Member's Login
Not yet a member? Register now
|
|
#205 (permalink) |
|
Hi, I'm Barry Scott
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,984
|
Apologies if this has been shared before.
Lynam rates Neville as the best pundit in town: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/foo...Des-Lynam.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#206 (permalink) | |
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Southern Ireland
Posts: 3,887
|
Quote:
So far in his fledgling career, I'd say that Neville ties Hansen - they're equally good in their different ways. Lynam gets Souness spot on, but I think 'auld lang syne' influences his ratings for Lawrensen. He comes as close as possible to saying Shearer is a bore - which he is. I don't agree with his rating of Collymore. I've only heard him once - off camera against Bilbao the other night - but he was good. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#207 (permalink) |
|
Resident Arse.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,161
|
Thought this guy was a complete dickhead when he was a player and I must say did think WTF when I heard Sky were recruiting him as their analyst. One thing is for sure the guys at Sky have done a brilliant job at polishing him up for TV, he looks very assured and confident on TV which is something some people don't and he is very good at his his point across clearly. However one thing they couldn't teach him and this comes from him is his analysing skills. For the first time in god knows how many years we have a half decent analyst on the tele. I used to switch the TV off at full time but now will actually sit back to wait to hear what he has to say. He is doing a brilliant job and surprisingly has remained quite neutral throughout.
The likes of Hansen, Shearer and that other Liverpool player week in week out just point out the bleeding obvious and offer little to no insight. I just don't understand why the hell BBC even persist with them. Dixon is alright still and I enjoy watching hi, |
|
|
|
|
|
#208 (permalink) | |
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,576
|
Quote:
What you want from a pundit is for them to tell you things you don't know and G Dot does that better than any pundit in the business. Virtually all the pundits have played before but few use the benefit of their experience as well as Neville does. Easily the best pundit on TV. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#209 (permalink) | |
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,064
|
Quote:
It's a real breath of fresh air as opposed to the tired old faces being rolled out and repeating the same old soundbites after watching 10mins of highlights. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#210 (permalink) | |
|
Resident Arse.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,161
|
Quote:
I still think there is a gaping hole in our TV Schedule where I'd love to see an hour long show every Sunday night where they would talk about football matters on a more deep and technical level rather than the shit we got at the moment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#211 (permalink) | |
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,064
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#212 (permalink) |
|
No Lifer
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Djibouti (La terre des braves)
Posts: 32,559
|
We more or less have the same issues in France with the Canal + coverage of football.Much like Sky the presentation is really good but when it comes to analyzing the intricate aspect of football only one or two pundits know their stuff.
Reynald Denoueix (the former Nantes and Real Sociedad coach) is for me the best one.The most knowledgeable and the one who explain complicated things very simply.He's a La Liga expert and he's too good in comparison to the usual pundits |
|
|
|
|
|
#213 (permalink) |
|
First Team Sub
Join Date: May 2009
Location: in a stolen ice cream truck on the wrong side of town
Posts: 5,716
|
He used to do guest co-commentary for FA Youth cup games on MUTV while he still played for United. You can definitely tell he had some experience before they signed him up for Sky.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#214 (permalink) |
|
First Team Regular
|
Is there a country that doesn't have an issue with its TV commentators? Most of the pundits in Israel - yeah, I know, just Israel - are a bunch of guys who were the top footballers in this country, and have absolutely NOTHING of any interest to say. They are only chosen because of who they were. They make Shearer sound refreshingly interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#218 (permalink) |
|
No Lifer
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Commas are important. "Come on, Barbie, let's go party" is much less sinister than "Come on Barbie, let's go party"
Posts: 33,114
|
Gaz knows where the line is....talking about fannies is okay, talking about smashing them isn't.
Good lad. |
|
|
|
|
|
#227 (permalink) | |
|
Came from nowhere, yet still a better modmin than Weaste ever was
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: mishy gishy gushy gushy mishy meshy mushy, motherfucker
Posts: 45,400
|
Quote:
Some on here could do well to take heed of that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#230 (permalink) | |
|
Aka LTS10
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,993
|
Quote:
![]() Some great clips of Ronaldo, amazing transformation to go through. Compare Neville's punditry to that of Jamie Redknapp, Alan Hansen, Mark Lawrenson, Alan Shearer, Dwight Yorke and others, its night and day. Neville really breaks everything down for you and its actually interesting to watch and listen to. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#233 (permalink) |
|
Hi, I'm Barry Scott
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,984
|
His knowledge is outstanding. He plucks numbers, fixtures, results and examples from nowhere when clearly a point or question has come out of the blue. Some footie fans can do this, but I rarely see pundits either bother to have the knowledge/do the research or have the composure to bring it to the table. He does it all the time and its very impressive.
His passion is good, but his tactical points are spot on. As are the little points he adds on what being a player on a matchday is like, for example. A young viewer could have no idea that Alan Shearer has outscored every Premier League striker ever. You'd never know it, watching his analysis. |
|
|
|
|
|
#237 (permalink) |
|
Reserve Team Player
|
The Neviller's absolutely quality. I know it's a bit rich but my favourite thing about his career as a punditry is also how he's getting so much out of Ed Chamberlain as well. Since Keys left, I've always felt as though Sky have struggled to find a quality host. The man best suited to the job, in my opinion, was Stelling and he's got other commitments. Chamberlain was really straight-faced and boring, possibly even a little stiff.
However, the two of them as a studio team really works. Gary seems to make Ed a better host and Ed seems to make the most of Gary's encyclopedic knowledge. I dunno, they just seem to click really well on-screen which somehow makes it that much more easy to watch. It's certainly better than watching Rebecca Lowe trying to coax intelligent life out of the "pundits" on ESPN. MNF is actually becoming a decent programme to watch and not just another game tacked onto the end of a weekend. I agree that it'd be nice to see a programme put together purely for a summary of the weekend's action offering pundit's views. I never thought I'd see that as a good idea but Gary does make it so much better. |
|
|
|
|
|
#238 (permalink) | |
|
Hi, I'm Barry Scott
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,984
|
Quote:
I did used to enjoy a lot of Gray's punditry on MNF and The Last Word, where he'd add lots more detail. He did pick out some good stuff you wouldn't normally spot. Neville, to his credit, is bettering it though. |
|
|
|
|