Go Back   RedCafe.net > Football Discussion > Manchester United Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 24th November 2005, 09:49   #81 (permalink)
Im rude and disprespectful to the ladies of the forum,though Im happy to cruise Jason and Suresh
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: 狗杂种,闭嘴 辱罵,用俚語說...废物点心 : Dinamic Dude
Posts: 16,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by ukbob
I am not denying for one moment that Park has talent, so DID Kleberson and Djemba. My point is that, what is the justification for putting him in ahead of Fletcher. You get your opportunity to show that you should be in the first team and quite frankly Park has not shown that class ....yet.
To be quite frank I also do not think Fletcher is the answer to our problems in midfield either but I do not see the justification in putting Park ahead of him either if you get my point.
Djemba was considered as a lesser version of Makalele but with Butt's being inconsistent he wasnt a bad option. But he never had a reputation like the other bloke the the rent boys signed this season.

Kleberson apart from a good world cup was nothing but a bit and pieces footballer.

You cannot say the same about Park. Can you?
vijay is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old 24th November 2005, 09:55   #82 (permalink)
Im rude and disprespectful to the ladies of the forum,though Im happy to cruise Jason and Suresh
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: 狗杂种,闭嘴 辱罵,用俚語說...废物点心 : Dinamic Dude
Posts: 16,344
Quote:
Originally Posted by devilish
Fletcher is an average player at best. In few words he is the younger, fitter and overrated version of Quinton Fortune. On the other hand Fortune is not Scottish.
So if Fortune had given enough chances like Fletcher.... Do you reckon he would've made it?
vijay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2005, 09:56   #83 (permalink)
A Barbie girl in a Barbie world
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cnut's home
Posts: 22,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by ukbob
I am not denying for one moment that Park has talent, so DID Kleberson and Djemba. My point is that, what is the justification for putting him in ahead of Fletcher. You get your opportunity to show that you should be in the first team and quite frankly Park has not shown that class ....yet.
To be quite frank I also do not think Fletcher is the answer to our problems in midfield either but I do not see the justification in putting Park ahead of him either if you get my point.
Kleberson was a player who rose to stardom because Emerson got injured. He wasnt a bad player but he didnt had the physical characteristics for an EPL side, he had never played in Europe + he was played much of the time out of position and was never given a proper first team run. Djemba was average in France as much as he was average with us. So I wouldnt consider them at par with Park.

On the other hand Fletcher had been an average player throughout his young career so I wonder why we dont consider him as so.
devilish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2005, 10:02   #84 (permalink)
Saq
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,303
Send a message via ICQ to Saq
-----------vds-----------

---gary----- rio ----wes---- silvestre---

----smith---- scholes(or new DM)-----

--------rooney---------

---ronaldo---ruud------saha(rossi)---

why not to try it?
TOTAL FOOTBALL
Saq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2005, 10:04   #85 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: There is no spoon.
Posts: 6,499
Send a message via MSN to redmanc Send a message via Skype™ to redmanc
Fletcher was shite, he had a pass completion ratio of about zero from what i saw.
redmanc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2005, 12:59   #86 (permalink)
Youth Team Player
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sitting in a chair
Posts: 423
Send a message via MSN to g_0405
Quote:
Originally Posted by vijay
So if Fortune had given enough chances like Fletcher.... Do you reckon he would've made it?
Fortune was given more than enough chances in the first team.
g_0405 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2005, 13:11   #87 (permalink)
Slabber
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike03
I must say that you do sound very clever yourself when you can't even explain the difference
I can but I won't. Thicko. Ask someone else.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2005, 13:16   #88 (permalink)
A Barbie girl in a Barbie world
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cnut's home
Posts: 22,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by vijay
So if Fortune had given enough chances like Fletcher.... Do you reckon he would've made it?
No if he was Scottish he would have been considered at par with Darren Fletcher.

In my opinion neither Fletcher nor Fortune had actually made it. I mean, at Barca, Juventus, AC Milan or at any team which are considered as geniune contenders for both the CL and the League title (even in our treble winning team_ Fortune and Fletcher would either be rotting in the reserves with little chance of ever playing or loaned to some Serie B side with the hope of getting that odd 1 million out of them.
devilish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2005, 13:32   #89 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: "I was never a great player" - Roy Keane, after being reminded that great players rarely make great managers.
Posts: 5,660
Send a message via MSN to reelworld Send a message via Yahoo to reelworld
Quote:
Originally Posted by devilish
No if he was Scottish he would have been considered at par with Darren Fletcher.
bollocks.
If that was the case, Darren Ferguson would've captain our first team rather than playing in the 2n div club.
reelworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2005, 13:36   #90 (permalink)
A Barbie girl in a Barbie world
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cnut's home
Posts: 22,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by reelworld
bollocks.
If that was the case, Darren Ferguson would've captain our first team rather than playing in the 2n div club.
those were different times. If I remember well We had Ince and Keane at that time with Scholes, Beckham and Butt coming through the ranks. If Darren played at that time he wouldnt have made the bench.
devilish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2005, 15:22   #91 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: "I was never a great player" - Roy Keane, after being reminded that great players rarely make great managers.
Posts: 5,660
Send a message via MSN to reelworld Send a message via Yahoo to reelworld
Quote:
Originally Posted by devilish
those were different times. If I remember well We had Ince and Keane at that time with Scholes, Beckham and Butt coming through the ranks. If Darren played at that time he wouldnt have made the bench.
That has no relation whatsoever with my point.

The argument that you use to justified Fletch place on the team is because he's scottish.

Now, let me repeat that again, Ferguson has shown not an ounce of favouritsm for his countryman before, so there are no reason why he's doing it now.

Your argument has no ground at all.
reelworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th November 2005, 15:30   #92 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 80 miles off Equator
Posts: 1,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by devilish
those were different times. If I remember well We had Ince and Keane at that time with Scholes, Beckham and Butt coming through the ranks. If Darren played at that time he wouldnt have made the bench.
Which leaves me recalling a post some time ago, at the end of the day, if Fletcher, whom a lot of people believe have loads of potential, does not deliver after numerous chances to show what he can do, he would go down the path the same way Luke Chadwick went.

Luke Chadwick was once touted as the "Next Beckham" with close control dribbling, moves down the wing to the bye line and crosses in to the strikers.

He was same as Fletcher, lanky. Same build and body frame, a bit on the light side. But, in retrospect, Luke Chadwick offered much more going forward. You can see defenders tracking back, even double teaming to stop him, because once Chadwick gets to the byeline, a crosss would come in. Low and hard, high and curling, nevertheless, the forward line benefited, and scored sometimes.

Whereas Fletcher with all his immense talent, tends to cut back, pass a square ball inward or worst of all, make a pass to the right back standing by behind him. Therefore, as a right midfield, Fletcher offers nothing to the team, and by starting Park, there is at least an option going forward.

Therefore, a few posts in this thread ago, I tried to suggest letting Smith play on the right and Fletcher in the middle. Might not work, be a disaster, a fiasco, or on the other hand, Smith could offer more going forward as he has experience playing there for Leeds, and Fletcher could scurry around and harry the opponents in front of the back line. Now that Keane is gone, Fletcher does not need to pass the ball back to anyone, he can be creative, more advanturous and do what he and those who believed in him expected him to do, make penetrative passes which would result in goals for us.
Romaleouf is online now   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:17.

Back to top