Transfer budget glass ceiling

SammyUnited_83

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2011
Messages
3,199
I agree with you there. There are plenty of United fans who know about big business, but they know nothing. That we haven't been players/manager so know nothing. It's the what do you know about it attitude.

You could also see the old Green and Gold campaign raising it's head again and unfortunately for the owners they haven't got SAF as manager acting as a buffer.
When they brought the Chevy guys out yesterday it went down like a lead ballon, especially when they started banging on about the Asian market.

Just spend some fecking money.
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
29,894
Location
Austria
Absolutely. Take last year: Moyes wanted Baines and Fellaini, so we bid up to £30million for the pair. Instead of increasing the bid for both, we sign one of them for around £30 million.
We bid up to around £30 million for Fabregas and fail to go any higher, despite him apparently being a main target. The closest we got signing anyone else was on loan.
We then pull an Arsenal and 'bid' £100 million for Bale as he sits in the Madrid medical room.

Blame Moyes for turning down Thiago. Fair enough. But where was the increased bid for Fabregas? I refuse to believe Woodward was sat there with £100 million but choose not to bid higher just for a laugh.

This is all after losing Sir Alex Ferguson. Cardiff City spent more.


The best chance we have of signing Vidal for his value is if we find ourselves in sixth place come January. And it'll just paper over the fact that there's no real intention to spend what we should be spending (when the team needs it) unless we're in trouble.
It will be the old excuse of not beeing able to pull off transfers in the January transfer window. We always have our excuses.
I also think we either don't have the money, the Glazers don't want to spend it or Woodward really is a complete tool. Those are pretty much the only explenations and I'm not sure which I'm tending to.
 

LoiusVanGaal

New Member
Joined
May 21, 2014
Messages
599
Location
Paulton
What's that in English?

You called him a cretin, when he said nothing aggressive to you. You also called everyone posting in the Vidal thread complete tools.
:rolleyes:

what are you? five years old? don't leave the house or put the telly on mate, clearly you aren't ready to face the reality of the fact people have emotions, have fun being a robot though.
 

Bojan11

Full Member
Joined
May 16, 2010
Messages
33,113
:rolleyes:

what are you? five years old? don't leave the house or put the telly on mate, clearly you aren't ready to face the reality of the fact people have emotions, have fun being a robot though.
You just insulted people twice for no reason. And you are calling me five? :lol:

Go look up the forum rules.
 

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
100,948
Location
Barrow In Furness
To think that if we paid the 8m agent fees required by Nasri's and Hazard's agents, we would most likely have those 2 players in our lineup. :( Instead we got Ashley Young and that's what you get for being cheap.
Principles are killing us. Yet we were quite happy to buy Bebe and I sure his agent got a nice little cut.
 

RedCoffee

Rants that backfired
Joined
Sep 18, 2010
Messages
1,746
After last season's disaster we should have binned the likes of Smalling, Young, Hernandez, Fletcher, Fellaini. The list goes on. Yet we have stuck with these losers on the back of a bunch of meaningless preseason friendlies. It was only a matter of time before they messed up again.

We let our experienced defenders leave. 3 of them and then replaced them with 1 who is unfit and already injured. Where the hell is the logic in that?

We've been crying out for a world class midfielder for 5 years and still the board have not delivered.

Our main rivals for 3rd and 4th, i.e Arsenal and Liverpool are outspending us and showing more ambition on the pitch at a time when we have just secured 1.2 billion in shirt deals. The scouts at our club are lacking, and the directors are useless.

I fear for our place as a top 4 club if these oversights continue. I don't think we will spend big simply due to the fact that profitability is key at a time when the Glazers are slowly relinquishing shares.

I do think that within 3 years this club will once again be a PLC controlled by a myriad of profiteers and probably not the glazers.
 

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,221
Of course the players would be here. But it's to pretend Woodward is somehow sitting there with £200 million but failing because he's stupid.
Did you not read all my post?
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
29,894
Location
Austria
When we brought Scholesy back from retirement it was all to obvious sth wasn't right with our budget or the way it's handled even back then. Don't see why anything should have changed.
 

royboy16

Full Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
8,184
Location
The moon gave me flowers for funerals to come.
I reckon the long term loss in monetary income far outweighs an initial overspend on players.

Didn't Adidas say that every year we fail to qualify for the CL we'll receive approx. £24m less than the £75m a year agreed upon for our kit deal?
Plus the loss of earnings from not being in the CL to begin with.
And the difference in PL money depending on where you finish in the table, and televised games etc.

You'd think that for example, paying an extra £10m on Vidal, Benatia & Di Maria each, even if "theres no value" would be worth it, if they can be the difference between a CL spot next year, and a repeat of last year.
Maybe they're worried in shelling out a shit load of money on players and not qualifying for Europe,double whammy in terms of loss.
 

Speak

Step up to my misogyny soapbox
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Messages
6,347
Maybe they're worried in shelling out a shit load of money on players and not qualifying for Europe,double whammy in terms of loss.
Unfortunately that's the risk that comes with owning a historically ambitious club with huge expectations and a huge fan base.
They could've backed us better in the past (for example after selling a key player for £80 million), and we probably wouldn't be in this situation.
 

villain

Hates Beyoncé
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
14,973
Maybe they're worried in shelling out a shit load of money on players and not qualifying for Europe,double whammy in terms of loss.
Potentially, and understandable - but by getting those players we greatly increase the probability of qualifying for Europe.
In fact without CL this year I would argue that those 3 signings would put us within title contention.

Whilst if we rest on our laurels there's a chance of repeating last year.
I personally don't think it'll happen and I do have confidence that we can finish top 4 even with this squad, but if those players are available and we have the funds plus the long term monetary investment implications that could occur if we don't get them - it's a no brainer to start buying.
 

Wicked_Badger

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2009
Messages
1,566
Location
Glasgow, Scotland
The proof is that Woodward said to investors to expect big business in the conference call back in April. And said we would spend more than usual. So he is hardly going to lie to investors .

The problem is we being cheap and refusing to pay the going rate for top class players. Which is typical of the Glazer regime.
We've already spent more than we usually do.
 

Moonred

Full Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
10,324
Location
Virgo Supercluster
That's the point though, that's the pattern. In fact it makes more sense to shout about it if we don't really have the cash as all it would ever do is drive up prices. Woody would know that and he's no mug.


Fergie always used to come out and talk about there being cash available if he needed it. Moyes did the same. It keeps the fans placated til the window ends then the cycle starts again.

I don't expect LVG would agree to be a glazer mouth piece so instead they get woody in to do his interview, he spouts his nonsense about how much cash is available sells season tickets and the cycle starts again...

We are actually all mugs as we fall for it every year, under SAF they could get away with it because of his genius and our continued success. Under moyes they obviously couldn't. I expect they thought LVG could have a similar impact as SAF.

We'll see now how valuable champions league football really is to the glazers as unless they spend big we won't be getting it for a while.

The business model is failing and it wouldn't surprise me if they sold up now those huge kit deals are in place to boost the value of the club.

We'll find out this year as LVG won't be anybody's bitch.
Well that could be very much what it is, but I am certainly not believing it until the transfer window closes. Fergie always talked about value and his genius always produced result which is why fans lived with it. Not so sure the owners will be ready to take a chance with the global brand with yet another season of underachievement. LVG has reiterated again the need for defenders and we haven't go any, we need to be rebuilding gradually but the first sign of intent has to come and there's only a week or so to go now. Time will tell, it will take LVG's genius like Fergie's in the past to paper over the cracks, but I wouldn't bet on it just yet.
 

Wicked_Badger

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2009
Messages
1,566
Location
Glasgow, Scotland

Catt

Ole's at the wheel!
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
27,647
Location
Norway
go feck your mothers ass mate. don't care if I get banned for telling fecks like you where to go.
Yeez, why ruin a whole thread with this nonsense? You know people come here to read and maybe post something useful..
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,814
Yeez, why ruin a whole thread with this nonsense? You know people come here to read and maybe post something useful..
I quite like how he added 'mate' to that. It's a bit like when people say 'no offence but...' or 'with all due respect...' - you know they'll probably end up saying you should be chemically castrated or something.
 

Catt

Ole's at the wheel!
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
27,647
Location
Norway
I quite like how he added 'mate' to that. It's a bit like when people say 'no offence but...' or 'with all due respect...' - you know they'll probably end up saying you should be chemically castrated or something.
Some are really losing their shit completely now. It's ok to have concerns and voice opinions but one can at least keep it sivilist.
 

Woodzy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Messages
14,728
Location
Cardiff
CONCRETE links means actual verified stories in reliable sources...not fecking two bit hacks from the fecking red tops making shit up, for gods sake man, do you also think the page three birds are empowering women do you? fecking hell.

again, where is this money? WHERE IS IT? it's lining the fecking glazers pockets is where it is, whilst cretins like you lap up the rubbish Woodward feeds you.

all he sees is how to make money for his bosses, time you figured that out.



yup, it's why I am not buying any merch this year, no kit, nothing, feck the Glazers man, they are turning this club from one of the biggest & best in the world to a fecking joke of a team that creams their pants with money whilst doing feck all on the pitch.
I don't get the point you are trying to make here... I said we have nothing concrete in the media...
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,814
For all the Glazer hate, we've spent quite a lot of money on dross and that's also a problem. I mean we spent something like 45 million on Ashley Young and Fellaini. Which is odd, considering we seem reluctant to pay the going price for top players but do not hesitate to overpay for 'PL proven' plodders from mid-table clubs, in the hope that they will 'do a job'.

(though I must admit I thought Young would be good for us.)
 

Igor Drefljak

Definitely Russian
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
7,154
Location
The Wastelands
For all the Glazer hate, we've spent quite a lot of money on dross and that's also a problem. I mean we spent something like 45 million on Ashley Young and Fellaini. Which is odd, considering we seem reluctant to pay the going price for top players but do not hesitate to overpay for 'PL proven' plodders from mid-table clubs, in the hope that they will 'do a job'.

(though I must admit I thought Young would be good for us.)
In the last 5 seasons:
United - Spent 267m / Sold 49.5m / Net 217.5m
Chelsea - Spent 409.5m / Sold 193.5m / Net 216m
Liverpool - Spent 324m / Sold 222m / Net 102m
Arsenal - Spent 228.5m / Sold 156m / Net 72.5m

So when you look at them figures, it shows we get absolute no resale value on players, excluding Ronaldo. We buy the wrong players, at the wrong times (Position, Age etc)
Them teams all currently have better squads than us, yet our net is the highest, albeit 1m above Chelsea, but it is still higher


*****

Said this on the previous page. We have spent money, its just on the wrong players
 

ghagua

Full Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2012
Messages
5,992
I wanted to write my feelings on our transfers, but didn't want to start a new threat, but also, didn't feel there was a topic for it.

Why are we struggling? I think it is down to two things.
1. The Board, Woodward etc only want to sign players if they feel it is for a fair price
2. When we have bought players of late, they have either been a failure, younger players not progressing, or players who just simply haven't even played for us

I remember a few years ago, Bayern Munich bought Javi Martinez for 34m, and in my opinion, people where shocked at the fee, myself included, but, he was a player they felt would improve their squad, and where happy that the fee was good enough.

We just seem like a club that want the best deal, but nothing else. An example currently is Rojo. We have bid 16m or so, which is delaying the deal, yet we won't pay the 24m buy out clause, which could have had the deal wrapped up already, and been an asset, especially while Shaw is out.

As for point number 2. When we have spent, it's always been on the wrong players, for different reasons.
Mata - Very good player, but it's already made a dilemma on how can we play Rooney, RVP and him
Fellaini - Just doesn't work for a style of play United should go for. Fans have fallen out with him, I don't think LVG wants him, clubs don't wanna spend on him
Kagawa - I just don't think he is suited to the high intensity and quality of the Premier league, but again, was played out of position so much due to Rooney and RVP
Zaha - Rarely played, still young, but I think he will be sold soon
Jones - Bought as the future of Uniteds defence. He just has not progressed at all. Spends to much time on the floor, and making last ditch challenges to recover from his own mistakes
Smalling - Again, in my opinion has never really progressed like he should have. There is a high regard for him on here, but I just don't think he has done that much
Bebe - Well, Bebe
Valencia - He started off well, but he has just regressed if anything. He was bought to replace Ronaldo, and I think that shows the intent of the club

They are the transfers from the last 5 seasons, If I look back, the likes of Nani, Anderson, Hargreaves, berbatov etc could have been thrown in there.
Our last really successful window was the 05/06 season, albeit no expensive players, but the right players.

In the last 5 seasons:
United - Spent 267m / Sold 49.5m / Net 217.5m
Chelsea - Spent 409.5m / Sold 193.5m / Net 216m
Liverpool - Spent 324m / Sold 222m / Net 102m
Arsenal - Spent 228.5m / Sold 156m / Net 72.5m

So when you look at them figures, it shows we get absolute no resale value on players, excluding Ronaldo. We buy the wrong players, at the wrong times (Position, Age etc)
Them teams all currently have better squads than us, yet our net is the highest, albeit 1m above Chelsea, but it is still higher

(I came in here with no posts, I dread to think how many have been posted by now :lol:)
Great assessment for the most part, but signing players like Smalling and Jones was a no brainer, and even Kagawa and Zaha to a certain extent. Smalling and Jones looked like excellent prospects when we brought them, plus the fact that they were English and would help with the homegrown rule made it a no brainer. The fact that they had so many injury issues and being played out of position did not help in their development. Kagawa was probably one of the best players in the German league, and if you saw his displays at Dortmund then you would say he was an excellent signing. It did not help Kagawa that he got injured for a while in his first season, just when he was hitting his stride and then the manager who signed him retired. Clearly Moyes did not rate him, and it looks like he is not going to be first choice under Van Gaal either.

Rest of your post i agree with. In every thread i see the same thing, blame the Glazer's. I'm not defending the Glazer's for a minute, but blaming them is the easy thing to do.

After the Champions league win in 2008, we should have cherry picked the top players to fit our style of play, but instead we signed Berbatov. We had such pace and movement with that team, but signed the wrong player and in turn alienated Tevez.

Players like Silva and Yaya Toure moved to City for a reasonable fee, Vidal moved to Juventus for 10 million, but United did not show any kind of interest in those players. All we needed to do was sign 1 top player every season to improve the team, and challenge the existing players, instead we spent money on players like Obertan, Manucho, Diouf, Tosic, Bebe, Valencia. Money was there to pull off 1 top signing every season. We have done the same thing again, over paying to Fellaini and Mata when we had no need for them.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,814
In the last 5 seasons:
United - Spent 267m / Sold 49.5m / Net 217.5m
Chelsea - Spent 409.5m / Sold 193.5m / Net 216m
Liverpool - Spent 324m / Sold 222m / Net 102m
Arsenal - Spent 228.5m / Sold 156m / Net 72.5m

So when you look at them figures, it shows we get absolute no resale value on players, excluding Ronaldo. We buy the wrong players, at the wrong times (Position, Age etc)
Them teams all currently have better squads than us, yet our net is the highest, albeit 1m above Chelsea, but it is still higher


*****

Said this on the previous page. We have spent money, its just on the wrong players
Part of the problem is that we stick by our players for far too long. Yes, family spirit and loyalty and giving everyone a chance and all that but the reality is that we keep underperforming players up to a point when their stock is so low we can't even get rid of them.

Case in point: Berbatov. We should have sold him in 2011. He was joint top scorer in the PL but clearly not in Fergie's plans, he didn't even make the bench in the CL final. We could have got about 10m for him I guess. Instead we kept him for another year for no reason, his value plummeted and we lost him for half of that.

Fergie lost some of his ruthlessness and that cost us. I don't know how Chelsea do it though. 50m for Luiz, 26m for Lukaku... insane.
 

Igor Drefljak

Definitely Russian
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
7,154
Location
The Wastelands
Great assessment for the most part, but signing players like Smalling and Jones was a no brainer, and even Kagawa and Zaha to a certain extent. Smalling and Jones looked like excellent prospects when we brought them, plus the fact that they were English and would help with the homegrown rule made it a no brainer. The fact that they had so many injury issues and being played out of position did not help in their development. Kagawa was probably one of the best players in the German league, and if you saw his displays at Dortmund then you would say he was an excellent signing. It did not help Kagawa that he got injured for a while in his first season, just when he was hitting his stride and then the manager who signed him retired. Clearly Moyes did not rate him, and it looks like he is not going to be first choice under Van Gaal either.
I agree with what you are saying. When we bought Jones, I was actually wanting him before the links where being made. Smalling I wasn't as fussed about, but at the time, never considered it a a bad signing.
I listed them more for the reasons that they just haven't really improved much as footballers. No doubting the signings of them when we made them, but for reasons (Injuries, playing time, playing in the correct positions), we are now left with these as our CBs, and are just not good enough right now. These two where definitely mis managed
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
29,894
Location
Austria
I wanted to write my feelings on our transfers, but didn't want to start a new threat, but also, didn't feel there was a topic for it.

Why are we struggling? I think it is down to two things.
1. The Board, Woodward etc only want to sign players if they feel it is for a fair price
2. When we have bought players of late, they have either been a failure, younger players not progressing, or players who just simply haven't even played for us

I remember a few years ago, Bayern Munich bought Javi Martinez for 34m, and in my opinion, people where shocked at the fee, myself included, but, he was a player they felt would improve their squad, and where happy that the fee was good enough.

We just seem like a club that want the best deal, but nothing else. An example currently is Rojo. We have bid 16m or so, which is delaying the deal, yet we won't pay the 24m buy out clause, which could have had the deal wrapped up already, and been an asset, especially while Shaw is out.

As for point number 2. When we have spent, it's always been on the wrong players, for different reasons.
Mata - Very good player, but it's already made a dilemma on how can we play Rooney, RVP and him
Fellaini - Just doesn't work for a style of play United should go for. Fans have fallen out with him, I don't think LVG wants him, clubs don't wanna spend on him
Kagawa - I just don't think he is suited to the high intensity and quality of the Premier league, but again, was played out of position so much due to Rooney and RVP
Zaha - Rarely played, still young, but I think he will be sold soon
Jones - Bought as the future of Uniteds defence. He just has not progressed at all. Spends to much time on the floor, and making last ditch challenges to recover from his own mistakes
Smalling - Again, in my opinion has never really progressed like he should have. There is a high regard for him on here, but I just don't think he has done that much
Bebe - Well, Bebe
Valencia - He started off well, but he has just regressed if anything. He was bought to replace Ronaldo, and I think that shows the intent of the club

They are the transfers from the last 5 seasons, If I look back, the likes of Nani, Anderson, Hargreaves, berbatov etc could have been thrown in there.
Our last really successful window was the 05/06 season, albeit no expensive players, but the right players.

In the last 5 seasons:
United - Spent 267m / Sold 49.5m / Net 217.5m
Chelsea - Spent 409.5m / Sold 193.5m / Net 216m
Liverpool - Spent 324m / Sold 222m / Net 102m
Arsenal - Spent 228.5m / Sold 156m / Net 72.5m

So when you look at them figures, it shows we get absolute no resale value on players, excluding Ronaldo. We buy the wrong players, at the wrong times (Position, Age etc)
Them teams all currently have better squads than us, yet our net is the highest, albeit 1m above Chelsea, but it is still higher

(I came in here with no posts, I dread to think how many have been posted by now :lol:)
I agree.
And especially your second point is really annoying. Our transfer record isn't good at all. We have bought some real dross for a lot of money these last few years.
 

ghagua

Full Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2012
Messages
5,992
For all the Glazer hate, we've spent quite a lot of money on dross and that's also a problem. I mean we spent something like 45 million on Ashley Young and Fellaini. Which is odd, considering we seem reluctant to pay the going price for top players but do not hesitate to overpay for 'PL proven' plodders from mid-table clubs, in the hope that they will 'do a job'.

(though I must admit I thought Young would be good for us.)
Exactly what i was thinking.
 

Igor Drefljak

Definitely Russian
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
7,154
Location
The Wastelands
Part of the problem is that we stick by our players for far too long. Yes, family spirit and loyalty and giving everyone a chance and all that but the reality is that we keep underperforming players up to a point when their stock is so low we can't even get rid of them.

Case in point: Berbatov. We should have sold him in 2011. He was joint top scorer in the PL but clearly not in Fergie's plans, he didn't even make the bench in the CL final. We could have got about 10m for him I guess. Instead we kept him for another year for no reason, his value plummeted and we lost him for half of that.

Fergie lost some of his ruthlessness and that cost us. I don't know how Chelsea do it though. 50m for Luiz, 26m for Lukaku... insane.
Yup, we keep hold for the wrong reasons. It's like Carrick now for an example. He isn't a bad player, but he'd struggle to get in any of the other top sides in my opinion, yet we just don't want to improve. Selling Carrick now would be pointless as you'd get nothing for him.

I also do not know how Chelsea do it :lol:. I think with the Lukaku one though, he was loaned out, he's been able to show what he can do.
If we loaned Hernandez out, especially in La Liga for a season, I really think we'd get some good money for him the season after
 

Spoony

The People's President
Joined
Oct 27, 2001
Messages
63,165
Location
Leve Palestina.
How much would Vidic, Rio and Evra cost to replace? £100? Well...Shaw cost £27m, I suspect two top class CBs costing at least as much.