Go Back   RedCafe.net > General Discussion > Entertainment Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2nd February 2012, 19:10   #2441 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: England; The home of James Bond, Fish and chips and Chavs!
Posts: 4,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by phelans shorts View Post
Just noticed no one picked up in Jerichos tweet yesterday, hinting at an upcoming Punk feud.
I think him coming into punks match on Raw and beating him down was more of a hint?
Garethw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2012, 19:53   #2442 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Gaz. Is a Mewling Quim.
Posts: 19,519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garethw View Post
I think him coming into punks match on Raw and beating him down was more of a hint?
I didn't watch it, so wouldn't know.
phelans shorts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2012, 20:18   #2443 (permalink)
101
Damnations
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place.
Posts: 7,613
Quote:
Originally Posted by phelans shorts View Post
I didn't watch it, so wouldn't know.
Jericho tweeted before Raw:

Quote:
I got something to say... #raw
Punk tweeted:

Quote:
I wonder if anyone's got anything to say?
Jericho came out during Punk and Bryan's match and gave him the Codebreaker.
101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2012, 13:46   #2444 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leroy The Red View Post
The problem nowadays is that the biggest moaners (those in their mid 20's) can't seem to grasp the main reason why wrestling isn't that fun for them anymore. The naivety in watching wrestling has gone.
The mid 20's lot are still living off the Attitude era where they were in their young years, they can't seem to understand that it's not that wrestling has all of a sudden become incredibly shit, it's that they've grown up and know too much.
Of course it still isn't as great as it was back in the late 90's but it's actually better than it was in the mid 90's. I'll admit I don't enjoy it as much as I once did but I still appreciate it. Too many people nowadays watch it with a stupid amount of cynicism and then act all surprised when they're not satisfied after a ppv.
The mid 90s was the greatest time in all of wrestling history thanks to the incredible crop of female performers in japan who blew away every male wrestler past present or future.
Pimpy the Magic Elf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2012, 10:21   #2445 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Belfast,Northern Ireland
Posts: 17,827
I've been watching WWE from around 1989-1990, I was about 6 or 7 years old. I kind of fell away from it around 1995, but I got back into it again around 1998 (I was 15 years old then). I knew it was staged, but it was just so much better back then.

The characters, the storylines, the feuds, the stables, the tag-teams......everything was just brilliant. My god, even the mid-carders were cheered like crazy every week whereas these days, even guys who are involved at the top level can barely get great pops.

I still watch it from time to time, but not as religiously as I once did. I still go to their live shows when they come here to Belfast, but for how much longer will I go? I honestly can't say. I watched some of the Rumble highlights, and one of the best parts for me was the Road Dogg coming down to the ring. I was singing along to 'Oh you didn't know'
MUFCgal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2012, 10:12   #2446 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Argh
Posts: 7,357
Fucking hell... RAW starts with an incredibly shit Triple H promo?? I haven't missed this for the last year or so I have to say...

Has he seemingly forgotten that he lost that fucking match?? He was putting it over as if he won...
Annihilate Now! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2012, 10:48   #2447 (permalink)
Redcafe FIFA Champion 2010
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: ''Ronaldo was the attacker more difficult to tackle, He was simply unstoppable'' Paulo Maldini on The Phenomenon
Posts: 4,210
Quote:
Originally Posted by MUFCgal View Post
I've been watching WWE from around 1989-1990, I was about 6 or 7 years old. I kind of fell away from it around 1995, but I got back into it again around 1998 (I was 15 years old then). I knew it was staged, but it was just so much better back then.

The characters, the storylines, the feuds, the stables, the tag-teams......everything was just brilliant. My god, even the mid-carders were cheered like crazy every week whereas these days, even guys who are involved at the top level can barely get great pops.

I still watch it from time to time, but not as religiously as I once did. I still go to their live shows when they come here to Belfast, but for how much longer will I go? I honestly can't say. I watched some of the Rumble highlights, and one of the best parts for me was the Road Dogg coming down to the ring. I was singing along to 'Oh you didn't know'
This

Him and Billy Gunn were awesome back in the day, they certainly knew how to get a crowd going.

