Messi v Ronaldo | Contains double your daily salt allowance

Messi or Ronaldo

  • Messi

  • Ronaldo


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Cal?

CR7 fan
Joined
Mar 18, 2002
Messages
34,942
There is something some people here are getting wrong imo.

Shots in football are not the same as shots in basketball.

When you take a shot in football in a direct football approach with quick transitions you are "finishing the play" which is considered good praxis if the style is very direct.

In a possession oriented kind of game there are not so many shots per game, the final pass is normally made when the circumstances are optimal.

Ronaldo's ability to take MANY shots is a great virtue of his in a direct kind of game.

It's a bit of a simplification but it's understood better this way.

This post doesn't want to make a comparison between Ronaldo and Messi. I'm just surprised at people who think this asset can be seen as a defect. I just cannot understand it. For a defender it has to be a nightmare to pay attention to a forward who has the skill to make a lot of shots per game.
Pretty much this. Goals per game (or minutes played) is a very meaningful stat.

Goals per shot is utterly useless.
 

MalcolmTucker

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2014
Messages
1,810
Pre-Madrid is debatable - maybe not post that - but yes, it is debatable - just because you haven't seen enough doesn't change my opinion (have seen both from a very young age)
No. I'm a United fan of 30 years old and Ronaldo was my favourite player to watch ever since his Bolton debut. He was an outstanding dribbler and one of the most entertaining players to watch and even when everyone wrote him off as a one trick pony I reckoned he was going to be the best player in the world one day and I was glad to be proven right. I used to hate Barca and Messi because they were annoyingly good back when we were the 2nd best team in the world and even though I knew deep down that Messi was probably better, I still preferred Ronaldo and favoured him and Madrid to do well over the smug tyrants of Barcelona. I can't remember at what point I let go of that grudge and started to appreciate Messi without bias, but even when I sung Viva Ronaldo at the Stretford end I knew Ronaldo, despite all his obvious ability, wasn't as good of a dribbler as Messi. It's really not debatable at all.
 

Pocho

Full Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2006
Messages
1,807
Ok, so if you take almost all the shots of your team and score a low percentage of goals it's better than taking less percentage of your team shots and score the same amount of goals. Very enlightning.
 

Cal?

CR7 fan
Joined
Mar 18, 2002
Messages
34,942
Ok, so if you take almost all the shots of your team and score a low percentage of goals it's better tan taking less percent of your team shots and score the same amount of goals. Very enlightning.
Please point out where I EVER said it’s better? :rolleyes:
 

hkjack

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 17, 2017
Messages
65
Supports
Man City
There is something some people here are getting wrong imo.

Shots in football are not the same as shots in basketball.

When you take a shot in football in a direct football approach with quick transitions you are "finishing the play" which is considered good praxis if the style is very direct.

In a possession oriented kind of game there are not so many shots per game, the final pass is normally made when the circumstances are optimal.

Ronaldo's ability to take MANY shots is a great virtue of his in a direct kind of game.

It's a bit of a simplification but it's understood better this way.

This post doesn't want to make a comparison between Ronaldo and Messi. I'm just surprised at people who think this asset can be seen as a defect. I just cannot understand it. For a defender it has to be a nightmare to pay attention to a forward who has the skill to make a lot of shots per game.
The fact is that Juventus has lesser goals than last season.
Dybala scored 22 goals in serie A last season but he has only 2 goals this season.
I don't see Juventus benefits from Ronaldo taking many shots because his teammate take less.
 

GatoLoco

Full Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2018
Messages
3,214
Supports
Real Madrid
The fact is that Juventus has lesser goals than last season.
Dybala scored 22 goals in serie A last season but he has only 2 goals this season.
I don't see Juventus benefits from Ronaldo taking many shots because his teammate take less.
And what's the conclusion if you take a 11 years bracket instead of a 5 months bracket?
 

2mufc0

Everything is fair game in capitalism!
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
16,992
Supports
Dragon of Dojima
Indeed, Barca fans and their holier than thou attitude to everything.

I'll leave you guys with this:
Probably the worst ref performance of all time.
 

Tommy

bigot with fetish for footballers getting fingered
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
10,672
Location
Birmingham
Supports
Liverpool
Probably the worst ref performance of all time.
I can't think of one that's remotely comparable. I remember watching that game. I hated Chelsea at the time. The first few decisions made me laugh. Then I was like... Eh? Then I was all Drogba-esque.

On-topic. Y'know what the most overrated aspect of Ronaldo's play is for me? The free kicks. He kicks the valve hard, sometimes it moves, sometimes it doesn't. Most of the time it hits the wall.
 

Shinjch

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
1,251
Yea, Casemiro did enough to be sent off twice in that game. Which isn't unusual. Shocking officiating all around.
 

mediocentr0

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 4, 2019
Messages
11
Supports
Juventus
Messi is more of a midfielder and CR7 a striker. It´s the same with Dembélé and Mbappe. I wouldn´t compare them, because they are just so different.
 

Pocho

Full Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2006
Messages
1,807
There is something some people here are getting wrong imo.

Shots in football are not the same as shots in basketball.

When you take a shot in football in a direct football approach with quick transitions you are "finishing the play" which is considered good praxis if the style is very direct.

In a possession oriented kind of game there are not so many shots per game, the final pass is normally made when the circumstances are optimal.

Ronaldo's ability to take MANY shots is a great virtue of his in a direct kind of game.

It's a bit of a simplification but it's understood better this way.

This post doesn't want to make a comparison between Ronaldo and Messi. I'm just surprised at people who think this asset can be seen as a defect. I just cannot understand it. For a defender it has to be a nightmare to pay attention to a forward who has the skill to make a lot of shots per game.
You agreed with this statement. @Cal?
 

Ishdalar

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2013
Messages
3,351
Location
Spain
Supports
Barcelona
There is something some people here are getting wrong imo.

Shots in football are not the same as shots in basketball.

When you take a shot in football in a direct football approach with quick transitions you are "finishing the play" which is considered good praxis if the style is very direct.

In a possession oriented kind of game there are not so many shots per game, the final pass is normally made when the circumstances are optimal.

Ronaldo's ability to take MANY shots is a great virtue of his in a direct kind of game.

It's a bit of a simplification but it's understood better this way.

This post doesn't want to make a comparison between Ronaldo and Messi. I'm just surprised at people who think this asset can be seen as a defect. I just cannot understand it. For a defender it has to be a nightmare to pay attention to a forward who has the skill to make a lot of shots per game.
That’s not how it works, unless you have an empty net to shoot at from inches out, it’ll never be 100% you should score. It’s all about the percentages.

Ronaldo may only score 5% of his shots from out far, but those 5% does go in. If Messi thinks he only scores 2% from far out and improves his scoring to 20% if he dribbles closer, he’d likely do that. However if he only dribbles successfully to those positions 25% of the time, you wind up with Messi scoring at a similar rate as Ronaldo but with a higher shots to goal ratio.

He’s not more productive with his goal scoring, just more conservation with his shooting.
This whole line of debate blows up when you notice that Messi has been outshooting and outscoring Cristiano Ronaldo from outside the area for almost 3 seasons in a row


What's going to be the next excuse, that many of those goals could've come from free kicks?. Michelacosta stats give Messi 25 goals from FK since 2015/2016, theres 32 goals in that graph, Ronaldo has scored 9 FK, there's 15 goals there.

The 5% figure and Messi "cutting his loses". In those seasons Ronaldo attempted 388 shots from outside the area for 15 goals, that's a 3'8%. Messi has a 6'6% (25 goals from 378 attempts). If Messi thinks he has worse conversion rate than Ronaldo from outside the box he's gravely mistaken.

So, who has that huge range, is Ronaldo better at this because he can score 1/2 screamers per season?.

He’s not more productive with his goal scoring, just more conservation with his shooting
He's more productive while being less conservative as he shoots more at that range nowadays, and has better conversion ratio from far than 09/12 Ronaldo who was pissing screamers to the sky. He's just more rational, scoring a screamer might be a good feeling, even cure some depressions, but 99% of the time it's not what his team needs from him to score a goal.


"But prime vs prime..." nope, on his best season (11/12) Ronaldo scored 10 goals from outside the area. Messi has reached 10 in 16/17 and 09/10. Ronaldo needed 164 shots for those 10 goals (6% conversion), Messi needed 87 (11% conversion).

Career wise Messi has 78 goals, Ronaldo 59. The only things in which Ronaldo beats Messi in this aspect might be A) goals scored from 30+ meters (around 5 in his whole career?) and B) the extra 3 meters of distance he shoots from to score compared to Messi, which barely even matter as 10 minutes of footage shows that Messi covers those 3 extra meters Ronaldo has in his legs with an extra touch or a dribble


Those two videos basically sum up the difference between their mid/long range scoring.
 

GatoLoco

Full Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2018
Messages
3,214
Supports
Real Madrid
I didn't talk about distances in my post.

I wasn't making a comparison between Ronaldo and Messi either.

I was only speaking about the ability to finish the plays. After quick transitions, with more imprecise passing. Or simply about the ability to create the shots on his own, which is a part of Ronaldo's style and should be seen as a virtue.
 

Cal?

CR7 fan
Joined
Mar 18, 2002
Messages
34,942
Probably the worst ref performance of all time.
Indeed, absolutely shocking. :(
I remember the ref in Real Madrid Bayern as bad as this one or worst
Ronaldo scored clearly in offside and Vidal was sent off when, I believe it was Casemiro, should have been sent off minutes before.
Vidal was rightly sent off for a clear 2nd yellow, and Bayern were awarded a non-existent penalty in that game.
You agreed with this statement. @Cal?
Being able to get on the end of direct attacks is great.
This whole line of debate blows up when you notice that Messi has been outshooting and outscoring Cristiano Ronaldo from outside the area for almost 3 seasons in a row


What's going to be the next excuse, that many of those goals could've come from free kicks?. Michelacosta stats give Messi 25 goals from FK since 2015/2016, theres 32 goals in that graph, Ronaldo has scored 9 FK, there's 15 goals there.

The 5% figure and Messi "cutting his loses". In those seasons Ronaldo attempted 388 shots from outside the area for 15 goals, that's a 3'8%. Messi has a 6'6% (25 goals from 378 attempts). If Messi thinks he has worse conversion rate than Ronaldo from outside the box he's gravely mistaken.

So, who has that huge range, is Ronaldo better at this because he can score 1/2 screamers per season?.



He's more productive while being less conservative as he shoots more at that range nowadays, and has better conversion ratio from far than 09/12 Ronaldo who was pissing screamers to the sky. He's just more rational, scoring a screamer might be a good feeling, even cure some depressions, but 99% of the time it's not what his team needs from him to score a goal.


"But prime vs prime..." nope, on his best season (11/12) Ronaldo scored 10 goals from outside the area. Messi has reached 10 in 16/17 and 09/10. Ronaldo needed 164 shots for those 10 goals (6% conversion), Messi needed 87 (11% conversion).

Career wise Messi has 78 goals, Ronaldo 59. The only things in which Ronaldo beats Messi in this aspect might be A) goals scored from 30+ meters (around 5 in his whole career?) and B) the extra 3 meters of distance he shoots from to score compared to Messi, which barely even matter as 10 minutes of footage shows that Messi covers those 3 extra meters Ronaldo has in his legs with an extra touch or a dribble


Those two videos basically sum up the difference between their mid/long range scoring.
Except for the fact that Messi doesn’t really score more than Ronaldo, pray tell why not shooting is a good thing when scoring is the aim of the game?
 

Infordin

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2016
Messages
3,897
Supports
Barcelona
Except for the fact that Messi doesn’t really score more than Ronaldo, pray tell why not shooting is a good thing when scoring is the aim of the game?
Ronaldo shoots from impossible angles when his teammates are in better positions. Look at Dybala's goalscoring this season compared to last season.
 

Deleted member 101472

Guest
@Cal?

Not sure if anyone has ever asked you this. I respect your opinion on why you think Ronaldo is better, but who do you enjoy watching more?
 

Cal?

CR7 fan
Joined
Mar 18, 2002
Messages
34,942
Ronaldo shoots from impossible angles when his teammates are in better positions. Look at Dybala's goalscoring this season compared to last season.
Look at the number of games Dybala has missed.

Ronaldo is signed to be the focal point of their attack, hardly surprising Dybala is scoring less.
 

Deleted member 101472

Guest
Ronaldo, I prefer a more direct style than Barca’s
Yeah I often wonder myself what I’d rather pay more to go see, a Messi v spurs type performance or a Ronaldo v Roma. Think Messi is probably better value for money on individual entertainment over the season though.
 

SirAF

Ageist
Joined
Sep 28, 2003
Messages
37,563
Location
Yeah I often wonder myself what I’d rather pay more to go see, a Messi v spurs type performance or a Ronaldo v Roma. Think Messi is probably better value for money on individual entertainment over the season though.


Probably these days, but certainly not in Ronaldo’s freestyle days :drool:
 

simonhch

Horrible boss
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
14,368
Location
Seventh Heaven
Supports
Urban Combat Preparedness
Ronaldo has obviously made a simply unbelievable career being a phenomenal goal scorer, but can anyone really claim - with a straight face and without an erection - that he’s even close to being as good an overall footballer as Messi? I find the notion simply too incredulous to be believable.
 

Schneckerl

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2016
Messages
2,704
Ronaldo's ability to take MANY shots is a great virtue of his in a direct kind of game.

It's a bit of a simplification but it's understood better this way.

This post doesn't want to make a comparison between Ronaldo and Messi. I'm just surprised at people who think this asset can be seen as a defect. I just cannot understand it. For a defender it has to be a nightmare to pay attention to a forward who has the skill to make a lot of shots per game.
Both of them benefit massively from the envirmonent they play in to be able to have this high volume shots playstyle often taking a chance from bad positions/far away.

Elite Forwards/Strikers in the 80s/90s like Van Basten would get about 2,5 to 3 shots/game. Even you argue Cristiano is the best ever at 'generating chances' due to his positioning or instinct how much better can he possibly be at that than someone like Van Basten?
 

GatoLoco

Full Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2018
Messages
3,214
Supports
Real Madrid
Both of them benefit massively from the envirmonent they play in to be able to have this high volume shots playstyle often taking a chance from bad positions/far away.

Elite Forwards/Strikers in the 80s/90s like Van Basten would get about 2,5 to 3 shots/game. Even you argue Cristiano is the best ever at 'generating chances' due to his positioning or instinct how much better can he possibly be at that than someone like Van Basten?
It's hard to answer that one, but just imagine Van Basten instead of Higuain at Madrid, Napoli, Juventus, Milan and now Chelsea. The injuries are the unique limitation. Other than that it's not hard to imagine significantly better figures than the ones Higuain got. And Higuain's figures are quite excellent.
 
Last edited:

Synco

Lucio's #1 Fan
Joined
Jul 19, 2014
Messages
6,437
Elite Forwards/Strikers in the 80s/90s like Van Basten would get about 2,5 to 3 shots/game. Even you argue Cristiano is the best ever at 'generating chances' due to his positioning or instinct how much better can he possibly be at that than someone like Van Basten?
Veering off topic here, but what's crazy is that the same is likely true for Gerd Müller. At least as far as the ~50 still available full games go. Not quite as low as your numbers, but almost certainly below 4 for these games.

If I haven't miscounted, he took 9 shots in the four knockout games for the 72 EUROs combined (2,25 per game), scoring 5 times.
 

zkap

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 19, 2018
Messages
155
Supports
Barça
Here's my monthly post -

Aside from the gut instinct test (which Ronaldo doesn't pass for most people), the major problem with the claim that Ronaldo is better than Messi is that it contains the implicit assumption that he's a contender for the best ever. And that definitely doesn't pass the gut instinct test.
Indeed. After the endless statistical data, gerrymandering and selective arguments, we come to this.

Messi has spent his career so far being compared to Maradona and the other greats, being placed at the same table with them. Ronaldo has spent his career so far being compared only to Messi.

They play in the same era and the comparisons are forced. It's mainly media campaigns and generating something for the views and clicks. Barcelona vs Real Madrid, Nike vs Adidas, PES vs FIFA, that sort of thing. The rivalry was encouraged and built up by certain parties, which include Ronaldo himself.

I think in a while, once both of them have retired, the comparisons will stop because there will be very little interest to build it up and add fuel to the fire. I don't think history will have any doubt as to which one was the better player, it's just a temporary thing now. All-time greats don't have to force the debate, they don't have to sport goatees and have their agents force the notion that they are the best, that they deserve all the awards etc. True all-time greats are naturally compared to one another because that's where they belong, in the same discussion, at the same table. Seeing Messi compared with Maradona is normal for me. Seeing Ronaldo compared with Maradona would have been laughable.
 
Last edited:

Zehner

Football Statistics Dork
Joined
Mar 29, 2018
Messages
7,984
Location
Germany
Supports
Bayer 04 Leverkusen
Wrote this post in the La Liga thread but it didn't belong there, so I decided to post it here..

It’s like having the heaviest man in the world calling me fat. We’re arguing about Barcelona and Messi, you make it about Ronaldo since there’s nothing else you can think about.

I don’t criticize Messi for being too important, you literally don’t understand English or football. I criticize them for giving him more importance than he should have. That is not the same thing. Please learn how to interpret a sentence.

Ronaldo at Madrid never had the team built around him the same way Messi does. He was a key part of the system, not the whole system. Ronaldo adapted to his teammates, at Barcelona its the team that has to adapt to Messi. Messi is always the same regardless of who else is playing, Ronaldo isn’t. Just have to watch how different he’s playing with Juve depending on who’s on the pitch and how different he’s playing compared to the past few years at Madrid. It’s nothing new either, with Portugal it’s always been that way.

We’ve argued this about 100 different times and you tell me I’m arguing exactly the opposite of what I’m arguing... Ronaldo was incredibly important to Madrid’s CL success, that does not mean he was the one influencing the way they played though... a common factor for years now in their teams is that a team with Ronaldo plays to the strengths of the other players so they can get the best out of them knowing Ronaldo can adapt to it, a team with Messi plays to his strengths alone and either buys the right profile of player in the transfer market to fit into that or the squad as a whole ends up underperforming. The one time in the past few years that this hasn’t happened Barcelona won the treble.

A team with Ronaldo has a plan A, a plan B, a plan C, etc. due to his versatility. A team with Messi has a great plan A and no adaptability when an opponent in similar quality figures it out. It’s like I said, the Champions League knockouts haven’t even happened yet and the results may go all kinds of different ways but even to you isn’t it beyond obvious that the exact same problems are still there? Nothing has changed. Barcelona (and Argentina) have a systematic tactical problem, not a problem of lack of squad quality.

And before you say it, no, I’m not blaming Messi for it 100%. The manager is at fault way more than anyone elss, but it is true that having Messi at the center of the team creates a lot of balance issues that make Valverde’s life harder from a tactical standpoint. Obviously tactics won’t matter at all if individual talent ends up masking it though and if Barcelona want to win the Champions League that’s what’s going to have to happen while Valverde is there and their way of playing remains the same.

This isn’t just about Messi btw. Football has evolved in a way that does not favour the type of player Messi is regardless of their talent due to the tactical problems they create in the team in terms of balance. James, Ozil, Dybala, Coutinho, Isco... these players are some of the most talented players in the world but they’re luxury players in modern football. They only work tactically in the right set of circumstances and they’re only worth that trouble when they’re producing offensively.
Yeah, of course you weren't talking about Ronaldo. Who are you trying to kid, honestly? In every fecking post of yours one can extract some argument that in one way or another makes Ronaldo look better or Messi look worse. You subtly sneak in those arguments again and again and at some point in the future you bring them up in the actual discussion as if they were facts (something like "Rakitic, ancient-Iniesta and Busquets are a better midfield than Kroos, Modric and Casemiro", "Alba is a better left back than Marcelo" or "Messi's playstyle makes his teams extremely dependent on him" or something along those lines). I'm annoyed of myself that I again took the bait and started this argument with you because it (rightly) annoys many users in here that this discussion is so omnipresent but it is simply impossible to resist the irk to call you out for this kind of stuff.

Your posts in this thread are perfect examples of how you are again and again twisting, turning and bending arguments until they fit your narrative. Messi has played in countless different setups, successfully occupied much more different roles and positions than Ronaldo, can outplay defenses in many more ways than CR7 and so forth, so what's your point? You are completely superficial in one direction ("Argentina and Barca's whole approach consists of giving the ball to Messi and this is of course his fault, he simply makes it incredible hard for tactical geniuses like Martino or Maradona who immediately had unimaginable success once they coached teams in which he wasn't there") and super in-depth in the other ("Yeah, of course Real Madrid struggles now that Ronaldo is gone but here are 7 essays consisting of 63 pages with 547 different reasons why that is actually not the case and everyone who doesn't agree with my argumentation has no clue about football and I will answer them with 50 laughing smileys that document my and Ronaldo's superiority").

By the way, a good description of how versatile Messi actually is this video:


This illustrates how ridiculous those things you claim actually are. Really, I can only repeat what I said in the last post. From time to time one has to reflect what you are actually arguing in this very moment in order to understand how far from reality your claims are. You constantly criticize Messi for being too good for his team. When Barca recently performed underwhelmingly your first instinct was to criticize Messi although he wasn't even on the pitch. You suggested that Rakitic was a better midfielder than fecking Toni Kroos and argued he had a better world cup for Croatia than Luka Modric. You criticized Messi for not being compatible with Dybala yet since Ronaldo plays for Juve the guy can't score for his life and has a siginficantly less important role in the squad. But of course you, and only you, know the true reason for that (which of course isn't the far too obvious explanation that Ronaldo has changed the environment for him but the supposed "fact" that the midfield around Pjanic has coincidently degressed the very moment Ronaldo joined the team). But do you know what my favourite part of that essay was? You said that Dybala scored less because he had to drop deep in order to build up the play from the midfield, the exact role Messi is executing in Barcelona without any negative effect on his productivity. So when the team performs bad, Messi falls back and takes over the responsibility and still manages to finish attacks while Ronaldo stays up front, scores less and leaves the task of initiating attacks to another team mate (who then scores less, too) but somehow this makes Ronaldo more versatile and Messi a challenge for the manager. What the actual f*ck? Unbelievable.

Yet the very moment a Barca fans says something negative about a player other than Messi you are immediately pointing your finger on him and are all like "THERE! Did you see that? He again criticized a Barca player in order to make Messi look better! These Barca fans are completely mental!"

You are really, truly incredible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.