Net Spend

Discussion in 'Manchester United Forum' started by charlenefan, Aug 9, 2018.

  1. Aug 9, 2018
    #1

    charlenefan Far less insightful than the other Charley

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2005
    Messages:
    16,542
    £53m-ish that's our Net Spend this window.... and no I'm not bringing this up the way some Liverpool supporters and Glaston do as that it's some kind of achievement. Fifty Three Fecking Million spent for the supposed richest club in the world!! What the actual feck?

    Woodward and the board need to answer for this transfer window

    /rant
  2. Aug 9, 2018
    #2

    Jacob Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2005
    Messages:
    22,053
    Location:
    London
    I disagree that spend is the only measure of ambition. We're fine.

    I just hope we do some selling before close of August.

    Fred, Dalot, Sanchez 2.0, Lindelöf 2.0 and promoted youth should improve us a bit. City can't improve on 100 points.
  3. Aug 9, 2018
    #3

    Crashoutcassius Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2013
    Messages:
    5,467
    Location:
    playa del carmen
    Why sign players that don't improve us for the sake of it ? Why further bloat our wage bill with overpaid average players ?
  4. Aug 9, 2018
    #4

    RedNed77 Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Messages:
    1,213
    Location:
    What's it to you???
    Net spend trophy in the bag if we manage that. Klopp and the scousers will be crying into their shoplifted coco-pops come September the 1st if that happens
  5. Aug 9, 2018
    #5

    cyberman Full Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2010
    Messages:
    13,978
    Could be 30m odd if we get rid of Rojo.
  6. Aug 9, 2018
    #6

    charlenefan Far less insightful than the other Charley

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2005
    Messages:
    16,542
    You'd have a point if we had the perfect team but we dont, there's countless players who would improve us in countless positions
  7. Aug 9, 2018
    #7

    Jacob Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2005
    Messages:
    22,053
    Location:
    London
    Don't be ridiculous. Getting rid of deadwood is one way to finance acquisitions. Instead of diluting the squad, we make room for improvements further on.

    Smalling, Jones, Rojo, Mata, Young, Darmian and eventually Valencia has to go. Ironically, 90 percent of them are defenders. I can see why Mou wanted a CB.
  8. Aug 9, 2018
    #8

    Crashoutcassius Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2013
    Messages:
    5,467
    Location:
    playa del carmen
    Should we pay any price that the selling club names ? 90 for Maguire ?
  9. Aug 9, 2018
    #9

    DesiBD Full Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2013
    Messages:
    5,482
    This window has emphasised our need for a DoF.
  10. Aug 9, 2018
    #10

    cyberman Full Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2010
    Messages:
    13,978
    Why? Would he have paid 75m for Toby?
    A DOF would see a lot more signings stretched out like this
  11. Aug 9, 2018
    #11

    VanGaalyTime Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2015
    Messages:
    1,337
    When we sell Rojo, our net spend will be 30 million. It'll be the lowest in recent history in a season where we need to strengthen to claw back 19 points. Disgraceful. Can only see huge problems ahead.
  12. Aug 9, 2018
    #12

    charlenefan Far less insightful than the other Charley

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2005
    Messages:
    16,542
    It's not a black and white question that. If the club has 3 or 4 names to fill one position then yes they should pay what it takes to get one of them
  13. Aug 9, 2018
    #13

    el3mel Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2016
    Messages:
    21,649
    Location:
    Egypt
    It's a shambolic window.

    Really don't understand how can anyone defend it at this stage.
  14. Aug 9, 2018
    #14

    UnrelatedPsuedo I pity the poor fool who stinks like I do!

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2015
    Messages:
    3,822
    Only 5 teams have spent more than us.

    It's been an outlier of a window.
  15. Aug 9, 2018
    #15

    Crashoutcassius Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2013
    Messages:
    5,467
    Location:
    playa del carmen
    So we should pay 90m for Maguire or 75m for alderwereld ... I don't agree personally
  16. Aug 9, 2018
    #16

    charlenefan Far less insightful than the other Charley

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2005
    Messages:
    16,542
    Why does it? Unless you hire a manager/coach knowing full well he's not in it for the long haul he should be your DOF. Now obviously many will say Jose isn't and never was in it for the long haul and in that case yes a DOF should have been brought in and possibly will once Jose leaves but a DOF wouldn't have helped this shit show of a transfer window
  17. Aug 9, 2018
    #17

    Ban Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2015
    Messages:
    18,745
    Location:
    Zagreb, HR
    For various reasons we havent bought as much as we should. Ed didn't want to give more money to Jose or is satisfied with getting top 4. What I dont get is how come we didn't get rid of more deadwood.
  18. Aug 9, 2018
    #18

    Crashoutcassius Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2013
    Messages:
    5,467
    Location:
    playa del carmen
    I'm disappointed we didn't get a player over the line. But I'm happy we aren't perpetuating the spending cycle and happy we are pushing back on mourinho extreme short termism for signings, if that is what is going on
  19. Aug 9, 2018
    #19

    Ban Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2015
    Messages:
    18,745
    Location:
    Zagreb, HR
    DoF wouldn't have made any difference.
  20. Aug 9, 2018
    #20

    JoaquinJoaquin Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2014
    Messages:
    6,684
    The way people used to defend 'no value in the market'. I'm glad we haven't bought for the sake of it, but Toby for example could of made a huge difference.
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2018
  21. Aug 9, 2018
    #21

    charlenefan Far less insightful than the other Charley

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2005
    Messages:
    16,542
    Not improving the side is like throwing the towel in before the fight has even started, serious what is the point in this upcoming season now?
  22. Aug 9, 2018
    #22

    ash_86 Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2013
    Messages:
    3,552
    The shocking thing is obvious weakness in LB RW. We should have closed these weaknesses. Shows lack of ambition
  23. Aug 9, 2018
    #23

    Crashoutcassius Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2013
    Messages:
    5,467
    Location:
    playa del carmen
    A DoF would have just paid 90m for Maguire like ed should have done
  24. Aug 9, 2018
    #24

    villain Hates Beyoncé

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2014
    Messages:
    10,603
    Quite frankly, I'm glad that we weren't taken for mugs by Spurs & Leicester.

    We should've got a LB & RW though.
  25. Aug 9, 2018
    #25

    FootyGirl88

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2018
    Messages:
    4,747
    It does - theres no planning or direction at this club.
  26. Aug 9, 2018
    #26

    Grib Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2013
    Messages:
    2,358
    :lol: these threads
  27. Aug 9, 2018
    #27

    Crashoutcassius Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2013
    Messages:
    5,467
    Location:
    playa del carmen
    We got enough points to win most titles last year. We have I proved in two positions. Some of our players are a year older and better. We could get 85 pts this year. If city get 100 pts we won't beat them even if we spent 90m on Maguire
  28. Aug 9, 2018
    #28

    charlenefan Far less insightful than the other Charley

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2005
    Messages:
    16,542
    Woodward will get the flack because he's the face of the club but everyone should realise it's not him holding the purse strings, a DOF wouldn't have had the power to do anything differently
  29. Aug 9, 2018
    #29

    automaticflare Full Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2016
    Messages:
    1,233
    I agree with this. There are some obvious spots where would could improve tho for relatively little outlay example would be left back

    Even if we discount right wing where we would probably have to shell out some major cash for a top class winger
  30. Aug 9, 2018
    #30

    charlenefan Far less insightful than the other Charley

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2005
    Messages:
    16,542
    2 positions? On the face of it we've replaced the hardly played retired Carrick with Fred who presumably will play and that it. The other signings of note being a 3rd choice keeper and a player for the under 23's who we hope may make a break through into the 1st team
  31. Aug 9, 2018
    #31

    Red_toad Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2010
    Messages:
    5,955
    Location:
    DownUnder
    By the looks of it agreeing fees has been the issue, not identifying targets. So unless a DoF can get teams to sell players for less, the. How exactly would one have helped? Fred, Dalot and keeper bloke are all very good signings, that will address issues over the coming season. We've obviously been after other players, but everyone we're targeting is suddenly 100 million bucks or near enough. Market is crazy and very unsustainable.
  32. Aug 9, 2018
    #32

    Crashoutcassius Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2013
    Messages:
    5,467
    Location:
    playa del carmen
    I see dalot playing an active role in first team squad. But agree it's possible he won't. Doesn't change the core of what I said
  33. Aug 9, 2018
    #33

    Nou_Camp99 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2013
    Messages:
    162
    I'm already writing this season off as a non starter. I'm excited about seeing a progressive manager in charge next season and hopefully given £200m NET to spend to make up for this summer. Zidane, Poch, Allegri or maybe Jardim.

    A £30m net spend this summer (should Rojo get his move) will surely confirm how much faith this club now has in jose and how they're not on the same page transfer wise.
  34. Aug 9, 2018
    #34

    ThierryHenry14 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2015
    Messages:
    299
    Supports:
    Arsenal
    DOF works really well for Arsenal this summer given our limited budget, and also by looking at Roma's model I think it is really good idea.
  35. Aug 9, 2018
    #35

    Trizy Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    10,721
    If we signed the following players we ''wanted'':

    Willian - RW
    Toby - CB
    Sandro - LB

    We would be much more improved.
  36. Aug 9, 2018
    #36

    AR87 Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2013
    Messages:
    2,638
    Location:
    Has fallen for Fred way too soon
    This is Jose's fault, right?
  37. Aug 9, 2018
    #37

    Crashoutcassius Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2013
    Messages:
    5,467
    Location:
    playa del carmen
    And if the club's ask for 80 or 90m for them ? Just pay it ? What about next summer when a player is 110m ? Just pay it ?
  38. Aug 9, 2018
    #38

    NikkiCFC Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2018
    Messages:
    105
    Location:
    Serbia
    Supports:
    Chelsea
    Net spend is everything! If Chelsea have let's say net spend -200m in one summer I would feel ashamed in front of other fans. Spending 300m but also selling players for 200m is ok, but just spend without selling is not good.
    For example Utd would have to sell Martial if thay wanted Bale, Pulisic, Willian... Otherwise is not a good image in public at least in my eyes...
  39. Aug 9, 2018
    #39

    reddaz71 Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2015
    Messages:
    713
    Location:
    Cheshire
    Totally indefensible window,the announcing of new sponsorship deals has been a pr disaster and further proves how out of touch the board actually are.Busby would be rolling in his grave!
  40. Aug 9, 2018
    #40

    el3mel Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2016
    Messages:
    21,649
    Location:
    Egypt
    It's not for the sake of it.

    We entered the window needing a right winger and 2 fullbacks. We got none. We didn't strengthen the team at all and only add one main player. Terrible window.