Bobby Charlton, who ran games .. he was the guy who in the middle would recieve the ball under pressure and instead of passing back, he’d take his man on and make sure England were facing forwards ready to attack. The 1990 team had Gascoigne, with able support from Platt and Waddle, technically gifted midfielders who drove England forward and helped us retain possession.

The current side needs midfielders of this ilk… it may not possess any, but would it hurt to try and make up for it by playing the technically assured midfielders we do have? Anyway without further ado.. my own proposed lineup..

Hart

Johnson Terry Dawson Cole

Barry Gerrard

Lennon J.Cole SWP

Rooney

  • Share/Bookmark

The World Cup – Still the Pinnacle of Football?

May 21st, 2010 by Raees

 

                                                                                      
 
Brazil 1970… a benchmark in footballing excellence that all sides (unless they’re managed by Big Sam and his disciples) aspire to. Considered by most footballing connoisseurs to be the greatest  ever exponents of the beautiful game and thus would be worthy examples of what represents the pinnacle of football. By pinnacle we mean the highest level or degree attainable; a culmination or zenith.
 
 

Historical Context

 
Traditionally it was thought that International Football represented the summit of footballing excellence rather than plying your trade for your regional side. Becoming a star for your local side, just didn’t compare to pitting your talents against the best the world had to offer and thus the world cup and international matches in general were the only way in effect that we could gauge the true level and ability of footballers from across the globe in comparison to those in our backyard.
 
One match encapsulates this more than any other from an english point of view..‘The Match of the Century – England v Hungary (Magical Magyars).  Here was a collection of the finest footballers England had to offer from the then First Division… the Wizard of Dribble - Stanley Matthews, legendary captain Billy Wright (100+ caps) to name but a few. Prior to kick-off Billy Wright commented: “When we walked out at Wembley that afternoon, side by side with the visiting team, I looked down and noticed that the Hungarians had on these strange, lightweight boots, cut away like slippers under the ankle bone. I turned to big Stan Mortensen and said, ‘We should be alright here, Stan, they haven’t got the proper kit.
 
Suffice to say..Billy underestimated the side from beyond the iron curtain and the country of England was taught a footballing lesson. In our little goldfish bowl, we thought we were being treated to a mastery of footballing art, our leagues representing the summit of football… instead we were exposed as living in the dark ages and that on a global scale we were nowhere near the best that football had to offer. If further confirmation was needed, the 1954 World Cup said it all where England barely left a traceable mark.
  
Early years of the European Cup
 
Despite early attempts to hold invitational International Club tournements, it was only with the advent of the European cup (superceding the Latin Cup) & South Americas equivalent the Copa Libertadores that Intercontintental Club Football became a spectacle in its own right and provided an alternative barometer for measuring the standard of our footballers.
 
Players like Di Stefano/Gento were given an oppurtunity to carve their name into legend despite not establishing stellar international careers and lets not forget the Busby Babes who were on the cusp of greatness due to their exploits in the competition. It provided an alternative medium in which one could display his talents to the world despite coming from a poor nation of footballers and our very own Bestie and Giggs are no doubt grateful to its existence.
 
 The European cup was a great measure of talent.. but it still struggled to shake off its ‘theory test’ image in comparison to the ‘Driving test’.. that being the World Cup. The 1974 World Cup final for instance contained many players formerly or still of Ajax and  Bayern Munich.. the eras two most dominant sides in the european cup and whilst this is a testament to the quality of the European Cup it doesn’t quite beat the achievement of winning a tournament containing opponents such as Jarzinho and Rivelino. Club sides consisted of mostly regional footballers, so countries were basically a reflection of the best regional sides with the advantage of filling weaknesses in their respective sides from a whole league of teams.
 
 
Dutch Total Football team 1974

Dutch Total Football team 1974

 
 

Joengblad (FC Amsterdam), Rijsbergen , Jansen, van hanagem (All Feyenoord), Rensenbrink (Anderlecht)… thats five players for instance who improve that Ajax European Cup side although the ‘Sweeper’ of that Ajax side was German and couldn’t displace Beckenbauer for the National side which is in itself ironic.

