Go Back   RedCafe.net > General Discussion > Current Events

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 13th October 2009, 09:51   #41 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Where the goals come from.
Posts: 20,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dresilved View Post
You can't compare what happened then to now...
I'm not saying it is, but it illustrates the point that freedom of speech is not and should not be absolute, in some cases it is for the greater good to shut people up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mockney View Post
Your average man in the street does not love the EDL or the BNP....
Not been to Stoke or Burnley recently?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mockney View Post
To say "we must stop them lest we end up like Nazi Germany" is complete bollocks
That's not what I said though, is it?
As I say, it was purely illustrating the concept, though you may be being a bit complacent if you think that the following statement is equally ridiculous:
"we must stop them lest we end up with an increase in racial tension and a reversal in British Muslim's hard earned status as equal citizens with equal opportunities alongn with a lack of protection for the British people to adhere to and practice whatever beliefes they hold."
Nobody's predicting another holocaust, but do you honestly not think that, if these people were to gain political influence, there would be no negative effect on minorities and society as a whole?
Sir A1ex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2009, 09:58   #42 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Chester
Posts: 5,831
I know a member of the EDL.
VivaRonaldo7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2009, 10:07   #43 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Where the goals come from.
Posts: 20,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by VivaRonaldo7 View Post
I know a member of the EDL.
There we go then. Nice bloke?
Sir A1ex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2009, 10:12   #44 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Chester
Posts: 5,831
Quote:
Originally Posted by A1Dan View Post
There we go then. Nice bloke?
The sort who got dragged into it all so to speak. Just randomly starts spouting off about it.
VivaRonaldo7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2009, 10:19   #45 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Where the goals come from.
Posts: 20,598
Bit of a tit then?
Sir A1ex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2009, 10:28   #46 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Chester
Posts: 5,831
Quote:
Originally Posted by A1Dan View Post
Bit of a tit then?
Yep.
VivaRonaldo7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2009, 10:47   #47 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Where the goals come from.
Posts: 20,598
interesting article on who the EDL are
Sir A1ex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2009, 11:11   #48 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tali'Zorah vas Normandy.
Posts: 16,027
Quote:
Originally Posted by A1Dan View Post
I'm not saying it is, but it illustrates the point that freedom of speech is not and should not be absolute, in some cases it is for the greater good to shut people up.
But who decides what's for the "greater good"? You? Those people believe that what they're trying to achieve is for the "greater good". They don't do it thinking, "y'know, this will fuck things up, but what the hell".

You can't start censoring people because then you're on a very slippery slope. So now you want to stop these people campaigning their hate. That's fine, but then some anti-war protestors set up shop somewhere and the government starts to use its newfound power to keep them quiet. Maybe then the tories get in, bring back fox hunting, people start protesting about that. Sorry, mates, we're not having that - off you go.

No matter what people are saying you cannot stop them saying or believing it. You just have to trust that other people won't be stupid or ignorant enough to join them; or, do as the UAF did and turn up in even greater numbers to show them they won't be convincing anyone. But once you start getting violent, or even just preventing them from espousing their views, you begin treading very dangerous territory.
Count Duckula is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2009, 12:17   #49 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Stretford
Posts: 14,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Duckula View Post
But who decides what's for the "greater good"? You? Those people believe that what they're trying to achieve is for the "greater good". They don't do it thinking, "y'know, this will fuck things up, but what the hell".

You can't start censoring people because then you're on a very slippery slope. So now you want to stop these people campaigning their hate. That's fine, but then some anti-war protestors set up shop somewhere and the government starts to use its newfound power to keep them quiet. Maybe then the tories get in, bring back fox hunting, people start protesting about that. Sorry, mates, we're not having that - off you go.

No matter what people are saying you cannot stop them saying or believing it. You just have to trust that other people won't be stupid or ignorant enough to join them; or, do as the UAF did and turn up in even greater numbers to show them they won't be convincing anyone. But once you start getting violent, or even just preventing them from espousing their views, you begin treading very dangerous territory.
Partially agree with that. But Freedom of Expression is not an absolute and inalienable human right (as is, for example, the right not to be tortured). It always has to be balanced against other rights - so the right to privacy, the right to security (for muslims who want to be able to walk the streets of Manchester on a Saturday afternoon in safety), and also other established laws (e.g. defamation, race hate, public order).

