Smalling and Hernandez injuries

bergen

Author of gayest thread 07/08
Joined
Oct 8, 2004
Messages
6,450
Location
Iceland
Dont know about those two. But the injury thread says Vidic and Welbeck are expected back against Stoke..? Does anyone know if they're back in training?
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
Hernandez's leg was numb, the fact he walked off I suspect/hope he'll be okay for Stoke

Smalling was a groin injury, Ferdinand only trained yesterday hence he missed todays game so if he trains all week I suspect if Smalling misses the Stoke game it wont be a massive problem as Jones will just slot to RB. Hopefully Vidic will be back for that one as well (no update on him just going off the original 5 week diagnoses)
 

cj_sparky

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2008
Messages
8,226
Hernandez's leg was numb according to the report on the official site and had little feeling in it. Said he could be out for a couple of weeks.

Smalling has a groin injury that will be looked at in the week.
 

Canuckred64

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2007
Messages
3,636
Location
Canada
Dont know about those two. But the injury thread says Vidic and Welbeck are expected back against Stoke..? Does anyone know if they're back in training?
The commentators today said that Welbeck is back in training Monday, not sure about Vidic though.
 

Denis' cuff

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
7,771
Location
here
if any of Rio, Vidic or Welbeck are near ready they might get a run out at Leeds
 

MiamiSpartan

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
1,225
Location
Miami, FL, USA
Dunno if he'd have walked off with ligament damage, it tends to hurt like hell

Badly bruised, I reckon/hope
If it was a sprained ankle (which is ligament damage), then I could see him walking off the way he was. It's happened to me on more than one occasion. All the movement, adrenaline, etc., that you've been going through when that happens tends to keep the ankle loose for a bit. It's when you go and sit down for a couple of hours that it tightens up, swells up, etc.

The odd thing is the reports of numbness. He must have gotten hit right on a nerve. I hope it just hit that nerve in such a way as to give the temporary effect, like when your foot falls asleep. Hopefully it's not a pinched nerve or longer-term damaged nerve as those could be tricky injuries.
 

LLMU

Full Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2004
Messages
3,971
Location
currently unknown
Looking at the reply, he was hit right at the shin rather than the ankle. It would be badly bruised in the next few days
 

Feedingseagulls

Full Member
Joined
May 25, 2004
Messages
11,825
Location
Beyond Good & Evil
He was hit on the shin/calf, but as the weight direction changes his lower leg is caught beneath Cole's legs with his foot in the turf and the ankle bends over a lot.
 

edmundo

Full Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2006
Messages
508
Location
Kildare
Did anybody else think that Cole's tackle on Hernandez was horrendous? And what really topped it all off for me was that that prick Terry, and Cole, spent the next 5 minutes mouthing to the ref about the whole thing. Clearly it was a straight red, absolutely disgraceful tackle.
 

Ole90+3

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
5,952
Location
Paddy's Pub with the gang
Did anybody else think that Cole's tackle on Hernandez was horrendous? And what really topped it all off for me was that that prick Terry, and Cole, spent the next 5 minutes mouthing to the ref about the whole thing. Clearly it was a straight red, absolutely disgraceful tackle.
The replay looked REALLY bad. I think it should have been a straight red, but can't really blame the ref for his decision, it didn't look that bad on first viewing.
 

mustaine

Full Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
889
Location
Reykjavik, Iceland
Did anybody else think that Cole's tackle on Hernandez was horrendous? And what really topped it all off for me was that that prick Terry, and Cole, spent the next 5 minutes mouthing to the ref about the whole thing. Clearly it was a straight red, absolutely disgraceful tackle.
The only reason that Chelsea really annoy me is the fact that they moan about pretty much every decision against them. Everybody complains from time to time but they swarm the ref like bees at every chance. Terry is especially bad, he always has a word for the referee, I know he's the captain and all but damn man, shut the hell up and play.

Oh and... that tackle by Cole was horrendus and should have been a red. Villas Boas trying to defend him shows that he'll fit in fine at Chelsea.
 

bsc

Full Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2010
Messages
6,713
Location
Stretford End - 3103
If Hernandez is just out for a few weeks i think we should be grateful.

That really was a ridiculous tackle, reckless isnt even the word. He could have snapped his ankle, or done his acl.
 

gooDevil

Worst scout ever
Joined
Oct 2, 2008
Messages
25,162
Location
The Kids are the Future
Studs showing, over the ball that had long gone, into the shin, has to be a red.

I would think the FA would want to be able to ban players for dangerous fouls like this, retrospectively, to stamp them out of the game.

I understand the idea of it being dealt with on the field, but just because a player gets a card doesn't seem to mean they can't be given a multiple game ban as well.

And, at the end of the day, what we want is for these things not to happen. If a player knows he'll miss games if he tries one, then I think you'll see far less.

Chicharito won't be back very soon, if it's not fractured it's a nasty bruise that should take a few weeks to heal.
 

Striker10

"Ronaldo and trophies > Manchester United football
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
18,857
If Hernandez is just out for a few weeks i think we should be grateful.

That really was a ridiculous tackle, reckless isnt even the word. He could have snapped his ankle, or done his acl.
True, fingers crossed. Cole is an idiot. These people need a serious reality check.
 

Striker10

"Ronaldo and trophies > Manchester United football
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
18,857
Studs showing, over the ball that had long gone, into the shin, has to be a red.

I would think the FA would want to be able to ban players for dangerous fouls like this, retrospectively, to stamp them out of the game.

I understand the idea of it being dealt with on the field, but just because a player gets a card doesn't seem to mean they can't be given a multiple game ban as well.

And, at the end of the day, what we want is for these things not to happen. If a player knows he'll miss games if he tries one, then I think you'll see far less.

Chicharito won't be back very soon, if it's not fractured it's a nasty bruise that should take a few weeks to heal.
I hate to say it ..but if it was a United player, the media would be all over it
 

Joey Mac

Full Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2009
Messages
1,699
Location
He scores goals, galore. Betfair "Refer and E
If Hernandez is just out for a few weeks i think we should be grateful.

That really was a ridiculous tackle, reckless isnt even the word. He could have snapped his ankle, or done his acl.
I agree in general, but that's not how an ACL injury occurs. Usually it's when 'twisting your knee', or if there's contact it would be a direct blow to the side of the knee itself, not the lower portion of his shin.

Fracture/dislocation is the serious injury avoided yesterday.
 

Eyepopper

Lowering the tone since 2006
Joined
Sep 1, 2006
Messages
66,913
Should be ok at the back, even if Smalling & Rio are out we have Fabio for RB and Jones & Evans in the centre.
 

Name Changed

weso26
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
27,395
Location
Dublin
The fact that he was up and walking was a good sign. How nothing was broken is amazing. And how the officials, after seeing the foul, did not send off Cole is baffling.
 

Sir A1ex

Full Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2002
Messages
27,949
Location
Where the goals come from.

Sir A1ex

Full Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2002
Messages
27,949
Location
Where the goals come from.
Different linesman made the call compared to the 2 first half goals that may or may not have been offside on top of that.
Even if it was the same linesman, since when were you allowed to try and break somebody's legs because an offside goal was given against you earlier in the match?

Even in the sense of explaining Gashley's actions without justifying them it's bollocks. So at 3-1 down he was prepared to do anything, however reckless, to avoid conceding a goal, but at 0-0 he wouldn't have bothered?:houllier:
 

Shimo

Full Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2009
Messages
8,080
lol - I know it's a ridiculous statement by AVB - was just saying it even if the linesman needed to make up for the missed calls, it wasn't the one that missed them in the first place that called the foul on Gashley.
 

Kelvin

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
21,342
offside goal or not, there is no excuses for cole to make such a reckless and leg-breaking tackle, he was doing it the whole match too, dirty cnut.

btw what was wrong with nani goal, offside my foot.
 

gooDevil

Worst scout ever
Joined
Oct 2, 2008
Messages
25,162
Location
The Kids are the Future
Villas Boas says that if the refs make the right calls then Ashley Cole won't try to break anyone's legs.

Villas-Boas also appeared to accept that it was a poor challenge. "Maybe he would not [have done it] if the linesman had done his work. Maybe he [Cole] would have been a bit more clear. Maybe, if it is 0-0, Ashley is a bit more in control of the situation."
 

Commadus

New Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2009
Messages
7,405
Walking off is not really indicitive of the seriousness of the injury. I know a local rugby player who walked off after having snapped 3 of his knee ligaments. Lets wait and see.