![]() |
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 4,393
|
There were two games on here last night: Orlando v 76ers and Lakers-San Antonio. Orlando and San Antonio won.
Tonight, there are two games on ESPN: Wizards at Raptors, 7 p.m. EST; Lakers at Trail Blazers, 9:30 p.m. EST. Shaq's out though. |
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
First Team Sub
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Fresno, California USA
Posts: 6,216
|
[quote]Originally posted by Nate:
<strong>Fecking Lakers lost on opening night...</strong><hr></blockquote> Luck the Fakers. Never could stand them, or their Hollywood fans. The Kings didn't play that well, but it was only the Cleveland Cadavers, after all. |
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 4,393
|
[quote]Originally posted by RUDDY:
<strong>is AI starting with philly,his injurys cost them big time last season best player in the NBA</strong><hr></blockquote> He played last night and scored 18 points (7 for 25 shooting). Van Horn played pretty well for Philly. |
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Baghdad
Posts: 26,792
|
[quote]Originally posted by RUDDY:
<strong>is AI starting with philly,his injurys cost them big time last season best player in the NBA</strong><hr></blockquote> He started last night. The Lakers should get off to a rocky start since they'll be without Shaq and Rick Fox. Can't see anyone beating them in the playoffs though. The Nets will be good again. |
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 4,393
|
[quote]Originally posted by RUDDY:
<strong> van horn's good but they really should have kept mutumbo</strong><hr></blockquote> You might be right about that. I think that Philly felt like Mutumbo was declining. I don't think anyone really knows how old he is. Nets look pretty good this year. |
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
First Team Regular
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: DC, USA
Posts: 11,106
|
[quote]Originally posted by ole_92:
<strong> Sacramento will finally beat LA</strong><hr></blockquote> Agreed, Sac will finally beat LA and then go on to win. I think they just have too much talent/depth, and now they have the experience. |
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) |
|
First Team Elder
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 19,690
|
Yeah, I have noticed here that the only shirts, caps etc that you can get hold of are from the NY and LA teams generally. 60 squid is a lot for bball shirt though, kinell. They charge the earth for shipping I think don't they?
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
[quote]Originally posted by Dans:
<strong>Yeah, I have noticed here that the only shirts, caps etc that you can get hold of are from the NY and LA teams generally. 60 squid is a lot for bball shirt though, kinell. They charge the earth for shipping I think don't they?</strong><hr></blockquote> lol yea the shirt is only 29$ Allen Iverson was on fire last night him and van horn look the biz this season and LA lost again which is always a good thing |
|
|
#32 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
[quote]Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>The Lakers will be hard to beat in the finals. They've still got the two best players in the game, as well as the best coach ever, and a good supporting cast.</strong><hr></blockquote> kobe granted but shaq is just a huge gaint he aint got no game is his toe alright now,what a pussy |
|
|
#33 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Baghdad
Posts: 26,792
|
[quote]Originally posted by RUDDY:
<strong> kobe granted but shaq is just a huge gaint he aint got no game is his toe alright now,what a pussy</strong><hr></blockquote> ehh ??? Shaq's the NBA's leading scorer (along with AI) when he's healthy. When healthy, he's easily the most dominant player in the game. |
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
[quote]Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong> ehh ??? Shaq's the NBA's leading scorer (along with AI) when he's healthy. When healthy, he's easily the most dominant player in the game.</strong><hr></blockquote> im not saying that hes not but if he was the size of an iverson or a kidd do you think he still would be as good? if he wasnt the gaint he is he wouldnt be anything |
|
|
#35 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Baghdad
Posts: 26,792
|
[quote]Originally posted by RUDDY:
<strong> im not saying that hes not but if he was the size of an iverson or a kidd do you think he still would be as good? if he wasnt the gaint he is he wouldnt be anything</strong><hr></blockquote> Apples and Oranges. Shaq plays a completely different position than Iverson and Kidd. There are plenty of 'Giants' in the NBA, but none are even remotely as good as Shaq. Infact imo, there have only been about three Centers in the history of the NBA (Kareem, Russell, Chamberlin) who are as good as Shaq. If I had to pick the best players in the NBA today it would go: Shaq McGrady Webber Iverson Bryant |
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
|
[quote]Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong> Apples and Oranges. Shaq plays a completely different position than Iverson and Kidd. There are plenty of 'Giants' in the NBA, but none are even remotely as good as Shaq. Infact imo, there have only been about three Centers in the history of the NBA (Kareem, Russell, Chamberlin) who are as good as Shaq. If I had to pick the best players in the NBA today it would go: Shaq McGrady Webber Iverson Bryant</strong><hr></blockquote> 100% agree with that team im a bit bias about shaq as i hate the lakers but yea id agree with you even if he is overrated by some |