Ivan Perisic | 1 year loan to Bayern

Status
Not open for further replies.

SinNombre

Full Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2019
Messages
2,626
I don't see Inter selling without an obligation to buy.

Emery likes his high workrate wingers like Mourinho so makes sense to go for him.
 

beergod

Full Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2002
Messages
2,749
We loaned Tomasz Kuszczak a few years ago for reasons I was not clear on. I'm guessing its financially a better deal for them to loan rather than buy at this time.
West Brom's execs loved those loans with mandatory purchases, probably for an easier structuring of the transfer payments.
 

Greck

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
7,099
Thank feck Dino man is gone. By now we'd be bent over a barrel desperate to get Perisic at any cost.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
57,890
Location
Canada
A classic example of why Mourinho's methods flat out suck. He wanted Perisic at all costs and complained that he didn't get him. Would get one good season out of him before he turns into mid table level and someone we'd look into replacing again. Pretty much how it is with Matic. How Sanchez instantly isn't needed without even having good performances. How it would be with Alderweireld or Willian. People criticize Woodward, but thank feck he is the way he was because he didn't let Mourinho ruin us long term.
 

Red Devil Rising

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 11, 2017
Messages
684
Maybe Mourinho can use his own money and make a bid for him.

He can then play him in whatever position he wants. On the floor with arse up in the air or on his knees. Whatever you want Jose.
 

Red-Man-Walking

Fully Erect
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Messages
4,924
Location
Partially Flaccid
Thank feck he didn't hand in a transfer request when Mourinho was here. We would be left with yet more dross in the squad on huge wages.
Agreed. I just find it fecking hilarious how Mourinho was desperate to bring him in for 2 summers straight and within weeks of him being sacked he hands in a transfer request :lol:
 

Fracture90

Full Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2016
Messages
10,360
Location
Serbia
Agreed. I just find it fecking hilarious how Mourinho was desperate to bring him in for 2 summers straight and within weeks of him being sacked he hands in a transfer request :lol:
Not to mention that 'Mourinho to Inter' looks like a really possibility now.

Maybe the poor feker doesn't fancy the prospect of working with Mourinho :lol:
 

simonhch

Horrible boss
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
14,456
Location
Seventh Heaven
Supports
Urban Combat Preparedness
A classic example of why Mourinho's methods flat out suck. He wanted Perisic at all costs and complained that he didn't get him. Would get one good season out of him before he turns into mid table level and someone we'd look into replacing again. Pretty much how it is with Matic. How Sanchez instantly isn't needed without even having good performances. How it would be with Alderweireld or Willian. People criticize Woodward, but thank feck he is the way he was because he didn't let Mourinho ruin us long term.
Woodward has gotten a lot of flak, some of it right; but in the summer when people were going bananas about Mourinho not being backed; I thought Ed was spot on.

Firstly, a lot of us wanted Mourinho gone at the end of last season. He was already getting feck all out of highly talented players he himself had signed, and he was meanwhile trying to offload our top players.

If Woodward hadn’t vetoed it, we would have:

Definitely sold Martial
Probably sold Pogba
Spent 60m on Perisic
Spent 75m on Alderweireld or Maguire

And lord knows what other horrendous deals. It’s not to say we couldn’t use a winger or a CB but his alienating of our best players and targeting of aging or average players for huge money, would’ve handicapped us for years.

Probably hard for people to accept Woodward got it right, because he’s a popular hate figure around here. But to me it seems he’s actually doing everything he can to modernise this club. In the last three years we’ve completely restructured the youth academy, and massively overhauled and expanding our scouting network. Next, we know, the club is bringing in a director of football. Restructuring a club the size of United takes time, not least with the huge weight of history and scrutiny it has. Especially difficult doing it in the wake of SAF’s retirement.

Ultimately in 5-7 years I think we’ll look back and say he took this club forward.
 

Andycoleno9

matchday malcontent
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
28,869
Location
Croatia
We don't need him because he is natural in left wing position. But for Arsenal it is good signing. He is huge upgrade on Iwobi
 

CassiusClaymore

Is it Gaizka Mendieta?
Scout
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
35,763
Location
None of your business mate
Supports
The greatest team in history
Woodward has gotten a lot of flak, some of it right; but in the summer when people were going bananas about Mourinho not being backed; I thought Ed was spot on.

Firstly, a lot of us wanted Mourinho gone at the end of last season. He was already getting feck all out of highly talented players he himself had signed, and he was meanwhile trying to offload our top players.

If Woodward hadn’t vetoed it, we would have:

Definitely sold Martial
Probably sold Pogba
Spent 60m on Perisic
Spent 75m on Alderweireld or Maguire

And lord knows what other horrendous deals. It’s not to say we couldn’t use a winger or a CB but his alienating of our best players and targeting of aging or average players for huge money, would’ve handicapped us for years.

Probably hard for people to accept Woodward got it right, because he’s a popular hate figure around here. But to me it seems he’s actually doing everything he can to modernise this club. In the last three years we’ve completely restructured the youth academy, and massively overhauled and expanding our scouting network. Next, we know, the club is bringing in a director of football. Restructuring a club the size of United takes time, not least with the huge weight of history and scrutiny it has. Especially difficult doing it in the wake of SAF’s retirement.

Ultimately in 5-7 years I think we’ll look back and say he took this club forward.
Good post and I totally agree. The only mistake I think was not moving Mourinho out in the summer with the benefit of hindsight. If they weren't going to back him and thought his plans were detrimental to the long term future of the club then there really was nowhere for him to go here. Obviously the prior mistake was extending his contact in January in the first instance but that's another matter.
 

awop

Odds winner of 'Odds or Evens 2022/2023'
Newbie
Joined
Sep 28, 2010
Messages
4,164
Location
Paris
Supports
Arsenal
We don't need him because he is natural in left wing position. But for Arsenal it is good signing. He is huge upgrade on Iwobi
There's a fire in the kitchen and we're shopping for a new TV. We're gonna drain 35M of our already small budget on a 30y old who might or might not be okay.
 

ravi2

Full Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2012
Messages
9,043
Location
Canada
Woodward has gotten a lot of flak, some of it right; but in the summer when people were going bananas about Mourinho not being backed; I thought Ed was spot on.

Firstly, a lot of us wanted Mourinho gone at the end of last season. He was already getting feck all out of highly talented players he himself had signed, and he was meanwhile trying to offload our top players.

If Woodward hadn’t vetoed it, we would have:

Definitely sold Martial
Probably sold Pogba
Spent 60m on Perisic
Spent 75m on Alderweireld or Maguire

And lord knows what other horrendous deals. It’s not to say we couldn’t use a winger or a CB but his alienating of our best players and targeting of aging or average players for huge money, would’ve handicapped us for years.

Probably hard for people to accept Woodward got it right, because he’s a popular hate figure around here. But to me it seems he’s actually doing everything he can to modernise this club. In the last three years we’ve completely restructured the youth academy, and massively overhauled and expanding our scouting network. Next, we know, the club is bringing in a director of football. Restructuring a club the size of United takes time, not least with the huge weight of history and scrutiny it has. Especially difficult doing it in the wake of SAF’s retirement.

Ultimately in 5-7 years I think we’ll look back and say he took this club forward.
Really good post, thank god Jose didnt get his way or we would have been well and truly up the creek
 

Andycoleno9

matchday malcontent
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
28,869
Location
Croatia
There's a fire in the kitchen and we're shopping for a new TV. We're gonna drain 35M of our already small budget on a 30y old who might or might not be okay.
Off the topic; what is up with your transfer budget? You have maybe the healthiest financial situation in PL and you are not spending money
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,185
His output this season has been abysmal, even Mata who's our 6th choice in attack has better output than him.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,623
Yet another dodged bullet. Thank god our club had stopped Mou from buying more tripe.
 

AltiUn

likes playing with swords after fantasies
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
23,576
His output this season has been abysmal, even Mata who's our 6th choice in attack has better output than him.
I watch a fair bit of Inter and he's been very out of sorts whenever I've seen him this season, I think his head's been away from Inter for a while personally.
 

Cloud7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
12,809
I watch a fair bit of Inter and he's been very out of sorts whenever I've seen him this season, I think his head's been away from Inter for a while personally.
He probably thinks about the nightly WhatsApp conversations with Jose when he asks him “When are you gonna sign me?” And Jose replies, “Soon Ivan, soon.” Every night the same conversation, yet the signing never comes.
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
Woodward has gotten a lot of flak, some of it right; but in the summer when people were going bananas about Mourinho not being backed; I thought Ed was spot on.

Firstly, a lot of us wanted Mourinho gone at the end of last season. He was already getting feck all out of highly talented players he himself had signed, and he was meanwhile trying to offload our top players.

If Woodward hadn’t vetoed it, we would have:

Definitely sold Martial
Probably sold Pogba
Spent 60m on Perisic
Spent 75m on Alderweireld or Maguire

And lord knows what other horrendous deals. It’s not to say we couldn’t use a winger or a CB but his alienating of our best players and targeting of aging or average players for huge money, would’ve handicapped us for years.

Probably hard for people to accept Woodward got it right, because he’s a popular hate figure around here. But to me it seems he’s actually doing everything he can to modernise this club. In the last three years we’ve completely restructured the youth academy, and massively overhauled and expanding our scouting network. Next, we know, the club is bringing in a director of football. Restructuring a club the size of United takes time, not least with the huge weight of history and scrutiny it has. Especially difficult doing it in the wake of SAF’s retirement.

Ultimately in 5-7 years I think we’ll look back and say he took this club forward.
This is one of the reasons why I'm now of the opinion that a DOF isn't necessarily a priority as it turns out the board got it spot on with the transfer activity in the summer (well maybe not spot on but certainly better than we gave them credit for). However....

.... the point still stands that if they had concerns about the manager the time to move him on was in the summer and not after he'd ruined half the season
 

ManRed

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
2,078
Location
London
He was one of the key players to take Croatia to the finals at the world cup. I think he never recovered from the summer yet, could look very different next season with some rest and full preseason at the club.
 

damageinc.

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 7, 2017
Messages
404
Supports
the unknown
His attitude this season has been very unprofessional and annoying on the pitch (not just poor performances) and outside the pitch. Its a big question why hes asking to go now, I dont see a step up for him and his career (except the money) to go from Inter to Arsenal, it must have happened something bad between him and the Inter environment.
 

Hawks2008

Full Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
4,912
Location
Melbz
Hope he does go to Arsenal, more people will realise what a streaky player of his and the pocket of posters on here who were desperate for him will know why the board wouldnt spend the money on the likes of him.
 

awop

Odds winner of 'Odds or Evens 2022/2023'
Newbie
Joined
Sep 28, 2010
Messages
4,164
Location
Paris
Supports
Arsenal
Off the topic; what is up with your transfer budget? You have maybe the healthiest financial situation in PL and you are not spending money
Check the Arsenal thread, lots of reasons, some are true some are not, nobody really knows but if we end up on February 1st with only Perisic and or/Suarez, it is not going to end well.
 

::sonny::

Full Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
17,868
Location
Milan
Woodward has gotten a lot of flak, some of it right; but in the summer when people were going bananas about Mourinho not being backed; I thought Ed was spot on.

Firstly, a lot of us wanted Mourinho gone at the end of last season. He was already getting feck all out of highly talented players he himself had signed, and he was meanwhile trying to offload our top players.

If Woodward hadn’t vetoed it, we would have:

Definitely sold Martial
Probably sold Pogba
Spent 60m on Perisic
Spent 75m on Alderweireld or Maguire

And lord knows what other horrendous deals. It’s not to say we couldn’t use a winger or a CB but his alienating of our best players and targeting of aging or average players for huge money, would’ve handicapped us for years.

Probably hard for people to accept Woodward got it right, because he’s a popular hate figure around here. But to me it seems he’s actually doing everything he can to modernise this club. In the last three years we’ve completely restructured the youth academy, and massively overhauled and expanding our scouting network. Next, we know, the club is bringing in a director of football. Restructuring a club the size of United takes time, not least with the huge weight of history and scrutiny it has. Especially difficult doing it in the wake of SAF’s retirement.

Ultimately in 5-7 years I think we’ll look back and say he took this club forward.
Oh my god

Definitely sold Martial
Probably sold Pogba
Spent 60m on Perisic
Spent 75m on Alderweireld or Maguire
 

Henrik Larsson

Still logged in at RAWK (help!)
Joined
Sep 13, 2013
Messages
5,421
Location
Swashbucklington
Interesting how everybody on this page knows for an actual 100% fact what went on behind the scenes.

What's even worse is the complete denial of the fact that our transfer business was limited last summer first and foremost because we needed to balance the books. A big reason for this is the insane spending in the last five years. But another big factor that conveniently gets completely overlooked in this, is that our business model is to keep a steady cash flow so the Glazers can keep on leeching money.

"The Glazers take around 50% off all Manchester United profits

The results revealed that, while the team is struggling, it is a money-making machine of unparalleled proportions. They generated record revenues of £590m and pre-tax profits of £44.1m, making them the most valuable football team in the world. Commercial income and TV money were up, allowing the club to absorb a drop in matchday income caused by lack of participation in the latter stages of the Champions' League.

What was barely mentioned was that, while United are making more than ever, they are losing around half of everything that they make to the Glazer family, as well as financing the deal by which the family bought the club in the first place in 2005."



Financial record after financial record is being broken. But a manager wanting to spend 40 million on another winger is somehow so problematic that he has to whine about it like a moron for two(!) summer windows straight.
 

arthurka

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Messages
18,709
Location
Rectum
Interesting how everybody on this page knows for an actual 100% fact what went on behind the scenes.

What's even worse is the complete denial of the fact that our transfer business was limited last summer first and foremost because we needed to balance the books. A big reason for this is the insane spending in the last five years. But another big factor that conveniently gets completely overlooked in this, is that our business model is to keep a steady cash flow so the Glazers can keep on leeching money.

"The Glazers take around 50% off all Manchester United profits

The results revealed that, while the team is struggling, it is a money-making machine of unparalleled proportions. They generated record revenues of £590m and pre-tax profits of £44.1m, making them the most valuable football team in the world. Commercial income and TV money were up, allowing the club to absorb a drop in matchday income caused by lack of participation in the latter stages of the Champions' League.

What was barely mentioned was that, while United are making more than ever, they are losing around half of everything that they make to the Glazer family, as well as financing the deal by which the family bought the club in the first place in 2005."



Financial record after financial record is being broken. But a manager wanting to spend 40 million on another winger is somehow so problematic that he has to whine about it like a moron for two(!) summer windows straight.
Finally .. thanks for this sensible post.
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
17,594
He was one of the key players to take Croatia to the finals at the world cup. I think he never recovered from the summer yet, could look very different next season with some rest and full preseason at the club.
He's 30 in a week or so according to google - he's a solid player but a very short term signing given his age and his position. Think Arsenal are in more need of defenders, a keeper for next year and a CM to replace Ramsey.
 

The Last Jedaiiii

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 15, 2018
Messages
101
Interesting how everybody on this page knows for an actual 100% fact what went on behind the scenes.

What's even worse is the complete denial of the fact that our transfer business was limited last summer first and foremost because we needed to balance the books. A big reason for this is the insane spending in the last five years. But another big factor that conveniently gets completely overlooked in this, is that our business model is to keep a steady cash flow so the Glazers can keep on leeching money.

"The Glazers take around 50% off all Manchester United profits

The results revealed that, while the team is struggling, it is a money-making machine of unparalleled proportions. They generated record revenues of £590m and pre-tax profits of £44.1m, making them the most valuable football team in the world. Commercial income and TV money were up, allowing the club to absorb a drop in matchday income caused by lack of participation in the latter stages of the Champions' League.

What was barely mentioned was that, while United are making more than ever, they are losing around half of everything that they make to the Glazer family, as well as financing the deal by which the family bought the club in the first place in 2005."



Financial record after financial record is being broken. But a manager wanting to spend 40 million on another winger is somehow so problematic that he has to whine about it like a moron for two(!) summer windows straight.
Its theft. Why hasn't someone bought them out ffs?
 

sideshow_bob

Full Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2018
Messages
738
Supports
Healthy nutrition
Interesting how everybody on this page knows for an actual 100% fact what went on behind the scenes.

What's even worse is the complete denial of the fact that our transfer business was limited last summer first and foremost because we needed to balance the books. A big reason for this is the insane spending in the last five years. But another big factor that conveniently gets completely overlooked in this, is that our business model is to keep a steady cash flow so the Glazers can keep on leeching money.

"The Glazers take around 50% off all Manchester United profits

The results revealed that, while the team is struggling, it is a money-making machine of unparalleled proportions. They generated record revenues of £590m and pre-tax profits of £44.1m, making them the most valuable football team in the world. Commercial income and TV money were up, allowing the club to absorb a drop in matchday income caused by lack of participation in the latter stages of the Champions' League.

What was barely mentioned was that, while United are making more than ever, they are losing around half of everything that they make to the Glazer family, as well as financing the deal by which the family bought the club in the first place in 2005."



Financial record after financial record is being broken. But a manager wanting to spend 40 million on another winger is somehow so problematic that he has to whine about it like a moron for two(!) summer windows straight.
This 100%. Glazers are laughing all the way to the bank. They are what's wrong with this club.
 

sglowrider

Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
25,201
Location
Hell on Earth
In terms of priorities, it makes no sense for the Gunners. Iwoebi is there.

What they need are more mobile defenders -- been that obvious for like 5 years now.
 

Greck

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
7,099
Interesting how everybody on this page knows for an actual 100% fact what went on behind the scenes.

What's even worse is the complete denial of the fact that our transfer business was limited last summer first and foremost because we needed to balance the books. A big reason for this is the insane spending in the last five years. But another big factor that conveniently gets completely overlooked in this, is that our business model is to keep a steady cash flow so the Glazers can keep on leeching money.

"The Glazers take around 50% off all Manchester United profits

The results revealed that, while the team is struggling, it is a money-making machine of unparalleled proportions. They generated record revenues of £590m and pre-tax profits of £44.1m, making them the most valuable football team in the world. Commercial income and TV money were up, allowing the club to absorb a drop in matchday income caused by lack of participation in the latter stages of the Champions' League.

What was barely mentioned was that, while United are making more than ever, they are losing around half of everything that they make to the Glazer family, as well as financing the deal by which the family bought the club in the first place in 2005."



Financial record after financial record is being broken. But a manager wanting to spend 40 million on another winger is somehow so problematic that he has to whine about it like a moron for two(!) summer windows straight.
The dividends paid to the Glazers in the most recent accounts come to £22m of £44m profit,
This isn't that bad. The first statement uses sensationalism to alarm fans into thinking they are taking half of the club's revenue (580m) when they only pay themselves after every expense has been made, transfers included. We aren't the first club to have owners pocketing similar dividends. In any case their 20 million dividend still doesn't make Perisic worth it.
 

Andycoleno9

matchday malcontent
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
28,869
Location
Croatia
In general( of course that sometimes you can buy excellent player for smaller money) transfer fees show what owners want from their club. Arsenal's owners show with their transfers that they are happy with this situation. They decided that they will not fight for title and they are happy with top six spot and that is why they are buying 30-35 mil players. Perisic is very good player but he is not a player who will bring you titles. For that you need monsters in attacking positions.
Next transfer window is biggest test for Glazers. If they invest in top class defender(s) and in one more player( full back or winger) then we will know that they want to fight with City. If they go for some cheap solutions then they are happy with top 4.
 

Kevin

Nostrodamus of football
Joined
Jan 8, 2002
Messages
13,766
Isn't this the guy who, according to Mourinho purists, was the one that could have changed our fortunes and missing out on him was the reason why we destroyed Mourinho and not vice versa? Seems bullet dodged.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.