Censorship is therefore actually necessary in many situations, because it is the lesser of two evils.

That said, in this case I think the GMP were right to let the protest go ahead, at least as long as the EDL can keep a lid on their Nazi element so long as the protest remained heavily regulated.
ralphie88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2009, 13:52   #50 (permalink)
السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: It is better for a leader to make a mistake in forgiving than to make a mistake in punishing
Posts: 34,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Duckula View Post
But who decides what's for the "greater good"? You? Those people believe that what they're trying to achieve is for the "greater good". They don't do it thinking, "y'know, this will fuck things up, but what the hell".

You can't start censoring people because then you're on a very slippery slope. So now you want to stop these people campaigning their hate. That's fine, but then some anti-war protestors set up shop somewhere and the government starts to use its newfound power to keep them quiet. Maybe then the tories get in, bring back fox hunting, people start protesting about that. Sorry, mates, we're not having that - off you go.

No matter what people are saying you cannot stop them saying or believing it. You just have to trust that other people won't be stupid or ignorant enough to join them; or, do as the UAF did and turn up in even greater numbers to show them they won't be convincing anyone. But once you start getting violent, or even just preventing them from espousing their views, you begin treading very dangerous territory.
Yet the simple fact is that both in Britain and in America, as in every other Western democracy, we live in the midst of censorship. Our ‘free society’ turns out, on inspection, to be a society where – for good or ill – practically every medium of expression other than the novel is subject to elaborate restrictions; where every programme we watch on television has been vetted by the guardians of public decency; where every film we see has been censored; where truly erotic works of art can scarcely be seen in any public gallery, and where every non-artistic picture ever published or displayed is subject to rigorous obscenity laws. These laws express, in their selective prohibitions and permissions, a seemingly profound antipathy to sexual love and a deep and almost insane horror of some of the most ordinary parts of the human body, particularly when these are conjoined in some of the most ordinary ways.

What is perhaps even more important than all these examples of public censorship, however, are the kinds of censorship we exercise upon ourselves. In the dark safety of the theatre of our own imagination we are permanently able, should we so desire, to watch demonstrations of sexual affection and erotic largesse so extraordinary, they could not be shown in any cinema. Simultaneously we are able to view and participate in scenes of passion and emotional generosity more reckless than any novelist would dare create. Yet for the most part it is probably true to say that we do not make much use of this extraordinary resource. For most of the time the theatre of our imagination remains locked – empty, unvisited, and unloved.

In our private, as in our public lives, far from being free from censorship, we are in almost permanent thrall to it. Unable to face up to this fact, however, we have developed an elaborate self-congratulatory myth of freedom. In the midst of repression we celebrate freedom; from the depths of our own puritanism we proclaim liberation.


Richard Webster.net
Sultan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2009, 14:20   #51 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tali'Zorah vas Normandy.
Posts: 16,027
That's just a bloke whinging about there not being enough tits on television, Sults.
Count Duckula is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2009, 16:11   #52 (permalink)
Wobbles like a massive pair of tits
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Duckula View Post
That's just a bloke whinging about there not being enough tits on television, Sults.
True.
MikeUpNorth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2009, 17:01   #53 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Where the goals come from.
Posts: 20,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Duckula View Post
You can't start censoring people because then you're on a very slippery slope.
Really? So it would make no difference if they were noisily campaigning in favour of genocide, or inciting people to rape and torture a spcific minority?
What about the very terrorists these people use as an excuse for their hatred? Should they be allowed to freely and openly advocate attrocities?

You can start censoring people, and every nation on earth already does. There does need to be a line drawn, and while I don't claim to be in any position to have that responsibilty, I'm allowed to voice my opinion on where it should be.
Sir A1ex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2009, 17:03   #54 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Where the goals come from.
Posts: 20,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Duckula View Post
That's just a bloke whinging about there not being enough tits on television, Sults.
Don't be so immature.

It's clearly fanny he wants to see more of.
Sir A1ex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2009, 17:09   #55 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: 西田麻衣の谷間. Being a nerd, geek and virgin
Posts: 17,789
Send a message via ICQ to x42bn6 Send a message via AIM to x42bn6 Send a message via MSN to x42bn6 Send a message via Yahoo to x42bn6 Send a message via Skype™ to x42bn6
Quote:
Originally Posted by A1Dan View Post
Really? So it would make no difference if they were noisily campaigning in favour of genocide, or inciting people to rape and torture a spcific minority?
What about the very terrorists these people use as an excuse for their hatred? Should they be allowed to freely and openly advocate attrocities?

You can start censoring people, and every nation on earth already does. There does need to be a line drawn, and while I don't claim to be in any position to have that responsibilty, I'm allowed to voice my opinion on where it should be.
I believe there are laws against inciting violence, or something similar - so you are limited to what you can say, through some "balancing" as ralphie has mentioned previously.

In fact, if you go down the street shouting that you are going to murder someone or a specific race/nationality/gender/etc., you would get pulled up and quite rightly so.
x42bn6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2009, 20:21   #56 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Where the goals come from.
Posts: 20,598
Quote:
Originally Posted by x42bn6 View Post
I believe there are laws against inciting violence, or something similar - so you are limited to what you can say, through some "balancing" as ralphie has mentioned previously.

In fact, if you go down the street shouting that you are going to murder someone or a specific race/nationality/gender/etc., you would get pulled up and quite rightly so.
Exactly.
Sir A1ex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2009, 21:30   #57 (permalink)
السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: It is better for a leader to make a mistake in forgiving than to make a mistake in punishing
Posts: 34,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Duckula View Post
That's just a bloke whinging about there not being enough tits on television, Sults.


We mostly assume free speech, freedom of action are inherently good. However as some have pointed out in above posts it's not always the case - in fact to believe that absolute freedoms is always beneficial is clearly wrong and would most likely mean an end of a stable, just and fair society.
Sultan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2009, 22:58   #58 (permalink)
Not the only poster to be named Poster of the Year twice
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bangerang
Posts: 29,040
Send a message via Skype™ to Mockney
Quote:
Originally Posted by A1Dan View Post
Not been to Stoke or Burnley recently?
No one who lives in stoke or burnley an be described as a normal person, let alone your average man in the street

Quote:
That's not what I said though, is it?
As I say, it was purely illustrating the concept, though you may be being a bit complacent if you think that the following statement is equally ridiculous:
"we must stop them lest we end up with an increase in racial tension and a reversal in British Muslim's hard earned status as equal citizens with equal opportunities alongn with a lack of protection for the British people to adhere to and practice whatever beliefes they hold."
Nobody's predicting another holocaust, but do you honestly not think that, if these people were to gain political influence, there would be no negative effect on minorities and society as a whole?
I'm sure if they came to power they would try and enact that sort of thing...but I don't think people in our country in this day and age would stand for it....certainly within living memory of Nazi Germany

England was pretty racist in the 1930s & 40s....all be it ignorantly rather than maliciously. it's not now
Mockney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2009, 14:03   #59 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Nablus, Palestine
Posts: 1,363
Send a message via MSN to Church o Choccy
The EDL are in Swansea tomorrow and Leeds at Hallowe'en. I'm gonna try and get along to the Leeds counter demo.
Church o Choccy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2009, 11:19   #60 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Stretford
Posts: 14,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by Church o Choccy View Post
The EDL are in Swansea tomorrow and Leeds at Hallowe'en. I'm gonna try and get along to the Leeds counter demo.
Leeds could well be messy with their reputation.
ralphie88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2009, 11:33   #61 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Reichenbach Falls
Posts: 6,844
Where did these fuckers come from? I'd never even heard of the EDL until a month or so back. I had a look on 'Stormfront' to see what the geniuses on there had to say and the consensus is that the EDL is controlled by the government and the Jews. Fuck, and I thought I was paranoid.

At any rate, they need a good shoeing and I hope the good people of Leeds give them one.
Moriarty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2009, 17:26   #62 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,828
Don't they make you proud to be English?
Red_Jamie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2009, 17:50   #63 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Uncle Tom's Cabin
Posts: 3,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdZzUtd View Post
The UAF aren't much better, just fascists claiming they aren't. Technically a small militant army.
I googled UAF, i assume you are talking about University of Alaska Fairbanks in which case you are correct.


Your a tit
GloryHunter07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2009, 18:04   #64 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Uncle Tom's Cabin
Posts: 3,204
The funny thing is, most of those skin heads would be religious fanatics if they were born in a different country, just bored, stupid and impressionable bigots the lot of them.

By the way, anyone watched "this is england"? Good film, and very applicable to the current world.
GloryHunter07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2009, 18:17   #65 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Stretford
Posts: 14,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by gloryhunter07 View Post
i googled uaf, i assume you are talking about university of alaska fairbanks in which case you are correct.


you're a tit
Hehe.
ralphie88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2009, 18:20   #66 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by GloryHunter07 View Post
The funny thing is, most of those skin heads would be religious fanatics if they were born in a different country, just bored, stupid and impressionable bigots the lot of them.

By the way, anyone watched "this is england"? Good film, and very applicable to the current world.
That's one of the best points i've heard regarding this. You're dead right. It's alarmingly obvious to anyone with half a brain cell that most of these people have no affection to the cause and just want to turn up in a big gang and chant their ingurland chants for an hour.
Red_Jamie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th October 2009, 20:02   #67 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 93, 94, 96, 97, 99, 00, 01, 03, 07, 08, 09...10
Posts: 4,412
Quote:
Originally Posted by GloryHunter07 View Post
The funny thing is, most of those skin heads would be religious fanatics if they were born in a different country, just bored, stupid and impressionable bigots the lot of them.

By the way, anyone watched "this is england"? Good film, and very applicable to the current world.
never thought of it that way, good point
Wembley Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th July 2010, 21:30   #68 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Behind my 
Posts: 12,662
Quote:
Originally Posted by noodlehair View Post
The "English Defence League"

You really don't need to hear anymore than that. The biggest gathering of them was probably at that West Ham vs Millwall game a month or so back.

I was going through their Facebook page trying to find out more about this bunch of thugs and came across the above video.






At first it made me laugh .... but then after thinking about it, I am quite disturbed ... I'd hoped that the EDL were really just a bunch of bored football hooligans with nowhere to fight anymore because they had had the stadiums taken away from them ... but after watching this video it made me think they actually believe in this as a 'cause'.

Out of interest, where did all the hooligans of yesteryear disappear to?
sammsky1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th July 2010, 21:36   #69 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Westminster, UK
Posts: 11,710
Bunch of fucking spastics who believe they have a 'right' to have this country when it was pure chance they were born here. Not to mention the huge number of British-born Muslims they think should 'fuck off home'.
MJLD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th July 2010, 21:43   #70 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Behind my 
Posts: 12,662
Im getting quite into this (ie finding out about who the EDL are).

Watch the video embedded within this Guardian article: English Defence League: Inside the violent world of Britain's new far right | UK news | The Guardian

Its very disconcerting .... I dont think this country has seen this sort of uprising since the sad bad old days of the National Front ...

My question is .... if one get get beyond the vile bile of a typical EDL member rant, do they actually have any justifiable grievances? Exactly what do they want and what would they consider as victory?

Or are they just a bunch of thick and bored Generation Y victims who would have been football hooligans in yesteryear? And are this lot fans of the England football team? Because, its because of people like this that many people like I feel uncomfortable about supporting the England team because I do not want to be any part of a movement like this.

Quote:

English Defence League: Inside the violent world of Britain's new far right

Undercover Guardian investigation reveals plan by English Defence League to hit racially sensitive areas in attempt to provoke disorder over summer


Matthew Taylor
guardian.co.uk,
Friday 28 May 2010



The English Defence League is planning a series of demonstrations this summer. Warning: video contains very strong language Link to this video
MPs expressed concern tonight after it emerged that far-right activists are planning to step up their provocative street campaign by targeting some of the UK's highest-profile Muslim communities, raising fears of widespread unrest this summer.

Undercover footage shot by the Guardian reveals the English Defence League, which has staged a number of violent protests in towns and cities across the country this year, is planning to "hit" Bradford and the London borough of Tower Hamlets as it intensifies its street protests.

Senior figures in the coalition government were briefed on the threat posed by EDL marches this week. Tomorrow up to 2,000 EDL supporters are expected to descend on Newcastle for its latest protest.

MPs said the group's decision to target some of the UK's most prominent Muslim communities was a blatant attempt to provoke mayhem and disorder. "This group has no positive agenda," said the Bradford South MP, Gerry Sutcliffe. "It is an agenda of hate that is designed to divide people and communities. We support legitimate protest but this is not legitimate, it is designed to stir up trouble. The people of Bradford will want no part of it."

The English Defence League, which started in Luton last year, has become the most significant far-right street movement in the UK since the National Front in the 1970s. A Guardian investigation has identified a number of known rightwing extremists who are taking an interest in the movement – from convicted football hooligans to members of violent rightwing splinter groups.

Thousands of people have attended its protests – many of which have descended into violence and racist and Islamophobic chanting. Supporters are split into "divisions" spread across the UK and as many as 3,000 people are attracted to its protests.

The group also appears to be drawing support from the armed forces. Its online armed forces division has 842 members and the EDL says many serving soldiers have attended its demonstrations. A spokeswoman for the EDL, whose husband is a serving soldier, said: "The soldiers are fighting Islamic extremism in Afghanistan and Iraq and the EDL are fighting it here … Not all the armed forces support the English Defence League but a majority do."

Following the British National party's poor showing in this month's local and national elections anti-racist campaigners say some far-right activists may be turning away from the ballot box and returning to violent street demonstrations for the first time in three decades.

Nick Lowles, from Searchlight, said: "What we are seeing now is the most serious, most dangerous, political phenomenon that we have had in Britain for a number of years. With EDL protests that are growing week in, week out there is a chance for major disorder and a major political shift to the right in this country."

In undercover footage shot by Guardian Films, EDL spokesman Guramit Singh says its Bradford demonstration "will be huge". He adds: "The problem with Bradford is the security threat, it is a highly populated Muslim area. They are very militant as well. Bradford is a place that has got to be hit."

Singh, who was speaking during an EDL demonstration in Dudley in April, said the organisation would also be targeting Tower Hamlets.

A spokesman for the EDL confirmed it would hold a demonstration in Bradford on 28 August because the city was "on course to be one of the first places to become a no-go area for non-Muslims". The EDL has already announced demonstrations in Cardiff and Dudley.

The former Home Office minister Phil Woolas said: "This is a deliberate attempt by the EDL at division and provocation, to try and push young Muslims into the hands of extremists, in order to perpetuate the divide. It is dangerous."

The EDL claims it is a peaceful and non-racist organisation only concerned with protesting against "militant Islam". However, over the last four months the Guardian has attended its demonstrations and witnessed racism, violence and virulent Islamophobia.

During the election campaign David Cameron described the EDL as "dreadful people" and said the organisation would "always be under review".

A spokesman for the Home Office said that although the government was committed to restoring the right to "non-violent protest … violence and intimidation are wholly unacceptable and the police have powers to deal with individuals who commit such acts. The government condemns those who seek to spread hatred."

He added: "Individual members of EDL – like all members of the public – are of course subject to the law, and all suspected criminal offences will be robustly investigated and dealt with by the police."
sammsky1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th July 2010, 04:58   #71 (permalink)
BTV
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: DC/Canberra/Dhaka
Posts: 7,314
The irony of a turban wearing Sikh being a part of a racist English Defence League, and advocating Muslims being kicked out of England...

Sure buddy...once the muslims are gone, who do you think is next?
Neutral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th July 2010, 08:59   #72 (permalink)
Wobbles like a massive pair of tits
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,254
Quote:
Originally Posted by sammsky1 View Post
My question is .... if one get get beyond the vile bile of a typical EDL member rant, do they actually have any justifiable grievances? Exactly what do they want and what would they consider as victory?

Or are they just a bunch of thick and bored Generation Y victims who would have been football hooligans in yesteryear? And are this lot fans of the England football team? Because, its because of people like this that many people like I feel uncomfortable about supporting the England team because I do not want to be any part of a movement like this.
The ones I have come across have pretty much just been hooligan scum looking for a fight, rather than having any real identifiable 'cause'. It's just racism, plain and simple - every country has them.
MikeUpNorth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th July 2010, 13:16   #73 (permalink)
In most joy
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Redcafe, circa 2006
Posts: 3,693
Quote:
Originally Posted by BTV_is_neutral View Post
The irony of a turban wearing Sikh being a part of a racist English Defence League, and advocating Muslims being kicked out of England...

Sure buddy...once the muslims are gone, who do you think is next?
Don't think it's that ironic.

When I was at school a lot of the Sikh kids hated Muslims incessantly - and by comparison nearly all of the white kids couldn't care less.
snootyjim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th July 2010, 15:10   #74 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 42,432
Its interesting to see these movements spring up in various European countries at a time when they're decreasing in the States.
Raoul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th July 2010, 16:04   #75 (permalink)
BTV
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: DC/Canberra/Dhaka
Posts: 7,314
Quote:
Originally Posted by snootyjim View Post
Don't think it's that ironic.

When I was at school a lot of the Sikh kids hated Muslims incessantly - and by comparison nearly all of the white kids couldn't care less.
No I know sikhs hate muslims, I have Indian friends, who tell me about the animosity that exists in their homeland...but for a sikh in the UK to be advocating discriminating against muslims, without realizing, once the muslim bogeyman was out...who would be next?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raoul View Post
Its interesting to see these movements spring up in various European countries at a time when they're decreasing in the States.

no matter how 'evil' the US becomes, when it comes to integrating its immigrants, and making ousiders feel like they belong...NO ONE does it better.
Neutral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th July 2010, 19:26   #76 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Behind my 
Posts: 12,662
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raoul View Post
Its interesting to see these movements spring up in various European countries at a time when they're decreasing in the States.
Yes, I have noticed that in my recent trips to the US.

I was recently in a non-descript business suburb called Schaumburg near Chicago.

I was told that it housed had one of the largest mosques in the states and that there was total integration, acceptance and harmony within the region.

Made me rethink many assumptions about the way things were going in the US, which seems to be more progressive as opposed to more regressive in the UK.
sammsky1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th July 2010, 00:14   #77 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,984
Quote:
Originally Posted by snootyjim View Post
Don't think it's that ironic.

When I was at school a lot of the Sikh kids hated Muslims incessantly - and by comparison nearly all of the white kids couldn't care less.
Its more because of the history. The Mughals in India persecuted the Guru's, and the hatred has largely stayed there since then. Fair enough, I suppose...
rotherham_red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2010, 10:33   #78 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Democratic Republic of Congo
Posts: 15,076
Had a visit from these tossers in Leicester on Saturday.

SHUTTERED stores, boarded-up windows, padlocked pubs, deserted streets, coppers on almost every corner. Leicester in lock-down, nailed shut, its familiar features carved up by high metal fences and massed ranks of police at every turn.

Thousands of Leicester residents turned out yesterday in a display of unity and cohesion just 24 hours after protesters from other parts of the country tried to disrupt the city.

They really are a waste of fuckin taxes. Took the largest police force in the county for 25 years to keep them from the busy parts of the town centre and even then some managed to get away and create scenes like this







But of course, they're not racist.

That last video shows you all you need to know about this lot. Pathetic.
CassiusClaymore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2010, 10:36   #79 (permalink)
9 Pages of infractions
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Lake Fianga
Posts: 24,726
They really are despicable twats.
esmufc14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2010, 11:03   #80 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Westminster, UK
Posts: 11,710
This is why West Ham and Millwall fans shouldn't be allowed to reproduce.
MJLD is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:58.

Back to top


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO