![]() |
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: "You sir, are the syphilitic cockbiscuit son of a hamster rimmer."; "Sir Alex Ferguson, trainer of the English champions, wants to start the spoon fruits since early."
Posts: 58,953
|
Quote:
It was so popular that aside from a temporary change in the crest in 1978/79, we wore it for five years. The whole idea of FCUofM is obviously to recreate the grass roots football many older supporters love and enjoyed. Having a retro style kit seems pretty obvious and quite a nice touch. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: May 2004
Location: S Wales
Posts: 670
|
If I can put an outsider's view....
Someone once said that a camel is a horse that was designed by a committee, and it appears that some of you think that this shirt has elements of that about it. But it's not that bad, surely? I've seen dozens of worse designs and if I was a supporter (which I'm not) and they made one big enough to fit a lard-arse like me (some fucking chance...) I'd wear it. And ripping off the fans?? Well that depends on the difference between the price theyr are bought in at and the price they're sold to the fans. It's a subjective issue and one that can only be answered by the people who actually run FCUOM. Last edited by Barry Red : 2nd July 2007 at 20:22. Reason: incomplete |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
GTBTB
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Red Republik
Posts: 20,930
|
Quote:
It does look like it onlt cost a couple of quid to produce that shirt. It's on sale for £27 is it? Won't go over old ground, but should have made a bigger point of charging a lot less... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
I want Peter Kenyon back
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 14,491
|
Quote:
Why should the club charge less ? Every penny of profit goes back into the club and makes it possible to charge adults on average £6 a game and £1 a game for kids. The difference is by paying £27 I know where the money is going, I know EXACTLY what its being used for, and I dont begrudge paying it because ultimately it helps the club. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
First Team Sub
|
Quote:
And with no shirt sponsorship to subsidise them |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
GTBTB
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Red Republik
Posts: 20,930
|
Quote:
Why incidently is there no shirt sponsership? Is that a statement? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
I want Peter Kenyon back
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 14,491
|
Quote:
The shirt belongs to FC and no one else.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: "You sir, are the syphilitic cockbiscuit son of a hamster rimmer."; "Sir Alex Ferguson, trainer of the English champions, wants to start the spoon fruits since early."
Posts: 58,953
|
Except of course the advertising for the manufacturer on your chest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
|
I want Peter Kenyon back
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 14,491
|
Quote:
When you buy a Toyota car and its got their logo on it, does that mean they are advertising on your car ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
Youth Team Player
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Manchester la la la
Posts: 354
|
[quote=fredthered;3450348]Its not an advertisement. Its the brand of shirt, no different to any other piece of sporting equipment you buy...
When you buy a Toyota car and its got their logo on it, does that mean they are advertising on your car ?[/QUOTE] Yes of course they are! don't be naive, it doesn't suit you Every company does it though, tis the way of our world right now You are still right though, no different to any other sporting equipment and would be tough to get made without it |
|
|
|