Go Back   RedCafe.net > Football Discussion > Football Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 8th February 2012, 13:33   #81 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: at the back post, lurking around, waiting for an easy tap-in.
Posts: 5,378
Quote:
Originally Posted by peterstorey View Post
Capello should have been sacked after the world cup and they should have started building for 2014, using the Euros as a development tournament.
Long-term planning? With the FA? Unthinkable!

Unless this is some Arsenal-like 10 year plan your alluding to? In that case I don't support the idea.
marjen is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 13:34   #82 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New Delhi
Posts: 8,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by peterstorey View Post
Capello should have been sacked after the world cup and they should have started building for 2014, using the Euros as a development tournament.
Exactly.

He hasnt done poorly but he hasnt done anything a half decent manager wouldnt have. England have a good bunch coming up, they need someone who'l use that well. Not stuart pearce either.
Varun_Utd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 13:34   #83 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: wayne rooney wonderland
Posts: 3,982
Quote:
Originally Posted by marjen View Post
Long-term planning? With the FA? Unthinkable!

Unless this is some Arsenal-like 10 year plan your alluding to? In that case I don't support the idea.
towcester_red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 13:36   #84 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sanctity, like a cat, abhors filth.
Posts: 8,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by peterstorey View Post
Capello should have been sacked after the world cup and they should have started building for 2014, using the Euros as a development tournament.
I always assumed the only reason that hadnt happened was his salary made him virtually unsackable. But yes, I agree with this.
Adebesi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 13:37   #85 (permalink)
Zen
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,282
Quote:
Originally Posted by africanspur View Post
Well, I'm sorry, clearly a bit dim today, can you explain the football manager comment to me then? I'm getting old you see.

Spurs bias? But everyone else who's disagreed with you isn't a Spurs fan and why would my spurs bias

a) want our manager, who's doing a fucking great job, to leave the club?
b) make me pick one Spurs figure (Redknapp) over another?

Funny how Levy didn't manage to bail out Jol or Ramos isn't it? Levy does a great job. Redknapp does a great job. Hence why we're third.
Quite simply...you guys seem to think managers pick all the players. They quite simply don't.

Jol seemed to get the blame for bad signings...ironically, of which were mostly from above his head that he had no clue about either, and unfortunately for him, unlike Redknapp, they didn't work out. Ramos simply wasn't a Prem manager, although obviously, they wouldn't have ended up 18th in that season or whatever when he left, but still clearly wrong team, wrong league for him.
Zen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 13:37   #86 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon Adebesi View Post
I always assumed the only reason that hadnt happened was his salary made him virtually unsackable. But yes, I agree with this.
Didn't they give him another contract right before the World Cup started too? The FA really are useless.
Aint gota Kalou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 13:37   #87 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NOBODY, calls Dugan a turd.
Posts: 19,808
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon Adebesi View Post
Come on Lancelot. Its about more than how far we progressed and who we lost to. Its the manner of how we performed, the tedium and total and utter ineptitude we had to endure leading up to our exit. If we had played convincingly, comfortably won the group and then been knocked out by Germany (if for example they had stumbled in the qualifying stages and had finished second in their group) we wouldnt be having this conversation. Surely you can see that?
I am not claiming in anyway that England were putting in impressive performances. They weren't. But when do they ever under any manager? Croatia, Germany, and Holland in '96 stick out. I am sure I am missing some.

My overriding point is, that the players aren't up to the expectations of some of the fans. Yet manager, after manager, after manager takes the flak when they fail.
Lance Uppercut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 13:40   #88 (permalink)
"It's like..."
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Flagg
Posts: 4,227
Send a message via MSN to noodlehair
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lance Uppercut View Post
"If England had been in a group with" is hypothetical bullshit.



So England would have found it tougher in a tougher group? Devastating insight.



You also must have missed England topping their group without losing a game. Sorry for using more meaningless things like "statistics" and "records."
How many times are you going to prove yourself hopelessly blind before you stop doing this?

Go and join your mate Randall on the fantasy moon jet. He's already in his seat, talking to Dalglish about what a great captain choice John Terry is, and how Ashley Cole is still the greatest left back in the known universe.
noodlehair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 13:41   #89 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sanctity, like a cat, abhors filth.
Posts: 8,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lance Uppercut View Post
My overriding point is, that the players aren't up to the expectations of some of the fans. Yet manager, after manager, after manager takes the flak when they fail.
You definitely have a point there. But then managers are well remunerated for that. If the buck doesnt stop with them then what is the point in paying them so much money? Which comes back to what I was saying in post 56. Maybe the manager is irrelevant and England just dont have the quality players to do any better. So why not save however many million pounds we waste on these fuckwits and spend the money on youth development, that we might in a generation's time have some players that can give a better account of themselves.
Adebesi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 13:42   #90 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Dark side of the moon
Posts: 6,960
Quote:
Originally Posted by peterstorey View Post
Capello should have been sacked after the world cup and they should have started building for 2014, using the Euros as a development tournament.
This,

To be honest I just want someone in charge who holds some passion for the job. One of the huge disappointments with England has been the lack of personality and with characters like McClaren, Sven, and Capello in charge it doesn't surprise that they've failed to inspire our players or the nation.

Couldn't think of a worse appointment than Pearce, I'd rather have bloody Holloway
Smores is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 13:42   #91 (permalink)
Zen
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,282
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lance Uppercut View Post
My overriding point is, that the players aren't up to the expectations of some of the fans. Yet manager, after manager, after manager takes the flak when they fail.
I don't know whether I completely agree with that. The manager is to blame for the team being obvious(same XI time and time again) and one dimensional at both the Euros 2004 and World Cup 2006....and Scholes getting out way too early by forcing him to play out of position.

And again, the manager is to blame for really bad selections at both the last two world cups. From what autobiographys have said, the players were up for the Euros in 2004 and definitely the world cup 2002....just one came up against the eventual winners without two key players in Gerrard and Neville and the other, we became obvious and lost a key player in Rooney this time, which meant we went back to the obvious 442 system.
Zen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 13:43   #92 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NOBODY, calls Dugan a turd.
Posts: 19,808
Quote:
Originally Posted by noodlehair View Post
How many times are you going to prove yourself hopelessly blind before you stop doing this?

Go and join your mate Randall on the fantasy moon jet. He's already in his seat, talking to Dalglish about what a great captain choice John Terry is, and how Ashley Cole is still the greatest left back in the known universe.
Clueless.
Lance Uppercut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 13:45   #93 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NOBODY, calls Dugan a turd.
Posts: 19,808
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon Adebesi View Post
You definitely have a point there. But then managers are well remunerated for that. If the buck doesnt stop with them then what is the point in paying them so much money? Which comes back to what I was saying in post 56. Maybe the manager is irrelevant and England just dont have the quality players to do any better. So why not save however many million pounds we waste on these fuckwits and spend the money on youth development, that we might in a generation's time have some players that can give a better account of themselves.
I agree with that.

Capello's wages are ludicrous. Who the hell authorised that amount?
Lance Uppercut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 13:48   #94 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Dark side of the moon
Posts: 6,960
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lance Uppercut View Post
My overriding point is, that the players aren't up to the expectations of some of the fans. Yet manager, after manager, after manager takes the flak when they fail.
Do you honestly think that any of our most recent managers have got the most out of those players?

Each manager has made choices which the fans have disagreed with strongly, that's why they're under such scrutiny.

There's just no defending someone who chooses to play Heskey
Smores is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 13:50   #95 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NOBODY, calls Dugan a turd.
Posts: 19,808
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smores View Post
Do you honestly think that any of our most recent managers have got the most out of those players?

Each manager has made choices which the fans have disagreed with strongly, that's why they're under such scrutiny.

There's just no defending someone who chooses to play Heskey
How many of them chose to play Heskey? Don't you think there is a reason for that?
Lance Uppercut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 13:50   #96 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mêlée Island
Posts: 15,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zen View Post
Quite simply...you guys seem to think managers pick all the players. They quite simply don't.

Jol seemed to get the blame for bad signings...ironically, of which were mostly from above his head that he had no clue about either, and unfortunately for him, unlike Redknapp, they didn't work out. Ramos simply wasn't a Prem manager, although obviously, they wouldn't have ended up 18th in that season or whatever when he left, but still clearly wrong team, wrong league for him.
It was different when Jol was there Zen, you seem to be stuck in the mid 00's

Quote:
Levy, who confirmed Redknapp will be given full control of transfers at Tottenham, sacked Juande Ramos after the club's horrendous start to the season.

"Following a meeting of the directors and a full review of our football management structure Damien will not be directly replaced.
"In Harry, we are also accepting with his appointment that now is the right time for us to move back to a more traditional style of football management at our club."
Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy says Harry Redknapp is a fighter who can avoid the drop: Football - Telegraph
I'm always right is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 13:51   #97 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sanctity, like a cat, abhors filth.
Posts: 8,436
Solskjaer for England.
Adebesi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 13:52   #98 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: wayne rooney wonderland
Posts: 3,982
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon Adebesi View Post
Solskjaer for England.
Wash your mouth out!

Utd >>> England

They dont deseve him.
towcester_red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 13:53   #99 (permalink)
Poster of the year 2008
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: "like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons from a deckchair"
Posts: 62,724
Judging an international team manager is a bit tricky as they always have the "don't have the players" get out clause. With a club manager, it's them that signed the players so there's no excuses.

If you look at the international sides that have won major trophies, without being one of the red-hot favourites, their managers almost always seem to be able to get teams to punch above their weight. To create a team that performs better than you'd expect based on the individual components. I don't think anyone would say that Capello has done this with England.
Pogue Mahone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 13:54   #100 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mêlée Island
Posts: 15,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pogue Mahone View Post
Judging an international team manager is a bit tricky as they always have the "don't have the players" get out clause. With a club manager, it's them that signed the players so there's no excuses.

If you look at the international sides that have won major trophies, without being one of the red-hot favourites, their managers almost always seem to be able to get teams to punch above their weight. To create a team that performs better than you'd expect based on the individual components. I don't think anyone would say that Capello has done this with England.
Said it better than I ever could Pogue. Bang on the money imo.
I'm always right is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 13:57   #101 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sanctity, like a cat, abhors filth.
Posts: 8,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by towcester_red View Post
Wash your mouth out!

Utd >>> England

They dont deseve him.
Ha ha. United > England, definitely.

It is just to give him a bit of experience. He has to manage some smaller clubs before he comes to us. And England is the smallest big club (OK, job) in the world.
Adebesi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 13:57   #102 (permalink)
"It's like..."
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Flagg
Posts: 4,227
Send a message via MSN to noodlehair
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smores View Post
There's just no defending someone who chooses to play Heskey
Yes but forget that, or Gareth Barry, or thinking John Terry is an appropriate ambassador as England captain, or the mid torunament player mutinies, or the thinking Jamie Carragher (the fullback, not the centreback) was worth more of an effort than Paul Scholes, or thinking Glen Johnson is good enough to be in the England team while Micah Richards isn't good enough to be in the squad, etc...

If you're really selective about it and ignore several large chunks of reality, this guy has the best record of any England manager in history! You can't argue with that.
noodlehair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 13:57   #103 (permalink)
Zen
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,282
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guybrush Threepwood View Post
It was different when Jol was there Zen, you seem to be stuck in the mid 00's



Tottenham chairman Daniel Levy says Harry Redknapp is a fighter who can avoid the drop: Football - Telegraph
I'll take Redknapp admitting he didn't know he was getting two players as a sign he doesn't have complete control, and in the modern game, unless your Fergie(who probably doesn't have 100% control anyway, maybe 80-85%), no manager does anyway, regardless of whats released by PR.
Zen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 14:00   #104 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mêlée Island
Posts: 15,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zen View Post
I'll take Redknapp admitting he didn't know he was getting two players as a sign he doesn't have complete control, and in the modern game, unless your Fergie(who probably doesn't have 100% control anyway, maybe 80-85%), no manager does anyway, regardless of whats released by PR.
Which 2 players?

We explained Adebayor to you, the reason he said "I don't know, the chairman is dealing with it" is because that's what Chairman do, they negotiate fees and contracts.

Why are you not getting this?
I'm always right is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 14:02   #105 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NOBODY, calls Dugan a turd.
Posts: 19,808
Quote:
Originally Posted by noodlehair View Post
Yes but forget that, or Gareth Barry, or thinking John Terry is an appropriate ambassador as England captain, or the mid torunament player mutinies, or the thinking Jamie Carragher (the fullback, not the centreback) was worth more of an effort than Paul Scholes, or thinking Glen Johnson is good enough to be in the England team while Micah Richards isn't good enough to be in the squad, etc...

If you're really selective about it and ignore several large chunks of reality, this guy has the best record of any England manager in history! You can't argue with that.
So despite all of that, he qualified for the Euros top of the group and unbeaten. Shit, Capello must be the greatest manager in history.
Lance Uppercut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 14:03   #106 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zen View Post
Quite simply...you guys seem to think managers pick all the players. They quite simply don't.

Jol seemed to get the blame for bad signings...ironically, of which were mostly from above his head that he had no clue about either, and unfortunately for him, unlike Redknapp, they didn't work out. Ramos simply wasn't a Prem manager, although obviously, they wouldn't have ended up 18th in that season or whatever when he left, but still clearly wrong team, wrong league for him.
Right, except I didn't say that did I? I said that Redknapp presents players. Levy will usually then chase up those players, do the negotiations etc. Occassionally, he'll veto Redknapp's suggestion. And sometimes Levy will suggest players, who Redknapp will also have to say yes to for Levy to start chasing. But Levy holds the ultimate power. Its not a coincidence that our buying strategy has changed from Jol--Ramos--Redknapp. Levy hasn't become a Schizophrenic.

Jol got the blame by clueless numpties. And even if those signings weren't his, we had a DoF then, which we no longer do.

Anyway, I feel like you're on a pretty big fishing trip here so I'll leave it there.
africanspur is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 14:04   #107 (permalink)
Zen
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,282
Or because well....he didn't know. And the other was clearly VdV, and I gave him credit for Parker, which is well, the three key signings under Harry, since Bale and Modric weren't his, one of which Levy was more key to keeping at Spurs than Harry was.

I think it's clear I know chairmans do the deals since I'm not the one blinded by thinking managers do everything.
Zen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 14:06   #108 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mêlée Island
Posts: 15,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zen View Post
I think it's clear I know chairmans do the deals since I'm not the one blinded by thinking managers do everything.
No mate, you think Chairman buy players.

Maybe if you're the Russian or Real Madrid, otherwise the manager ok's deals, certainly.
I'm always right is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 14:07   #109 (permalink)
Zen
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,282
Chairman do buy players, and you've just confirmed it by giving a few more examples, thanks son.
Zen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 14:08   #110 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mêlée Island
Posts: 15,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zen View Post
Chairman do buy players, and you've just confirmed it by giving a few more examples, thanks son.
I never denied that son.
I'm always right is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 14:13   #111 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mêlée Island
Posts: 15,933
You obviously don't like Redknapp but making out that his dream (Crouch and Defoe) was scuppered by Daniel Levy buying VdV and Adebayor without the manager's know how just makes you sound bitter, from a United fan I don't really get it.

It was obvious Redknapp had told Levy to go after Adebayor and in that he said to let Crouch go, why you deny this is a mystery to me. As Africanspur says, maybe Levy should save some cash and manage the club himself.

You also made a silly point about Modric which added to the bizarre bitterness, saying that only Levy made him stay. Redknapp made it obvious he wanted him to stay, but obviously the buck lies with the chairman.

In short, you have a bizarre irrational hatred of Harry Redknapp.
I'm always right is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 14:14   #112 (permalink)
American
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Brooklyn, Connecticut. "Football Was Alright As Long as We Were Winning Everything And Everybody Knew Their Place"
Posts: 13,106
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pogue Mahone View Post
Judging an international team manager is a bit tricky as they always have the "don't have the players" get out clause. With a club manager, it's them that signed the players so there's no excuses.

If you look at the international sides that have won major trophies, without being one of the red-hot favourites, their managers almost always seem to be able to get teams to punch above their weight. To create a team that performs better than you'd expect based on the individual components. I don't think anyone would say that Capello has done this with England.
I can't think of any team apart from Greece that everyone didn't expect to win the competition. Italy, Spain, Spain, France, Brasil? All with much better teams than England.
adexkola is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 14:15   #113 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mêlée Island
Posts: 15,933
Now.... back to Capello.
I'm always right is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 14:16   #114 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mêlée Island
Posts: 15,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by adexkola View Post
I can't think of any team apart from Greece that everyone didn't expect to win the competition. Italy, Spain, Spain, France, Brasil? All with much better teams than England.
Italy were not such a "great" team at all, they certainly punched above their weight by winning the WC.
I'm always right is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 14:17   #115 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: at the back post, lurking around, waiting for an easy tap-in.
Posts: 5,378
I always get the impression that Harry just goes along with the ideas of everyone around him, and has just fluked his entire Spurs spell. I mean, if he can't write, can't use a computer, then what hope has he of comprehending how to get the best out of his team? And he has like what, 18 assistant managers and Joe Jordan(for kicking the shit out of anyone not behaving).

"Oh, Peter, you want to leave? Stoke suits you better? Perfectly fine."
"So, Daniel, you want to keep Luka? He's valuable you say? Fine I guess. I promised him he could go to Chelsea though."
"Oh, Gareth, you want to play more centrally this season? Switch flanks with Aaron you say? Sure."
"Buy some guy from West Ham? He's a London bloke ey? I'll take that."

This is obviously not true, but it's what I always will believe to have happened. No matter what.
marjen is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 14:21   #116 (permalink)
Zen
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,282
<----- doesn't hate or even dislike Redknapp. Just don't want him as next England manager nor will I overrate his managerial skills like others do.

I dislike Mourinho a lot, but I'd want him as England manager.
Zen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 14:22   #117 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mêlée Island
Posts: 15,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by marjen View Post
I always get the impression that Harry just goes along with the ideas of everyone around him, and has just fluked his entire Spurs spell. I mean, if he can't write, can't use a computer, then what hope has he of comprehending how to get the best out of his team? And he has like what, 18 assistant managers and Joe Jordan(for kicking the shit out of anyone not behaving).

"Oh, Peter, you want to leave? Stoke suits you better? Perfectly fine."
"So, Daniel, you want to keep Luka? He's valuable you say? Fine I guess. I promised him he could go to Chelsea though."
"Oh, Gareth, you want to play more centrally this season? Switch flanks with Aaron you say? Sure."
"Buy some guy from West Ham? He's a London bloke ey? I'll take that."

This is obviously not true, but it's what I always will believe to have happened. No matter what.
I'm always right is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 14:24   #118 (permalink)
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NOBODY, calls Dugan a turd.
Posts: 19,808
I hope 'Arry gets it at some point. I look forward to seeing his buddies in the press trying to paint every fuck up as some kind of achievement.
Lance Uppercut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 14:26   #119 (permalink)
Zen
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,282
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lance Uppercut View Post
I hope 'Arry gets it at some point. I look forward to seeing his buddies in the press trying to paint every fuck up as some kind of achievement.


I'm with Lance. Nothing better than the press contradicting themselves.
Zen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th February 2012, 15:09   #120 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 7,413
With regards to Redknapp as England manager, I don't expect him to wield the axe on players and experiment on a new system. Case of same old, same old more likely. Which is part of the problem with the national team.

Expectation and media pressure will make 'Arry like some sort of 'savior' which he isn't. One poor result against a Germany or France and he will unfortunately get hounded, no matter how strong his media links are.
Guy Incognito is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:58.

Back to top


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO