Go Back   RedCafe.net > Football Discussion > Football Forum

View Poll Results: Who will win based on players in their prime, team tactics, balance & bench strength?
Team Brwned 14 51.85%
Team Cal? 13 48.15%
Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11th January 2012, 02:09   #41 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheReligion View Post
I am not sure on the love in for Angloma and Ronny Johnsen.

Des Walker is pretty underrated and was very good in his prime, but these two are not in the same league as Blind, Desailly and Benarrivo in my honest opinion.

Going forward Polaroid's outfit is very balanced though, but a side containing Bergkamp, Cantona, Savicevic, Stojkovic is going to cause problems against any defence. Rijkaard helping out and breaking up play also seems to be going unoticed. He was simply fantastic and essentially turns Brwned's defence into a back 5 when needed.

Man for man I don't think there is a great deal in it when you see past the names.
Have to seriously question how much you saw of Angloma. As a reflection of how good he was, it suffices to say he was chosen by leading sports journalists across Europe in their Team of the Year 3 times, in an era of Cafu, Thuram and Javier Zanetti.

Johnsen was never in the top bracket of centrebacks (neither was Blind) hence my pick of Baresi to add to my team.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snow View Post
Have to work it to your advantage that Laudrup and Hassler are kind of being played out of position.
How are they out of position when they have played the floating attacking midfield role on so many occassions for club and country?
Polaroid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2012, 03:38   #42 (permalink)
Baby Cameron loves X-Factor
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 16,056
Would you consider going 5-3-2 taking in Costacurta - might be something to think about though I would be seriously thinking about Redondo.

I think you should have got Seaman and Bergkamp as your last two.
Team Brian GB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2012, 07:22   #43 (permalink)
Poster of the year: 2010
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 33,938
I did think about Costacurta but then I'm playing a 3 man defence with just one wing-back, I couldn't play Myung-Bo there.

Like this then, antohan? With no width at all? I thought that's why Savicevic was useful.

Brwned is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2012, 10:08   #44 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polaroid View Post
Have to seriously question how much you saw of Angloma. As a reflection of how good he was, it suffices to say he was chosen by leading sports journalists across Europe in their Team of the Year 3 times, in an era of Cafu, Thuram and Javier Zanetti.

Johnsen was never in the top bracket of centrebacks (neither was Blind) hence my pick of Baresi to add to my team.
Disagree about the Blind - Johnsen comparison.

Blind was far superior in every department. Angloma was nothing more than decent from what I can remember, certainly not in the same bracket as Zanetti, Thuram, Lizarazu and Cafu.
TheReligion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2012, 10:09   #45 (permalink)
KM
First Team Regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Q.P.R
Posts: 14,862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brwned View Post
I did think about Costacurta but then I'm playing a 3 man defence with just one wing-back, I couldn't play Myung-Bo there.

Like this then, antohan? With no width at all? I thought that's why Savicevic was useful.

Good god, that midfield three is sensational.
KM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2012, 10:37   #46 (permalink)
Hi, I'm Barry Scott
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,391
I am surprised by this result.
Cling Bak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2012, 10:50   #47 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polaroid View Post
Have to seriously question how much you saw of Angloma. As a reflection of how good he was, it suffices to say he was chosen by leading sports journalists across Europe in their Team of the Year 3 times, in an era of Cafu, Thuram and Javier Zanetti.

Johnsen was never in the top bracket of centrebacks (neither was Blind) hence my pick of Baresi to add to my team.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheReligion View Post
Disagree about the Blind - Johnsen comparison.

Blind was far superior in every department. Angloma was nothing more than decent from what I can remember, certainly not in the same bracket as Zanetti, Thuram, Lizarazu and Cafu.
So by your judgement, Blind was in the top bracket of centre-backs, far superior in every department to Ronny Johnsen, and Angloma was nothing more than decent. Wow...I would like to throw the question out there - who else shares the same verdict on the ability of these players as TheReligion?
Polaroid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2012, 11:22   #48 (permalink)
Hi, I'm Barry Scott
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 6,391
I would say all three - Blind, Johnsen and Angloma - were good players. If I had to place them in order, I'd go: 1. Angloma, 2. Blind, 3. Johnsen.

Ronny would be more distant in third, if I'm being honest. Still a very tidy player, but he didn't have the career or talent of the other two. Angloma was around during a fantastic French national team and enjoyed good spells at several clubs; Blind was part of a great Ajax side.
Cling Bak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2012, 11:31   #49 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: I figure I'm gonna have to do 6,000 years before I get accepted into heaven and 6,000 years is nothin' in eternity terms. I can do that standing on my head. It's like a couple of days here.
Posts: 4,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brwned View Post
I did think about Costacurta but then I'm playing a 3 man defence with just one wing-back, I couldn't play Myung-Bo there.

Like this then, antohan? With no width at all? I thought that's why Savicevic was useful.

