![]() |
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Reserve Team Player
|
Didnt seem too bothered by the pressure. The best bit he showed was how easily and confidently he held the ball in the corner until the Newcastle player conceded the throw for us, he looked in complete control and balance for the whole thing, something I rarely see from any player.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,272
|
looked composed on the ball which is always good. I like to see a bit more aggresion in his play when defending. Early to say but he does have carricks style, we will have to see how he progresses and how many games he can get under his belt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
"Ronaldo and trophies > Manchester United football club"
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,822
|
Quote:
Rodrigo did fine. Didn't give the ball away. It's never easy coming on as a sub, especially when it's 1-1 and both teams could still nick it. Obviously added to that there was more pressure on us to win the game AND it being your debut in competitive action We don't know Rodrigos game fully yet so we cannot dismiss anything. Unfortunately people will be critical of Rodrigo saying he passes sideways BUT the point is when your struggling with width, its not easy to spray your passes. Giggs comes inside as does fletcher, it's not always easy to pass the ball if the players don't make the runs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
most 'know it all' poster
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London
Posts: 10,545
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: There's hope in hanging snore
Posts: 800
|
That's because O'Shea clearly is better defensively and is vastly more experienced. Replacing Carrick with O'Shea was a no-brainer (and I hate it when he plays in midfield...)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
McFuckwit
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,915
|
Really? He did okay at left back. Must have been the goalkeeper in him, right? Cant be that he's a defender.
I'm not saying he's great. He's pretty poor in the middle of midfield, but Rodrigo doesnt have what it takes to play next to Scholes in a midfield 2 yet because neither one can take on the physical and defensive responsibility of the role. Rodrigo may do in the future, or he may be like Scholes himself and always rely on another to do it. But Carrick for example, is leagues ahead and Carrick's defensive ability is not much more than the minimum an attacking team like ours needs. A midfield 3 of Fletcher, Scholes and Rodrigo would be fine though. But then we have our flank problem... Not that Fletcher solves it anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
"Ronaldo and trophies > Manchester United football club"
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,822
|
There was a time I remember when Scholes was the one that held deep so there is no automatic excuse to put o'shea on just because scholes needs someone defensive by him.
There would have been no problem keeping scholes back and putting possebon or gibson or whoever ahead of him people talk about experience but how many games we had like this with fletcher and oshea in the midfield. Granted today fletcher was fine, though he didn't offer brilliant width but bringing on o'shea was a backward step. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) | |
|
McFuckwit
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,915
|
Quote:
He is not a defensive player and never will be. O'Shea is. In all partnerships, one player needs to cover the other's weakeness'. For Scholes thats purely defence related. Hence, John O'Shea. |
|
|
|
|