Discussion in 'Manchester United Forum' started by nemanja15, Dec 30, 2010.
Let's just be thankful we don't have AIG on the kits anymore
Aon hit with FSA’s biggest ever bribery fine in corruption scandal
Though this was before we signed with them to be fair.
Yes, it would have looked better (slightly) but it would have cost a lot more to produce that fabric than to print a pattern onto their normal stuff.
I own that shirt in black and red, and have never once realised that pattern!
I got given that shirt from a bird I was shagging who worked for AIG. She said everyone who worked in her office got one. No wonder the company was in such shit.
Last time I looked at the photo of our new kit, I'll be honest I didn't like it.
But now I think I'm getting used to it.
Getting used to how abhorrent it is.
Would make sense. The profit on shirt sales would be enormous if it cost a quid to make 100 quid to sell. There has to be well over a million shirts sold every season? Or is that being unrealistic..
Bet you isparky's left ball sac that come next season, the vast majority will say, you know, that kits not half bad. Like the 09/10 kit with that ugly arse black chevron.
I'd rather it be a table cloth, than the fecking power point slide background that Barca have.
i'll bet they don't run them past anyone but United officials. what we see is United's decision.
I suppose there have been tons of much uglier kits, especially in Italy. I'd almost rather it was extremely gaudy instead of just looking tacky. They could at least picked a plaid pattern that's more interesting than a tablecloth.
Word is this is the leaked GK shirt...
Separate names with a comma.