![]() |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Created by two, felt by millions - T.I.O.T.R
Posts: 22,539
|
Grylls is a little inbred who runs around eating live animals despite having a camera crew with him, and over several shows actually sleeping in their car because it was too cold.
Mears isn't as entertaining or daft. He's brilliant though, could probably make a xbox out of a tree if he had too. Mears. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Out of the closet, into life.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: renowned and profound prophet of rimglish.
Posts: 9,551
|
it is a difficult one, i find grylls more entertaining but i think mears is better at what he does. i will have to go with grylls, any man who drinks the poo of elephants is alright by me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Out of the closet, into life.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: renowned and profound prophet of rimglish.
Posts: 9,551
|
grylls is the one who eats live animals. he does born survivor on discovery, e4, channel 4, more4, something else4. your right he is more entertaining than mears but not as good as him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
I'd find it flattering if someone hard rubbed against me.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,523
|
I liked Bear Grylls. But he looks like Clattenburg without the fat and with an irresistible accent, and it's annoying. I'm supposed to hate Clattenburg for his antics for the Scouse last season, but I can't watch him ref without being a little turned on
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Dr Death wasting tax payers money on the Caf all day
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: "As relaxed and natural on the park as a dog chasing a piece of silver paper in the wind"
Posts: 13,561
|
That show was fecking hilarious.
He caught the turtle, turned to camera and said "One of the big problems here is dehydration, you can replace some missing salts by drinking blood" Then he started rooting around in it's neck hole with his knife, only for the camera to cut away and show some scenery... Now, bear in mind every other time he's killed and eaten an animal, they show everything that happens, in full gory detail. This includes eating worms, maggots and biting into a live trout so enthusiastically, that it's belly ruptured and sprayed entrails all over his face. So when they cut away from the whole turtle/knife/neck-hole thing, you just knew that what happened next was seriously wrong. Sure enough, when they cut back to (a visibly shaken) Bear Grylls, he was fecking covered in gore. I can't shake the image of him trying to drink blood out of a horrifically wounded turtle that was hosing him in claret, it's wee legs frantically peddling at the air, and the director going "Jesus Christ! Cut! Cut! Cut!" ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
Off his rockerJoin Date: Jul 2006
Location: H.D.Y.K.I.S.T.I.H.W.
Posts: 7,409
|
Quote:
classical.you don't get that shit with Mears. Grylls >>>>>>>>>>> Mears |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
I.C.F. Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Viva Ronaldo
Posts: 22,798
|
From Whacky Peado
"Criticism Following allegations that the show deceived viewers into believing that he was really stranded in the wild when he was not, Channel 4 temporarily suspended the show. Discovery aired re-edited episodes, designed to remove elements that were considered too planned, with a fresh voiceover, and has continued to broadcast the programme. An adviser to the Man vs. Wild/Born Survivor series had claimed that Grylls had been staying at a California motel while filming. A crossing of a deep crevass was shown to be just yards from a busy highway.[25] Similarly, it was alleged that Grylls had stayed at a crew base-camp in the Costa Rican jungle, while giving viewers the impression that he was alone. These allegations were confirmed by Channel 4, who argued that it was not a documentary, but a 'how-to' guide to survival, implying that 'faked' or re-shot scenes were acceptable in that context " |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | ||
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,026
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
First Team Sub
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In the corner, losing my religion.
Posts: 5,828
|
Anyone that kills animals for nothing but entertainment is sick, in my opinion. It's one thing killing for food, but killing things just for the sake of television is just wrong.
I hope he gets eaten by a bear. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
First Team Sub
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oslo
Posts: 5,091
|
Grylls.
Lars Monsen is the bigger man all together though. He spent three years crossing Canada on his own using only his feet, skiis, a canoe and a sled. He`s a man`s man. Some funny stuff in his videos as well. Like when he "had to kill" the polar bear because it was chewing away at his shelter. When he films the dead bear though it`s lying about a hundred meters away, probably on it`s way back to where it came from. Also funny when he met a brown bear in the Canadian outback, and starts shouting at it in Norwegian. When the bear refuses to move, he switches to English! Like the fecking bear knows the difference. |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 (permalink) |
|
Dr Death wasting tax payers money on the Caf all day
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: "As relaxed and natural on the park as a dog chasing a piece of silver paper in the wind"
Posts: 13,561
|
Just to stir things up a bit, I reckon this bloke is tougher than either of the English ponces discussed in this thread.
http://www.survivorman.ca/ He doesn't have Gryll's "wonder-knife" and bottomless water bottle, nor does he have Mears' plush camper-van to retreat to at sun-down for some medium rare veal and a nice bottle of Chateauneuf de Pape. No water. No tools. No camera crew. Ave it. |
|
|
|