Go Back   RedCafe.net > General Discussion > Other Sport

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 31st August 2010, 14:41   #121 (permalink)
Zen
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Prophetville!
Posts: 6,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devilton View Post
Many people at the time were talking about how he could possibly get 45 centuries, and how at his average he would break 10,000 runs and do this and that...

The same was said of Monty Panesar as well. How at his rate he would break Warnes record if he played into his late 30's...basically, it was all just over zealous prognostication. A lot of hype about players who while being good, aren't as great as they are made out to be.
By these "many people", you mean the ones who tune in once every four years for the Ashes....and even then no one was that bad about Panesar, jesus most people still considered him a fluke when he was doing decent.
Zen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2010, 14:59   #122 (permalink)
most 'know it all' poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London
Posts: 19,264
Yeah looks like he has been dropped for the ODI and T20s, presumably so he can have some 4 day cricket behind him before the team flies out to Australia. That to be honest is more important than a series which may end up getting called off.
FlawlessThaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2010, 15:22   #123 (permalink)
Grumpy Old Git
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Mrs Slocombe's Pussy
Posts: 5,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlawlessThaw View Post
Yeah looks like he has been dropped for the ODI and T20s, presumably so he can have some 4 day cricket behind him before the team flies out to Australia. That to be honest is more important than a series which may end up getting called off.
On the BBC Website now!
ERICSAGOD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2010, 15:25   #124 (permalink)
most 'know it all' poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London
Posts: 19,264
Quote:
Originally Posted by ERICSAGOD View Post
On the BBC Website now!
He's an idiot for tweeting it but it took them at least 2 or 3 hours to notice. That's poor IMO.
FlawlessThaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2010, 16:45   #125 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,106
I think KP's relationship with the ECB and some of the players in the squad has been strained since his whole captaincy debacle. Announcing he's been dropped on Twitter and saying 'it's a fuck up' is hardly the best thing to do.
ha_rooney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2010, 19:45   #126 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,127
Smith was right about some of the things said about KP. He's a snide little bugger who think he's a rockstar...that would be fine if you actually had the talent to back up all that brash talk. But KP's been poor. He should learn to shut up and prove his doubters wrong with his bat rather then his mouth, and his twitter page.
Devilton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2010, 19:48   #127 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zen View Post
By these "many people", you mean the ones who tune in once every four years for the Ashes....and even then no one was that bad about Panesar, jesus most people still considered him a fluke when he was doing decent.
No. They didn't. I remember watching an England test at a time that Monty had one of the best strikerates in the world and these people (so ex-England players) were already suggesting how many wickets he would take at the current rate. They were extrapolating and coming up with some magical figures even though it was pretty clear even then that Monty had very little variation and provided no support either with the bat or in the field.
Devilton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2010, 19:52   #128 (permalink)
BTV
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: DC/Canberra/Dhaka
Posts: 6,447
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devilton View Post
No. They didn't. I remember watching an England test at a time that Monty had one of the best strikerates in the world and these people (so ex-England players) were already suggesting how many wickets he would take at the current rate. They were extrapolating and coming up with some magical figures even though it was pretty clear even then that Monty had very little variation and provided no support either with the bat or in the field.
I think Monty was a feel good story they all wanted to come good. Indian bloke, representing England, a spinner at that, quiet, polite, and very humble. I remember Channel 9 in Australia being very critical of him, and saying he was decent, but had to add a lot more to his game to survive in the test arena
Neutral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2010, 19:57   #129 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,127
Right, so my point is that every country will have a player that does well, that stands out, and as such the commentators, the media pundits will hype him up, make him seam like he's the shining light.

And that's happened with KP. He was a good player with SA...but he didn't get his chances there. He splits, comes to England with a point to prove, does well and suddenly people are hearing he's one of the best to every play the game.

I said earlier that if you think KP is the best english talent in your lifetime then you're not very old. And turns out the poster is a young in...i don't blame someone who's 20, and probably only started to watch the game a few years ago to think KP is the best and all of that.

He should pick up a Wisden. Talk to someone over the age of 50 and ask them who the best English batsmen is. I'm sure they won't have KP on their top 10 list (and rightly so).
Devilton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2010, 21:36   #130 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Football is about glory, it is about doing things in style and with a flourish, about going out and beating the lot, not waiting for them to die of boredom
Posts: 9,355
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devilton View Post
Right, so my point is that every country will have a player that does well, that stands out, and as such the commentators, the media pundits will hype him up, make him seam like he's the shining light.

And that's happened with KP. He was a good player with SA...but he didn't get his chances there. He splits, comes to England with a point to prove, does well and suddenly people are hearing he's one of the best to every play the game.

I said earlier that if you think KP is the best english talent in your lifetime then you're not very old. And turns out the poster is a young in...i don't blame someone who's 20, and probably only started to watch the game a few years ago to think KP is the best and all of that.

He should pick up a Wisden. Talk to someone over the age of 50 and ask them who the best English batsmen is. I'm sure they won't have KP on their top 10 list (and rightly so).
Fucking hell
samabachan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st September 2010, 08:15   #131 (permalink)
Zen
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Prophetville!
Posts: 6,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devilton View Post
No. They didn't. I remember watching an England test at a time that Monty had one of the best strikerates in the world and these people (so ex-England players) were already suggesting how many wickets he would take at the current rate. They were extrapolating and coming up with some magical figures even though it was pretty clear even then that Monty had very little variation and provided no support either with the bat or in the field.
Well the whole gang on SkySports never really seemed to like him that much, they seemed to be semi-mocking him half the time(a couple seemed more sympathetic). They were probably only showing that stat for the sake of showing a "what if" scenario, I don't think a single one of them ever believed he'd go over 300 wickets.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Devilton View Post
He should pick up a Wisden. Talk to someone over the age of 50 and ask them who the best English batsmen is. I'm sure they won't have KP on their top 10 list (and rightly so).
I know someone who turned 50 this year(he's going to Australia for the Ashes as his late present/his present to his son for Christmas), has been following the Sport from what I can gather since he was a kid, and highly rates Pietersen. Top 10 all-time, sure he might not make that list technically, but you can't really compare Hobbs' era to Pietersen's. I think it's fair to say he's one of the best of the past 40 years or so
Zen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st September 2010, 08:57   #132 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 6,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by samabachan View Post
Fucking hell
I wouldn't expect someone who probably started watching cricket in the 90's to understand. But carry on like you know better.
Devilton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th September 2010, 21:58   #133 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Did you offer him an aspirin?
Posts: 4,524
Pietersen joins KwaZulu-Natal | England Cricket News | Cricinfo.com

Uncle Junior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th September 2010, 22:10   #134 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,292
What's funny?

Got to give him credit for his desire to play himself into form
EdWeatherall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2010, 09:33   #135 (permalink)
Caf Vigilante
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Goes it so.
Posts: 12,107
Pietersen's ridiculously over-rated. You English lot wouldn't know what a good batsman was if one came to you and smacked you in the face with a groin guard.

That said, he's obviously talented. Just needs to find his touch. He'll be nowhere near the greats though. Ever.
Donadol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2010, 12:20   #136 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Did you offer him an aspirin?
Posts: 4,524
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdWeatherall View Post
What's funny?

Got to give him credit for his desire to play himself into form
I thought he was one of the top 10 batsmen in history; what's he doing playing for no namers to try and get back into his team?
Uncle Junior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2010, 13:13   #137 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,836
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donadol View Post
Pietersen's ridiculously over-rated. You English lot wouldn't know what a good batsman is if it came to you and smacked you in the face a groin guard.

That said, he's obviously talented. Just needs to find his touch. He'll be nowhere near the greats though. Ever.
Who do you support?

I do agree that he won't be as good as the greats, but who in modern cricket will be?

Plus its no great surprise that he has gone back to his former team to get some form
oleonenumber20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2012, 11:08   #138 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Aliens are in control of my tagline & location, but they'll never take me alive!
Posts: 10,817
Time to bump this, although a bit belated.

Still so overrated...
Colin129 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2012, 13:17   #139 (permalink)
shittest username ever manutddabest791
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK - Ronaldo's House.
Posts: 11,009
People call him a great batsmen, i never bought it and still don't. He is a good enough player that blows hot and cold and is a good striker of the ball on form.
Red Pavan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2012, 13:25   #140 (permalink)
BTV
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: DC/Canberra/Dhaka
Posts: 6,447
He's obviously not a GREAT batsmen, but he is a very good player. He has sucked balls against Pakistan - but he averaged 70.3 in his last 12 test matches.

His ODI record on the other hand if you're English is a worry - he is going backwards, and at great knots.
Neutral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2012, 13:31   #141 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: I may be the devil, but i'm not a monster
Posts: 12,593
Solid batsman, but no better than Damien Martyn was for Australia 'even then I give Marto's pure sex batting style' the nod over KP'eeeeeeeeeeeeee'

I've seen alot better batsman and some of the comments earlier in this thread are embarrassing. Most dangerous batsman? Please, the likes of Gilchrist, Richards and Sehwag say otherwise.


Also UJ's list severely underrates the success of Alan Border. Absolutely cracking cricketer, that is up there with the very best to ever play the game. He was Australia's Keano in the mid 80's early 90's.
mariachi-19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2012, 18:05   #142 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Villa
Posts: 5,145
Very talented batsman. Really thought he'd go on and become the mainstay of your lineup but has been very inconsistent. Injuries havent been kind to him either. Had the talent i feel, that much was never in doubt, never really made the best of it.
Varun_Utd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st February 2012, 18:23   #143 (permalink)
Wants to be more like Top
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: RIP Sydney Youngblood, who died in a tragic go-karting accident in 2007. RIP my cat 2001-09. iRIP Steve Cunting Jobs
Posts: 42,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neutral View Post
He's obviously not a GREAT batsmen, but he is a very good player. He has sucked balls against Pakistan - but he averaged 70.3 in his last 12 test matches.His ODI record on the other hand if you're English is a worry - he is going backwards, and at great knots.
Funnily enough his ratings have remained around the 700 mark for three years.

Reliance ICC Player Rankings

He peaked in 06/07. He's a strange one...I've seen him bash Murali and Warne to all parts...but he's a shadow thesedays. I think he had the potential...in fact still does to be a great player.
Spoony Youngblood is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:02.

Back to top


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO