Member's Login
Not yet a member? Register now
|
|
#921 (permalink) | |
|
Youth Team Player
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 440
|
Quote:
If I was choosing the first XI 'purely on footballing reasons' I'd go for Richards--Rio--Terry--Baines/Cole -------Scholes--Carrick------ Sturridge---Rooney---Young -----------Welbeck---------- Replace Sturridge with Oxlaide-Chamberlain if he can't do the defensive side of that role. Scholes and Carrick have been the most successful midfield partnership in English football this season probably, if memory serves we won every game bar one or two draws with that midfield. People might criticise the lack of pace or energy there but if they're that successful in the high-tempo Premier League there's no reason they couldn't do it in International football. Young, Rooney and Welbeck should be a certainty when Rooney's back, in my opinion the Rooney-Welbeck combo is one of the strongest things England have going for them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#923 (permalink) |
|
Poster of the year 2008
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: "like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons from a deckchair"
Posts: 62,724
|
Apparently he's all about relentless, repetitive defensive drills to get all the players locked into his preferred system of play. I guess he thinks that selecting players he's already worked with before will help him get his ideas across a bit quicker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#924 (permalink) |
|
News 24
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: "I'd also like to remind you that we've had bad times here. The club stood by me. All my staff stood by me. The players stood by me. So your job now is to stand by our new manager. That is important. "
Posts: 15,430
|
Hodgson clearly places a lot of emphasis on the opinions of club managers,therefore Mancini's reluctance to turn to Richards at the sharp end of the season is going to count against him quite badly. Which is before you overcome the matter of his positional sense at full back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#925 (permalink) |
|
Worst scout ever
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Kids are the Future
Posts: 16,955
|
I was expecting Hodgson to start with a midfield 3 of Parker, Barry and Gerrard for our toughest games, without Barry I would think that Carrick would be the obvious choice to replace him in the starting line up.
If reports that Carrick would accept a place in the team if he was a starter are true, if I was Hodgson I'd give him that spot. Especially while Rooney in out, it would make sense to play 433/451 and have 3 central midfielders out there. I suppose it's quite possible that the reports are nonsense though and Carrick isn't willing to play even if he's starting. But if England start Milner or Lampard over Carrick to partner Parker and Gerrard in a midfield 3, then Hodgson may well be doomed as England manager. Unless Wilshere gets healthy soon and solves all these midfield selection problems. Sadly we're stuck with Gerrard in midfield, I fear, until he retires, being captain and all. |
|
|
|
|
|
#926 (permalink) |
|
Not as crap as eferyone thinks
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The treble gone
Posts: 23,010
|
Rooney - Welbeck OxCh - Cleverley - Wilshere - Walcott Baines - Jones - Smalling - Walker Hart Sturridge - Carroll Young - McEachran - ??? - Milner Gibbs - ??? - ??? - Richards Sinclair So much quality there for the next few years. |
|
|
|
|
|
#929 (permalink) |
|
Agent something or other's friend or the like
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Commas are important. "Come on, Barbie, let's go party" is much less sinister than "Come on Barbie, let's go party"
Posts: 33,079
|
McEachran has a lot to prove. I don't think he's anything like nailed on to be a top player.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#930 (permalink) | |
|
Not as crap as eferyone thinks
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The treble gone
Posts: 23,010
|
Quote:
Has the makings of a very high quality, and complimentary, England team in my opinion. The one thing I am very worried about is Welbeck getting a career ending injury. He seems the type. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#931 (permalink) |
|
Everton fan
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Scotland.
Posts: 4,247
|
Fair enough, how much have you seen of Barkley? It's all hypothetical of course and being brilliant at youth/reserve doesn't mean you'll ace at the senior level but he is way too good for them and it's holding him back as he takes the piss which isn't good for his development. He came into our first team and was probably motm on his debut at 17. I'm 90% sure he won't go the way of Rodwell too.
EDIT: I think Barkley will be better than Rodwell too, plus at least good enough to be an England first choice sub if not starter. |
|
|
|
|
|
#933 (permalink) | |
|
Not Allowed A Hash Tag
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Formerly cw1984
Posts: 31,708
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|