How close is Aguero to Henry/Shearer?

yumtum

DUX' bumchum
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
7,132
Location
Wales
He's what I thought Torres would have become for Liverpool, thank God that didn't happen.
 

Matt007a

Full Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2018
Messages
764
Henry is still the best for me. He had more to his game than either Aguero or Shearer. Before injuries Shearer was seriously good and could have been the world's best striker. If you consider his goal scoring ratio and the teams he played for, it's pretty amazing. If Aguero played for Newcastle back then he wouldn't score the amount he does for City, who create 5-10 clear cut chances a game.

Saying that, there is no doubt that Aguero is a fantastic striker. He and Kane are easily the best in the EPL and have been for the last 5 years. Ronaldo and Suarez had higher peak seasons but don't compare to someone who has done it over the course of 7 seasons.
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,027
Location
Moscow
For me it's probably

Henry
Shearer
Rooney/Aguero
Ruud/Suarez

Suarez peak was too short (although as good as anyone's bar Henry) and Aguero already beat Ruud on longevity. Somehow, for all the goals that he scores, he is rarely the best player in the City team, let alone in the league (Toure, Silva and now De Bruyne often outshine him). But you can't argue against his numbers, they are insane.
 

RochaRoja

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2018
Messages
1,567
Henry is still the best for me. He had more to his game than either Aguero or Shearer. Before injuries Shearer was seriously good and could have been the world's best striker. If you consider his goal scoring ratio and the teams he played for, it's pretty amazing. If Aguero played for Newcastle back then he wouldn't score the amount he does for City, who create 5-10 clear cut chances a game.
I really doubt Agüero would score less playing against the likes of Jason Cundy, Darren Peacock and Ken Monkou every week, even in a less creative side.

People seem to just think of Agüero as a poacher nowadays but when he was younger he was a hell of a dribbler. Back in his Atlético days, I considered his finishing one of his weaker attributes. Put Agüero in the PL of the early to mid ‘90s and he’d be considered a phenomenon.
 

Kentonio

Full Member
Scout
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
13,188
Location
Stamford Bridge
Supports
Chelsea
I had hoped United would buy him but he moved to City as Fergie said there was no value in the market back then. What a bargain he would have been, top quality striker. I'm sure we'd have a few more titles had we picked him up instead of City.
How do you think we feel at Chelsea? The guy was supposedly locked in to sign for us until City pounced. We'd have dominated the PL for the best part of a decade if he'd signed. Instead we got Torres.. :houllier:
 

Hazard Warning

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 24, 2018
Messages
168
Supports
Chelsea
How do you think we feel at Chelsea? The guy was supposedly locked in to sign for us until City pounced. We'd have dominated the PL for the best part of a decade if he'd signed. Instead we got Torres.. :houllier:
Was heavily linked to us before he even signed for Atletico and that carried on for every single transfer window until City signed him - definitely the biggest “one that got away” since the Abramovich era began.
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
How do you think we feel at Chelsea? The guy was supposedly locked in to sign for us until City pounced. We'd have dominated the PL for the best part of a decade if he'd signed. Instead we got Torres.. :houllier:
Yeah because City have dominated for the best part of a decade with him haven't they. Don't be so ridiculous, dominated for the best part of a decade :rolleyes::lol:
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,440
Yeah because City have dominated for the best part of a decade with him haven't they. Don't be so ridiculous, dominated for the best part of a decade :rolleyes::lol:
If you give Chelsea Citys titiles (which is plausible if they had Agureo and City did not) then you could say they would have dominated the decade. Chelsea City and United are pretty even in the time period. Chelsea with Aguero and City without could have made Chelsea dominate I think was the point.
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
If you give Chelsea Citys titiles (which is plausible if they had Agureo and City did not) then you could say they would have dominated the decade. Chelsea City and United are pretty even in the time period. Chelsea with Aguero and City without could have made Chelsea dominate I think was the point.
Again a laughable point. City wouldn't of just had no one would they, they wouldn't have just stuck with Dzeko, they'd of signed someone
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,440
Again a laughable point. City wouldn't of just had no one would they, they wouldn't have just stuck with Dzeko, they'd of signed someone
Aguero isn't someone is the point. Hes the best the league has seen in the past decade by a distance. Kane is the only player to challenge him now. "Someone" else wasn't going to come close.
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
Aguero isn't someone is the point. Hes the best the league has seen in the past decade by a distance. Kane is the only player to challenge him now. "Someone" else wasn't going to come close.
And the 'best in the league' has won only 3 league titles, and he didn't win them alone either, I think the likes of Kompany, Toure and Silva would argue they've played just as big a role in them and last season the likes of De Bruyne, Sterling and Sane. It's a totally ridiculously, idiotic and naive notion that take one player from one club and give them to another and they'd of dominated or won the same amount of trophies

