14
Agreed mate but there's no point in positive posts either if you think about it though. It's only an internet forum nothing posted here affects the players. Unless they read it daily which i doubt.Sorry friend but that's not I am suggesting.
I already said when he has bad days we should criticize him.
but when there is no football is playing we can give him some break, no point of posting same negative post.
No it's not over the top mate at all, but you would have about as much success playing snooker with a rope as you would trying to make the Lingard performance thread more positive.Please read my initial reply to post. The person try to predict future and all I said to be little positive.
I understand how forum work, but asking someone to little positive and give him break is not over the top comment.
Very true, which is why am very sad that Martial has got only like 45 minutes more playing time than Lingard in the first 11 games of the season. I think that says a lot about Mourinho and United in general these days. If Lingard played for City, he would probably have 0-50 minutes in total, and Martial would have had much more. Every time I see us fielding Lingard from start, or keep bringing him on when tied, I know we won’t win the game.He is much closer to a Championship level player, than a Manchester United one.
Is it really that close? That's crazy.Very true, which is why am very sad that Martial has got only like 45 minutes more playing time than Lingard in the first 11 games of the season. I think that says a lot about Mourinho and United in general these days. If Lingard played for City, he would probably have 0-50 minutes in total, and Martial would have had much more. Every time I see us fielding Lingard from start, or keep bringing him on when tied, I know we won’t win the game.
Must admit when I walk up the stairs at OT and see his name on the team sheet my heart sinks a little. As much as I like home grown players he just isn't good enough to play at this level. Shows how far standards have slipped that people continue to make excuses for him.Very true, which is why am very sad that Martial has got only like 45 minutes more playing time than Lingard in the first 11 games of the season. I think that says a lot about Mourinho and United in general these days. If Lingard played for City, he would probably have 0-50 minutes in total, and Martial would have had much more. Every time I see us fielding Lingard from start, or keep bringing him on when tied, I know we won’t win the game.
No its not. Martial has 704 minutes and Lingard 556. Or if for some bizarre reason you only count the league Martial has 70 more minutes.Is it really that close? That's crazy.
Let me put it this way, you are right, our first eleven is the problem and they should be upgraded with better players. The likes of Mkhitaryan should be demoted to squad player, and players like Lingard should be moved on. We can't have a place in the squad for players like Lingard for him to only deliver 3-4 games a year, not for 100k a week.We have problems with our first eleven and some of you want to chop Lingard and replace him when he has shown he is capable in the cups as a squad player.
Everyone is so harsh on him.
He doesn't only deliver 3-4 times a year. Mkhitaryan probably wouldn't accept being a squad player. Lingard is homegrown which actually counts for something.Let me put it this way, you are right, our first eleven is the problem and they should be upgraded with better players. The likes of Mkhitaryan should be demoted to squad player, and players like Lingard should be moved on. We can't have a place in the squad for players like Lingard for him to only deliver 3-4 games a year, not for 100k a week.
He didn't exactly light up the Championship when he played there for a season.He is much closer to a Championship level player, than a Manchester United one.
He's good at the intangibles which Mourinho values over actually being good on the ball.He is an ordinary footballer. Cannot believe the amount of respect he gets from our manager.
He doesn’t? If you forget the “good movement” attribute he barely offers anything . Him being homegrown saved him long enough, we can balance the numbers without him.He doesn't only deliver 3-4 times a year. Mkhitaryan probably wouldn't accept being a squad player. Lingard is homegrown which actually counts for something.
Don't be harsh. He deserves a free pass for being a local lad and scoring in a few cup games.I hope we can give him away and get him off the books in the summer or even better January.
No he’s not he’s pretty average at best and we need better.He plays well with good players because he's got good movement and understanding of the game so keeps things moving and links up well but he doesn't really have the level to impose himself on a game and be the main man, which isn't necessarily a bad thing as he can help our other, more talented, players elevate their own games by constantly being the wall they play off, he's a useful squad player for sure.
Unfortunately his constant movement meant our only attacking threat on the right was bloody Darmian.He offers very little other than decent movement. Constantly running into the opposition, taking needless touches.
This is annoying about him he makes team look out of shape running pointless even to left midfield. It’s not working hard it’s being stupid chasing shadows. Pointless player as usualUnfortunately his constant movement meant our only attacking threat on the right was bloody Darmian.
Question is, does he have enough of them for a squad player at Man United? He has scored in a couple of important cup games but I really don't think he can be relied upon to perform with any kind of consistency. I am always surprised if he does well, which tells its own story.He can have good matches, which sometimes don't get acknowledged on here. This certainly wasn't one of them.