 
By the late seventies and early eighties, England was dominating the European cup and Liverpool were at the forefront… despite this it was unreflected in the world cup due in part to the talented players in that side being Scottish. Whilst Scotland were able to beat the finalists (Netherlands) in a group game ultimately it wasn’t enough and they were knocked out on goal difference again highlighting the competitiveness of International football and its unforgiving nature.
 
The best players in this era were not collectively in one side.. they were spread across the continents and many of them featured for sides with hardly any well-known players and would single-handedly push them towards league titles, players in the situation of Torres and David Villa (playing for mediocre teams yet world stars) was the norm not the exception. There wasn’t no real desire of ’I want to get my hands on a european cup before I retire’. Likes of Mario Kempes, Zico, Maradona are testamant to this and the  only superstar from this era that was prolific in the European Cup was Platini. Today in the modern era players gravitate towards the ‘traditional big fish’ and this happens on a global scale, not so much in the past and as I will expand on later on in the article maybe this sort of era may be repeated i.e. a spread of talent.
 
Thus the only way to witness these great players in teams befitting their talent and measuring how good they really were was again the World Cup. The traditional barometer of footballing greatness was just as useful as it had ever been and the most magical footballing moments of the eighties and possibly of all time came from the World Cup. The 1982 Brazillian world cup side was footballing porn and its arguable that they were on a different footballing level to any side in the european cup at the time. Brian Clough’s Forest side v Brazil of 1982.. for me there’d only be one winner and yet one was a team of champions and the others a set of glorified losers. Shows how hard the world cup was to win during that period.
 
Champions League – Contender to the World Cup
  
Since 1992 there has been no team that has successfully retained the what was previously called the European cup. With the influx of money garnered from successful campaigns in europe (prize money, extra revenue, media exposure etc)… big clubs from the major-footballing  countries hoovered up talent due to their ability to pay the best wages and the ability to offer global exposure… the prestige of the European Cup increased tenfold and as a result so did competitiveness. This in turn has had a knock-on effect on the appeal of club football in general.. its got alot more sexier and wealthier due to the underlying aims of wanting to get into Europe – its a stage the cream of football want to play on.
 
The European cup was now more representative of global talent than ever before and club football in general has gone that way with talents from South America or Africa taking risks by coming to lesser clubs in the league with an eye to winning a move to the well established big clubs. Increased wealth also meant that bigger clubs were more willing to send scouts all over the globe which in itself is an expensive and sometimes fruitless mission but with the new wealth in the game, it was like dropping a penny in the ocean in return for finding a raw diamond.
 
All this created a competition which was now as representative of the best of Global talent as the World Cup (Fifa’s amatuerish Fifa World Club Cup doesn’t count). Whereas players would previously be measured by their international exploits with notable exceptions, the Champions League was fast becoming the stage all top players really earnt their kudos.
 
Despite this in the nineties.. its perhaps fair to say the World Cup was still top dog and the careers of modern Superstars such as Ronaldo (Brazillian) and Zidane bear testament to this. Both of their club exploits were average in comparison to say Clarence Seedorf but it was in the global arena where they came into their own and entered footballing folklore. That World Cup in 1998 is what propelled them above their rivals, it made an instant superstar out of Michael Owen who by proving he could cut it on the international stage proved that he’d be able to cut it anywhere else. It was still the barometer of greatness and there were alot of great teams in that tournement.
 
Noughties – World Cup losing its lustre?
  
Such was the competitiveness of Club football and its increased market and subsequent scope for talent.. the World Cup was going to struggle to produce competitive teams on the level of club football due to day in day out nature of club football and the oppurtunity to work with them and fill weak positions in the team with anyone in the world.
 
The Brazil team of ’2002′ and the Italian team of ’2006′ were winners of what were labelled poor World Cups. Many will say its nostalgia that is to blame for these notions but I don’t remember anyone criticising the 98 world cup or any of the recent Euro’s. If there is a good tournement of football, people will say so.. there is no real bias.
 
The Brazil team of ’2002′.. was it a superior product to the Galacticos team at the time and did it face superior opposition? It’s not that clear cut but on balanace its submitted that the answer is probably no.  Alot of big teams underperformed at this World Cup and I don’t think it was to do with increased International competition more to do with a lack of cohesive good quality sides.
 
Brazil v Germany - Fifa World Cup 2002

 

 
  Real Madrid v Bayer Leverkusen

By 2006 the World Cup was showing signs of becoming a spent force… overhyped, bloated and it was far from being the ‘Pinnacle’ of football that it is meant to be. The greatest stage on which to showcase your footballing talent? not any more.. and the Champions League was now the best quality footballing spectacle. Compare Manchester Uniteds all-conquering team from 2007/08 and compare it to the Italian team of 2006.

VDS

Brown Rio Vidic Evra

Hargreaves Scholes Carrick Ronaldo

Rooney Tevez

Toni

Camronesi Totti Perotta

Pirlo Gattuso

Gross Materazzi Cannavaro Zambrotta

Buffon

Thats just the respective first teams, when you take into account squad depth, the fact the United team knew each other so well and that we were able to buy Berbatov to strengthen that team furthermore, then it paints the picture that the quality of Club football at the elite level had superceded that of International football.

  

The Present

Current Financial Climate and possible resurgence of World Cup

 What made all of this possible… money generated from exposure, whilst this can’t really make an impact in the international game .. the club game has thrived because of it.
What the club game was not prepared for was the recent financial crisis and supposed wealthy benefactors from abroad placing strains on our clubs rather than elevating them to new heights. The Italian clubs due to lack of revenue and investment in the game have become a corpse in European Football.. failure to invest has left them full of ‘hasbeen’ players and although Inter are flying the flag for them at the moment.. its not a team designed to conquer Europe over a prolonged period.
 
The English teams who due to them possessing the most money dominated the Champions League from 2004-2009 are now suffering… why? lack of investment, pure and simple. The generation of Rio, Gerrard, Lampard etc are reaching their end and there isn’t any desire being shown to replace them… normally this would be labelled a transition period but as long as these financial dictators are in power its hard to get out of it and the league as a whole will struggle to compete on the continent without money being spent.
 
Spain has the two wealthiest teams, that much is true.. but across the league as a whole.. its not the powerhouse it portrays itself as.. likes of Valencia/Deportivo are not as strong as they once were and teams like Athletico are the spanish equivalent of Spurs.
 
The lack of quality sides in Europe this year is linked to money, all clubs are feeling the pinch and as a result we could see club football go backwards for a small period. lack of investment means lack of globalistion and gravitation of best talents to a small core of clubs which makeup the champions League. Possibly more depth in football? yes… more sides will possess talented players, but ‘pinnacle’ of football? No… you need the best to play the best, only that way can Club football produce a great spectacle. As it is only Barcelona are the true team of Quality in club football in the current climate, the rest are in a period of transition.
 
This means that the World Cup which has fallen off the wayside has the chance to reclaim itself as the true representation of global football and the stage on which we can pit top class talent against each other. The top four teams in the Champions league were Lyon, Bayern, Inter and Barcelona… personally I think we can easily find 4 teams better than then 3 of them at this years World Cup.
  
So International football still the biggest test for players?
  
It has been a bone to pick with the English players, that whilst they make look great domestically.. when it comes to the International stage many of them come across as mentally and technically limited. Why is this… well they don’t have technically gifted foriegn players around them who compensate for their weaknesses… Rooney, Rio and A.Cole, J.Cole who if they were playing for any national team in the world they would not be found wanting technically. On the other hand players like Lampard and Gerrard have looked ponderous on the international stage and its because Midfield is the position where you need the most mobility, fluidity of technique and whilst they’ve been surrounded by stellar midfield talents for their club sides (leaving them to focus on their strengths i.e. goalscoring) they’ve been unable to adapt and perform in deeper midfield playmaking roles for their country. Its why someone like Gareth Barry gets into the national team, technically he’s a very sound footballer and the most likely from that trio to play the ‘Paul Scholes’ role.
 
Its also a subject which has plagued various other international teams and prodominantly the two teams which contain arguably the two best footballers in the world… Messi and Ronaldo. Both have dominated the European stage but in the International Arena.. both have on times been found wanting despite playing for decent enough teams technically. Portugual and Argentina are big enough names in World Football for both of these talents to compete and establish themselves as the true embodiment of footballing perfection… the World stage is now  coming back as the place to be for confirming one’s talents. They’ve found club football easy enough.. but can they hack the international stage.. which as I have argued above , due to the financial climate affecting club football, carries more weight then it has for quite some time.
 
To summarise, the World Cup has been long established as the barometer of footballing talent.. it has lost its way with the arrival of the Champions League but this summer I’m hoping we may be witnessing a renaissance.
 
Written by Raees Mahmood.
  • Share/Bookmark

World Cup and Poverty: Make a Difference

April 19th, 2010 by askabob

This summer 32 nations will fight in South Africa to be named the world’s best footballing nation. This summer 63 international matches will take place in 10 top-of-the-line stadiums. This summer the entire country of South Africa will open its arms and embrace the world.

This summer 6 billion people will come together and be united as one.

A large sporting event in a developing country inevitably brings an influx money into the economy through tourism and jobs. This summer’s World Cup will contribute over $7 billion to the South African economy, generate over 400,000 jobs (20,000 for building stadia), and contribute $2.5 billion in tax income to the South African government. The $6 billion that South Africa spent on infrastructure pales in comparison to the revenue that is coming into the nation. The hurdles that South Africa has overcome to prepare for the World Cup will “send ripples of confidence form the Cape to Cairo,” claimed South African President Thabo Mbeki.

Whilst the World Cup highlights the progress that industrial Africa has made within the past few decades, it also underlines the increasing disparity within social classes in the country. The 415,000 jobs that were generated in all sectors do not make a dent in the 24.3% unemployment rate. 20,000 workers were required to build new stadiums while thousands of other jobs were spread out throughout the tourism industry. But 400,000 salaries at near-minimum wage do not require billions of dollars in revenue, so where does the money go?

The answer lies in the gulf in class between the rich and poor. It is the wealthy that benefit from such an influx in the economy, and consequently it is the poor that are left without any benefits from such large government spending.

… lives in a mud house accessible by a dirt road whose cavities deepen with each rainfall. His doorway is a short jaunt to the new stadium. “Those who’ll benefit from this are the wealthy that already have plenty in their hand,” he said, not in resentment so much as weariness. “Some people were hired to work on the stadium, but not enough. We’ve been promised a better life, but look how we live. If you pour water into a glass, you can see things moving inside.”

(from the New York Times)

Millions can barely afford even one $18 ticket that is specially priced for South African residents. Yet these millions scrounge together whatever little they have so they can fulfill their dream of attending a World Cup match. Their lack of running water, electricity, and toilets does not keep them away from the sport that they hold dear to their hearts.

The terrible plight of South Africa’s poor is shared by countless across the world.

One of the few things that brings them together is football.

Despite not having a team participating in South Africa, nearly every nation on earth will be watching.  One of these is a nation whose history was greatly affected by the experiences of one Mohandas Ghandi in South Africa. This summer I’ll be going to Gandhi’s motherland to volunteer at several primary schools that are in dire need of help. These schools are home to underprivileged children, children of poor laborers who can only afford to send their kids to school until they are 8 because then the children are expected to bring their own income into the family. One particular school has only one classroom so the principal’s office is in the same room as over a hundred kids, another doesn’t have benches so children are forced to sit on the unhygienic floor, and yet another has one staff member who serves as principal, administrator, and teacher for five grades. Teachers have to deal with an extremely limited budget– so limited, in fact, that a chalkboard is the only means they have to educate the children. No books, no paper or pencils, and certainly no hands-on activities.

I figured I would somehow incorporate the World Cup into my activities when teaching the children. I plan on teaching geography based on World Cup Qualifiers and perhaps even something about teamwork with mini-games. I’ll also buy a few balls to pass out to the children.

Everyone can help to bring change into even one child’s life. Donate a football; it doesn’t have to be a Nike T90, just something from your neighborhood supermarket. It doesn’t have to be shipped overseas to some third-world country; local charities can find children who would love to have a real ball to play with. It doesn’t even have to be a football. Do something creative as there are countless underprivileged children that would appreciate even the smallest of gifts.

Football is the only sport that brings the entire world together. With the flagship of football taking place this summer, it is our duty to reach a helping hand to our brothers and sisters across the world and ensure that they enjoy it as much as we do.

Challenge yourself. How can you change the world?

  • Share/Bookmark

Back to top