Go Back   RedCafe.net > Football Discussion > Manchester United Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 4th February 2012, 20:06   #241 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Kids are the Future ✹
Posts: 10,730
Hughes is under a sort of obligation to Macheda. Loan spells aren't done with a dartboard, I'm sure there were conversations about his plans for Macheda. Newcastle wasn't required to play Rossi, but SAF was none too pleased with the loan spell, and we haven't loaned a player to Newcastle since.
gooDevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2012, 20:20   #242 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: E236:24:101 PSN:FrozenInHell BetfairPromo: UTFAKVVTJ
Posts: 12,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by gooDevil View Post
Hughes is under a sort of obligation to Macheda. Loan spells aren't done with a dartboard, I'm sure there were conversations about his plans for Macheda. Newcastle wasn't required to play Rossi, but SAF was none too pleased with the loan spell, and we haven't loaned a player to Newcastle since.
But it was Warnock who signed Macheda. Hughes has since signed Zamora and Cisse and may not like Macheda.
RonaldoVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2012, 20:30   #243 (permalink)
Rød grød med fløde
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Denmark
Posts: 3,071
Quote:
Originally Posted by gooDevil View Post
Hughes is under a sort of obligation to Macheda. Loan spells aren't done with a dartboard, I'm sure there were conversations about his plans for Macheda. Newcastle wasn't required to play Rossi, but SAF was none too pleased with the loan spell, and we haven't loaned a player to Newcastle since.
I understand what you're saying, but like RonaldoVII is saying; different managers. The QPR board holds some responsibility though as I see it. They knew Warnock was on the verge of getting fired. QPR hasn't done anything wrong in this case, but I think it's fairly certain that they won't get another player on loan from United in the near future. I doubt the owner will care though, considering the money he's throwing around.

Regarding calling back Macheda (as some has suggested) I don't think it's actually possible. I think the PL rules state that loans run from transfer window to transfer window, so Macheda is stuck there till summer.
Wowi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2012, 20:36   #244 (permalink)
Cuckoo
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canada,
Posts: 1,709
we lost a big talent for the next few months
England1966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2012, 21:04   #245 (permalink)
Twitter bot
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham + Londinium
Posts: 9,977
One thing is sure.........

he needs to go on loan next season so early as possible to the club, he needs a pre-season.
Sean_RedDevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2012, 21:18   #246 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Kids are the Future ✹
Posts: 10,730
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonaldoVII View Post
But it was Warnock who signed Macheda. Hughes has since signed Zamora and Cisse and may not like Macheda.
Ah, that does made a huge difference, I obviously thought this happened after Hughes got there.

What bad luck for Macheda, after the same thing happening at Sampdoria!
gooDevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2012, 21:39   #247 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Rehovot, Israel
Posts: 16,092
Send a message via ICQ to Amir
Quote:
Originally Posted by gooDevil View Post
Newcastle wasn't required to play Rossi, but SAF was none too pleased with the loan spell, and we haven't loaned a player to Newcastle since.
Maybe they just didn't want anyone. If we refuse to send a player on loan to a club because they didn't let a previous loanee play much it's silly. It's about who the manager is, not what club it is.

If we can recall Macheda now and send him on loan to the Championship, we should. He's not going to play at QPR now. It's no one's fault. A manager took him on loan and was then sacked, and his replacement has other ideas. Fair enough, as long as they don't insisnt that he stays for nothing.
Amir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2012, 21:46   #248 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: E236:24:101 PSN:FrozenInHell BetfairPromo: UTFAKVVTJ
Posts: 12,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amir View Post
Maybe they just didn't want anyone. If we refuse to send a player on loan to a club because they didn't let a previous loanee play much it's silly. It's about who the manager is, not what club it is.

If we can recall Macheda now and send him on loan to the Championship, we should. He's not going to play at QPR now. It's no one's fault. A manager took him on loan and was then sacked, and his replacement has other ideas. Fair enough, as long as they don't insisnt that he stays for nothing.
Apparently there's some rule that Premier League loans can only be window to window so he's stuck there until the end of the season. Can't see him getting much game time when even Hulse is ahead of him in the pecking order.
RonaldoVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2012, 22:31   #249 (permalink)
السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: It is better for a leader to make a mistake in forgiving than to make a mistake in punishing
Posts: 31,452
The club did not force Macheda's loan move to QPR. He, together with his agent chose the path. United as a club just facilitated the move.
Sultan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2012, 22:37   #250 (permalink)
السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: It is better for a leader to make a mistake in forgiving than to make a mistake in punishing
Posts: 31,452
United can hardly dictate to another club to play one of their players. Hughes will look after his own, and QPR's interests, and if there are players better at the club it's makes sense he plays them before a loanee.
Sultan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2012, 22:43   #251 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Where the goals come from.
Posts: 19,907
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonaldoVII View Post
Apparently there's some rule that Premier League loans can only be window to window so he's stuck there until the end of the season. Can't see him getting much game time when even Hulse is ahead of him in the pecking order.
Can we pull him back outside of the window? If so could we then loan him outside the Premier League?

Or even if we kept him ourselves, he'd have about as much chance of playing, with Diouf gone and Owen perma-knacked.
Sir A1ex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2012, 23:05   #252 (permalink)
السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: It is better for a leader to make a mistake in forgiving than to make a mistake in punishing
Posts: 31,452
To be honest he needs to be looking for a permanent move. He's not progressed as expected.
Sultan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2012, 23:26   #253 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Kids are the Future ✹
Posts: 10,730
It would be pretty funny if he ends up playing for the QPR reserves against the United reserves.
gooDevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2012, 23:34   #254 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 8,350
Could we not ask QPR to loan him to a Championship club, if they don't plan on playing him? I'm pretty sure players have gone on loan from clubs they were on loan to. In fact, I'm almost certain Spurs loaned out a player they had on loan. And I think a Liverpool player went on loan to a club who then loaned him out.
The Neviller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2012, 23:57   #255 (permalink)
Smells
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Scotland
Posts: 5,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sultan View Post
To be honest he needs to be looking for a permanent move. He's not progressed as expected.
This is probably what's going to happen, in all honesty. He's a talented youngster, but we've got Rooney, Hernandez and Welbeck who will all be here for years to come, hopefully. I doubt Macheda will want to spend his football career as a 4th choice striker, which may not even be the case if Keane starts to show some promise.
Cheesy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2012, 00:06   #256 (permalink)
Another mad swede
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Balcony BB and after that W3106
Posts: 2,327
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sultan View Post
To be honest he needs to be looking for a permanent move. He's not progressed as expected.
I agree. After the Villa game I thought he was a legend in the making but even though he is still young there is no way he´ll make it here.
Magnus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2012, 00:17   #257 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: RIP "The General"
Posts: 21,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Neviller View Post
Could we not ask QPR to loan him to a Championship club, if they don't plan on playing him? I'm pretty sure players have gone on loan from clubs they were on loan to. In fact, I'm almost certain Spurs loaned out a player they had on loan. And I think a Liverpool player went on loan to a club who then loaned him out.

Surely Macheda needs to man up and fight for a starting place.

He's crap. A one trick pony
bazalini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2012, 00:19   #258 (permalink)
most 'know it all' poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London
Posts: 19,271
Not sure whose idea it was to send him to Italy last season and not a Championship but whoever instigated it made the wrong choice.
FlawlessThaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2012, 00:47   #259 (permalink)
MUFC lad living in a matriel world
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Has an air of inevitibility about it. Fuck - Guz-kop on rawk @ Utd 2-2 Villa
Posts: 6,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by bazalini View Post
Surely Macheda needs to man up and fight for a starting place.

He's crap. A one trick pony
whats the trick? scoring the odd game winning goal?
anything about now is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2012, 05:12   #260 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: London,UK
Posts: 17,368
Needs to get out of QPR.

No way is going to play in the first team there.

Would be better back training at United.
Cold_Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2012, 12:21   #261 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Djibouti (La terre des braves)
Posts: 25,548
Maybe he isn't good enough.That great goal he scored might have his biggest problem, he never lived up to it
kouroux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2012, 12:25   #262 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: at the back post, lurking around, waiting for an easy tap-in.
Posts: 3,625
He's such a limited player, but the one thing he's always shown signs of being, is a great finisher.

He doesn't have the pace, the strength, the intelligence or the touch to play Premier League football, but he is a good goalscorer. Which makes for a bit of a conoundrum. He'll never be ideal for a club scrapping for survival like QPR though, they need strikers who'll committ defenders and run the channels.

As I said at the time, I couldn't belive those that rated Macheda higher than Welbeck. And I stand by that. Macheda will not make it at United, he's just not good enough.

However, I sort of feel for the lad. He's had a horrid time on his loan spells, really unlucky, but at the same time he's never shown the will to bite his teeth and fight his way into the team with some great performances.

He'll live forever in United folklore for that goal against Villa, but in fact I think that might have done him a disfavour in the long run.
marjen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2012, 12:58   #263 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,175
It's probably fair to say that if he hadn't scored that goal against Villa he'd have been out of here a long time ago and be continuing his career in the Championship/lower leagues or back in Italy.
Anderson8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2012, 14:52   #264 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dubai
Posts: 1,246
Problem with his development stalling as it has, there is always the next batch of youngsters coming through to take his place. We've seen it before..
Sylvain Blake was followed by Frazier Campbell, then came Welbeck, and now there's Will Keane looking over his shoulder. If you don't do extremely well in these loan spells, its just a matter of time before you get moved on, its just the nature of the beast.
savais is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2012, 14:40   #265 (permalink)
Twitter bot
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Birmingham + Londinium
Posts: 9,977
Again no Kiko in the QPR squad...........fuck
Sean_RedDevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2012, 15:01   #266 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,444
Funnily enough I just bumped into Davide Petrucci and Alberto Massacci on the tube and walked with them to the ground as I was going there too.
Obviously they came to see Macheda.
Funny guys, the pair of them actually.
Judging by what they were saying they will enjoy their weekend in London anyway!!
AKDevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2012, 15:04   #267 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: I predicted 5 results in a row succesfully and these were United vs QPR. Arse vs City. Chelsea vs Barca and Real Madrid vs Bayern and Barca vs Real. I even got Ronnie as the match winner but still I did not recieve an award. What a shame.
Posts: 6,909
sparkys a dick
Relevated is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2012, 15:06   #268 (permalink)
Brewlio's fugly sister
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Why don't we just kill Badger?
Posts: 27,706
From day one it looked like QPR took him to pad out their squad and that was even before they spent all that money. Unfortunately at that age it's very difficult to play almost no first team football for years on end and still develop.
Brophs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2012, 15:07   #269 (permalink)
Self-Aware Redcafe Database (and poster)
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 15,462
Send a message via MSN to Damien1990 Send a message via Skype™ to Damien1990
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean_RedDevil View Post
Again no Kiko in the QPR squad...........fuck
It's a shame but not too surprising. I agree with what Sultan has said on this page, it would be best for him to look for a permanent move. He needs game time. It's not worked out with his loan spells so far and can't see him getting the games he needs here to develop and rather than developing and improving he seems to have come to a stand still.
Damien1990 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2012, 15:20   #270 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,860
Send a message via ICQ to Donut
He really needs to play, but the reality is that (at least for now) he's not good enough. We should have loaned him to championship or even lower, where he'd be a sure starter.
Donut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2012, 19:36   #271 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: "Messi can do some amazing things, but anything he can do Joe can do as well, if not better," Steven Gerrard on Joe Cole
Posts: 3,107
Sparky is stubborn and will probably never play him just to be a stubborn dick. Macheda blew his chance last year when he went against Fergies wishes and signed for an Italian team! His career has been one big nose dive ever since. Surely we can rip up his contract at QPR if he is not getting games and send to him to Leeds or something!
Ringo 07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2012, 19:37   #272 (permalink)
Spit and Polish
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 'Sometimes you look in a field and you see a cow and you think it's a better cow than the one you've got in your own field. It's a fact, right? And it never really works out that way. It’s probably the same cow and not as good as your own cow.'
Posts: 9,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo 07 View Post
Sparky is stubborn and will probably never play him over abuse he probably got from Utd fans when he was shitty manager. Macheda blew his chance last year when he went against Fergies wishes and signed for an Italian team! His career has been one big nose dive ever since
What?
Maciek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2012, 19:40   #273 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: "Messi can do some amazing things, but anything he can do Joe can do as well, if not better," Steven Gerrard on Joe Cole
Posts: 3,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maciek View Post
What?
The strong rumour reported in many sources was that Fergie wanted him to stay in England and go to a championship club yet there was rumours Macheda was a little homesick and went against his wishes and made up a story that it was better for his international career to be playing in Italy and came back with his tail between his legs 6 months later after practically no game time and violent threats from the Sampdoria fans!!
Ringo 07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2012, 19:43   #274 (permalink)
Has issues!
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: You're too old fat man, your t*ts are too big, get the f**k off my porch!!
Posts: 7,495
Been arguing for the best part of 2-3 season that he really needs a loan to a championship side to really learn his trade properly.

He isn't gonna ever be a starter for any prem side at this stage of his career.
BAMSOLA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2012, 19:46   #275 (permalink)
Spit and Polish
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 'Sometimes you look in a field and you see a cow and you think it's a better cow than the one you've got in your own field. It's a fact, right? And it never really works out that way. It’s probably the same cow and not as good as your own cow.'
Posts: 9,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo 07 View Post
The strong rumour reported in many sources was that Fergie wanted him to stay in England and go to a championship club yet there was rumours Macheda was a little homesick and went against his wishes and made up a story that it was better for his international career to be playing in Italy and came back with his tail between his legs 6 months later after practically no game time and violent threats from the Sampdoria fans!!
I don't remember that strong rumour reported in many sources.

Of course, it's quite possible that he prefered to go to Italy than to join a Championship side, but I don't think he expected how the thing would look in Italy. I'm pretty sure there wasn't any Premier League team interested in him, so he went to Serie A, not to one of The Championship side.

You can hardly blame him for going on loan to Sampdoria...
Maciek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2012, 20:02   #276 (permalink)
Top
Admin
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Denmark
Posts: 23,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by AKDevil View Post
Funnily enough I just bumped into Davide Petrucci and Alberto Massacci on the tube and walked with them to the ground as I was going there too.
Obviously they came to see Macheda.
Funny guys, the pair of them actually.
Judging by what they were saying they will enjoy their weekend in London anyway!!
Did you ask Petrucci about how he sees his chances of some day playing for the first team?
Top is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2012, 20:26   #277 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Rehovot, Israel
Posts: 16,092
Send a message via ICQ to Amir
Whether Fergie wanted Kiko to stay in England or not last year, what we're seeing now is that what happened to him at Sampdoria could also happen in England, so it doesn't really matter. You go on loan, the coach is sacked and everything changes.

I wish we could recall him and send him to the Championship. The loan has become a total waste of time. I can't blame Hughes, though. He was brought in to do a job, he was given money, he added two better strikers. Fair enough.
Amir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2012, 22:45   #278 (permalink)
Compulsive wanker
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Guiding Cardiff to the promised land just so I can wipe that smug fucking grin of Cider's face.
Posts: 24,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo 07 View Post
The strong rumour reported in many sources was that Fergie wanted him to stay in England and go to a championship club yet there was rumours Macheda was a little homesick and went against his wishes and made up a story that it was better for his international career to be playing in Italy and came back with his tail between his legs 6 months later after practically no game time and violent threats from the Sampdoria fans!!
He didn't go against his wishes. If Fergie didn't want him to go to Italy her simply wouldn't have allowed it.

Where your exaggeration has probably come from is Fergie said he would have rather he went on a domestic loan but Macheda wanted to play in Italy as he felt he wouldn't be noticed by the bosses of the national teams if he was with a small club over here.

Or something like that.
cw1984 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th February 2012, 22:48   #279 (permalink)
Compulsive wanker
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Guiding Cardiff to the promised land just so I can wipe that smug fucking grin of Cider's face.
Posts: 24,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAMSOLA View Post
Been arguing for the best part of 2-3 season that he really needs a loan to a championship side to really learn his trade properly.

He isn't gonna ever be a starter for any prem side at this stage of his career.
Aye. Me too. Had he gone to a Championship side last season and had a good year in the side he'd have come on leaps and bounds.
cw1984 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th February 2012, 18:40   #280 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Symptomless coma
Posts: 7,706
Quote:
Newcastle United’s Nile Ranger, Walsall’s Manny Smith and Manchester United’s Federico Macheda, currently on loan at Queens Park Rangers, have all been charged with improper conduct in relation to comments made on Twitter.

The charge is that the players acted in a way which was improper and/or brought the game into disrepute.

It is further alleged that the breach included a reference to a person’s or persons’ sexual orientation.

Each has until 4pm on Wednesday 29 February 2012 to respond to the charge.
What's this?
pillory is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:18.

Back to top


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO