Higuain´s foul against Neuer

Stack

Leave Women's Football Alone!!!
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
13,331
Location
Auckland New Zealand
LOL. Kramer did not foul Garay, he had possesion of the ball.

Like I said before, you argies build a straw_man, you focus all on the colission and then cry and blame the ref. But the ref was right, in both cases. The most important thing was not the collision, but who had the possesion of the ball. Neuer played the ball, Higuain did not, He fouled Neuer. The ref was right.
Good grief????? Higuain was going for the ball, he didnt play the man at all. Are you blind??????
 

Mockney

Not the only poster to be named Poster of the Year
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
40,956
Location
Editing my own posts.
What I said in the Match Thread was...

The Neuer punch is a difficult one. He's obviously going for and wins the ball, so I reckon it would've been just as contentious to give a foul for dangerous play than to let it go.

Even if you give it, what do you give? A penalty for a successful keeper challenge? An indirect free kick in the box?
I think a penalty for that would've been the more controversial call. Free kick in the box is a possibility. I wouldn't have been outraged by it, but the argument that Neuer is going for and gets the ball would have been argued just as much. So it's one I don't really blame the ref for not taking a big, game changing stance on.

That said it's obviously not Higuain's foul. But then, unless you were convinced Argentina would've definitely scored from the resulting throw in, it's not really that huge of an injustice.
 
Last edited:

mancan92

Full Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2011
Messages
10,218
Location
Loughborough university
Keepers get ridiculous cover these days so that kind of contact always results in the keeper's advantage. Its really stupid and just inconsistent at the best of times.
 

Marcosdeto

Guess who's back?
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
49,983
Location
Buenos Aires - Argentina
What I said in the Match Thread was...



I think a penalty for that would've been the more controversial call. Free kick in the box is a possibility. I wouldn't have been outraged by it, but the argument that Neuer is going for and gets the ball would have been argued just as much. So it's one I don't really blame the ref for not taking a big, game changing stance on.

That said it's obviously not Higuain's foul. But then, unless you were convinced of scoring from the resulting throw in, it's not really that much of an injustice.
probably you are right, but i think that it was a very dangerous move by neuer and should have been awarded an indirect kick for argentina, the foul that the ref called was ridiculous

i really dont understand how a player can foul another one with his left ear
 

Fritz

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
81
Good grief????? Higuain was going for the ball, he didnt play the man at all. Are you blind??????
Are you blind ??? Higuain had no chance to get to the ball before Neuer. How can you say that he did not play the man at all, when there was the clear colision????? Good gried indeed. You know what Higuain did not play at all ???? The frikking ball.
 

Mockney

Not the only poster to be named Poster of the Year
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
40,956
Location
Editing my own posts.
probably you are right, but i think that it was a very dangerous move by neuer and should have been awarded an indirect kick for argentina, the foul that the ref called was ridiculous
Referees seem to forget they can give those for some reason. I'd actually like them given more. Ideally penalties should only be for goal scoring opportunities.

Though it's a huge can of worms to try and enforce that.
 

Joemo

whistling in the wind
Joined
Feb 27, 2012
Messages
8,342
Argentina throw in.

A case could be made for an indirect free kick, I suppose, but it wasn't a foul by Higuain nor a penalty-worthy foul (if that makes sense)
 

Abizzz

Full Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
7,637
Here are the FIFA rules:
Careless, reckless, using excessive force
“Careless” means that the player has shown a lack of attention or
consideration when making a challenge or that he acted without precaution.
• No further disciplinary sanction is needed if a foul is judged to be careless
“Reckless” means that the player has acted with complete disregard to the
danger to, or consequences for, his opponent.
• A player who plays in a reckless manner must be cautioned
“Using excessive force” means that the player has far exceeded the necessary
use of force and is in danger of injuring his opponent.
• A player who uses excessive force must be sent off

So which one would you argue? This is bizarre.
 

Marcosdeto

Guess who's back?
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
49,983
Location
Buenos Aires - Argentina
Here are the FIFA rules:
Careless, reckless, using excessive force
“Careless” means that the player has shown a lack of attention or
consideration when making a challenge or that he acted without precaution.
• No further disciplinary sanction is needed if a foul is judged to be careless
“Reckless” means that the player has acted with complete disregard to the
danger to, or consequences for, his opponent.
• A player who plays in a reckless manner must be cautioned
“Using excessive force” means that the player has far exceeded the necessary
use of force and is in danger of injuring his opponent.
• A player who uses excessive force must be sent off

So which one would you argue? This is bizarre.
higuains foul, of course
 

Momochiru

Full Member
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
1,989
Location
マンチェスター·ユナイテッド
probably you are right, but i think that it was a very dangerous move by neuer and should have been awarded an indirect kick for argentina, the foul that the ref called was ridiculous

i really dont understand how a player can foul another one with his left ear
You can't give an indirect free kick for dangerous play for that challenge. Indirect free kick for dangerous play is given only if there is no contact, if there is a contact it's no longer dangerous play - these are the rules. It's either a penalty or a throw-in. If the keeper didn't get the ball it would've been a penalty.
 

dinners85

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2006
Messages
1,300
Location
Perth (Scotland) previously Warrington
Neuer went for the ball which was miles above Higuain.

If that was defender (rather than a keeper) and there was knee to head contact then I could see it being a foul for high feet or 'knees' ?

Given that he'd clearly punched the ball before contact was made (follow through) then I can see why it wasn't given.

It's one that's down to the ref and you can can make a fair case either way.

Out of interest - players get pulled up for it all the time once they 'launch' themselves so when a keeper leaves the ground - when is he considered 'out of control' ?
 

Marcosdeto

Guess who's back?
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
49,983
Location
Buenos Aires - Argentina
Question is, was the referee better or worse than Howard Webb in 2010?
hard to say, howards webb had a very bad decision with De Jong, but then he oficiated really good

and, because spain won, that decisión didnt affected the outcome of the game

the italian tonight should have redcarded aguero and howedes

but i guess that FIFA asked the refs not to do that

i'm convinced that this is the world cup with less penalties, yellow cards and redcards every awarded
 

Fritz

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
81
higuains foul, of course
Of course it was. There was a heavy colision, Neuer played the ball, Higuain did not, and Neuer did not impede higuain to play the ball, before Neuer played the ball. Clear higuain foul. The ref was absolutely right.

Absolutely pathetic by the argies, to blame the ref, because they could not finish 1on1 with the gk. Pathetic
 

Marcosdeto

Guess who's back?
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
49,983
Location
Buenos Aires - Argentina
Of course it was. There was a heavy colision, Neuer played the ball, Higuain did not, and Neuer did not impede higuain to play the ball, before Neuer played the ball. Clear higuain foul. The ref was absolutely right.

Absolutely pathetic by the argies, to blame the ref, because they could not finish 1on1 with the gk. Pathetic
sorry, didnt mean to upset you
 

Fritz

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
81
Every defender should be allowed to run full steam and clatter into forwards after they have headed the ball away from an opposing goal kick then? Let's get a few more injuries like Neymar's out there.
LOL another pathetic straw_man. Neuer did not run after Higuain, the collision happened immediately after he made contact with the ball.
 

bleedred

Full Member
Joined
May 2, 2011
Messages
5,822
Location
404
Here are the FIFA rules:
Careless, reckless, using excessive force
“Careless” means that the player has shown a lack of attention or
consideration when making a challenge or that he acted without precaution.
• No further disciplinary sanction is needed if a foul is judged to be careless
“Reckless” means that the player has acted with complete disregard to the
danger to, or consequences for, his opponent.
• A player who plays in a reckless manner must be cautioned
“Using excessive force” means that the player has far exceeded the necessary
use of force and is in danger of injuring his opponent.
• A player who uses excessive force must be sent off

So which one would you argue? This is bizarre.
Going in with your knee, in the air, out of control. I would say Reckless.

I remember few years back when Lampard lunged in on Alonso and clearly won the ball but got sent off because the tackle was considered reckless. Similar things have happened in the past, Gerrard vs carrick in FA cup and Shevley and Evans.

If it was an outfield player that is a clear foul. My first reaction to it was that Neuer won the ball and it should have been a throw in and never a foul on Higuain, but seeing that tackle again, Neuer goes in for the ball, with no care for the player. That's reckless to me.
 

Marcosdeto

Guess who's back?
Joined
Feb 24, 2006
Messages
49,983
Location
Buenos Aires - Argentina

iBoss

i-ttack the space
Joined
Mar 22, 2012
Messages
9,039
Location
Illuminati headquarters, chillin' with Jay Z.
LOL another pathetic straw_man. Neuer did not run after Higuain, the collision happened immediately after he made contact with the ball.
I didn't care who won the final, so no, not really.

Defenders don't have to run after players. It is more than likely that a player from the opposing team will contend for a ball in the air as a result of a goal kick. Defenders should run full steam, win the ball, and take out the opposing player on the follow through using their knees/legs.
 

Grinner

Not fat gutted. Hirsuteness of shoulders TBD.
Staff
Joined
May 5, 2003
Messages
72,287
Location
I love free dirt and rocks!
Supports
Arsenal
Neuer knew what he was doing and took the advantage to clatter Higuain knowing that he'd likely get away with it. I thought it was dangerous play but only after several slo-mo replays.
 

bleedred

Full Member
Joined
May 2, 2011
Messages
5,822
Location
404
Anyone who thinks that's a penalty should feck off and play tiddlywinks or something.
There has to be a consistency to the decisions. If it was some outfield player, it is a clear foul. Is it not?.

I have no prejudice in this and as I said in my previous post, when I watched the game live, I thought Neuer won the ball and it was a throw in to Argentina.
But having looked at it again, the tackle looks reckless to me.
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,175
Location
Montevideo


I dunno if you've ever jumped. But moving your legs does give you an advantage when you try.
I seem to remember keepers are now expected to not charge with their knees up like that and just sort of jump in an upright position. It never made any sense to me, sounds completely unnatural, but I see the logic re: potential head injuries.

That said, I do like keepers pretty much owning their box and putting themselves about, if the forwards can't live with them that's their problem. No idea how it was an Higuaín foul though, clear throw in IMO.
 

Grinner

Not fat gutted. Hirsuteness of shoulders TBD.
Staff
Joined
May 5, 2003
Messages
72,287
Location
I love free dirt and rocks!
Supports
Arsenal
Exactly. People saying this is fine would complain if someone like Luiz made sure he did the same for every aerial challenge after winning a header.

I think there are times when players get to make a challenge knowing that it will be legal but it will also hurt the opponent. It comes down the cuntishness of the individual as to whether they take that opportunity. Personally I wouldn't do it unless it was against another cnut who deserved it.

there's also an element of Neuer protecting himself by leading with his knee. Is that legal or not?
 

FlapR

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 30, 2010
Messages
851
You appear to be taking this quite badly marcos, lol.
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,175
Location
Montevideo
Another classic one here:



:drool: Proper goalkeeping. My penalty area, my zone, you can feck right off if you want the ball ahead of me. Too fecking right.
 

Ulfric Stormcloak

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 12, 2013
Messages
58
Another classic one here:



:drool: Proper goalkeeping. My penalty area, my zone, you can feck right off if you want the ball ahead of me. Too fecking right.
Spot on, a lot of whinging over nothing. You can tell the difference between posters that have or haven't played football.