We have much bigger "problems" than Mourinho at the club

gibers

Full Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2017
Messages
1,065
Location
UK
We've got far bigger problems than Mou. The structure of the club is a mess.

Let's start off with all the other clubs

City - Director of football, have strategy and mimicking Barcas model. Players bought to fit style rather than just signing big names like they did at the start of the Sheikh era. They have even changed their youth model to mimic Barcas so even when Pep leaves they will get a manager that suits the bill rather than just a big name manager.

Spurs - Structured and now Pochettino being there there is a strategy with player being bought to fit a style. They don't really spend much and are playing good football and have the players from their youth system

Liverpool - players bought to fit a style and long term planning

Chelsea - have a structure in place - won the EPl with 2 diff managers in 3 seasons and buy players to fit irrespective of manager. Like Real MAdrid's model tbh but it works because they usually hire managers with different methods but same philosophy Conte, Mou, Ancelotti, Ranieri etc

Arsenal - they were like us under SAf as Wenger was all powerful but that's slowly being phased out, got Dortmund's former head scout, who has made purchases that Arsene doesn't like and they are preparing for a future without him and reducing his power



That leaves us - 3 different managers with different styles

Moyes, LVG and now Mou

buying big name players rather than having a specific style

Woodward isn't a director of football and tbh seems clueless. Still playing Ashley Young as a fb, Fellaini still at the club, managed to get rid of Rooney last year and he should never have signed a new contract after SAF left, too many squad players are sitting on massive wages, an indication of poor wage management tbh.

There was an article about the power struggle and how the old guard didn't want Mou and Woodward's power grew after Moyes flopped

so Now we will go out and splash on big names once again and if Mou doesn't work out we will have another manager with a different style with players he might not like.


We can all sit here and blame Mou for being Mou but we all knew what he was like before he joined. We all knew about him throwing players under the bus, we all knew about his tactics, we all knew about how he imploded.

So what happens if we sack Mou? Who would we get?

Pochettino? Would he even want to come seeing how much of a mess we are?

Simeone? Honestly I never thought I would say this but I would take him in a heart beat atm.

They would potentially be saddled with footballers that won't fit their style, then we would have another fecking rebuild once again. This is going down the same route as Liverpool tbh.

Any Thoughts?

(Mods please move thread if you feel that this isn't worth it's own thread)
 

JK-27

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2017
Messages
869
What point are you making? That our club structure doesn't work?

City have won the league a couple of times over the last 5 seasons, it's not like it's consistent success which, given how much they spend, it should be. And they have never won the CL. This year will be the first year they win anything with Pep as manager.

Spurs have won feck all under Pochettino. Fantastic to watch, great players, but they haven't won anything.

Liverpool have won feck all under Klopp. Same as Spurs, great players, but they blow hot and cold.

Chelsea win then league then collapse, win the league again then collapse. Who wants that?

Arsenal have won the FA Cup but have never looked capable of winning the league or being successful in Europe.

We've won the FA Cup, League Cup, and Europa League in the past 3 seasons. We're currently 2nd in the Prem and in the semis of the FA Cup. That's far more consistent success then the clubs you state have a better structure. Not bad for such a shambles I'd say.
 

M Bison

Full Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
6,795
Location
In the Wilderness
Supports
York City
I don’t agree at all. I find it difficult to believe that we’re behind Spurs and liverpool, given our league standing.

It’s easy to say a club has a structure and a style and players are bought to fit the style of play is etc, but both those managers have had time to develop their teams and style and ethos takes time to ingrain.

Us on the other hand, are 18 months into Jose’s tenure and most of the people on this forum want rid of him because we’re not entertaining enough. The upshot being, we’ll be back in this situation again in 18 months time, having blown another £500m, and still with a morning fan base who want a change in manager, and all manner of conspiracy theories being banded about.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,542
Location
Somewhere out there
I don’t agree at all. I find it difficult to believe that we’re behind Spurs and liverpool, given our league standing.

It’s easy to say a club has a structure and a style and players are bought to fit the style of play is etc, but both those managers have had time to develop their teams and style and ethos takes time to ingrain.

Us on the other hand, are 18 months into Jose’s tenure and most of the people on this forum want rid of him because we’re not entertaining enough. The upshot being, we’ll be back in this situation again in 18 months time, having blown another £500m, and still with a morning fan base who want a change in manager, and all manner of conspiracy theories being banded about.
Aye.

The one thing we should possibly try doing, is sticking with a manager if there are tangible signs of progress.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,789
What point are you making? That our club structure doesn't work?

City have won the league a couple of times over the last 5 seasons, it's not like it's consistent success which, given how much they spend, it should be. And they have never won the CL. This year will be the first year they win anything with Pep as manager.

Spurs have won feck all under Pochettino. Fantastic to watch, great players, but they haven't won anything.

Liverpool have won feck all under Klopp. Same as Spurs, great players, but they blow hot and cold.

Chelsea win then league then collapse, win the league again then collapse. Who wants that?

Arsenal have won the FA Cup but have never looked capable of winning the league or being successful in Europe.

We've won the FA Cup, League Cup, and Europa League in the past 3 seasons. We're currently 2nd in the Prem and in the semis of the FA Cup. That's far more consistent success then the clubs you state have a better structure. Not bad for such a shambles I'd say.
Well it's better than being consistently mediocre, to be fair. I'd swap their last four seasons for ours.
 

Devil81

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
6,646
The only structure wrong with United is the tactics Mourinho adopts, after two years of LVG's pedestrian paced football we all thought Mourinho would spark life in us.

Whilst he's made us stronger, the football is just as boring and the life is slowly being drained out of all the flair players we invested in. I personally used to love a match day and it would be the highlight of the week, now it's another day with a game that usually disappoints. Mourinho and LVG have ruined us.
 

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
100,446
Location
Barrow In Furness
The only thing I would say is other clubs seem to be building for the future. With us it always seems to be the here and now, which is why we buy these big names. The trouble is it isn't always working. We seem to be sorting out our academy system which is good. We however need to be building a team that has a certain style, which I am not sure we are, or if this is our style, then god help us. As has been said we need to either stick with Jose or if he is completely losing it we need to find a manager for the longterm and a DOF to help build the future for the club. Think the priorities of the club are wrong at the moment.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,542
Location
Somewhere out there
The only thing I would say is other clubs seem to be building for the future. With us it always seems to be the here and now, which is why we buy these big names. The trouble is it isn't always working. We seem to be sorting out our academy system which is good. We however need to be building a team that has a certain style, which I am not sure we are, or if this is our style, then god help us. As has been said we need to either stick with Jose or if he is completely losing it we need to find a manager for the longterm and a DOF to help build the future for the club. Think the priorities of the club are wrong at the moment.
Bailly is young, Lukaku is young, Lindelöf is young, Pogba is young. We're playing Lingard, Rashford, McTominay regularly.

There's a long term plan there, but Mourinho has been here just 20 months, we'll never have long term planning if we keep crying for every single manager to get binned after two seasons.
 

JK-27

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2017
Messages
869
Well it's better than being consistently mediocre, to be fair. I'd swap their last four seasons for ours.
Well if you're happy with a merry-go-round of managers that's up to you.

The only structure wrong with United is the tactics Mourinho adopts, after two years of LVG's pedestrian paced football we all thought Mourinho would spark life in us.

Whilst he's made us stronger, the football is just as boring and the life is slowly being drained out of all the flair players we invested in. I personally used to love a match day and it would be the highlight of the week, now it's another day with a game that usually disappoints. Mourinho and LVG have ruined us.
At the beginning of the season we were banging goals in for fun. We're not as prolific now, but we've still scored more goals then last year, and are averaging 2 goals a game. Boring to watch, but winning games and scoring goals. So what do you want? To win every game? To score 4 goals a game?

OP is completely right, we are missing an overall concept on how to develop the club post SAF area and it shows mainly in the mess we have made of our manager signings.
I'm old enough to remember that it was the same pre-SAF era. Take SAF out of the equation and we chopped and changed our managers regularly, without winning much. The chances of finding someone else like SAF are slim, and every manager is now going to be unfairly compared to him.
 

Devil81

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
6,646
At the beginning of the season we were banging goals in for fun. We're not as prolific now, but we've still scored more goals then last year, and are averaging 2 goals a game. Boring to watch, but winning games and scoring goals. So what do you want? To win every game? To score 4 goals a game?
You don't have to score four goals a game to be entertaining. If you are entertained enough by our style of football, fair enough. Personally, I think we've swayed away from the traditions of our club, we always entertained the fans and took the game to teams. We're now struggling for chances against the likes of Brighton and Huddersfield when we're playing at home.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,789
Well if you're happy with a merry-go-round of managers that's up to you.
I'd be happy with two league titles instead of zero. If not changing the manager is more important to you, that's up to you. We had a similar merry-go-round, by the way, without that whole 'winning the league' part. Chelsea have been more successful than us in recent years.
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
119,431
Location
Dublin, Ireland
I think you’re wrong about Liverpool and Chelsea btw

Chelsea don’t have a plan other than the manager gets hired and fired on the whim of Abramovic. Very few homegrown players getting a chance

Liverpool have a transfer committee ffs. Prior to this season most of their signings have been duff. What will happen when Klopp moves on? They may be going through an upswing now but if Klopp were to leave, well you’ve seen their last few manager appointments. That’s not structure, it’s a throwing enough shit at a wall and see what sticks

Spurs on a similar vien. You can’t see what the structure is until poch leaves.

United, for all the moaning have been introducing and giving chances to young players even under Mourinho. The youth have just undergone a major restructuring. We have several good quality youngsters out on loan who are on the verge of our first team.
It’s wrong to say united don’t have structure. We may not have a DoF but we do have structure.
 

JohnnyKills

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
7,098
Well if you're happy with a merry-go-round of managers that's up to you.



At the beginning of the season we were banging goals in for fun. We're not as prolific now, but we've still scored more goals then last year, and are averaging 2 goals a game. Boring to watch, but winning games and scoring goals. So what do you want? To win every game? To score 4 goals a game?



I'm old enough to remember that it was the same pre-SAF era. Take SAF out of the equation and we chopped and changed our managers regularly, without winning much. The chances of finding someone else like SAF are slim, and every manager is now going to be unfairly compared to him.
Think most of us want it not to be boring tbh.

And we didn't chop and change before Fergie. We gave docherty four years (he would have had more had he not been shagging the physio's wife), sexton four years and Atkinson over five years. That's fairly patient I'd say given none of them won the league.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
Not really. We've got a very good squad of players that Mourinho is doing his best to convince the wallies amongst us otherwise. The club generates and supports its manager(s) aggressively in the transfer market and the club is in a fantastic financial position.

We need to continue to invest in the squad (which we will) and employ a manager that can reinvigorate United's footballing identity. I used to hate that word, but after Van Gaal and now Mourinho, I just want to see some football played the right way.
 

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
100,446
Location
Barrow In Furness
Think most of us want it not to be boring tbh.

And we didn't chop and change before Fergie. We gave docherty four years (he would have had more had he not been shagging the physio's wife), sexton four years and Atkinson over five years. That's fairly patient I'd say given none of them won the league.
We didn't win the league then, but it cost Atkinson eventually. SAF won it regularly and now the aspirations are a lot higher than the odd cup win, which is what we are going back to.
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,542
Location
Somewhere out there
Not really. We've got a very good squad of players that Mourinho is doing his best to convince the wallies amongst us otherwise.
Aye, we've the second best squad in the league and we're second.

We've still got a few gaping holes, not least that we have to play 2 failed wingers as fullbacks because of the shite investments earlier managers made there (Darmien, Shaw). 2 summer transfer windows has simply not been enough, such was the sorry state of our squad in Summer 2016.
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
9,871
Well if you're happy with a merry-go-round of managers that's up to you.



At the beginning of the season we were banging goals in for fun. We're not as prolific now, but we've still scored more goals then last year, and are averaging 2 goals a game. Boring to watch, but winning games and scoring goals. So what do you want? To win every game? To score 4 goals a game?



I'm old enough to remember that it was the same pre-SAF era. Take SAF out of the equation and we chopped and changed our managers regularly, without winning much. The chances of finding someone else like SAF are slim, and every manager is now going to be unfairly compared to him.
Thats not true. Doc got 5 years and got sacked only because he was fecking the physios wife. He was playing some lovely football with some good young players in. Sexton got 4 years, and Atkinson got 5 years. Hardly the same as post Fergie.
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
9,871
Think most of us want it not to be boring tbh.

And we didn't chop and change before Fergie. We gave docherty four years (he would have had more had he not been shagging the physio's wife), sexton four years and Atkinson over five years. That's fairly patient I'd say given none of them won the league.
Sorry I have just put the same as you lol. Read the original posting first
 

Hugh Jass

Shave Dass
Joined
Apr 16, 2016
Messages
11,244
I don’t agree at all. I find it difficult to believe that we’re behind Spurs and liverpool, given our league standing.

It’s easy to say a club has a structure and a style and players are bought to fit the style of play is etc, but both those managers have had time to develop their teams and style and ethos takes time to ingrain.

Us on the other hand, are 18 months into Jose’s tenure and most of the people on this forum want rid of him because we’re not entertaining enough. The upshot being, we’ll be back in this situation again in 18 months time, having blown another £500m, and still with a morning fan base who want a change in manager, and all manner of conspiracy theories being banded about.
This.
 

Nikelesh Reddy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2017
Messages
1,912
We've got far bigger problems than Mou. The structure of the club is a mess.

Let's start off with all the other clubs

City - Director of football, have strategy and mimicking Barcas model. Players bought to fit style rather than just signing big names like they did at the start of the Sheikh era. They have even changed their youth model to mimic Barcas so even when Pep leaves they will get a manager that suits the bill rather than just a big name manager.

Spurs - Structured and now Pochettino being there there is a strategy with player being bought to fit a style. They don't really spend much and are playing good football and have the players from their youth system

Liverpool - players bought to fit a style and long term planning

Chelsea - have a structure in place - won the EPl with 2 diff managers in 3 seasons and buy players to fit irrespective of manager. Like Real MAdrid's model tbh but it works because they usually hire managers with different methods but same philosophy Conte, Mou, Ancelotti, Ranieri etc

Arsenal - they were like us under SAf as Wenger was all powerful but that's slowly being phased out, got Dortmund's former head scout, who has made purchases that Arsene doesn't like and they are preparing for a future without him and reducing his power



That leaves us - 3 different managers with different styles

Moyes, LVG and now Mou

buying big name players rather than having a specific style

Woodward isn't a director of football and tbh seems clueless. Still playing Ashley Young as a fb, Fellaini still at the club, managed to get rid of Rooney last year and he should never have signed a new contract after SAF left, too many squad players are sitting on massive wages, an indication of poor wage management tbh.

There was an article about the power struggle and how the old guard didn't want Mou and Woodward's power grew after Moyes flopped

so Now we will go out and splash on big names once again and if Mou doesn't work out we will have another manager with a different style with players he might not like.


We can all sit here and blame Mou for being Mou but we all knew what he was like before he joined. We all knew about him throwing players under the bus, we all knew about his tactics, we all knew about how he imploded.

So what happens if we sack Mou? Who would we get?

Pochettino? Would he even want to come seeing how much of a mess we are?

Simeone? Honestly I never thought I would say this but I would take him in a heart beat atm.

They would potentially be saddled with footballers that won't fit their style, then we would have another fecking rebuild once again. This is going down the same route as Liverpool tbh.

Any Thoughts?

(Mods please move thread if you feel that this isn't worth it's own thread)
Spurs and Liverpool have won 2 trophies between them in a decade,they are both behind us in the league right now....Arsenal aren't even rivals anymore....Chelsea are all over the place,jumping from one extreme to the other....So no thanks,I wouldn't want the "structure" of any of these clubs.,,.We are 2nd in the league,behind one of the all time great PL teams....Lets not kid ourselves into believing that there's something fundamentally wrong with our structure....Just give Jose more money and time,he will make us champions again...
 

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
100,446
Location
Barrow In Furness
Spurs and Liverpool have won 2 trophies between them in a decade,they are both behind us in the league right now....Arsenal aren't even rivals anymore....Chelsea are all over the place,jumping from one extreme to the other....So no thanks,I wouldn't want the "structure" of any of these clubs.,,.We are 2nd in the league,behind one of the all time great PL teams....Lets not kid ourselves into believing that there's something fundamentally wrong with our structure....Just give Jose more money and time,he will make us champions again...
Would you be happy being 2nd to City for the foreseeable future? Just asking.
 

NikSab

Anthony Martial's #1 fan
Newbie
Joined
Jan 15, 2018
Messages
252
Location
India
You don't have to score four goals a game to be entertaining. If you are entertained enough by our style of football, fair enough. Personally, I think we've swayed away from the traditions of our club, we always entertained the fans and took the game to teams. We're now struggling for chances against the likes of Brighton and Huddersfield when we're playing at home.
We have not managed to score 2 goals or less only two times in 10 league games in 2018. Beating Pool and Chelsea might be boring for some but definitely not for me.
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
9,871
I think you’re wrong about Liverpool and Chelsea btw

Chelsea don’t have a plan other than the manager gets hired and fired on the whim of Abramovic. Very few homegrown players getting a chance

Liverpool have a transfer committee ffs. Prior to this season most of their signings have been duff. What will happen when Klopp moves on? They may be going through an upswing now but if Klopp were to leave, well you’ve seen their last few manager appointments. That’s not structure, it’s a throwing enough shit at a wall and see what sticks

Spurs on a similar vien. You can’t see what the structure is until poch leaves.

United, for all the moaning have been introducing and giving chances to young players even under Mourinho. The youth have just undergone a major restructuring. We have several good quality youngsters out on loan who are on the verge of our first team.
It’s wrong to say united don’t have structure. We may not have a DoF but we do have structure.
Why would Klopp and Poch leave though? They have improved their teams no end. Especially Poch. Under him they are regular top 4, unlike before him. Klopp has turned Liverpool into an exciting attacking team, and both have spent a fraction of what we have in the same periods.
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
Aye, we've the second best squad in the league and we're second.

We've still got a few gaping holes, not least that we have to play 2 failed wingers as fullbacks because of the shite investments earlier managers made there (Darmien, Shaw). 2 summer transfer windows has simply not been enough, such was the sorry state of our squad in Summer 2016.
Mourinho has had three transfer windows to buy a left back. Guardiola picked up a squad with similar holes (I've outlined this view before as many people choose to deny this), which was completely unsuitable for the football he wants to play. Mourinho had work to do, absolutely, but the quality of football is simply unacceptable irrespective of the full backs. That's undeniable.
 

Red_toad

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
11,587
Location
DownUnder
We've got far bigger problems than Mou. The structure of the club is a mess.

Let's start off with all the other clubs

City - Director of football, have strategy and mimicking Barcas model. Players bought to fit style rather than just signing big names like they did at the start of the Sheikh era. They have even changed their youth model to mimic Barcas so even when Pep leaves they will get a manager that suits the bill rather than just a big name manager.

Spurs - Structured and now Pochettino being there there is a strategy with player being bought to fit a style. They don't really spend much and are playing good football and have the players from their youth system

Liverpool - players bought to fit a style and long term planning

Chelsea - have a structure in place - won the EPl with 2 diff managers in 3 seasons and buy players to fit irrespective of manager. Like Real MAdrid's model tbh but it works because they usually hire managers with different methods but same philosophy Conte, Mou, Ancelotti, Ranieri etc

Arsenal - they were like us under SAf as Wenger was all powerful but that's slowly being phased out, got Dortmund's former head scout, who has made purchases that Arsene doesn't like and they are preparing for a future without him and reducing his power



That leaves us - 3 different managers with different styles

Moyes, LVG and now Mou

buying big name players rather than having a specific style

Woodward isn't a director of football and tbh seems clueless. Still playing Ashley Young as a fb, Fellaini still at the club, managed to get rid of Rooney last year and he should never have signed a new contract after SAF left, too many squad players are sitting on massive wages, an indication of poor wage management tbh.

There was an article about the power struggle and how the old guard didn't want Mou and Woodward's power grew after Moyes flopped

so Now we will go out and splash on big names once again and if Mou doesn't work out we will have another manager with a different style with players he might not like.


We can all sit here and blame Mou for being Mou but we all knew what he was like before he joined. We all knew about him throwing players under the bus, we all knew about his tactics, we all knew about how he imploded.

So what happens if we sack Mou? Who would we get?

Pochettino? Would he even want to come seeing how much of a mess we are?

Simeone? Honestly I never thought I would say this but I would take him in a heart beat atm.

They would potentially be saddled with footballers that won't fit their style, then we would have another fecking rebuild once again. This is going down the same route as Liverpool tbh.

Any Thoughts?

(Mods please move thread if you feel that this isn't worth it's own thread)

Drama much.

Would a manager want to take over a club second in the league and have a massive transfer budget and team of very talented players at his disposal? Are you serious?

Trying to make out we're in a worse state than Arsenal :lol:

You'd think we were West Brom with this thread...
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,542
Location
Somewhere out there
Mourinho has had three transfer windows to buy a left back.
He doesn't have an unlimited budget sadly and other areas were obviously more pressing. He's stated clearly on the record that he was miffed at not getting the final player he wanted last summer.

Guardiola picked up a squad with similar holes (I've outlined this view before as many people choose to deny this), which was completely unsuitable for the football he wants to play. Mourinho had work to do, absolutely, but the quality of football is simply unacceptable irrespective of the full backs. That's undeniable.
ooooh come on @Kag, Guardiola had:

No keeper

No RB No CB Otamendi NO LB

Fernandinho
KDB Silva
Sterling NO LW
Aguero
That is 6 of his current first team at the club, hell, no Kompany is back it's SEVEN.

Mourinho had:

DDG
NO RB NO CB Smalling NO LB
NO CDM
NO CM NO CM

NO RW
Martial/Rashford

NO STRIKER

What World are you living in? Guardiola had to rebuild his defence, Mourinho has had to rebuild his entire side. Guardiola couldn't get it to work last season, but with 20 months working with the same midfield and attack (Sane aside) it's top drawer now and oozing in confidence.
 
Last edited:

Nikelesh Reddy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2017
Messages
1,912
Would you be happy being 2nd to City for the foreseeable future? Just asking.
Nope,I"m not happy being 2nd in the league right now....But I can clearly see signs of progress,We finished last season with 69 points,we are well on course to finish this season with 80-84 points....That's definitive,substantial progress in my view...As long as we keep progressing and as long as we keep improving,I"ll definitely keep supporting the manager...

If we finish 2nd next season with 90 points and if City win the league and end up with 94-96 points,then I would still back Jose because it's not sensible to sack a manager who gets 90 points in the league.If we sack Jose,is there any manager who can hit the ground running and defeat Guardiola in a season?Its highly unlikely,we may end up taking a backward step again...So it's better to keep supporting the manager as long as we keep improving....
 

EyeInTheSky

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2015
Messages
9,992
Location
On my sofa enjoying pineapple on its own
What point are you making? That our club structure doesn't work?

City have won the league a couple of times over the last 5 seasons, it's not like it's consistent success which, given how much they spend, it should be. And they have never won the CL. This year will be the first year they win anything with Pep as manager.

Spurs have won feck all under Pochettino. Fantastic to watch, great players, but they haven't won anything.

Liverpool have won feck all under Klopp. Same as Spurs, great players, but they blow hot and cold.

Chelsea win then league then collapse, win the league again then collapse. Who wants that?

Arsenal have won the FA Cup but have never looked capable of winning the league or being successful in Europe.

We've won the FA Cup, League Cup, and Europa League in the past 3 seasons. We're currently 2nd in the Prem and in the semis of the FA Cup. That's far more consistent success then the clubs you state have a better structure. Not bad for such a shambles I'd say.
Why did you have to go and render this thread redundant so quickly :lol:
 

Kag

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2013
Messages
18,875
Location
United Kingdom
He doesn't have an unlimited budget sadly and other areas were obviously more pressing. He's stated clearly on the record that he was miffed at not getting the final player he wanted last summer.



ooooh come on @Kag, Guardiola had:

No keeper

No RB No CB Otamendi NO LB

Fernandinho
KDB Silva
Sterling NO LW
Aguero
That is 6 of his current first team at the club, hell, no Kompany is back it's SEVEN.

Mourinho had:

DDG
NO RB NO CB Smalling NO LB
NO CDM
NO CM NO CM

NO RW
Martial/Rashford

NO STRIKER

What World are you living in? Guardiola had to rebuild his defence, Mourinho has had to rebuild his entire side. Guardiola couldn't get it to work last season, but with 20 months working with the same midfield and attack (Sane aside) it's top drawer now and oozing in confidence.
I think it's disingenuous to include the likes of Sterling and Fernandinho and then omit the likes of Valencia, Herrera and Mata. The former pair are playing better in a better team although there isn't really much between that lot as players. Form is so much more than player x > player y. You know that. De Bruyne even: he has come on leaps and bounds. Would he be playing like that here? I'm not having that.

We had more to work at, but it doesn't escape the reality that the current football is not good enough relative to personnel available. If you think that merely replacing Valencia and Young with shiny, new toys is going to significantly change our approach to attacking football then then you're at best naive and at worst a little daft.
 

Minimalist

New Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2013
Messages
15,091
It’s a wonder we sacked Van Gaal if we only had 4 players worth a damn.

Pretty certain the main reason we sacked him was because it was believed his methods weren’t getting the best out of our players.

Might as well have stuck with him if it was all about crap players.
 

Alock1

Wears XXXL shirts and can't type ellipses
Joined
Nov 30, 2011
Messages
16,081

Me (Alex), @Rood (Nik), @That'sHernandez (Ed) & @Schmiznurf (Craig) spoke about this on this week's episode of the podcast. Starts at 1:05 if you want to skip ahead.

I had similar thoughts to the OP - there should be some sort of strategy that filters down from the top and is consistent throughout both our manager selections & our purchases - they could do this with a Director of Football but it isn't necessary and is achievable without. If there is a strategy filtering down from the top at present, then it's to get the biggest, most marketable names and to utilize them as a springboard for commercial sponsorship deals.
 

Jacko21

Full Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2016
Messages
4,567
Location
Manchester
Ironically though, it is Mourinho who has had a big hand in bringing about changes in how Manchester United operates as an entity.

It's long been reported that when he took over, the club did not operate in a way that he had come to expect of top European clubs and that as well as making matters right on the pitch, there was a great deal of work for him to do off it. By all accounts, Woodward, Arnold and the Glazers have been impressed with the impact he has made. Far from being seen as the problem, Mourinho is considered part of the solution.

We had one manager for a quarter of a century, you can't underestimate what impact that has on the structure and operations of a football club. As a club, we are far more traditional than our counterparts and that is to our detriment sometimes. The club do appear to be making changes in all areas in order to try to find the consistency of Barca, Real, Bayern and Juve - that's not just about having a successful team, it's about everybody within the club being on the same page and working towards a common goal.

Mourinho has never worked in an environment like United. At Chelsea, Abramovich would watch over him. At Inter, Moratti. At Real, Perez. There is nobody like that at Manchester United. Nobody to undermine him, no political volatility or internal wrangling. He clearly retains the full support of the key figures within the club - Woodward has tasked Mourinho with returning Manchester United to the top and whilst financial obligations and stakeholder objectives must be met, you get the sense that Mourinho has far more leverage at this club, than he has ever done before. He's calling out the players, because he knows the trigger will be pulled on them, before it turns to him.

Essentially, the club know they have fallen short in a number of departments, but hope Mourinho can be the man to point them in the right direction. Whether that proves a wise decision, only time will tell.

We botched SAF's retirement badly and we're still paying for it today. Look at the operational changes Arsenal have made over the last 12 months, you can bet they look upon United as evidence of how not to handle the departure of a long-serving manager. That's not to say they'll get it right, but rather they are making every effort to ease the transition.

At this moment in time, I'm inclined to trust Mourinho and Woodward to make the necessary changes in order to achieve what we all want. Stability and competitiveness.
 

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
100,446
Location
Barrow In Furness

Me (Alex), @Rood (Nik), @That'sHernandez (Ed) & @Schmiznurf (Craig) spoke about this on this week's episode of the podcast. Starts at 1:05 if you want to skip ahead.

I had similar thoughts to the OP - there should be some sort of strategy that filters down from the top and is consistent throughout both our manager selections & our purchases - they could do this with a Director of Football but it isn't necessary and is achievable without. If there is a strategy filtering down from the top at present, then it's to get the biggest, most marketable names and to utilize them as a springboard for commercial sponsorship deals.
There is no playing strategy. You just have to compare the U-18's to the U-23's and first team. Who are they being prepared for?
 

Cal?

CR7 fan
Joined
Mar 18, 2002
Messages
34,941
I just don't get what's so wrong with United at the moment, if truth be told, most people (who are realistic) will have been happy with 2nd place and CL QF.

So we had one very poor 2nd half to cost us that 1 round of the CL, is that really such a huge issue that suddenly the whole season is awful and the manager should be sacked?
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
22,542
Location
Somewhere out there
I think it's disingenuous to include the likes of Sterling and Fernandinho and then omit the likes of Valencia, Herrera and Mata. The former pair are playing better in a better team although there isn't really much between that lot as players. Form is so much more than player x > player y. You know that. De Bruyne even: he has come on leaps and bounds. Would he be playing like that here? I'm not having that.

We had more to work at, but it doesn't escape the reality that the current football is not good enough relative to personnel available. If you think that merely replacing Valencia and Young with shiny, new toys is going to significantly change our approach to attacking football then then you're at best naive and at worst a little daft.
Ok, I'll buy that first line, 100%.

But can you seriously tell me that Pep could be playing a team filled with 7 of the players Mourinho inherited (and 4 of his own) and have them playing remotely like City are now? If so build that team @Kag:

7 Mou inherited United players + 4 Pep signings.

The best I could do:
DDG
Valencia, Smalling, Laporte, Mendy
Gundogen
, Hererra, Mata
Rashford Martial Sane

And that doesn't look a good side to me. At least 4 of them would still need replacing.​
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
119,431
Location
Dublin, Ireland
Why would Klopp and Poch leave though? They have improved their teams no end. Especially Poch. Under him they are regular top 4, unlike before him. Klopp has turned Liverpool into an exciting attacking team, and both have spent a fraction of what we have in the same periods.
They won’t stay forever will they? Madrid are already sniffing around Poch, he’s Argentinian so it’s only a matter of time before he goes to Spain.

The main point was those clubs don’t have any more structure than us, they just have 2 good managers