grass or not to grass

peterstorey · 7th March 2012, 23:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eightball

Is that supposed to mean something to me?

You're an idiot.

You're obviously some prick who changed his username to try and distance himself from the shite he's posted all along - who are you as a well-known dickhead?

Rado_N · 7th March 2012, 23:55

What difference does it make who I am? You're the one showing yourself up for the hypocrite that you are.

Burrow · 7th March 2012, 23:56

What the fuck does it mean 'to grass' ?

peterstorey · 7th March 2012, 23:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eightball

What difference does it make who I am? You're the one showing yourself up for the hypocrite that you are.

Fucking hell, you must have been a major-league wanker if you won't even 'fess up. Who are you? Who are you?

Damien · 7th March 2012, 23:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by Burrow

What the fuck does it mean 'to grass' ?

To inform someone to the police or some other authority when someone has done something wrong or illegal.

Link: Grass up

And as for the OP, yes I would report him.

LoveInTheAsylum · 8th March 2012, 00:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by peterstorey

Fuck me the guy's hardly getting away with a fortune and the cunts at the top of the tree are ripping you off for millions [benefit fraud £2Bn v not paying tax £100Bn]. Divide and conquer - British imperial strategy revisited on the working class of all nations.

Stick it to the man, by screwing over those around you.

Your posts are pretty much always worth reading and this is probably just some contrary schtick of yours to crowbar in a wider point you feel is more important, but drunkenness is the only excuse for turning being called out on a post as you so obviously wanted, into a dull bitchfest.

Rado_N · 8th March 2012, 00:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by peterstorey

Fucking hell, you must have been a major-league wanker if you won't even 'fess up. Who are you? Who are you?

There was a reason I changed my username, not that it's of any concern to you.

No surprise to see you distracting from the issue, though. Nothing to actually argue, attack the poster, that's your standard MO.

peterstorey · 8th March 2012, 00:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eightball

There was a reason I changed my username, not that it's of any concern to you.

No surprise to see you distracting from the issue, though. Nothing to actually argue, attack the poster, that's your standard MO.

Well I demolished your shit argument I just wanted to know what well-known wanker I was arguing with.

peterstorey · 8th March 2012, 00:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoveInTheAsylum

Stick it to the man, by screwing over those around you.

He's not screwing those around him though is he? They look as if they want to screw him tho'.

Rado_N · 8th March 2012, 00:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by peterstorey

Well I demolished your shit argument

Erm, how on earth did you come to that conclusion?

Quote:

I just wanted to know what well-known wanker I was arguing with.

I honestly don't know how you keep your posting rights on here, you're such a tiresome twat, all you ever do is chuck insults around when you've nothing to actually say, which is about 90% of the time.

Rado_N · 8th March 2012, 00:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by peterstorey

He's not screwing those around him though is he? They look as if they want to screw him tho'.

Good fucking lord.

Yes; he is screwing those around him. He's earning just shy of £30,000 and paying no tax or NI whilst simultaneously claiming benefits on a fraudulent basis to the detriment of those who genuinely rely on disability payments to get by. You'd have to be borderline retarded not to see the problem with that.

But he's not rich, so it's fine by Pete.

peterstorey · 8th March 2012, 00:14

'Oo are you?

Burrow · 8th March 2012, 00:18

It's Boss.

It's not Boss.

Sir Matt · 8th March 2012, 00:20

Anyone know how to build a wall in here? I'm thinking of building one...

peterstorey · 8th March 2012, 00:20

Can't be Boss, Boss wasn't a dickhead.

mjs020294 · 8th March 2012, 00:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by no.7

ive been brought up never to grass, but is there a circumstance where its right, i am working for a guy doing all his building work and get a set day rate ( quite good ) now he has got one of his old mates in to help, he gets the same as me per day, a van, which means fuel and road tax paid, and does far less in fact half what the other lads do, and he claims loads of benefits and gets paid cash in hand, not talking a couple weeks work, hes been with us for nearly a year

why should i pay all my taxes - public liability insurance and such like when he gets away with everything, its pissing me off

should i ?

You might want to have a word with the guy you're working for if you feel you deserve more BUT tread carefully. If the other guy is a mate of his you might talk yourself out a job. If you're happy with what you're being paid I would be inclined to let it go TBH.

narnar · 8th March 2012, 00:22

Does it matter?

Where did you demolish his argument?

