RedCafe.net  
 

Go Back   RedCafe.net > General Discussion > Current Events
Forum Register Arcade FAQ Mark Forums Read Archives

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 18th September 2008, 00:38   #1 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Co Armagh Ireland
Posts: 1,008
Send a message via Yahoo to Fitzjames
BBC Newsman Robert Peston Deserves Award

Surely Robert Peston the BBC Economics Editor deserves a journalism award......maybe even two.

Last year he broke the Northern Rock story. Today he broke the HBOS story.

That man must have some contacts book. It does however beg the question why the other journos did not get two big stories. What kept them all so quiet. Are they all so untalented?

Presumably since the weekend there must have been rumblings in the City, the Treasury, the Bank of England, on trading floors about Lloyds TSB. Meetings had to be arranged so how come all those TV pundit regulars, the rent a quote "City spokesmen" did not know.

If I understand this ......HBOS shares were worth £10 a year ago and 90pence today. A big loss to a lot of people. But at anytime over the past year those losses could have been mitigated by people getting in and getting out at the right time.
Id love to see the paper trails over the last few days......not to mention cell phone records. Luckily the City of London traders are very ethical.
Fitzjames is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old 18th September 2008, 09:17   #2 (permalink)
Teeth like a reindeer. Hung like a horse.
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Ingadus Speramus
Posts: 35,622
He broke the story on the day the sale was announced?

Give that man the Purlitzer.

Although more amusingly I saw a UK business web site telling their readers to buy these shares yesterday with a $375p target price in the future because they believed the liquidity concerns were overstated.

Wibble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2008, 11:33   #3 (permalink)
Resident Arse.
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,628
Yeah the media deserve an award here, the way they worked up hysteria over the Northern Rock crisis meaning even though they were in trouble it was probably just about manageable. The media on the other hand did a great job at making savers and Northern Rock users panic thus fucking them up even more and in the end meant they had to be taken over by the Government.
JazzG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2008, 11:53   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Castellón de la Plana
Posts: 62,041
He's actually a poor journalist though, so no award from me.
WeasteDevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2008, 12:59   #5 (permalink)
Paz's ion
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Everything is "blarg".
Posts: 22,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitzjames View Post
Presumably since the weekend there must have been rumblings in the City, the Treasury, the Bank of England, on trading floors about Lloyds TSB. Meetings had to be arranged so how come all those TV pundit regulars, the rent a quote "City spokesmen" did not know.
You think they'd let on information that might make them money?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitzjames View Post
HBOS shares were worth £10 a year ago and 90pence today. A big loss to a lot of people. But at anytime over the past year those losses could have been mitigated by people getting in and getting out at the right time.
Id love to see the paper trails over the last few days......not to mention cell phone records. Luckily the City of London traders are very ethical.
HBOS was taken out at 232p, which was a surprise, so if you're alleging insider dealing based on price movements, you (a) don't have enough information (b) are unlikely to be correct even based on the information you do have and (c) don't have a clue what you're talking about.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitzjames View Post
If I understand this ......
spinoza is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2008, 16:31   #6 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Co Armagh Ireland
Posts: 1,008
Send a message via Yahoo to Fitzjames
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wibble View Post
He broke the story on the day the sale was announced?

Give that man the Purlitzer.

Although more amusingly I saw a UK business web site telling their readers to buy these shares yesterday with a $375p target price in the future because they believed the liquidity concerns were overstated.

Yes it was a big scoop. He just got a telephone call from Number 10 (according to todays Independent).
He obviously has more ethics than me.
The shares were around 90p and he went on air right away.
Id have phoned Mrs Fitzjames to BUY BUY BUY at 90p .
Deep down I have the ethics of a trader.
Fitzjames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2008, 16:42   #7 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Co Armagh Ireland
Posts: 1,008
Send a message via Yahoo to Fitzjames
Are you suggesting that those immaculately presented guys and girls who are always available might actually withhold information on the basis that they might make money if they withheld it. Thats unethical.
That’s almost like saying they worked for the Daily Mirror.
Ive never heard anything so ridiculous that PROFESSIONAL ETHICAL JOURNOS on City pages in our great newspapers hype shares or talk down shares to make a few quid for themselves. There should be a law agin it.
Im NOT suggesting anything at all and indeed will happily admit that I know nothing of which I speak. Nor do I want to know anything.
But it appears to me that when somebody LOSES money……someone else might conceivably have made a few quid along the way.
Even to cushion the blow of redundancy.
Hedge Fund Managers whose enormous bonus payments attract the attention of our newspapers to day and who seem to be carrying the can (a highly expensive designer brand can I suppose). Quite possibly a few others in and around the Trading Floor knew what was going on.
Or did nobody have a clue?
Fitzjames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2008, 17:43   #8 (permalink)
Paz's ion
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Everything is "blarg".
Posts: 22,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitzjames View Post
Are you suggesting that those immaculately presented guys and girls who are always available might actually withhold information on the basis that they might make money if they withheld it. Thats unethical.
How's that unethical? They're being paid for commentary, not investment ideas.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitzjames View Post
That’s almost like saying they worked for the Daily Mirror.
Ive never heard anything so ridiculous that PROFESSIONAL ETHICAL JOURNOS on City pages in our great newspapers hype shares or talk down shares to make a few quid for themselves. There should be a law agin it.
No need, journos don't move stocks anymore. They can't, they're not listened to by the people who deploy large chunks of capital. 10, even 8 years ago, maybe. Now, very unlikely.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitzjames View Post
Im NOT suggesting anything at all and indeed will happily admit that I know nothing of which I speak. Nor do I want to know anything.
But it appears to me that when somebody LOSES money……someone else might conceivably have made a few quid along the way.
Even to cushion the blow of redundancy.
Hedge Fund Managers whose enormous bonus payments attract the attention of our newspapers to day and who seem to be carrying the can (a highly expensive designer brand can I suppose). Quite possibly a few others in and around the Trading Floor knew what was going on.
Or did nobody have a clue?
In the first place, there are many trading floors, and there are many places where you can buy or sell securities. The public markets probably account for about half of actual executed trades.

So when you say some people knew what was going on - yes, some people had an inkling. Did they make money - yes, probably. Would it have been right for them to tell people about it? No, why should they? Were they trading in public markets? Probably not. Did any of them work at Lehman? I doubt it.

Before you start, the definition of illegal insider trading is very specific with regards to the way the information is acquired. Anything else is legal, and ethical.

But since you don't actually want to know anything, I suspect you'll ignore this post and continue to spout rubbish.
spinoza is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2008, 17:52   #9 (permalink)
Paz's ion
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Everything is "blarg".
Posts: 22,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wibble View Post
Although more amusingly I saw a UK business web site telling their readers to buy these shares yesterday with a $375p target price in the future because they believed the liquidity concerns were overstated.
If they had bought at 90p they would have made a 158% return by selling to Lloyds
spinoza is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2008, 17:57   #10 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Co Armagh Ireland
Posts: 1,008
Send a message via Yahoo to Fitzjames
Quote:
Originally Posted by spinoza View Post
How's that unethical? They're being paid for commentary, not investment ideas.



No need, journos don't move stocks anymore. They can't, they're not listened to by the people who deploy large chunks of capital. 10, even 8 years ago, maybe. Now, very unlikely.


In the first place, there are many trading floors, and there are many places where you can buy or sell securities. The public markets probably account for about half of actual executed trades.

So when you say some people knew what was going on - yes, some people had an inkling. Did they make money - yes, probably. Would it have been right for them to tell people about it? No, why should they? Were they trading in public markets? Probably not. Did any of them work at Lehman? I doubt it.

Before you start, the definition of illegal insider trading is very specific with regards to the way the information is acquired. Anything else is legal, and ethical.

But since you don't actually want to know anything, I suspect you'll ignore this post and continue to spout rubbish.
Now you cant blame me if I take a little pleasure in seeing Capitalism implode.even if its only for a few days.
And nobodys gonna lose out not even the City traders who lose their jobs...I see they might be retrained as teachers. They probably see it like a Viet Cong re-education centre but I look forward to seeing ex-traders being converted to the joys of working for the public sector.
Not sure how they will be able to pay their dealers for the strange white powder many of them seem to use. Maybe Im watching the wrong movies.

Interesting article in todays Guardian (what else?) where a survey reveals that looking at 26 successful american traders.......high levels of depression anxiety sleeplessness and an over dependence on alcohol and cocaine.
"For relaxation they chose solitary pursuits...jogging, masturbation and fishing were common" (todays Guardian)
Fitzjames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2008, 18:15   #11 (permalink)
Paz's ion
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Everything is "blarg".
Posts: 22,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitzjames View Post
Now you cant blame me if I take a little pleasure in seeing Capitalism implode.even if its only for a few days.
And nobodys gonna lose out not even the City traders who lose their jobs...I see they might be retrained as teachers. They probably see it like a Viet Cong re-education centre but I look forward to seeing ex-traders being converted to the joys of working for the public sector.
Not sure how they will be able to pay their dealers for the strange white powder many of them seem to use. Maybe Im watching the wrong movies.
I know a fair few City people who went into teaching, after the last cycle. One of my colleagues just left to train as a vicar. "Traders", as you put it (you actually mean front office capital markets staff, "trader" has a specific meaning), aren't too different from any random segment of British society. More cosmopolitan, maybe.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitzjames View Post
Interesting article in todays Guardian (what else?) where a survey reveals that looking at 26 successful american traders.......high levels of depression anxiety sleeplessness and an over dependence on alcohol and cocaine.
"For relaxation they chose solitary pursuits...jogging, masturbation and fishing were common" (todays Guardian)

It's from the school of the bleeding obvious anyway. Every trader (people who buy and sell securities) I know has depression, anxiety, sleeplessness and an overdependence on some sort of mood-altering substance. It's cured come pay day. When it doesn't, it's time to move on.
spinoza is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2008, 18:21   #12 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Co Armagh Ireland
Posts: 1,008
Send a message via Yahoo to Fitzjames
Quote:
Originally Posted by spinoza View Post
I know a fair few City people who went into teaching, after the last cycle. One of my colleagues just left to train as a vicar. "Traders", as you put it (you actually mean front office capital markets staff, "trader" has a specific meaning), aren't too different from any random segment of British society. More cosmopolitan, maybe.




It's from the school of the bleeding obvious anyway. Every trader (people who buy and sell securities) I know has depression, anxiety, sleeplessness and an overdependence on some sort of mood-altering substance. It's cured come pay day. When it doesn't, it's time to move on.
Watching heir portfolis shrink could cure it. Im just enjoying the fact that their pay days are running out.
Fitzjames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2008, 18:53   #13 (permalink)
Paz's ion
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Everything is "blarg".
Posts: 22,303
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitzjames View Post
Watching heir portfolis shrink could cure it. Im just enjoying the fact that their pay days are running out.
It won't for the good ones. That's the silliness of the schadenfreude.

You can rail and rant at some monolithic entity of "City people" who behave in ways you don't like, but it doesn't really exist.
spinoza is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2008, 00:16   #14 (permalink)
Teeth like a reindeer. Hung like a horse.
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Ingadus Speramus
Posts: 35,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by spinoza View Post
If they had bought at 90p they would have made a 158% return by selling to Lloyds
Indeed. It was the bit about buying because the liquidity concerns were overstated that amused me.
Wibble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2008, 00:56   #15 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Co Armagh Ireland
Posts: 1,008
Send a message via Yahoo to Fitzjames
I hope Nick Leeson gets a job on BBC.
He looks like a man I could trust.
Can we maybe organise a petition to have him pardoned?

Last edited by Fitzjames : 19th September 2008 at 00:57. Reason: addition
Fitzjames is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:55.

Forum Register FAQ Mark Forums Read Archives Contact Us Top

Copyright © RedCafe.net 1997-2008.
RedCafe.net is in no way authorised by or connected with Manchester United [insert appropriate acronym] or the official club website.
The views and opinions expressed within this site are those of the specified authors.
Externally linked content is the property of the relevant copyright holder.
Powered by vBulletin®

LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0