Member's Login
Not yet a member? Register now
|
|
#44 (permalink) |
|
First Team Sub
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: RedCafe Ninja. Stalks the forum undercover, then wham, throws in a line or two of common sense just to confuse everyone :-P
Posts: 6,808
|
Sneijder is the better player but I think Modric would be better fit for United
1. I think Modric wouldnt kick up as big a stink when left out 2. Sneijder plays in Rooneys role, whereas Modric is more of a Scholes replacement 3. Modric already up to Prem speed 4. Less expectations on Modric |
|
|
|
|
#50 (permalink) |
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 4,054
|
Man for man, the Barca trio are way ahead of each man. As a unit, they're also untouchable, we've seen it time and time again. For sure, those three would fair better than Carrick 'the passenger' and a 37 year old Giggs.
|
|
|
|
|
#53 (permalink) | |
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 4,054
|
Quote:
For sure he'd look better in the Biscuits position, but he didn't play there so we cant laud him. |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 (permalink) |
|
Reserve Team Player
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Failing a Jib anywhere, anyhow
Posts: 2,318
|
Modric all day long, I don't want Sneijder purely because Rooneys a better no 10 than he is. We don't need him.
As for Carrick being a passenger, scapegoating him got boring 2 years ago. |
|
|
|
|
#61 (permalink) |
|
First Team Sub
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: kota bharu
Posts: 6,674
|
if we really did sign sneijder then i don't think he will have any problem playing in a 2 man midfield against the fulhams, blackburns or west broms..
when we are playing the big teams then we will change to 4-5-1 and that will suit sneijder as well.. |
|
|
|
|
#62 (permalink) | |
|
First Team Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 27,190
|
Quote:
![]() To bag those two new players you'll need at least 60m |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mêlée Island
Posts: 15,933
|
Carrick didn't play in the Cup Winners Cup final
![]() The use of the word "previous" isn't working too well with this one. And I totally disagree with singling Carrick out as a passenger in this final, he did as much as he could I thought. Put him in a 3 alongside players like Modric and Sneijder and you'd really start to see his influence. |
|
|
|
|
#68 (permalink) | |
|
First Team Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 27,190
|
Quote:
BTW in such circumstances Id rather play Fletch then Carrick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 (permalink) |
|
Dear RHD.. I need your advice. My girlfriend recently..
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: "i said a hip hop the hippie the hippie to the hip hip hop, a you dont stop the rock it to the bang bang boogie say up jumped the boogie to the rhythm of the boogie, the beat.........."
Posts: 13,811
|
To be greedy, i'd like to see Sneider & Modric signed, aswell as Lass Diarra. I think Diarra is perfect for us aswell as those two..
|
|
|
|
|
#71 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mêlée Island
Posts: 15,933
|
Quote:
Was totally hypothetical to ask, what would we need to match Barca. I'm 31, I don't play football manager. |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mêlée Island
Posts: 15,933
|
Quote:
Stop trying to be a clever dick, it doesn't suit you. |
|
|
|
|
|
#79 (permalink) | |
|
Redcafe's Greatest Poster
![]() Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Salford in Castellón de la Plana
Posts: 101,558
|
Quote:
That's not the point I'm making. Spending big money on something that's second best isn't going to plug the gap either, it's pissing in the wind. |
|
|
|
|
|
#80 (permalink) |
|
First Team Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 27,190
|
Sneijder and Modric are available at the right price, that's true but we can't afford them both. You're talking here about at least 60m. One shouldn't forget their salaries, their signing on fee AND the fact that we need to bring in a new keeper. Its nearly as realistic as getting Iniesta or Xavi.
|
|
|