RedCafe.net  
 

Go Back   RedCafe.net > Football Discussion > Manchester United Forum > FCUoM
Forum Register Arcade FAQ Mark Forums Read Archives

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 5th October 2006, 22:40   #81 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Geeb's favourite poster
Posts: 5,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRedFlag
us lot nobbing off?

thats a good one, i still go to OT on a regular basis (hint hint) but I can easily recognise that the soul of Manchester United has gone.
That happened a long time ago
Guvnorgaz is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old 5th October 2006, 22:50   #82 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,602
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guvnorgaz
They hate old Malc and the boys but are happy to use their club to try and promote their own by making people think the two are linked
It is pretty obvious that the two are linked. 90+% of FC supporters are also United fans.

Like you, I don't see Glazer as THE reason for FC existing. Football has been changing for years. All-seater stadia, the premiership and Sky were big recent factors in this continuing move from football as sport to football as business. The club being bought by a billionaire from a non-footballing country was the straw that broke the camel's back for many.

I remember being shocked when a middle-aged bloke told me he no longer followed football because of the emphasis on money. The overpaid, image-obsessed players move from club to club because the were offered bigger contracts or were 'too big' for the club that had nurtured them. He complained about the lack of integrity and common decency and how it was no longer the game he grew up with. I didn't understand what he meant. That was in about 1970 and now I often feel the same.
dicko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2006, 23:06   #83 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Geeb's favourite poster
Posts: 5,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by dicko
It is pretty obvious that the two are linked. 90+% of FC supporters are also United fans.

Like you, I don't see Glazer as THE reason for FC existing. Football has been changing for years. All-seater stadia, the premiership and Sky were big recent factors in this continuing move from football as sport to football as business. The club being bought by a billionaire from a non-footballing country was the straw that broke the camel's back for many.

I remember being shocked when a middle-aged bloke told me he no longer followed football because of the emphasis on money. The overpaid, image-obsessed players move from club to club because the were offered bigger contracts or were 'too big' for the club that had nurtured them. He complained about the lack of integrity and common decency and how it was no longer the game he grew up with. I didn't understand what he meant. That was in about 1970 and now I often feel the same.
The fans are as much to blame for the money men in football always looking to make as much money as possible, thsi summer was a prime example, we spent 14m on Carrick, tried to buy Hargreaves and still we get fuckwits moaning about the lack of transfer cash, where do they think the money comes from? If the club dropped ticket prices and only made 10m profit each year and spent half on players they would all be whining like fuck. Its obvious that if fans moan about the lack of transfers then the first thing any club will do is stick ticket prices up
Guvnorgaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2006, 23:37   #84 (permalink)
Bitterer than a bitter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Stretford
Posts: 7,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by jasonrh
Umm, starting this thread in the MUFC forum is a deliberate attempt to start the same old bullshit FCUM vs. MUFC nonsense yet again.

Hence, it is designed to be a WUM. The fact it was moved illustrates my point.

I know its a tough concept for someone like you with his head so far up his fucking twat to understand, but there it is.
You've missed the point. The aggro was started by Manchester United supporters. If United had kicked off at, say Villa, would it have been a 'WUM'? The fact it was moved just indicates that some of the Mods on here don't like proper debates, they prefer threads like "Gary Neville: Legend. Discuss".

If you ever make it to Manchester we can have a chat. That's not a threat, I'll probably be about 80 by then and unable to use physical force against you.
ralphie88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2006, 00:20   #85 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,602
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guvnorgaz
The fans are as much to blame for the money men in football always looking to make as much money as possible, thsi summer was a prime example, we spent 14m on Carrick, tried to buy Hargreaves and still we get fuckwits moaning about the lack of transfer cash, where do they think the money comes from? If the club dropped ticket prices and only made 10m profit each year and spent half on players they would all be whining like fuck. Its obvious that if fans moan about the lack of transfers then the first thing any club will do is stick ticket prices up
A problem is when we talk about 'the fans', 'the clubs' and 'the players'. There are huge differences of opinion within each group.

The majority of 'the fans' demand success and big name players. To provide this 'the clubs' need to raise money from whatever source they can, including the fans. There are, however, fans at all clubs who disagree with this attitude.

United fans were the first to take their disagreement as far as creating another club*. I don't see FC as a rival club because they are unlikely to ever rival United.

I guess most FC fans see United as their first club and FC as their second. Most other people also have a second team. The level of support for it varies. It might be as little as checking the results when they remember every month or so. It might be watching them play on a regular basis.

FC gives disillusioned United fans a place to vent their opposition to the changes without entirely leaving United. Other clubs' fans may start similar clubs and, perhaps, the voice of protest will be heard. I doubt if 'mass conscience' will ever win over 'mass greed' but politicians or regulators may step in if things become too vocal.

*I don't count Wimbledon. The club left the area.
dicko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2006, 01:05   #86 (permalink)
Chef and honorary fat bloke in the Warrington Gimp Collective
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Quietly going about my business.
Posts: 16,650
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRedFlag
Twats - as are all those who dislike FCUM.
agreed.
Shane Bluck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th October 2006, 09:23   #87 (permalink)
Youth Team Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Manchester
Posts: 181
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Kippax Kid
im a manc lass, i support city, i didnt support anyone the other night, i went because i like football.
That part wasn't meant for you but the rest of the forum should have made myself clearer.......did you enjoy the game what did you think about they way Salford played?
Moorsey1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2006, 08:46   #88 (permalink)
Anagram of Peter Crouch
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: L.S. Lowry, Albert Finney, Vinegar Vera, Ben Kingsley, Anthony H, Hooky and Barney, Paul Scholes, John Cooper Clarke, Shaun Ryder, Heightmassive - The pride of Salford.
Posts: 5,334
It's all very sad this.

Has it been established who they were? Were they just a bunch of scrotes from Weaste?

I go casually to FC and enjoy it, if it starts getting to the point where things are really militant and there's aggro, it'll put the floaters like me off.

Funnily enough there was a bloke behind me a few weeks back that got smacked for wearing an FC cap. Bloke in the Stretford end twatted for wearing an FC hat

Do the FC regulars feel theres more of an 'us and them' attitude this year?
heightmassive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2006, 11:36   #89 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: It's not the colour of your shirt that counts, it's the colour of your heart
Posts: 2,891
Send a message via Yahoo to redfan
Quote:
Originally Posted by heightmassive
It's all very sad this.

Has it been established who they were? Were they just a bunch of scrotes from Weaste?

I go casually to FC and enjoy it, if it starts getting to the point where things are really militant and there's aggro, it'll put the floaters like me off.

Funnily enough there was a bloke behind me a few weeks back that got smacked for wearing an FC cap. Bloke in the Stretford end twatted for wearing an FC hat

Do the FC regulars feel theres more of an 'us and them' attitude this year?
I think that there are a small minority of big United fans who have a problem with FC, at the end of the day FC is a protest against Glazer, football or prices, it is not a protest against United. It will not put me off it will make me dig my heels in, makes me wonder who in fact is the judas.
redfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2006, 15:24   #90 (permalink)
A bit of a brute
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: A beaut of a Brit
Posts: 1,669
Which is the jobsworth mod then? This United issue has sat happily in the correct forum for 5 days. Why move it now?
northroad1878 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2006, 21:01   #91 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Glazer wherever you be, You bought Old Trafford, but you can't buy me, I said "Not for sale" and I meant just that, you can't buy me you greedy twat!
Posts: 528
Here you go I'll tell you the score.

Once upon a time Manchester United fans were a right bunch of cunts. Everyone hated us and we went round England mob-handed causing trouble. During this time a man called Tony became a "face" and started slapping non-United fans. By all accounts he was good at it (if he says so himself in not one but two books) and went on to become one of the main "faces" in United's "firm".

Fast forward to recently and Tony can't watch United in England anymore because he's permanently banned from all football grounds. So he sets up a travel company to organise tours in Europe. Sounds great... get to watch United and make a few quid, plus if it kicks off abroad Tony is with you.

FC is formed basically from Red Issue, UWS and IMUSA-wallas who all know who Tony is because they've time served reds, home and away.

Tony asks FC if he can organise the coaches for FC away games. FC think this is a shit idea because his reputation will smear FC.

Tony gets upset because now he can't do coaches and the people going watching FC are the same people who went on loads of Euro aways so he's lost twice.

Tony starts a smear campaign against FC, cuminating in trying to get into Gigg Lane with his mates with the banner and then going to Salford with it.

Tony and his mates dropped a proper bollock because chanting "USA!" and "There's only one Malcolm Glazer" whilst getting no repsonse from FC fans has alienated them from match going reds.

So I wouldn't worry about going to watch FC... especially at Gigg Lane where the police will stop him and his mates from going in.
ladybarnred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2006, 22:23   #92 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,602
Quote:
Originally Posted by redfan
I think that there are a small minority of big United fans who have a problem with FC, at the end of the day FC is a protest against Glazer, football or prices, it is not a protest against United. It will not put me off it will make me dig my heels in, makes me wonder who in fact is the judas.
You've summed up eighteen months of my thinking in half a sentence.
dicko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2006, 23:45   #93 (permalink)
Look, I'm a cunt, can type in colour so I must be important.
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Outside Right
Posts: 5,046
Send a message via AIM to Nem 7 Send a message via MSN to Nem 7 Send a message via Yahoo to Nem 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by ralphie88
Y The fact it was moved just indicates that some of the Mods on here don't like proper debates, they prefer threads like "Gary Neville: Legend. Discuss".
That's so true.

Nem 7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2006, 23:51   #94 (permalink)
Bitterer than a bitter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Stretford
Posts: 7,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladybarnred
Here you go I'll tell you the score.

Once upon a time Manchester United fans were a right bunch of cunts. Everyone hated us and we went round England mob-handed causing trouble. During this time a man called Tony became a "face" and started slapping non-United fans. By all accounts he was good at it (if he says so himself in not one but two books) and went on to become one of the main "faces" in United's "firm".

Fast forward to recently and Tony can't watch United in England anymore because he's permanently banned from all football grounds. So he sets up a travel company to organise tours in Europe. Sounds great... get to watch United and make a few quid, plus if it kicks off abroad Tony is with you.

FC is formed basically from Red Issue, UWS and IMUSA-wallas who all know who Tony is because they've time served reds, home and away.

Tony asks FC if he can organise the coaches for FC away games. FC think this is a shit idea because his reputation will smear FC.

Tony gets upset because now he can't do coaches and the people going watching FC are the same people who went on loads of Euro aways so he's lost twice.

Tony starts a smear campaign against FC, cuminating in trying to get into Gigg Lane with his mates with the banner and then going to Salford with it.

Tony and his mates dropped a proper bollock because chanting "USA!" and "There's only one Malcolm Glazer" whilst getting no repsonse from FC fans has alienated them from match going reds.

So I wouldn't worry about going to watch FC... especially at Gigg Lane where the police will stop him and his mates from going in.
Close but no cigar.

1. FC is nothing to do with SU/MUST. In fact MUST are well aware that FC diverts funds from the trust.

2. The cops can't stop TON going to FC as bans don't apply to that level of football, only FC can do that. And the last time TON went to FC, he was not prevented from entering (although he decided not to do so).

3. TON wasn't at Salford.
ralphie88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th October 2006, 01:57   #95 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: It's not the colour of your shirt that counts, it's the colour of your heart
Posts: 2,891
Send a message via Yahoo to redfan
Quote:
Originally Posted by ralphie88
Close but no cigar.

1. FC is nothing to do with SU/MUST. In fact MUST are well aware that FC diverts funds from the trust.

2. The cops can't stop TON going to FC as bans don't apply to that level of football, only FC can do that. And the last time TON went to FC, he was not prevented from entering (although he decided not to do so).

3. TON wasn't at Salford.
I still support MUST, I support FC but I will never give Glazer a fucking penny.
redfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th October 2006, 09:40   #96 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Glazer wherever you be, You bought Old Trafford, but you can't buy me, I said "Not for sale" and I meant just that, you can't buy me you greedy twat!
Posts: 528
Quote:
Originally Posted by ralphie88
Close but no cigar.

1. FC is nothing to do with SU/MUST. In fact MUST are well aware that FC diverts funds from the trust.

2. The cops can't stop TON going to FC as bans don't apply to that level of football, only FC can do that. And the last time TON went to FC, he was not prevented from entering (although he decided not to do so).

3. TON wasn't at Salford.
1. Never mentioned MUST/SU. FC was formed from UWS/RI/IMUSA.... obviously from the board members.

Plus if you're saying money is being diverted from FCs trust, I'd hire a solicitor... quick!

2. They can stop him he is banned from football LEAGUE GROUNDS. He can't walk on the other side SMB Way because it's too close to OT. Gigg Lane is a League Ground (until the end of the season at least ) so he can't come in. He can go to most other places FC play.

3. Didn't see him... but that's his banner, and those were his dick-head mates.

The worst of this is that whilst those fucking planks itimidate women and children at FC, Glazer walks the streets unchallenged apart from the actions of FFU and they're full of FC fans?!?!?
ladybarnred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th October 2006, 17:00   #97 (permalink)
Bitterer than a bitter
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Stretford
Posts: 7,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladybarnred
1. Never mentioned MUST/SU. FC was formed from UWS/RI/IMUSA.... obviously from the board members.

Plus if you're saying money is being diverted from FCs trust, I'd hire a solicitor... quick!

2. They can stop him he is banned from football LEAGUE GROUNDS. He can't walk on the other side SMB Way because it's too close to OT. Gigg Lane is a League Ground (until the end of the season at least ) so he can't come in. He can go to most other places FC play.
1. Apologies, you didn't mention MUST/SU at all, my mistake. And what I was trying to say was that the existence of FC diverted funds from MUST. Mi lud.

2. No I'm afraid you are wrong on that - it is matches, not grounds that are designated for the purposed of the Football Disorder Act (but grounds not matches that are designated for other purposes - eg Sporting Events Act 1985). So he could go to Gigg Lane if he wanted.
ralphie88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th October 2006, 10:01   #98 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Glazer wherever you be, You bought Old Trafford, but you can't buy me, I said "Not for sale" and I meant just that, you can't buy me you greedy twat!
Posts: 528
Quote:
Originally Posted by ralphie88
1. Apologies, you didn't mention MUST/SU at all, my mistake. And what I was trying to say was that the existence of FC diverted funds from MUST. Mi lud.

2. No I'm afraid you are wrong on that - it is matches, not grounds that are designated for the purposed of the Football Disorder Act (but grounds not matches that are designated for other purposes - eg Sporting Events Act 1985). So he could go to Gigg Lane if he wanted.
1 - It'll never stand up in court... where there's blame there's a claim!

2 - Really?... well you live and learn
ladybarnred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd October 2006, 01:07   #99 (permalink)
I want Peter Kenyon back
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 14,491
Lets clear this up..

The two twats on the pitch WERE NOT United fans.

No United fan would stand singing "USA USA" and attempt to start fights with other reds. Those two people were just troublemakers there to stir up shite where there was no shite to stir up.

For one reason or another I know better than anyone else what those two knobheads were doing, and I can assure you they went with the intention of getting some trouble going, and thats precisely what happened...
fredthered is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:55.

Forum Register FAQ Mark Forums Read Archives Contact Us Top

Copyright © RedCafe.net 1997-2008.
RedCafe.net is in no way authorised by or connected with Manchester United [insert appropriate acronym] or the official club website.
The views and opinions expressed within this site are those of the specified authors.
Externally linked content is the property of the relevant copyright holder.
Powered by vBulletin®

LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0