Ronaldo No.9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2012, 15:20   #2448 (permalink)
3-0 and you messed it up!
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 'I see the line, in the sand.... time to find out, who I am...' Soccer Manager - Manchester United.
Posts: 15,835
Why are they, in the run up to the EC, playing the Scottish rendition of Amazing Grace in the background of an Irish superstars promo?
Zarlak is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2012, 15:44   #2449 (permalink)
Platini's mum
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Machete's Chop Shop
Posts: 11,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zarlak View Post
Why are they, in the run up to the EC, playing the Scottish rendition of Amazing Grace in the background of an Irish superstars promo?
Because 99% of people watching won't know, and 99.9% won't care?
kietotheworld is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2012, 15:50   #2450 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Gaz. Is a Mewling Quim.
Posts: 19,519
I find it highly annoying.
phelans shorts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2012, 15:55   #2451 (permalink)
3-0 and you messed it up!
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 'I see the line, in the sand.... time to find out, who I am...' Soccer Manager - Manchester United.
Posts: 15,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by kietotheworld View Post
Because 99% of people watching won't know, and 99.9% won't care?
Probably. Also just flicked over to Smackdown to see if it was worth watching yet, then I saw Santino and Jim Duggan in a tag team, and D Bryan banging on about being a vegan and this really shite angle with his 'girlfriend' and whether he loves her or not and decided no. I'll stick with RAW for now.
Zarlak is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2012, 16:00   #2452 (permalink)
Sticky tip
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Its best if I don't tell you.
Posts: 6,667
RAW was terrible, just terrible.
Silva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2012, 16:15   #2453 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Argh
Posts: 7,357
You mean video package television??

I enjoyed the Daniel Bryan/Big Show stuff, the Jericho promo was just okay, the tag match was fine for a match that involved Khali, and the main event was a bit of a mess... everything else was pretty dire, the number of recaps/video package was an insult, the Kane bit at the end was dreadful... and anything that involved HHH was utter garbage.
Annihilate Now! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2012, 16:45   #2454 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London
Posts: 6,723
So WWE are going down the man City route.
Undertaker may have beaten Triple H last year but because he was stretched off, it was seen as a moral victory for Triple H.
Leroy The Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2012, 16:53   #2455 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Argh
Posts: 7,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leroy The Red View Post
So WWE are going down the man City route.
Undertaker may have beaten Triple H last year but because he was stretched off, it was seen as a moral victory for Triple H.
This pissed me off no end. If someone who hadn't seen the match last year and didn't know the result was watching... they would have no reason not to believe that HHH won the match.

Not only that, but he almost devalued the whole idea of Undertaker's streak... I mean, fuck that, I beat him up bad, and that's more important!

On another note... we have an Ambulance match to look forward to at Elimination Chamber it seems, which is just an awful awful match type. The basic idea is "I hate you so much, I'm going to assist you on your way to getting medical attention" ... urgh, I was barely looking forward to a Kane Cena match as is, but that stipulation definitely means I'm out.
Annihilate Now! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2012, 17:03   #2456 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: London
Posts: 6,723
Quote:
Originally Posted by Annihilate Now! View Post
This pissed me off no end. If someone who hadn't seen the match last year and didn't know the result was watching... they would have no reason not to believe that HHH won the match.

Not only that, but he almost devalued the whole idea of Undertaker's streak... I mean, fuck that, I beat him up bad, and that's more important!

On another note... we have an Ambulance match to look forward to at Elimination Chamber it seems, which is just an awful awful match type. The basic idea is "I hate you so much, I'm going to assist you on your way to getting medical attention" ... urgh, I was barely looking forward to a Kane Cena match as is, but that stipulation definitely means I'm out.


But yeah the whole Taker/HHH thing is absolutely dreadful, Taker could have faced Jericho, Punk or Orton, to do Undertaker/HBK twice in a row was a bit iffy but HHH/Taker twice in a row, fucking hell.
Last year they ignored the fact Undertaker beat HHH at Wrestlemania 17, now they're doing a THIRD FUCKING match on the basis HHH was the moral winner last year, absurd. I'm always defending the WWE but this is just retarded.
Leroy The Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2012, 17:32   #2457 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Shrewsbury
Posts: 5,762
I dunno why they couldn't just have Cena vs. Kane in a plain old Falls Count Anywhere match. I know they've done one recently with Orton vs. Barrett, but surely just letting them wander through the backstage area throwing things at each other would help cover up the obvious limitations.

On another note, anyone else wince when R-Truth slammed into the floor during that six-way match?
Minkaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2012, 17:38   #2458 (permalink)
101
Damnations
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place.
Posts: 7,613
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minkaro View Post
I dunno why they couldn't just have Cena vs. Kane in a plain old Falls Count Anywhere match. I know they've done one recently with Orton vs. Barrett, but surely just letting them wander through the backstage area throwing things at each other would help cover up the obvious limitations.

On another note, anyone else wince when R-Truth slammed into the floor during that six-way match?
Aye, looked like he took that fall pretty hard. Miz flopped on the catching front there. Every time I see Daniel Bryan I have to laugh. He is absolute quality.
101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2012, 21:41   #2459 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,661
The WWE is very lame these days...

Except for anything involving the Undertaker... then its awesome.

Literally, the only thing I find of any interest in Pro Wrestling is the Undertaker's entrance... on TV its captivating... and the timing of it is always bang on.
204Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2012, 21:47   #2460 (permalink)
Coach
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rancho Cordova, California, USA
Posts: 14,268
Quote:
Originally Posted by 101 View Post
Aye, looked like he took that fall pretty hard. Miz flopped on the catching front there. Every time I see Daniel Bryan I have to laugh. He is absolute quality.
Yeah he had to have caught hell for that backstage. I think I read that Truth overshot the flip but if Miz had broken the fall like he was supposed to, then it wouldn't have mattered. I'm surprised as hell that Truth is okay from that.
jveezy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2012, 21:58   #2461 (permalink)
Chica Time!
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: California in RL, Liverpool in SM
Posts: 7,965
Miz totally blew the catch:
Excal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2012, 22:06   #2462 (permalink)
101
Damnations
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Somewhere between a rock and a hard place.
Posts: 7,613
The more you watch that, the more you feel he sidestepped Truth!
101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 01:21   #2463 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Matrix
Posts: 6,481
Raw was pretty crap yesterday. How many times has the rock featured in WWE since that come back?
Neo_Mufc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2012, 23:41   #2464 (permalink)
3-0 and you messed it up!
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 'I see the line, in the sand.... time to find out, who I am...' Soccer Manager - Manchester United.
Posts: 15,835
This DB angle is pissing me off. I'm a vegan, I'm a role model, I recycle, I care about the future generations, I went for a nature walk while you all eat meat, I'm a vegan, didn't you guys know I'm a vegan, I have a Prius, do I love my girlfriend? She loves me.

I don't give a fuck. This isn't Twilight. Get in the ring and wrestle.
Zarlak is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2012, 09:09   #2465 (permalink)
Desperately wants to be a Muppet
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Asagan and SagatX destroyed, now worship COX!
Posts: 24,711
Just saw my first Epico match, at last a tag team that acts like a tag team and is able to portray a tag team match.
gambit28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2012, 09:39   #2466 (permalink)
Desperately wants to be a Muppet
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Asagan and SagatX destroyed, now worship COX!
Posts: 24,711
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leroy The Red View Post
The problem nowadays is that the biggest moaners (those in their mid 20's) can't seem to grasp the main reason why wrestling isn't that fun for them anymore. The naivety in watching wrestling has gone.
The mid 20's lot are still living off the Attitude era where they were in their young years, they can't seem to understand that it's not that wrestling has all of a sudden become incredibly shit, it's that they've grown up and know too much.
Of course it still isn't as great as it was back in the late 90's but it's actually better than it was in the mid 90's. I'll admit I don't enjoy it as much as I once did but I still appreciate it. Too many people nowadays watch it with a stupid amount of cynicism and then act all surprised when they're not satisfied after a ppv.
I agree but disagree a lot with what your saying. 90% of the matches now are mediocre. A lot of the wrestlers they have are fantastic at their set of moves and playing their mic' characters in the ring, but as actual wrestlers who can tell a story in the ring that makes it appear competitive and interesting, no. Wrestling in the early to mid 90's was a lot better then it was now. Everybody gets caught up in this late 90's business but I preffered the earlier stuff. Also WCW had better perfomers as well and wasn't just trying to be WWF mark 2. The likes of the rise of Bret Hart, the Undertaker was giving his best performances, Davey Boy Smith and Bret summer slam match was in 92. Then we had the rise of Shawn Michaels. They brought in the ladder match, ECW and Japan was starting to affect the performances of the large ppv matches and we were seeing matches that were a breath of fresh air. The WCW at the time had the likes of Sting, Vader, Cactus Jack and the Steiners in their prime performing in matches that piss all over anything you see today. We're not even in the mid 90's yet. My friend and I who are huge wrestling fans, (actually did pro wrestling training as well) were discussing this the other month, thinking was it just because we were younger, but then we even thought that early 00's was a fantastic period for the WWE as well. We watched some old matches on youtube, then both agreed that the only place we could find that level of in ring perfomance was mostly coming from Japan again and the odd ROH match.

So it's not just the naivety aspect, the fact is for me I feel is that it's all to diliuted and all the undercard stuff means jack squat anymore. Watching PPVs now is all about the top 2 main events. The rest seems so unimportant it's staggering so that when they fail to deliver it destroys the whole card, as oppposed to even the 80's where the undercard was so strong and the perfomances of the lesser wrestlers so great that the main event could just be a 10 minute pose-a-thon that gave a nice finality to the whole event and didn't leave you feeling ripped off.

The WWE does have a huge talent pool and there are some wrestlers in there who deserve to get some proper attention. I've been wanting the tag team league to be built up again properly for years, I want the Intercontinental championship to regain it's old prestige. I want for Raw and Smackdown to redifine how they operate, either as seperate identities that build from within and don't just swap the upper level wrestlers around every year, or to combine and get back to having one set of belts, the world championship, the midcard Intercontinental, the tag team and maybe a junior heavyweight title and thats it. Also I'd only have a roster swapping every 3 -4 years. This would then redefine why the wrestlers are there and mean that they would have to develop the stars so it's not all about the same thing year in year out.
gambit28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2012, 14:54   #2467 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Belfast,Northern Ireland
Posts: 17,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by 204Red View Post
The WWE is very lame these days...

Except for anything involving the Undertaker... then its awesome.

Literally, the only thing I find of any interest in Pro Wrestling is the Undertaker's entrance... on TV its captivating... and the timing of it is always bang on.
This.

Seeing it live in person though is something that does need to be experienced. The only wrestler to ever give me chills down my spine simply by walking to the ring.

Love him.
MUFCgal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2012, 16:24   #2468 (permalink)
"It's like..."
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Flagg
Posts: 2,095
Send a message via MSN to noodlehair
I've always thought it was incredibly unfair how much better Undertaker's entrance is compared to everyone elses.

Someone could perform a triple backflip from the top rope, scissor suplex an opponent out of the ring with their legs whilst in mid air, and then land perfectly on the adjacent turnbucle with their eyes closed, and as far as everyone in the arena is concerned, Undertake would still usurp them just by bothering to walk out when his music hits.
noodlehair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2012, 16:27   #2469 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Argh
Posts: 7,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by noodlehair View Post
I've always thought it was incredibly unfair how much better Undertaker's entrance is compared to everyone elses.

Someone could perform a triple backflip from the top rope, scissor suplex an opponent out of the ring with their legs whilst in mid air, and then land perfectly on the adjacent turnbucle with their eyes closed, and as far as everyone in the arena is concerned, Undertake would still usurp them just by bothering to walk out when his music hits.
Woah woah woah... he doesn't just walk... he walks extremely slowly.

And takes his hat off.
Annihilate Now! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2012, 16:29   #2470 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Belfast,Northern Ireland
Posts: 17,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by noodlehair View Post
I've always thought it was incredibly unfair how much better Undertaker's entrance is compared to everyone elses.

Someone could perform a triple backflip from the top rope, scissor suplex an opponent out of the ring with their legs whilst in mid air, and then land perfectly on the adjacent turnbucle with their eyes closed, and as far as everyone in the arena is concerned, Undertake would still usurp them just by bothering to walk out when his music hits.
It's not just the walking, it's the aura the man gives off.

You know you are looking at a legend.
MUFCgal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2012, 18:36   #2471 (permalink)
tasted George Michael
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by MUFCgal View Post
This.

Seeing it live in person though is something that does need to be experienced. The only wrestler to ever give me chills down my spine simply by walking to the ring.

Love him.
I think Stone Cold was another example of this. When the glass shatters and the audience reacts its a shiver down the spine moment.
RyanGoggs is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2012, 19:22   #2472 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: England; The home of James Bond, Fish and chips and Chavs!
Posts: 4,826
Taker is definately a legend, but he should never have dropped the deadman angle and gone with that ridiculous American bad ass character.

Only blip in an otherwise faultless career.
Garethw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2012, 19:37   #2473 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Argh
Posts: 7,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garethw View Post
Taker is definately a legend, but he should never have dropped the deadman angle and gone with that ridiculous American bad ass character.

Only blip in an otherwise faultless career.
You say this, but I would argue that that gimmick allowed him to become a better wrestler and into the great performer he has been ever since.

In the Badass gimmick, he could use different styles/moves that he wouldn't have used in his old-school Undertaker gimmick... and he could also wrestle different kinds of matches, which I think allowed him to become a better in-ring performer. He's brought those styles and moves forward back into the "Undertaker" gimmick, which has allowed him to have the multiple great matches that we've seen.

Here's a question... how many truly great, non-gimmicked wrestling matches did 'Taker have before he changed gimmick?? Off the top of my head I can't actually think of one... where as, in his time as the Badass and back as normal Undertaker I could name several, and not just the obvious ones against HBK.

As an aside, The Badass gimmick also allowed him to cut loose on the mic, and show that he is actually an excellent promo person too when given the chance.
Annihilate Now! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2012, 19:42   #2474 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Belfast,Northern Ireland
Posts: 17,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garethw View Post
Taker is definately a legend, but he should never have dropped the deadman angle and gone with that ridiculous American bad ass character.

Only blip in an otherwise faultless career.
I know not everyone was a fan of the biker gimmick, but I kind of liked it. He needed a change to freshen the character up, and it was more like seeing Mark Calaway then just a character.

My all time favourite gimmick through Taker's career was the Ministry, when he was all satanic and he used to do the sacrifices.
MUFCgal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2012, 19:48   #2475 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Belfast,Northern Ireland
Posts: 17,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronaldo No.9 View Post
This

Him and Billy Gunn were awesome back in the day, they certainly knew how to get a crowd going.

Mr Ass
MUFCgal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2012, 19:50   #2476 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Shrewsbury
Posts: 5,762
I reckon Taker was at his best around 2006, in terms of match quality. I'll agree that Ministry Taker was his best gimmick though.
Minkaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2012, 20:03   #2477 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Argh
Posts: 7,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minkaro View Post
I reckon Taker was at his best around 2006, in terms of match quality. I'll agree that Ministry Taker was his best gimmick though.
I'd go along with that... his match against Kurt Angle at No Way Out was incredible. MOTY for that year I would say.
Annihilate Now! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2012, 21:01   #2478 (permalink)
Scarlett woman ( Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn )
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 16,678
His biker gimmick was awful, as was his feud with DDP. And I really liked DDP years ago.

I used to like the ministry, but I think they fecked that up in the end too. Remeber he hung Big Bossman?
Randall Flagg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2012, 21:09   #2479 (permalink)
Coach
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rancho Cordova, California, USA
Posts: 14,268
I really liked the biker gimmick actually. Completely inconsistent with everything else, but I enjoyed it nonetheless. The whole invasion angle was messed up so the DDP thing doesn't bother me too much in context. Maybe as an American I can enjoy the "American Badass" persona a bit more, though of course that isn't the only factor.
jveezy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th February 2012, 21:14   #2480 (permalink)
tasted George Michael
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by jveezy View Post
I really liked the biker gimmick actually. Completely inconsistent with everything else, but I enjoyed it nonetheless. The whole invasion angle was messed up so the DDP thing doesn't bother me too much in context. Maybe as an American I can enjoy the "American Badass" persona a bit more, though of course that isn't the only factor.
I found it just a little bit too UnUndertaker. I mean, he still had the name but the gimmick just didn't really fit it. Nothing really beats Ministry Undertaker, that was so sinister and really well done, but to me the biker gimmick just didn't fit, despite it maybe closely portraying Mark Calloways real persona. It wasn't terrible but just not right.
RyanGoggs is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:52.

Back to top


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO