Member's Login
Not yet a member? Register now
|
||||||
| View Poll Results: Who has the better United Legends team? | |||
| Team DanNistelrooy |
|
27 | 56.25% |
| Team Polaroid |
|
21 | 43.75% |
| Voters: 48. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,273
|
United Legends Grand Final - Team DanNistelrooy vs Team Polaroid
This is a United Legends Fantasy competition, where voting is open to all Redcafe members other than the managers of the teams. Managers are required to assemble their squads of United Legends by selecting players who have made at least 100 post-WW2 appearances for United based on their performances for United and overall footballing impact/contributions to United. As in any team, team tactics and balance also play a part. Hence please carefully consider the abovesaid factors and evaluate the merits of both teams before voting for the team which in your opinion is the better United Legends team. Polls will last for 1 day. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,273
|
Team DanNistelrooy
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,273
|
Team Polaroid
Quote:
Last edited by Polaroid; 8th February 2012 at 18:49. Reason: Updated formation graphic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,273
|
Team line-ups head-to-head
Team DanNistelrooy ![]() Subs: David Gaskell John O'shea Kevin Moran Ray Wilkins Jesper Olsen Andrei Kanchelskis Frank Stapleton Team Polaroid Line-up now ![]() Subs: Norman Whiteside Dennis Viollet David Herd Stan Pearson Eddie Colman Allenby Chilton Harry Gregg Previous line-up
Last edited by Polaroid; 8th February 2012 at 19:54. Reason: substitution |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
First Team Sub
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Montevideo
Posts: 5,919
|
Polaroid's team is very impressive, superb fight and creativity in midfield, but looks too dependent on Taylor for the scoring. Could Stam and Pallister keep him in his pocket? Frankly, I don't know as he is way before my days, but it is a clear weakness. Leaves you to wonder if Giggs will go on a mazy run, a Beckham free kick special...
On the other hand, you know Dan will score, there's no doubt in my mind at all. Even better, he will score in classic United style: exploiting width with technical ability, pace, grit and a reasonable dose of petulant genius... The modern day fan in me says Polaroid would control the game and grind out the win. The romantic in me says Dan would work his way around those shackles and claim a famous victory. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
First Team Sub
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Manchester
Posts: 6,720
|
Pretty close this one.
At this stage you can't really criticise the other team because they are both strong now, both filled with legends. The one thing my team does has over Polaroid's is goal scoring. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,273
|
Dan's goalscoring threats are Law, Best and Hughes
My goalscoring threats are Taylor, Giggs, Scholes, Beckham and Whiteside If anything, my side is more difficult to defend against with goals coming from so many possible sources Scholes Beckham |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
First Team Sub
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Montevideo
Posts: 5,919
|
Quote:
You'll probably have to go 4-4-2 to have more firepower but will lose some central midfield strength in the process. Against Keane and Ince that may not be such a good idea. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,273
|
I would like to hear people's reasons for their votes (for and against)
Do people rate Tommy Taylor, Whiteside, McGrath or Buchan? Personally I think I have the advantage in the following areas 1. more possession and control of the game 2. more creativity and flair to do something with possession 3. more sources of goals to make the possession count 4. stronger back 6 (with Edwards) to keep out the opposition 5. stronger bench of United legends |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,273
|
Quote:
As I have said, firepower-wise, I have Taylor-Scholes-Beckham-Whiteside-Giggs vs Law-Best-Hughes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
First Team Sub
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Montevideo
Posts: 5,919
|
Quote:
It's somewhat unfair to include Beckham and Whiteside on one hand and not Coppell on the other. That leaves you 5-4 in terms of players who are in any way prolific, but that is not the whole story. Taylor is your main goalscoring threat and up there by himself he will struggle more than Law and Hughes. You would expect a target man to have someone playing along feeding off his scraps. You probably do have more ways you could score. Again, it would be interesting to see Violett alongside Taylor but you do have to sacrifice some midfield control in the process. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,273
|
Quote:
As stated in my tactics, Giggs and Whiteside will be breaking forward in support of Taylor, he will hardly be isolated. Strikers are often only as good as the service they get, this is particularly true for both teams - Law, Hughes and Taylor are not creative strikers. The key in this case would be the possession, creativity and goals from midfield - this is where i have the advantages. If you do not have the ball, you cannot score, when you have the ball, you have to create a goal-scoring opportunity, and you need players who can score goals to make your opportunities count. My midfield has the edge in possession and creativity. I have more goal-scorers in my team, more ways of scoring and in Taylor, the striker with the best goalscoring rate in United history. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | ||||
|
First Team Sub
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Montevideo
Posts: 5,919
|
Quote:
I actually expected you to have Whiteside alongside Taylor and slightly more withdrawn (support striker type positioning) and Edwards alongside Scholes with the option of dropping back. That would look a lot more positive. As it stands now it looks like you are wasting those two a bit by pulling them back. I guess the rationale is you need to stregthen to battle it out with a formidable pair (Keane + Ince) but the result is you seem to have three players committed to deal with two and Taylor upfront looks bloody lonely. Just telling you what I'm seeing and many clearly are seeing the same. Quote:
The way I see it you've got Giggs but he's got Best. You've got Beckham crossing for Taylor, which is the most obvious threat but I wouldn't put it past Pallister and Stam to deal with that. You've got Scoles playing Giggs through and arriving late (main advantage) and then you've got free kicks. It's good but it is not Best and Coppell on either wing with Law and Hughes through the middle. Simple, straightforward and devastating. Quote:
Quote:
What doesn't quite fly with me is putting those deep in the middle to ensure possession against Keano and Ince and somewhat miraculously Whiteside being upfront being second striker. He could switch over the course of the game but not really do it at the same time. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,273
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
|
First Team Sub
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Montevideo
Posts: 5,919
|
Quote:
In latter stages teams tend to have legends we are a lot more acquainted and familiar with, which really helps! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) | |
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,273
|
Quote:
Whiteside is a key piece in this game, his goal-scoring and ball-winning prowess is a double bonus. Alongside Scholes and Edwards, I have the possession, creativity and goalscoring edge in midfield. Adding Giggs and Beckham, I have more avenues to create, more ways to score. As you have said, Dan's offence is more straightforward, it will almost certainly go through the wingers. Coppell will head for the byline, Evra can keep pace with him. His team is really relying on Best for flair and creativity. Hence I have Edwards there to help Carey double up on him. His offence is relatively more predictable and easier to contain compared to one with many creative options. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) | ||||
|
First Team Sub
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Montevideo
Posts: 5,919
|
Quote:
Quote:
For the most part, I didn't see the point of wasting Edwards in a back four protection role in the hole when Dan would be charging down the wing. Quote:
Quote:
Dan had United legends setting out to play this game the United way, you had United legends starting out in some sort of modern European style emphasising midfield possession which just didn't feel right. Go back a few years and year after year we concluded that we failed in Europe because 4-4-2 was dated and predictable, yet every time we played anything else the debate raged in here because, ultimately, our best United memories were playing 4-4-2. I have no doubt that had a massive impact here. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) |
|
Shit stirrer (Literally)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Northern Ireland. W3101, Row 29, Seat 174
Posts: 5,498
|
Seeings as this is based on the overall footballing impact and contribution to United, it has got to be Polaroid. Look at that midfield, incredible. Also our most legendary keeper, and a striker that won us a Champions League final.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) | ||||
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 982
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Tommy Taylor up front alone is just as good as Denis Law and Mark Hughes, if not better. The guy was a machine, no one else has a better goal ratio for United. He was also strong, pacy and the best header of the ball in his era. I think he could handle himself just fine up front. Remember, this is a player that the great Alfredo di Stefano called "Magnifico". Edwards-Scholes is also a better midfield partnership, i lost votes and was criticized for having Ince in midfield at the start of the competition. I'd say wingers are fairly even, as are the CB pairings. Polaroid has better fullbacks (Byrne is a legend but i'm not sure why he's being played out of position). Polaroid gets my vote. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) | ||
|
First Team Sub
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Montevideo
Posts: 5,919
|
Quote:
Quote:
INITIAL FORMATION (NO LONGER IN PLAY)
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) | |
|
First Team Sub
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Montevideo
Posts: 5,919
|
Quote:
This is why initial teamsheets should be kept, people would be able to make a lot more sense of the voting and the discussions that go along with it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) |
|
First Team Regular
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: I like turtles
Posts: 12,315
|
I think these older players are glorified too much. You guys haven't seen them play. It's all based on stats and them being remembered kindly, especially those who died in Munich. It's impossible to compare and it's not fair to argue that they could do this and that as same as other people.
Ruud actually had a better goal record with than Tommy Taylor. I'd also argue that the game in 2005 is more difficult than it was in 1955. Every single player like him get unbelievable descriptions and the highest praises. I'm sure Stam or Pallister could beat him in the air. If a man is properly marked he stands little chance of scoring in the air if he isn't close to goal. |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) | |
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 691
|
Quote:
68.49% versus 68.59% And Tommy Taylor was only getting started. Last edited by w'or bobby; 9th February 2012 at 03:03. Reason: had to check exact per cents. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) | |
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: 'Keep the flag flying Jimmy'
Posts: 4,150
|
Quote:
Not much different than how Fergie won his second CL either |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) | |||||
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,273
|
Quote:
It is: Who has the better United Legends team? If anyone did not consider the team as a whole, then he has not really addressed the poll question Quote:
This is so common in football - midfielders breaking forward to link up with forwards when in possession - I honestly do not understand your issue with it.Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Ruud's record was 150 in 219. Tommy Taylor's was 131 in 191. Do the maths and you will see that it is not true when you said that Ruud has a better goal record than Taylor. Ruud is not playing for Dan's team though. It is a mistake to think that Taylor only has to be guarded against headers. He had tremendous strength, a neat turn, powerful running and a rocket of a shot. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) | ||
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,273
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|