Discussion in 'General Forum' started by ciderman9000000, Aug 24, 2011.
Yeah Irwin, I agree, those 6 are the dangerous players. The wolves should kill those 6.
what is the reasoning for 4>
why not have public votes?
We always feared the Mods in game 2 for that very reason!!
I'd add Top on that list btw Irwin. I made it very clear before that the top 3 should be looked at pretty early on. Crappy is due being a wolf anyway so i'd check on him first imo.
Well that's going to suck my phone is notorious for having terrible battery life
Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk
I should have put you on the list Top but I forgot you were playing.
The six of those are crazy dangerous as we will allow ourselves to be led by them be they wolf or good. I will feel a lot better knowing that they have been checked out.
I guess because it's too easy for wolves to jump on a bandwagon to clear their names.
If it's private and people don't discuss it publicly, then wolves and villagers alike have to give a valid explanation behind their vote, not just because so and so makes a good point.
May not work though, will make discovering wolves much harder.
Good evening everybody
I disagree, but I'll get into the reasons more tomorrow as that's when that decision has to be made.
Providing I survive the night.
how/why did you arrive at those?
I assume the roles are selected by random patterns?
Heh, in truth I disagree with your list.
No one really listens to Mehro, Phelan, Scrumpet or Vivs. They haven't managed to influence the village so far. Vivs only did so because of her role.
Its a good theory. Problem with it is that we'll end up lynching PVs.
Whilst we're on the subject of PVs:
If youre clearly about to get lynched, dont do a fucking THM!!
what's a THM?
Me too, see below.
They have been the best/most influential players so far, so I'd rather know they're allegiance before I allow myself to be let by them.
PS. I ask a lot of questions now, so I can be sagely later.
Right, first of all, do we have anyone from Australia? If so, I'm gonna lynch you.
We played the entire last game without a seer. Was about to get lynched, clear as daylight, didnt bother coming out to say he was a seer. Thats a THM.
Last game THM was the sane seer. On the first day as the lynching approached he was the favourite to be hanged. He was online but didn't say a word and died.
Fine, I'm just putting names out there. What about the actual two I said to check? Redsky and Crappy.
Just speaking my mind mate. He's the only 'big' player not to be a wolf yet... in other news we only have 5 x wolves playing. I'm not sure if thats an advantage or disadvantage to the village though.
Also, don't do a Big-Red
Hello everyone! Fuck Arsenal and their PIG. What a save that was!
I agree entirely with Irwin BTW. I made the point in the last game that we must check out the experienced players first of all.
If we can get the likes of Crappy, Top, RedSky et al on a safe list then it'll stand us in good sted for the rest of the game.
Another one - I presume the first turn starts with the night.
What about witnesses and bodyguards? Will they be able to witness/guard tonight?
How's it going boys. What's happening in here tonight
Or a DE.
It's so liberating being a normal villager. Having been a Seer and Wolf in the last two games, it's so much more enjoyable being able to just do whatever you like without having to fear being found out.
That might get me killed as the wolves are going to suspect I just say this to throw them off the scent, but I'd rather they kill me, one of the very few normal villagers, rather than one of the dozen or so important villager roles (Seers, Priests, Masons, Lovers)
On the downside, not having a sub-mission is a bit boring.
I think I'm in love with Chezza!
Yeah and don't I fucking know it, every fucker ignores me.
Or a vivs.
Or a McG.
Or a Top.
..yeah the list goes on
In to gloat, brag, be happy??
Enough with the don't do a this, that or whatever. Not all of us have played every werewolf game! Expand on what you're saying.
Have the villagers ever got a wolf on the first turn yet, I don't remember.
This time I'm actually gonna go ahead and say the Seer shouldn't check me out.
It'd be a waste of a question. I'm a villager, and that'll either be obvious from my far more liberated style or when I die sooner rather than later.
Don't ask about me.
If you're a PV close to getting lynched, don't go down silently.
If you're a PV, don't be a spastic and blurt it out unless it's required.
Thats fairly interesting.
What's a Top? Outing yourself and clearing 4 members just at the right time when the wolves had planned on murdering you anyway?
Or suspecting that Big-Red is not who he says he is? We've all done a Top then...
If anything so far has annoyed you, you really won't like being quizzed later on...
Nah, I'd still get you checked out. In recent games people have used the tactic of "Check me out!" when they do have a role to put the seer off their trail. Anyone putting themselves to be checked out/not checked out should be monitored.
Why would you check vivs over Top?
We should just lynch vivs anyway though. I'm 100% behind that.
Separate names with a comma.