Member's Login
Not yet a member? Register now
|
|
#163 (permalink) |
|
First Team Sub
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,792
|
As I said Pakistan dropped a clanger on this pitch. They are an average side no better than fifth in the world as their batting is very weak but their bowling is very strong. Broad has a habit of playing well against Pakistan. His innings will win it for England. If we post a 100 lead we will skittle Pakistan out for less than 250.
Straight forward win for England. Yes! |
|
|
|
|
|
#167 (permalink) | |
|
First Team Sub
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Going nowhere
Posts: 6,421
|
Quote:
England's open bowlers (Anderson/Broad) have been very busy physically and mentally all morning. Small margin of details? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#169 (permalink) |
|
First Team Sub
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Going nowhere
Posts: 6,421
|
10-wicket Ajmal got spanked on this pitch by a part-time batsman.
![]() But as expected Broad's being rested as he won't be able to bend his back to deliver his lethal short of a length balls. |
|
|
|
|
|
#179 (permalink) |
|
First Team Regular
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Behind my
Posts: 10,763
|
abit of a stunning collapse by Pakistan. Happy for Monty - good for his confidence.
Just goes to show what picking a proper team according to match conditions will do. Still left dumbfounded how England went into first test with just one spinner |
|
|
|
|
|
#184 (permalink) |
|
First Team Regular
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,106
|
The inevitable batting failure has shown up
![]() We had a very good line-up when Inzy, Younis & Yousuf were playing about 8 or so years back. Maybe the lack of world-class batsman is to do with the mentality of some players who seem more suited to ODI/T20 cricket than Test cricket or maybe it's the training they are given? Given our history of producing great bowlers, I think Pakistani youngsters would rather aim to be the next Akram or Waqar than the next Miandad. |
|
|
|
|
|
#185 (permalink) |
|
most 'know it all' poster
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London
Posts: 19,265
|
Seems to be the opposite issue to India who all want to be batsman and that just leaves medium paced trundlers.
Anyway Pakistan are fighting back. If they have a lead of 150+, you'd back them especially if Ajmal is in song. Last hour probably goes to them as they finish on 125-4, or effectively 55-4. |
|
|
|
|
|
#186 (permalink) |
|
First Team Sub
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Going nowhere
Posts: 6,421
|
This mini resistenance has proven its still a batting track. Commadus is right, we need 220 lead to win. 200 may just be enough. But anything less and England should knock them off quite comfortably.
Come on Commadus, what lead do you reckon Pak will finish on? |
|
|
|
|
|
#187 (permalink) |
|
First Team Sub
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,792
|
It seems wickets fall in clusters and England have proved that they can get them against Pakistan. Tomorrow first session I expect Pakistan to lose 4 further wickets for about 80 runs added. Pakistan will be out with a lead of about 150 which is not enough. Ajmal will make it hard but Pakistan playing under pressure and Misbah poor use of DRS will ensure we win.
As to Pakistan not producing batsment my theory is that you create decent enough technical batsmen who get 20 and 30 but then fail once they are in to make big scores. To me this is a clear indication of lack of mental toughness and discipline whereby they concentrate hard at the start and when they feel they are "in" they lose focus and subsequently their wicket. |
|
|
|
|
|
#188 (permalink) | |
|
First Team Sub
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,792
|
Quote:
200 and its evens. However I feel Broads innings and his bowling will sway it for England. Unless Pakistans seemers find their groove and help their spinners then England should have this in the bag. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#189 (permalink) |
|
السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: It is better for a leader to make a mistake in forgiving than to make a mistake in punishing
Posts: 31,449
|
Everything depends on this pair. If they fall early I can't see the rest getting many with Swan, and Monty bowling in tandem.
|
|
|
|