People on here really dont live in the real world
 

steakpie

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 13, 2018
Messages
429
Aguero has the highest goals per minute in PL history. Kane 2nd. Henry 3rd.

In my opinion, Aguero is on par with Shearer and Henry.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,440
And the 'best in the league' has won only 3 league titles, and he didn't win them alone either, I think the likes of Kompany, Toure and Silva would argue they've played just as big a role in them and last season the likes of De Bruyne, Sterling and Sane. It's a totally ridiculously, idiotic and naive notion that take one player from one club and give them to another and they'd of dominated or won the same amount of trophies

People on here really dont live in the real world
You're missing the point again. Who said he won it alone?

The point is Chelsea won 3 titiles, without a striker in that class. Costa was good but nowhere near Aguero and even in the last couple of years a top striker is what they have been missing. Aguero would have elevated their team to another level which "could" have made them dominate.

Some people on here "YOU" love to jump to conclusions instead of understanding the point. You don't have to agree, but why come up with things like "He didn't win it alone" as if that was the point.
 

robinamicrowave

Wanted to be bran, ended up being littlefinger
Joined
Jul 29, 2013
Messages
2,739
Supports
Man City
Think he's in the conversation for being the best out-and-out striker in Premier League history but he came to this league half a decade after Shearer retired, and Henry was more of a "forward" so it's hard to truly compare them all against each other fairly. He'll stay in this league until 2021, in my view, and we'll then be able to look back and get a better picture of how good he truly was. By that point he'll be approaching 300 PL appearances (currently on 227) and, given his current strikerate, will likely be in the top three for total goals in the Premier League.
 

El Jefe

Full Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
4,904
As many have said, Henry is way out in number 1. Shearer and Aguero follow respectively, although Kun still has time to surpass Shearer but he just doesn't have the all round quality to overtake Henry.

Suarez is the only striker who actually had the ability to surpass Henry as the best striker the PL has seen but luckily for us he took his talents to Barcelona.
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
You're missing the point again. Who said he won it alone?

The point is Chelsea won 3 titiles, without a striker in that class. Costa was good but nowhere near Aguero and even in the last couple of years a top striker is what they have been missing. Aguero would have elevated their team to another level which "could" have made them dominate.

Some people on here "YOU" love to jump to conclusions instead of understanding the point. You don't have to agree, but why come up with things like "He didn't win it alone" as if that was the point.
Fact is Chelsea with Aguero does not = 'a best part of a decade of dominance'

You were the one who said about giving Chelsea the titles City won and it's total and utter rubbish. I'm not jumping to any conclusions I'm saying your whole argument is again total and utter rubbish
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,440
Fact is Chelsea with Aguero does not = 'a best part of a decade of dominance'

You were the one who said about giving Chelsea the titles City won and it's total and utter rubbish. I'm not jumping to any conclusions I'm saying your whole argument is again total and utter rubbish
If you say so
 

Harry190

Bobby ten Hag
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
7,617
Location
Canada
Well, the club you play for contributes to your legend, doesn't it. Sadly for him, he will be a side-note to those guys.
 

Shark

@NotShark
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Messages
26,496
Location
Ireland
Even though he's declined a tad bit, he's still an incredible striker. He was even more explosive a few seasons back.
 

stepic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2006
Messages
8,672
Location
London
he's an annoyingly brilliant striker. can't wait for him to retire - as Chelsea's efforts at signing a striker in recent years have shown, they're difficult to find.
 

Rito

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 6, 2018
Messages
165
Supports
Chelsea
Massive, massive underrating going on here. On one side, he's being criticized for winning "only" 3 league titles. How many did Henry won? or Suarez? And these two are apparently rated "much" higher.
Also, his injury record is passed around as if he has been a RVP v 2.0. Even with his injuries the guy has 4-6 seasons of 20+ goals in the league. He has been a spine for the city side and has survived and excelled under different managers.
The most laughable point is that no top team has wanted him. Messi has only played for Barcelona, does that mean that no top team has wanted him? Go figure.
 

Cascarino

Magnum Poopus
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
7,616
Location
Wales
Supports
Swansea
Henry is in the conversation for greatest player in the PL. Aguero is not.

As for top 9s this is how I see it:

Henry and Ruud tied for the top spot, Henry being the better all-around forward but Ruud being the best pure finisher.
Shearer
Rooney
Aguero

Ronaldo would be at the top had his career in the PL lasted longer. Had that been the case, Ronaldo would be the greatest PL player (he's of course in the conversation for GOAT in the sport) and greatest PL forward/scorer/magician.

A shame Rooney never reached his full potential, despite the career that he actually had. But this thread is about Aguero and he's earned the praise he's receiving here. But no, he's no Henry and no Ruud.
You're overrating Ruud.
 

Jeffthered

Full Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2015
Messages
2,705
Nowhere near as good as Henry. Great player though.
Are you kidding me? They are two different types of forward.. I think they are certainly in the same bracket / class. Henry was more of an athelete, more spectacular in some ways.. but all round player? Aguero is certainly no worst than Henry. On par in my opinion.. like Shearer etc. Those guys are different in how they approach their game, but all super players. But difficult to say one is better than another. Henry played alongside a superb team...
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,440
This thread shows how under rated Aguero really is
 

Bergman

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 22, 2018
Messages
405
Supports
Liverpool
Scores 3 tap ins even Sterling would have managed and thread gets bumped!

1) Henry
2)Suarez
-
3) Aguero/Shearer/RVP
 

Sauldogba

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 6, 2018
Messages
533
For me as strikers goes it would probably be

1st tear Henry
2nd tear Aguero,Ruud,Shearer,Suarez,Cole,Rooney etc
 

RedDevil@84

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2014
Messages
21,693
Location
USA
Wow. The under rating here is ridiculous. He is one of the best players of PL in last decade. May or may not be Henry like. But still not miles below.
Many people thought he is a goner when Pep came and yet there he is producing the goods week in week out.

Some City fans (and club) call Yaya Toure and Kompany as some kind of recent legends of the club. I think there is no one who is more of a City legend than Aguero.
 

Jeffthered

Full Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2015
Messages
2,705
For me as strikers goes it would probably be

1st tear Henry
2nd tear Aguero,Ruud,Shearer,Suarez,Cole,Rooney etc
Henry is a better striker than Ruud Van Nistelrooy? Or Alan Shearer?

Sorry, I can't have that. They are all unbelievable talents, but if you offered me a Centre Forward (not wide player etc.. a striker, goalscorer..) out of all of those, I would take Shearer, RVN.. then look at the rest.

Shearer and RVN just scored goals man. All types of goals. How many goals did Henry score with his head? A few.. but not many. I would take Ronaldo in his last couple of seasons over Henry, if you are looking for that all-round, swashbuckling, super-hero type player.

But for week-in-week-out goals... give me Shearer or Ruud any day of the week.
 

padr81

Full Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2015
Messages
11,938
Supports
Man City
Suarez is superior though. His peak is of an all time great CF. I mean he actually outscored Messi and Ronaldo one season if I'm not mistaken. Aguero is a level below him and Herry, for me.
Suarez outside of England? Yes, absolutely, Suarez in England nope. Suarez is one of the best players to ever play in England but I think its fair to say of his 3 seasons in England only 1 was at a world class level. Kun has has 7 in a row. In England Aguero scores a full half hour quicker than Suarez. One every 110 minutes for Kun, almost 140 minutes for Suarez. Suarez did have that amazing season though and Aguero has never put up one like that.
 

arthurka

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Messages
18,734
Location
Rectum
Best foreign import post 2000. Been brilliant for City.
He is absolutely up there with the best or even simply the best.