Personally I'd keep Savicevic in there for that reason. I think Antohan's right about Vialli being essential for team shape, which leaves you with the difficult decision of who to drop between Cantona and Bergkamp.
Pat_Mustard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2012, 11:50   #50 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Montevideo
Posts: 5,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brwned View Post
I did think about Costacurta but then I'm playing a 3 man defence with just one wing-back, I couldn't play Myung-Bo there.

Like this then, antohan? With no width at all? I thought that's why Savicevic was useful.

The point being that you nullify his key strength. At the quarters, his midfield looked far and away the best around, now there's a case for yours being the tits.

I'm not sure if you can but I pictured Bergkamp being level with Eric with both closer to the corner of the box (as you had before changing the pic) and Vialli centre. Bergkamp can definitely go wide as and when if a game requires it, and don't forget you've got Benarrivo.

What I can't see is how you will have width on the right with that chap Bo and Eric there. Maldini is the left fullback, mind, not much joy there (although with width not an issue he may well play three at the back and reinstate midfield dominance).

I look at both teamsheets and can't avoid the feeling that you are playing 10vs11. You have to start posting some Myung Bo Youtube clips

Mmmm, maybe it is Vialli you have to drop after all and have Eric as some sort of false 9 with Bergkamp and Savicevic either side... After all, it is the quality balls from midfield and the movement of these three that will get you to carve up what is a very solid defence.
antohan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2012, 11:55   #51 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Montevideo
Posts: 5,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat_Mustard View Post
Personally I'd keep Savicevic in there for that reason. I think Antohan's right about Vialli being essential for team shape, which leaves you with the difficult decision of who to drop between Cantona and Bergkamp.
That is an impossible decision... because, quite frankly, it would have to be Eric. That's why I backtracked on Vialli and suggested Eric as a false 9. The teamsheet would look odd but it is not as bad an idea as it sounds.

But... you can't drop Eric Cantona on Redcafe.net and expect anything good to come from it
antohan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2012, 12:12   #52 (permalink)
Poster of the year: 2010
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 33,938
Dropping Cantona's a huge gamble but there you go, it's done. Bergkamp was better. I've changed it so many times already so chances are it'll change during the game following outrage! Here it is:



And Myung-Bo was one of the very, very few defenders to be nominated for one of the top three players in a WC, he's not that bad. Captain of that '02 South Korea side while playing as the sweeper, supremely composed but with a real hardness to his game. You'll remember him if you saw him! Not exactly many videos knocking about though...there is this, with the comment just under it saying:

Quote:
Hong is likely the best Asian soccer player ever, and most domestic experts would agree. It's fashionable for the non-expert public to say that Cha was the best, but Cha was lucky in that he could "escape" to Europe and show his wares due to unique circumstances.
In his prime, Hong was often compared to Beckenbauer as an attacking libero. He could dribble all day and had a canon shot like Roberto Carlos.
Brwned is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2012, 13:00   #53 (permalink)
Gio
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bonnie Scotland
Posts: 4,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by Team Brian GB View Post
Would you consider going 5-3-2 taking in Costacurta - might be something to think about though I would be seriously thinking about Redondo.

I think you should have got Seaman and Bergkamp as your last two.
If we take Euro 96 as Kopke's and Seaman's peaks, there's nothing to split them. They're both great second-tier keepers from this era (first tier being Schmeichel and Kahn).
Gio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th January 2012, 17:47   #54 (permalink)
Reserve Team Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: I figure I'm gonna have to do 6,000 years before I get accepted into heaven and 6,000 years is nothin' in eternity terms. I can do that standing on my head. It's like a couple of days here.
Posts: 4,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by antohan View Post
That is an impossible decision... because, quite frankly, it would have to be Eric. That's why I backtracked on Vialli and suggested Eric as a false 9. The teamsheet would look odd but it is not as bad an idea as it sounds.

But... you can't drop Eric Cantona on Redcafe.net and expect anything good to come from it
I don't think its a bad idea at all, but there's been alot of complaints from others in this thread about a lack of balance in a Cantona-Bergkamp partnership. It looks like a definite vote loser to play them together from the comments so far.
Pat_Mustard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th January 2012, 01:28   #55 (permalink)
First Team Sub
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polaroid View Post
So by your judgement, Blind was in the top bracket of centre-backs, far superior in every department to Ronny Johnsen, and Angloma was nothing more than decent. Wow...I would like to throw the question out there - who else shares the same verdict on the ability of these players as TheReligion?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cling Bak View Post
I would say all three - Blind, Johnsen and Angloma - were good players. If I had to place them in order, I'd go: 1. Angloma, 2. Blind, 3. Johnsen.

Ronny would be more distant in third, if I'm being honest. Still a very tidy player, but he didn't have the career or talent of the other two. Angloma was around during a fantastic French national team and enjoyed good spells at several clubs; Blind was part of a great Ajax side.
I just don't think Angloma was as good as people are portraying.

Of course Blind is better than Johnsen. Would be madness to suggest otherwise!
TheReligion is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

 


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:57.

Back to top


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO