Ish
Lights on for Luke
Plot twist. Eriksen wanted the assist so he made Kane claim it.
Yeah that too.
Eriksen
Plot twist. Eriksen wanted the assist so he made Kane claim it.
Yeah that too.
I really doubt Agüero would score less playing against the likes of Jason Cundy, Darren Peacock and Ken Monkou every week, even in a less creative side.Henry is still the best for me. He had more to his game than either Aguero or Shearer. Before injuries Shearer was seriously good and could have been the world's best striker. If you consider his goal scoring ratio and the teams he played for, it's pretty amazing. If Aguero played for Newcastle back then he wouldn't score the amount he does for City, who create 5-10 clear cut chances a game.
How do you think we feel at Chelsea? The guy was supposedly locked in to sign for us until City pounced. We'd have dominated the PL for the best part of a decade if he'd signed. Instead we got Torres..I had hoped United would buy him but he moved to City as Fergie said there was no value in the market back then. What a bargain he would have been, top quality striker. I'm sure we'd have a few more titles had we picked him up instead of City.
Was heavily linked to us before he even signed for Atletico and that carried on for every single transfer window until City signed him - definitely the biggest “one that got away” since the Abramovich era began.How do you think we feel at Chelsea? The guy was supposedly locked in to sign for us until City pounced. We'd have dominated the PL for the best part of a decade if he'd signed. Instead we got Torres..
Yeah because City have dominated for the best part of a decade with him haven't they. Don't be so ridiculous, dominated for the best part of a decadeHow do you think we feel at Chelsea? The guy was supposedly locked in to sign for us until City pounced. We'd have dominated the PL for the best part of a decade if he'd signed. Instead we got Torres..
If you give Chelsea Citys titiles (which is plausible if they had Agureo and City did not) then you could say they would have dominated the decade. Chelsea City and United are pretty even in the time period. Chelsea with Aguero and City without could have made Chelsea dominate I think was the point.Yeah because City have dominated for the best part of a decade with him haven't they. Don't be so ridiculous, dominated for the best part of a decade
Again a laughable point. City wouldn't of just had no one would they, they wouldn't have just stuck with Dzeko, they'd of signed someoneIf you give Chelsea Citys titiles (which is plausible if they had Agureo and City did not) then you could say they would have dominated the decade. Chelsea City and United are pretty even in the time period. Chelsea with Aguero and City without could have made Chelsea dominate I think was the point.
Aguero isn't someone is the point. Hes the best the league has seen in the past decade by a distance. Kane is the only player to challenge him now. "Someone" else wasn't going to come close.Again a laughable point. City wouldn't of just had no one would they, they wouldn't have just stuck with Dzeko, they'd of signed someone
And the 'best in the league' has won only 3 league titles, and he didn't win them alone either, I think the likes of Kompany, Toure and Silva would argue they've played just as big a role in them and last season the likes of De Bruyne, Sterling and Sane. It's a totally ridiculously, idiotic and naive notion that take one player from one club and give them to another and they'd of dominated or won the same amount of trophiesAguero isn't someone is the point. Hes the best the league has seen in the past decade by a distance. Kane is the only player to challenge him now. "Someone" else wasn't going to come close.
You're missing the point again. Who said he won it alone?And the 'best in the league' has won only 3 league titles, and he didn't win them alone either, I think the likes of Kompany, Toure and Silva would argue they've played just as big a role in them and last season the likes of De Bruyne, Sterling and Sane. It's a totally ridiculously, idiotic and naive notion that take one player from one club and give them to another and they'd of dominated or won the same amount of trophies
People on here really dont live in the real world
Aguero 64 apps 42 goalsKinda meaningless stat without number of games though.
Aguero: 65.6%Aguero 64 apps 42 goals
Kane 42 apps 21 goals
Rooney 46 apps 20 goals
Rvp 31 apps 18 goals
Hazard 63 apps 17 goals
Fact is Chelsea with Aguero does not = 'a best part of a decade of dominance'You're missing the point again. Who said he won it alone?
The point is Chelsea won 3 titiles, without a striker in that class. Costa was good but nowhere near Aguero and even in the last couple of years a top striker is what they have been missing. Aguero would have elevated their team to another level which "could" have made them dominate.
Some people on here "YOU" love to jump to conclusions instead of understanding the point. You don't have to agree, but why come up with things like "He didn't win it alone" as if that was the point.
If you say soFact is Chelsea with Aguero does not = 'a best part of a decade of dominance'
You were the one who said about giving Chelsea the titles City won and it's total and utter rubbish. I'm not jumping to any conclusions I'm saying your whole argument is again total and utter rubbish
You're overrating Ruud.Henry is in the conversation for greatest player in the PL. Aguero is not.
As for top 9s this is how I see it:
Henry and Ruud tied for the top spot, Henry being the better all-around forward but Ruud being the best pure finisher.
Shearer
Rooney
Aguero
Ronaldo would be at the top had his career in the PL lasted longer. Had that been the case, Ronaldo would be the greatest PL player (he's of course in the conversation for GOAT in the sport) and greatest PL forward/scorer/magician.
A shame Rooney never reached his full potential, despite the career that he actually had. But this thread is about Aguero and he's earned the praise he's receiving here. But no, he's no Henry and no Ruud.
Are you kidding me? They are two different types of forward.. I think they are certainly in the same bracket / class. Henry was more of an athelete, more spectacular in some ways.. but all round player? Aguero is certainly no worst than Henry. On par in my opinion.. like Shearer etc. Those guys are different in how they approach their game, but all super players. But difficult to say one is better than another. Henry played alongside a superb team...Nowhere near as good as Henry. Great player though.
Very impressive.Aguero 64 apps 42 goals
Kane 42 apps 21 goals
Rooney 46 apps 20 goals
Rvp 31 apps 18 goals
Hazard 63 apps 17 goals
He'll have someone else's say too.
Henry is a better striker than Ruud Van Nistelrooy? Or Alan Shearer?For me as strikers goes it would probably be
1st tear Henry
2nd tear Aguero,Ruud,Shearer,Suarez,Cole,Rooney etc
Suarez outside of England? Yes, absolutely, Suarez in England nope. Suarez is one of the best players to ever play in England but I think its fair to say of his 3 seasons in England only 1 was at a world class level. Kun has has 7 in a row. In England Aguero scores a full half hour quicker than Suarez. One every 110 minutes for Kun, almost 140 minutes for Suarez. Suarez did have that amazing season though and Aguero has never put up one like that.Suarez is superior though. His peak is of an all time great CF. I mean he actually outscored Messi and Ronaldo one season if I'm not mistaken. Aguero is a level below him and Herry, for me.