Wrong Tactics

Discussion in 'Manchester United Forum' started by Cheesy, Apr 30, 2012.

  1. May 1, 2012

    gaffs Full Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    10,103
    Location:
    Moscow 08, Rome 09, London 11
    Three
  2. May 1, 2012

    Ruud_boy_10 Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    1,657
    I completly agree with you. If Cleverly had been match fit then he should have started but the boy hasn't played a full game in 6 months, it would've been cruel to throw him in.
  3. May 1, 2012

    gaffs Full Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    10,103
    Location:
    Moscow 08, Rome 09, London 11
    We were as negative at Chelsea against Barca.

    At least Chelsea had a few shots on goal.
  4. May 1, 2012

    Nani Nana Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2009
    Messages:
    4,163
    Location:
    Serbia
    Saying Fergie picked the wrong tactics implies too much of an internal locus of control for some posters

    IMO we did about as much as we could do with the players at our disposal and those against us. It's against Everton, Blackburn and the like at home that we did not do what our potential allowed to. Last season we did not drop one single point against the bottom 16 teams at home ffs!
  5. May 1, 2012

    Walrus Oppressed White Male

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2008
    Messages:
    5,457
    So we are playing a sole player for the sole reason of helping against one part of an oppositions game?
  6. May 1, 2012

    Varun Wants the D...

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2011
    Messages:
    17,243
    Location:
    New Delhi
    PArk hasnt started a game for a long time too. Clev has not been making many appearances recently because Scholesy has been brilliant, not due to fitness issues.

    Had match fitness been a concern, Park shouldnt have been in manchester let alone starting the game.
  7. May 1, 2012

    Ruud_boy_10 Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    1,657
    Welbeck Rooney
    Nani Carrick Scholes Valencia

    Not a bad front six.
  8. May 1, 2012

    Nani Nana Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2009
    Messages:
    4,163
    Location:
    Serbia
    That's what happens when you face a better team than yours

    I'm afraid some posters are a bit deluded about how our injury-wrecked squad compares with that of City
  9. May 1, 2012

    Ruud_boy_10 Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    1,657
    Again, completly agree on Park.
  10. May 1, 2012

    Varun Wants the D...

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2011
    Messages:
    17,243
    Location:
    New Delhi
    Not bad at all, but it'd pitch Carrick and Scholes vs Barry and Toure at the middle of the park. 9 times out of 10 at the Etihad, there will always be 1 winner.

    As usual, the importance of controlling the middle of the park being overlooked i feel. You cant simply have 4 attacking players and throw them high up the pitch if you cant control the middle of the park.
  11. May 1, 2012

    Ruud_boy_10 Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    1,657
    Not deluded. Just play your strongest team, thats all.
  12. May 1, 2012

    Adebesi Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2006
    Messages:
    11,483
    Location:
    Sanctity, like a cat, abhors filth.
    You know whose fault all this is? Glazer's. The fecking bastard.
  13. May 1, 2012

    Sultan السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Messages:
    36,818
    Location:
    Pulpit of Pearls
    It's very well going for experience in these games, but you also need energy, and pace of youth. Losing is part of the game, however, it's the manner in which lost. Dropping Valencia with all his pace, strength and energy was the biggest clanger of the night, along with starting Giggs and Scholes in the same team.
  14. May 1, 2012

    Pogue Mahone Poster of the year 2008

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2006
    Messages:
    66,963
    Location:
    "like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
    Bullshit.

    We had more possesion and more territory. City had far fewer chances to score than Barca did against Chelsea and nothing like their overall dominance.

    It was a scrappy game with few chances at either end. Which can happen when the stakes are high. De Gea made one save in 90 minutes. Was that because City were as negative as Chelsea?
  15. May 1, 2012

    gaffs Full Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    10,103
    Location:
    Moscow 08, Rome 09, London 11
    Really? Anderson has not proved himself. We have seen short runs of form from him.

    Fletcher we miss, but Fergie has known for a long time that he has this bowl problem.

    And Cleverly is not much more than a prospect at the moment.

    Have we come to rely on these players?
  16. May 1, 2012

    Varun Wants the D...

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2011
    Messages:
    17,243
    Location:
    New Delhi
    Yep, nothing wrong at all in trying to take someone like Toure out of the game, sadly we dont have the personnel to do that though, certainly not PArk.

    Most have issues with our starting 11, the squad is probably the best in the league or joint best with City.
  17. May 1, 2012

    gaffs Full Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    10,103
    Location:
    Moscow 08, Rome 09, London 11
    At least Chelsea had a game plan and stuck to it. We just did nothing. We didn't defend well, we didn't retain possession well and we created naff all.
  18. May 1, 2012

    Sultan السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Messages:
    36,818
    Location:
    Pulpit of Pearls
    Can someone get stats on our results when Park has started in midfield please? I'm sure it won't be peasant reading.
  19. May 1, 2012

    Pogue Mahone Poster of the year 2008

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2006
    Messages:
    66,963
    Location:
    "like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
    Yes, really.

    If any of them had been fit and in form they'd have been a far better option than Park. For various reasons (some predictable, some less so) they weren't. Which hurt us.
  20. May 1, 2012

    Ruud_boy_10 Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    1,657
    IMHO:
    Carrick > Barry
  21. May 1, 2012

    Pogue Mahone Poster of the year 2008

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2006
    Messages:
    66,963
    Location:
    "like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
    We didn't defend well? Like I said, De Gea made one save in 90 minutes. Did City really attack that poorly? We certainly protected our keeper far better than Chelsea did theirs.
  22. May 1, 2012

    Ruud_boy_10 Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    1,657
    I posted this earlier

    Football365: "United had lost eight of the last ten games Ji-Sung Park had started, and all of the last four in which he had started in tandem with Ryan Giggs. "
  23. May 1, 2012

    Adebesi Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2006
    Messages:
    11,483
    Location:
    Sanctity, like a cat, abhors filth.
    No need to bring his class into this.

    Totally agree with what you said above btw tho it is easy to be wise after the fact. If we had scrapped a draw with that performance it would have been justified, though it is a tacit admission of our inferiority. But having lost, in retrospect you would rather have gone out all guns blazing. And indeed I was one of the many people advocating a much more attacking lineup than the one we played. Tbf I dont think anyone suggested a lineup quite as negative as the one we played. Not that I saw anyway.
  24. May 1, 2012

    Pogue Mahone Poster of the year 2008

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2006
    Messages:
    66,963
    Location:
    "like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
    After the Everton fiasco it's not hard to see why Fergie decided to tighten things up a bit.
  25. May 1, 2012

    Sultan السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Messages:
    36,818
    Location:
    Pulpit of Pearls
    That's because Scholesy has lost his legs to compete in a 2 man midfield against a packed midfield.
  26. May 1, 2012

    Adebesi Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2006
    Messages:
    11,483
    Location:
    Sanctity, like a cat, abhors filth.
    A bollocking and a warning to maintain concentration levels was all that was needed following the Everton game. That wasnt down to a fundamentally flawed formation.
  27. May 1, 2012

    amolbhatia100 Barbiturates ain't got nothin' on me

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Messages:
    42,031
    Location:
    india
    We've consistently got our tactics wrong this season. Wonderful habit we've acquired.

    We set up against a team that are very hard to get the better off when they go a goal ahead by setting up completely to defend. Awful awful tactics. If you asked City that they'd need to beat United to win the title and that too do it having all of the ball and United camped in their own half with Rooney dealing with two giant defenders, they'd have bitten your hand off without blinking.

    We shot ourselves in the foot with our tactics yet again. Title decider, the biggest game in ages, and we set up like a bunch of timid turds. Hardly surprising that we had a shot on target. We basically pinned all our hopes of Nani doing something special against an extremely solid defense.

    So disappointing.
  28. May 1, 2012

    Jimy_Hills_Chin Desperately wants to be ITK

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,897
    Location:
    ITK
    I think that we would have played three in central midfield regardless of the Everton result.

    We defended well but we attacked limply. Rooney was truly terrible, Jones was extremely poor going forward and Nani could not get in the game. We lost the battle of midfield and thus spent most of our time in two banks of four.

    Although Carrick was probably our best player we saw last night why he is not in the same bracket as a player like Toure. Carrick does his job very well but can not impose himself on or influence the game like Toure can. Scholes is 37 now and, in my opinion, we need a midfielder that can dominate a midfield at the very top level if we are to progress.

    I can't see City going anywhere except forward next year. If they do take the title this year, as is likely, then we need to up our game next year.
  29. May 1, 2012

    gaffs Full Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    10,103
    Location:
    Moscow 08, Rome 09, London 11
    My point is, we cant rely on these players to be fit or on form. Were talking about unproven or injury/illness prone players here.

    Since Barca gave us the run around in Rome 3 years ago, we have not been the same side. Fergie said we were on the passing merry-go-round. What have we learned since - nothing. Have we improved - no. Now we have a team in our league who can do the same to us and we dont have the players to be able to cope with it. Therefore, we have to play in a negative way.

    I think its simple - we dont have the quality to be able to go toe to toe with City.
  30. May 1, 2012

    Pogue Mahone Poster of the year 2008

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2006
    Messages:
    66,963
    Location:
    "like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
    It was down to all round poor defending. Hence Rafael got dropped and Fergie will have been apprehensive about our ability to keep the score down if the game went helter skelter and end to end.

    As always after a defeat, a lot of people are being wise after the fact. There's dozens of examples of us going to difficult grounds in CL games, setting out as a 451 and getting the result we need. Which was exactly what was needed last night. If he'd gone with just Carrick and Scholes in the centre and City overran us in midfield he'd be getting even more stick on here. At the end of the day, they scored direct from a corner and the only save De Gea made was an effort from their left back, from the edge of our box.

    We definitely lacked composure at times (I thought Chris Smalling used the ball really poorly - which repeatedly handed the initiative back to City) and didn't retain possession as well as we can. Despite this, we had just under 55% possession in the second half and the game was won and lost on very fine margins. If Kompany's header had been 12 inches or so higher - and key players like Rooney and Nani had been a little sharper - Fergie would be getting all the plaudits for winning the tactical battle and nullifying a team with the best home record this season in the history of the Premier League (at least I think they have, right?)
  31. May 1, 2012

    Pogue Mahone Poster of the year 2008

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2006
    Messages:
    66,963
    Location:
    "like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
    See this is the kind of hyperbolic bullshit that really grinds my gears after every defeat. City had 54% territorial advantage. We were hardly camped in our own half. As per my last post, we actually had more of the ball than them after half-time.
  32. May 1, 2012

    Varun Wants the D...

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2011
    Messages:
    17,243
    Location:
    New Delhi
    Ofcourse he is but is scholesy as mobile as he once was? Certainly not. Could those 2 compete with Toure+ Barry? Not for me. Not with Silva and Tevez/Aguero dropping deep too.

    Ofcourse. Which is why 3 in the middle was the correct call, just not the personnel to do it with.
  33. May 1, 2012

    Adebesi Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2006
    Messages:
    11,483
    Location:
    Sanctity, like a cat, abhors filth.
    Dont disagree with much of that, said something vaguely similar in post 183. But it isnt really how most of us want to see United play.

    You are right though, when we lose a game there will be a lot of wisdom around here from people who would have done things very differently. At the end of the day we did what we did and it is over.

    All I want to see now is investment in the team and progress from the young players so we can compete next year. Because City are, man for man, much better than us and winning it this year will make them stronger and more experienced next year.
  34. May 1, 2012

    Crustanoid Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2008
    Messages:
    15,499
    1 point out of the last 9 - I think it's more of a mental capitulation this time around. SAFs approach was getting brilliant results out of a limited squad before that.
  35. May 1, 2012

    amolbhatia100 Barbiturates ain't got nothin' on me

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Messages:
    42,031
    Location:
    india
    We did nothing with it. Their forwards consistently linked up and moved the ball well. There was some interplay between their attacking players. We were playing on hope rather than any real pattern of play. It was completely negative. Hardly surprising that once we rung the changes we started to get on the ball more and created more space giving Rooney some support.

    Also, I've tried to put you on ignore but I can't because you're a mod so just ignore my posts yourself. Thanks.
  36. May 1, 2012

    Cheesy Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2011
    Messages:
    12,819
    Location:
    Scotland
    I'm not deluded about it at all. I'm the first Man United fan who can accept that City have a better side than us and that it was always going to be hard for our current side to topple them. I even thought that when we were 8 points clear.

    It wasn't impossible for us to stop them in one game though, as we did 11 vs 11 in the Community Shield game. If they had a tactical genius like Mourinho in charge, I'd accept defeat with ease, but it's Mancini. He's not the hardest to beat at a tactical game, and it's clear we could have approached some things differently yesterday.
  37. May 1, 2012

    Pogue Mahone Poster of the year 2008

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2006
    Messages:
    66,963
    Location:
    "like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
    When City have their best players fit and available - and we don't - I agree.

    It's not easy competing against a side that cost half a billion quid. All it takes is one or two injuries to key players and we can look very much the poor cousin. Losing Vidic was a blow. Losing the central defender who we've relied upon to take his place compounded that problem.

    In central midfield, we could have done with at least one of Fletcher or Anderson available. Like I said, we were up against a team with every one of their best XI players available. Without the same luxury available to us, it was always going to be tough.
  38. May 1, 2012

    Cheesy Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2011
    Messages:
    12,819
    Location:
    Scotland
    I don't agree that we would have done much better with Anderson or Fletcher last night. Fletcher would've given it his best shot at stopping Toure, but it would've been a hard ask. I don't see what Anderson would have added. He's more attack minded if anything, and all of City's midfielders are quite easily better than him. He would've been as equally hopeless as Park when it came to tracking Toure.
  39. May 1, 2012

    Jimy_Hills_Chin Desperately wants to be ITK

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2010
    Messages:
    10,897
    Location:
    ITK
    There is no way that Anderson would have been worse than Park. Ando is strong, young and better on the ball. I am not saying that he would have made a significant difference because that would involve ignoring historical evidence.
  40. May 1, 2012

    Trigg aka Trippin_Stoned

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2004
    Messages:
    4,412
    Location:
    Preston
    Not read the whole thing thread but I feel that the tactics weren't the problem but more so the personal. I'm not generally a fan of playing Giggs and Scholes in the same starting 11, and I think playing Park was a massive mistake. An odd one selection too as he's not featured recently and his performance showed that.

    I'd have either played with Welbeck and Rooney but with Rooney dropping deep, or Rooney/Welbeck on the left with the other leading the line.

    Hindsight is a wonderful thing but as soon as I saw the team sheet I wasn't optimistic.

    I still think the draw against Everton was the one that did the damage, not just in the lost points but also I feel it give Man City something and showed they had a chance. Had we beat Everton like should have then I think the Man City game would have been totally different, has would our attitude going in to it.

    Still not given up yet but it's obviously heavily in Man City's favor now.

Share This Page