Persian-Fred · 8th March 2012, 00:24

mjs020294 · 8th March 2012, 00:26

My money is on Pete using two accounts so he can argue with himself.

peterstorey · 8th March 2012, 00:27

Look you get company directors paying themselves £6,750 salaries and pulling down £200K divis taxed at 20%. Basically robbing the exchequer of £60K pa. Yet you want to get all stoked up over some guy scamming nowhere near that.

Persian-Fred · 8th March 2012, 00:28

I'm surprised he hasn't been banned by now tbh. All he ever does is argue the controversial side of any argument. I doubt he even believes the shit he types half the time.

Stereotypical and very obvious WUM poster. Always has been.

Rado_N · 8th March 2012, 00:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by peterstorey

Look you get company directors paying themselves £6,750 salaries and pulling down £200K divis taxed at 20%. Basically robbing the exchequer of £60K pa. Yet you want to get all stoked up over some guy scamming nowhere near that.

Wrong.

711 · 8th March 2012, 00:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sir Matt

Anyone know how to build a wall in here? I'm thinking of building one...

Location ain't right though, but it's gotta be someone.

We need an official caf historian, who hasn't been banned or likely to be banned, which limits it somewhat.

mjs020294 · 8th March 2012, 00:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by peterstorey

Look you get company directors paying themselves £6,750 salaries and pulling down £200K divis taxed at 20%. Basically robbing the exchequer of £60K pa. Yet you want to get all stoked up over some guy scamming nowhere near that.

Difference is Pete the directors are not doing anything illegal. They are paying the taxes owed not pulling out undeclared money under the table. Plus they are not drawing benefits that everyone of us are subsidizing.

narnar · 8th March 2012, 00:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by peterstorey

Look you get company directors paying themselves £6,750 salaries and pulling down £200K divis taxed at 20%. Basically robbing the exchequer of £60K pa. Yet you want to get all stoked up over some guy scamming nowhere near that.

Doesn't make it right just because it is less though.

PhilipB · 8th March 2012, 00:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by 711

Location ain't right though, but it's gotta be someone.

We need an official caf historian, who hasn't been banned or likely to be banned, which limits it somewhat.

I know who it is but I'm not prepared to grass...

mjs020294 · 8th March 2012, 00:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by philipb231190

I know who it is but I'm not prepared to grass...

peterstorey · 8th March 2012, 00:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eightball

Wrong.

Oh, for fuck's sake you are doubly blessed by being a wanker AND an accountant. What is the rate of corp tax these days?

Rado_N · 8th March 2012, 00:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by peterstorey

Oh, for fuck's sake you are doubly blessed by being a wanker AND an accountant. What is the rate of corp tax these days?

What the fuck does the rate of corporation tax have to do with the rate of tax directors pay on their dividends?

Christ, not even I had you down for being this clueless.

peterstorey · 8th March 2012, 00:39

Hi Nick!

Thick Numpty · 8th March 2012, 00:41

Is someone trying to argue that benefit fraud is fine because company directors do worse? Interesting viewpoint.

Sir Matt · 8th March 2012, 00:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by 711

Location ain't right though, but it's gotta be someone.

We need an official caf historian, who hasn't been banned or likely to be banned, which limits it somewhat.

Maybe I can get no. 7's mate to help build it and pay him under the table.

Persian-Fred · 8th March 2012, 00:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Neviller

Is someone trying to argue that benefit fraud is fine because company directors do worse? Interesting viewpoint.

Welcome to the world of peterstorey.

mjs020294 · 8th March 2012, 00:44

I know where Pete's coming from but it isn't really a logical argument in this thread. We all know the tax system is being abused by some, and a small minority in society earn far too much BUT that has nothing to do with a benefits fraudster being paid a fair days pay for half a day of illegal work.

Wibble · 8th March 2012, 00:44

I'd report him in a flash just as I'd report anyone defrauding in a way that was paid for by me. And reducing tax avoidance is also a good idea. The two aren't mutually exclusive.

711 · 8th March 2012, 00:46

Right then, it's not Wibble.

Thick Numpty · 8th March 2012, 00:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by peterstorey

Oh, for fuck's sake you are doubly blessed by being a wanker AND an accountant. What is the rate of corp tax these days?

peterstorey · 8th March 2012, 00:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Neviller

Is someone trying to argue that benefit fraud is fine because company directors do worse? Interesting viewpoint.

Yeah because most of the people doing benefit fraud are fucking poor, skimming pennies to sustain shit lifestyles. Whereas your posh cunts are scamming 50x more. You should be redeployed to Customs & Excise - you'd be a lot more cost effective collecting revenue off the rich since there's about £100Bn a year more to be harvested.

Wibble · 8th March 2012, 00:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by 711

Right then, it's not Wibble.

I am often called a banker mind. At least I think that is what they are saying.

Vidic_In_Moscow · 8th March 2012, 00:54

Well it seems you just want to report him out of jealousy rather than because it's the right thing to do, in which case do what you bloody well like.

RedCafe.net

The Leading Manchester United Forum

Member's Login

grass or not to grass

Latest Forum Topics

Jump to Forum

Not yet registered?

7th March 2012, 23:55	#42 (permalink)
Rado_N Came from nowhere, yet still a better modmin than Weaste ever was Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: mishy gishy gushy gushy mishy meshy mushy, motherfucker Posts: 45,395	What difference does it make who I am? You're the one showing yourself up for the hypocrite that you are.

7th March 2012, 23:56	#43 (permalink)
Burrow would like you all to call him "Glorious Leader" Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Beautiful Norway Posts: 13,083	What the fuck does it mean 'to grass' ?

8th March 2012, 00:14	#52 (permalink)
peterstorey Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: I've dealt with RiP being injured for 8 seasons - it's your problem now. Posts: 29,931	'Oo are you?

8th March 2012, 00:18	#53 (permalink)
Burrow would like you all to call him "Glorious Leader" Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Beautiful Norway Posts: 13,083	It's Boss. It's not Boss.

8th March 2012, 00:20	#54 (permalink)
Sir Matt First Team Regular Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: LUHG Posts: 11,374	Anyone know how to build a wall in here? I'm thinking of building one...

8th March 2012, 00:20	#55 (permalink)
peterstorey Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: I've dealt with RiP being injured for 8 seasons - it's your problem now. Posts: 29,931	Can't be Boss, Boss wasn't a dickhead.

8th March 2012, 00:22	#57 (permalink)
narnar Needs Help Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Let me please introduce myself, I'm a man of wealth and taste Posts: 11,218	Does it matter? Where did you demolish his argument?

8th March 2012, 00:24	#58 (permalink)
Persian-Fred Banned Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Chelsea. Come at me bitches! Posts: 7,248

8th March 2012, 00:26	#59 (permalink)
mjs020294 Banned Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 16,908	My money is on Pete using two accounts so he can argue with himself.

8th March 2012, 00:27	#60 (permalink)
peterstorey Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: I've dealt with RiP being injured for 8 seasons - it's your problem now. Posts: 29,931	Look you get company directors paying themselves £6,750 salaries and pulling down £200K divis taxed at 20%. Basically robbing the exchequer of £60K pa. Yet you want to get all stoked up over some guy scamming nowhere near that.

8th March 2012, 00:28	#61 (permalink)
Persian-Fred Banned Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Chelsea. Come at me bitches! Posts: 7,248	I'm surprised he hasn't been banned by now tbh. All he ever does is argue the controversial side of any argument. I doubt he even believes the shit he types half the time. Stereotypical and very obvious WUM poster. Always has been.

8th March 2012, 00:39	#70 (permalink)
peterstorey Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: I've dealt with RiP being injured for 8 seasons - it's your problem now. Posts: 29,931	Hi Nick!

8th March 2012, 00:41	#71 (permalink)
Thick Numpty First Team Regular Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Not The Neviller Posts: 21,854	Is someone trying to argue that benefit fraud is fine because company directors do worse? Interesting viewpoint.

8th March 2012, 00:44	#74 (permalink)
mjs020294 Banned Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 16,908	I know where Pete's coming from but it isn't really a logical argument in this thread. We all know the tax system is being abused by some, and a small minority in society earn far too much BUT that has nothing to do with a benefits fraudster being paid a fair days pay for half a day of illegal work.

8th March 2012, 00:44	#75 (permalink)
Wibble In Gadus Speramus Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Centre Back Posts: 54,204	I'd report him in a flash just as I'd report anyone defrauding in a way that was paid for by me. And reducing tax avoidance is also a good idea. The two aren't mutually exclusive.

8th March 2012, 00:46	#76 (permalink)
711 Real Caftard Fantasy Champ 2009 Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Effete. Very effete. Posts: 9,229	Right then, it's not Wibble.

8th March 2012, 00:54	#80 (permalink)
Vidic_In_Moscow Banned Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 8,118	Well it seems you just want to report him out of jealousy rather than because it's the right thing to do, in which case do what you bloody well like.