I nominate myself...

26 may 1999 · 5th February 2006, 18:00

As this forums first moderator...

I would also like superpowers such as being able to make stickies and the likes.

Plechazunga · 5th February 2006, 18:00

I nominate myself aswell

26 may 1999 · 5th February 2006, 18:04

Fair enough...

Two will be enough for now.

Come on Wibbs.

Make it so.

5th February 2006, 18:06

I don't think you can get forum specific moderators.

Murt · 5th February 2006, 18:08

very ruud should be a mod,
seeing as he's the only one willing to die for the cause.

Plechazunga · 5th February 2006, 18:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by 26 may 1999

Fair enough...

Two will be enough for now.

Come on Wibbs.

Make it so.

you're a tolerant man, Twenty-Sixth Of, given that I've never been to a FCUM game and only participate in discussions about them to wind both sides up

26 may 1999 · 5th February 2006, 18:19

Ahh...

But you like us.

fredthered · 5th February 2006, 19:10

Nice one.

26th for Mod....

Oh and Mickthered too.

We need a semi decent MOD. Someone who can see the links between MUFC and FCUM, rather than some weak knee'd panderer who lets their anti FCUM feelings interfere with being impartial.

H10 · 5th February 2006, 19:15

I nominate myself to be moderator of the Video forum...whoever disagrees can die or get bummed by sol campbell, your choice...

26 may 1999 · 5th February 2006, 19:17

I'll take death please.

H10 · 5th February 2006, 19:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by 26 may 1999

I'll take death please.

5th February 2006, 19:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dubai_Devil

I don't think you can get forum specific moderators.

Yes you can!

mickthered · 5th February 2006, 19:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by fredthered

Nice one.

26th for Mod....

Oh and Mickthered too.

We need a semi decent MOD. Someone who can see the links between MUFC and FCUM, rather than some weak knee'd panderer who lets their anti FCUM feelings interfere with being impartial.

Dosnt seem like you are allowed to see any links Fred

After all the crying about it yet they now seem to spend more time on here

They dont understand the links for the simple reason is that they dont care about Glazer as the nearest they will ever get to him is seeing him on the tv or hearing his name on the radio
To these people the prices going up etc at OT will not make any difference to them so why should they worry
They are happy if the prices go up as they think it will be more money for the club
Even if there is no one in the ground for games it will not bother them as long as they can sit at home and watch the game on TV

It seems to me that you are a "Top red " if you sit at home and watch the game on tv

But do the same and also watch FC United you are a traitor

ManUtdRed · 5th February 2006, 19:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dubai_Devil

I don't think you can get forum specific moderators.

You can. I'm a mod on this specific forum, as of today as it seems.

http://rush.myfreeforum.org/forum13.php

fredthered · 5th February 2006, 19:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by mickthered

Dosnt seem like you are allowed to see any links Fred

After all the crying about it yet they now seem to spend more time on here

They dont understand the links for the simple reason is that they dont care about Glazer as the nearest they will ever get to him is seeing him on the tv or hearing his name on the radio
To these people the prices going up etc at OT will not make any difference to them so why should they worry
They are happy if the prices go up as they think it will be more money for the club
Even if there is no one in the ground for games it will not bother them as long as they can sit at home and watch the game on TV

It seems to me that you are a "Top red " if you sit at home and watch the game on tv

But do the same and also watch FC United you are a traitor

Their true feelings are coming out now.

5th February 2006, 19:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by ManUtdRed

You can. I'm a mod on this specific forum, as of today as it seems.

http://rush.myfreeforum.org/forum13.php

I've told him that already, it didn't require your cheap and blatant attempt at publicity!

5th February 2006, 20:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by mickthered

They dont understand the links for the simple reason is that they dont care about Glazer as the nearest they will ever get to him is seeing him on the tv or hearing his name on the radio

I've told you before. FCUoM will have no effect on the Glazer issue at all. You are 6% of the OT gate, and about to become 5%. In fact, it's probably less than that, as quite a few FCUoM goers still go to OT.

fredthered · 5th February 2006, 20:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by WeasteDevil

I've told you before. FCUoM will have no effect on the Glazer issue at all. You are 6% of the OT gate, and about to become 5%.

How so, given attendances are RISING.

5th February 2006, 20:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by fredthered

How so, given attendances are RISING.

Because the capacity of OT is RISING! By a larger quantity than your gate.

fredthered · 5th February 2006, 20:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by WeasteDevil

Because the capacity of OT is RISING! By a larger quantity than your gate.

Have they sold the tickets already then ?

fredthered · 5th February 2006, 20:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by WeasteDevil

Because the capacity of OT is RISING! By a larger quantity than your gate.

and you dont think that FCUMs attendances can grow steadily, as opposed to a one of increase.

Were you not saying we would all go back by christmas. Erm can you tell me how many have gone back, in comparison to the numbers who at the end of this season will jack in their STs at OT and go to FCUM full time.

5th February 2006, 20:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by fredthered

Have they sold the tickets already then ?

I dunno, but I bet you that once those stands are open, our home gate record (OT - 70,504 against Villa 27/12/1920) will fall. After 86 years!

5th February 2006, 20:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by fredthered

and you dont think that FCUMs attendances can grow steadily, as opposed to a one of increase.

Were you not saying we would all go back by christmas. Erm can you tell me how many have gone back, in comparison to the numbers who at the end of this season will jack in their STs at OT and go to FCUM full time.

Of course you can grow. But you will not grow at even a linear rate, never mind exponential. You will hit the top of your bell curve very soon I predict.

As for the numbers that have left United for little United exclusively, you can't give me those numbers, and thus neither can I reciprocate

Yesterday however, the gate against Fulham was 67,844.

5th February 2006, 20:12

I nominate me.

fredthered · 5th February 2006, 20:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by WeasteDevil

Of course you can grow. But you will not grow at even a linear rate, never mind exponential. You will hit the top of your bell curve very soon I predict.

As for the numbers that have left United for little United exclusively, you can't give me those numbers, and thus neither can I reciprocate

Yesterday however, the gate against Fulham was 67,844.

You lot predicted we would all be back by christmas and you were wrong.

5th February 2006, 20:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by fredthered

You lot predicted we would all be back by christmas and you were wrong.

Many of you clearly are looking at the gate.

And what do you mean by "You lot"? I've never questioned the existence of FCUoM for those who cannot afford to go to OT have I? All I have ever questioned is the capability of FCUoM to effect the Glazer situation at OT, and I will still contest that it will and cannot have any effect. From this came by second observation that those who could not afford to go to OT could have gone and supported Altrincham or Ashton, etc. This second observation is put down however by the response "If we did that we couldn't stand next to other United supporters and support United could we?". Well, of course not, because Ashton Town, Alty, whatever, is not Manchester United, and neither is FCUoM Manchester United. That's the point.

I've no problem with FCUoM; I do however have a problem with a faction of their support getting high and mighty with the rest of us and claiming that they are the true supporters, and FCUoM is the saviour of Manchester united and will have an effect on the situation at OT. It clearly will not, and those that left that could have afforded to stay are the Judases not those who didn't go to FCUoM.

The idea of the supporters owning the club is a great concept, I come across blokes that own part of a very large football club (Barcelona) every day. Thing is, Manchester United will never be in that position for at least as long as I live, and possibly never. And, for FCUoM to have any effect on Manchester nited itself, it will have to throw all of its ideals out of the window.

It's a road to nowhere regarding Manchester United. But that's my opinion on the matter. I do not begrudge any of you fo supporting FCUoM or the existence of FCUoM, and I wish you every success.

I do however dislike this connection between FCUoM and Manchester United being forced down my and other people's throat because the connection is entirely a one way matter: 6% of Manchester United's OT match going supporters support FCUoM; 94% of Manchester United's OT match going supporters do not support FCUoM; 99% at most of FCUoM's match going supporters are Manchester United supporters. The gates speak for themselves.

Good luck to you all, and I will not upset your new forum anymore.

mickthered · 5th February 2006, 21:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by WeasteDevil

Many of you clearly are looking at the gate.

And what do you mean by "You lot"? I've never questioned the existence of FCUoM for those who cannot afford to go to OT have I? All I have ever questioned is the capability of FCUoM to effect the Glazer situation at OT, and I will still contest that it will and cannot have any effect. From this came by second observation that those who could not afford to go to OT could have gone and supported Altrincham or Ashton, etc. This second observation is put down however by the response "If we did that we couldn't stand next to other United supporters and support United could we?". Well, of course not, because Ashton Town, Alty, whatever, is not Manchester United, and neither is FCUoM Manchester United. That's the point.

I've no problem with FCUoM; I do however have a problem with a faction of their support getting high and mighty with the rest of us and claiming that they are the true supporters, and FCUoM is the saviour of Manchester united and will have an effect on the situation at OT. It clearly will not, and those that left that could have afforded to stay are the Judases not those who didn't go to FCUoM.

The idea of the supporters owning the club is a great concept, I come across blokes that own part of a very large football club (Barcelona) every day. Thing is, Manchester United will never be in that position for at least as long as I live, and possibly never. And, for FCUoM to have any effect on Manchester nited itself, it will have to throw all of its ideals out of the window.

It's a road to nowhere regarding Manchester United. But that's my opinion on the matter. I do not begrudge any of you fo supporting FCUoM or the existence of FCUoM, and I wish you every success.

I do however dislike this connection between FCUoM and Manchester United being forced down my and other people's throat because the connection is entirely a one way matter: 6% of Manchester United's OT match going supporters support FCUoM; 94% of Manchester United's OT match going supporters do not support FCUoM; 99% at most of FCUoM's match going supporters are Manchester United supporters. The gates speak for themselves.

Good luck to you all, and I will not upset your new forum anymore.

Seems obvious that you want the fans split into different camps

As you say dislike any any sort of connection

Looks like anyone can post shit about FC United

But FC United fans can not post an opinion on United or just to make that Clear MU

fredthered · 5th February 2006, 22:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by WeasteDevil

Many of you clearly are looking at the gate.

And what do you mean by "You lot"? I've never questioned the existence of FCUoM for those who cannot afford to go to OT have I? All I have ever questioned is the capability of FCUoM to effect the Glazer situation at OT, and I will still contest that it will and cannot have any effect. From this came by second observation that those who could not afford to go to OT could have gone and supported Altrincham or Ashton, etc. This second observation is put down however by the response "If we did that we couldn't stand next to other United supporters and support United could we?". Well, of course not, because Ashton Town, Alty, whatever, is not Manchester United, and neither is FCUoM Manchester United. That's the point.

I've no problem with FCUoM; I do however have a problem with a faction of their support getting high and mighty with the rest of us and claiming that they are the true supporters, and FCUoM is the saviour of Manchester united and will have an effect on the situation at OT. It clearly will not, and those that left that could have afforded to stay are the Judases not those who didn't go to FCUoM.

The idea of the supporters owning the club is a great concept, I come across blokes that own part of a very large football club (Barcelona) every day. Thing is, Manchester United will never be in that position for at least as long as I live, and possibly never. And, for FCUoM to have any effect on Manchester nited itself, it will have to throw all of its ideals out of the window.

It's a road to nowhere regarding Manchester United. But that's my opinion on the matter. I do not begrudge any of you fo supporting FCUoM or the existence of FCUoM, and I wish you every success.

I do however dislike this connection between FCUoM and Manchester United being forced down my and other people's throat because the connection is entirely a one way matter: 6% of Manchester United's OT match going supporters support FCUoM; 94% of Manchester United's OT match going supporters do not support FCUoM; 99% at most of FCUoM's match going supporters are Manchester United supporters. The gates speak for themselves.

Good luck to you all, and I will not upset your new forum anymore.

Thats the biggest load of uneducated bullshit ever to grace the Caf

You quote "6%" and "94%" as if they are confirmed figures. You havent a fucking clue who goes to FCUM or Man United.

I know of dozens of supporters who have STs at OT who wont be renewing this year. Currently they are loaning them out, but they have said they wont be doing it again this year.

As for who is "YOU LOT" its the Glazer apologists, who know the problems, who can see what is happening, but havent the will power to fight against it.

Thats the irony of all this. Those with the guts to fight ate being cast aside, whilst the ones who are too scared to get involved take over....

5th February 2006, 22:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by fredthered

Thats the biggest load of uneducated bullshit ever to grace the Caf

You quote "6%" and "94%" as if they are confirmed figures. You havent a fucking clue who goes to FCUM or Man United.

I know of dozens of supporters who have STs at OT who wont be renewing this year. Currently they are loaning them out, but they have said they wont be doing it again this year.

As for who is "YOU LOT" its the Glazer apologists, who know the problems, who can see what is happening, but havent the will power to fight against it.

Thats the irony of all this. Those with the guts to fight ate being cast aside, whilst the ones who are too scared to get involved take over....

Ok, thanks for answering my points professor!

fredthered · 5th February 2006, 22:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by WeasteDevil

Ok, thanks for answering my points professor!

You havent made a point. You have spouted out a load of inane bollocks that is so wrong on so many counts, I would be in my 90s before I answered them all.

You havent a clue about FC United, so why are you even entering the debate.

Its like me trying to talk to brain surgeons about the finer points of the inner Cranium. I have a clue, and that would be evident the moment I made my first point. Such is the case with you.

You dont know what you are talking about, so how about you piss off to your own forum, and leave those that care about the future of United, to our own devices....

Wibble · 6th February 2006, 00:15

This has happend because both sides can't play nicely.

Any other motive would have seen this forum as a sub forum of the Football forum.

It was not done because any of the mods are anti FCUoM. In fact far from it. If for example I was anti-FCUoM then being called a wanker yesterday would have resulted in bans. In fact all it did was confirm that the evangelical FCUoM component need their own playroom.

6th February 2006, 00:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wibble

This has happend because both sides can't play nicely.

Any other motive would have seen this forum as a sub forum of the Football forum.

It was not done because any of the mods are anti FCUoM. In fact far from it. If for example I was anti-FCUoM then being called a wanker yesterday would have resulted in bans. In fact all it did was confirm that the evangelical FCUoM component need their own playroom.

You should have banned VR. Not for calling you a wanker. Just for being.

Wibble · 6th February 2006, 00:23

That is a vey different argument.

And one that could/would result in thousands of posters being banned. Just can't be arsed TBH.

fredthered · 6th February 2006, 00:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wibble

This has happend because both sides can't play nicely.

Any other motive would have seen this forum as a sub forum of the Football forum.

It was not done because any of the mods are anti FCUoM. In fact far from it. If for example I was anti-FCUoM then being called a wanker yesterday would have resulted in bans. In fact all it did was confirm that the evangelical FCUoM component need their own playroom.

Oh so thats the score is it

Call a mod a wanker and get banned.

Call an FC United supporter a traitor, and fuck all happens.

That about says it all.

FC United, not worth worrying about

Mods - The be all and end all of the Caf......

The Hairdryer · 6th February 2006, 00:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by fredthered

Oh so thats the score is it

Call a mod a wanker and get banned.

Call an FC United supporter a traitor, and fuck all happens.

That about says it all.

FC United, not worth worrying about

Mods - The be all and end all of the Caf......

6th February 2006, 00:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by fredthered

Call a mod a wanker and get banned.

No, he wasn't banned.

fredthered · 6th February 2006, 00:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Hairdryer

Arent you in the wrong forum.

Shouldnt you be in the "glazers are my best friend" forum....

Wibble · 6th February 2006, 00:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by fredthered

Oh so thats the score is it

Call a mod a wanker and get banned.

Call an FC United supporter a traitor, and fuck all happens.

That about says it all.

FC United, not worth worrying about

Mods - The be all and end all of the Caf......

Are you simple? I was saying that if I was in any way anti-FCUoM then I would have used being called a wanker as an excuse to ban one of the more irritating people on here.

Is that easy enough to understand?

Kinell

The Hairdryer · 6th February 2006, 00:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by fredthered

Arent you in the wrong forum.

Shouldnt you be in the "glazers are my best friend" forum....

Cutting.

I've been asleep for eight hours, I wake and you're all still in a hissy fit. You lot remind me of and eight year old who's dropped his bottom lip and had a temper tantrum because he's just been moved out of his bedroom into the little one because some relatives are visting.

I find it all too amusing.

fredthered · 6th February 2006, 00:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wibble

Are you simple? I was saying that if I was in any way anti-FCUoM then I would have used being called a wanker as an excuse to ban one of the more irritating people on here.

Is that easy enough to understand?

Kinell

So if you call a Mod a wanker its a banning offence.. No matter how much of a wanker he is being....

I shall bear that in mind.

Do you masturbate ?

5th February 2006, 18:00	#1 (permalink)
26 may 1999 Striker Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: MUFCUM...Manc-Union. Posts: 21,156	I nominate myself... As this forums first moderator... I would also like superpowers such as being able to make stickies and the likes.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

RedCafe.net

The Leading Manchester United Forum

Member's Login

I nominate myself...

Latest Forum Topics

Jump to Forum

Not yet registered?

5th February 2006, 18:00	#2 (permalink)
Plechazunga Phones, soup, paint, chairs and computers are troubling. Join Date: May 2003 Location: Where Albert Stubbins scored a diving header Posts: 47,728	I nominate myself aswell

5th February 2006, 18:04	#3 (permalink)
26 may 1999 Striker Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: MUFCUM...Manc-Union. Posts: 21,156	Fair enough... Two will be enough for now. Come on Wibbs. Make it so.

5th February 2006, 18:06	#4 (permalink)
Dubai_Devil Guest Posts: n/a	I don't think you can get forum specific moderators.

5th February 2006, 18:08	#5 (permalink)
Murt Banned Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Dimmer than Welsh Red Posts: 17,065	very ruud should be a mod, seeing as he's the only one willing to die for the cause.

5th February 2006, 18:19	#7 (permalink)
26 may 1999 Striker Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: MUFCUM...Manc-Union. Posts: 21,156	Ahh... But you like us.

5th February 2006, 19:10	#8 (permalink)
fredthered I want Peter Kenyon back Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: UK Posts: 17,985	Nice one. 26th for Mod.... Oh and Mickthered too. We need a semi decent MOD. Someone who can see the links between MUFC and FCUM, rather than some weak knee'd panderer who lets their anti FCUM feelings interfere with being impartial.

5th February 2006, 19:15	#9 (permalink)
H10 Huseyin 10 Join Date: May 2004 Location: London Posts: 9,243	I nominate myself to be moderator of the Video forum...whoever disagrees can die or get bummed by sol campbell, your choice...

5th February 2006, 19:17	#10 (permalink)
26 may 1999 Striker Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: MUFCUM...Manc-Union. Posts: 21,156	I'll take death please.

5th February 2006, 20:12	#24 (permalink)
Slabber Guest Posts: n/a	I nominate me.

6th February 2006, 00:15	#31 (permalink)
Wibble Ingadus Speramus Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Centre Back Posts: 49,870	This has happend because both sides can't play nicely. Any other motive would have seen this forum as a sub forum of the Football forum. It was not done because any of the mods are anti FCUoM. In fact far from it. If for example I was anti-FCUoM then being called a wanker yesterday would have resulted in bans. In fact all it did was confirm that the evangelical FCUoM component need their own playroom.

6th February 2006, 00:23	#33 (permalink)
Wibble Ingadus Speramus Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Centre Back Posts: 49,870	That is a vey different argument. And one that could/would result in thousands of posters being banned. Just can't be arsed TBH.