Adrien Rabiot / completing formalities at Juventus

Status
Not open for further replies.

tenpoless

No 6-pack, just 2Pac
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
16,323
Location
Ole's ipad
Supports
4-4-2 classic
Would improve our midfield option but a huge risk. When you're the dickhead in a team consisting of Dani Alves and Neymar...
 

flappyjay

Full Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2016
Messages
5,932
If we are planning on plaguing many holes a free wouldn't hurt. He would be a better option than our Brazilian cm's if he plays to his potential.
 

Kostov

Full Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2017
Messages
9,416
Location
Skopje, Macedonia
I think it would be a very smart transfer if we manage to put him in order with this group, and as already mentioned, it can help us divert money to other glaring needs.
 

Silas

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2016
Messages
4,688
Location
UK
There'd be no point in us signing him if he doesn't actually want to play as a #6. Plus, he seems like a knob.
 

Mb194dc

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
4,654
Supports
Chelsea
I'd take him at Chelsea, probably. It's his Mum that is the difficult one, and also his agent :lol:. I'm sure he's decent guy and a good professional.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,149
Location
...
Drama aside, he’s a very good footballer who always impresses when I watch him. I’d have him at United on a free for sure. Reckon he could replace Matic, although he’s a little more forward thinking.
 

davidmichael

Full Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2015
Messages
3,403
Drama aside, he’s a very good footballer who always impresses when I watch him. I’d have him at United on a free for sure. Reckon he could replace Matic, although he’s a little more forward thinking.


That’s not a bad thing Rabiot being more forward thinking as we’ve lacked that since Carrick was a regular in the team.

I’d be happy with a Herrera-Rabiot-Pogba trio against the smaller teams at home then Herrera-Matic-Pogba in the away games with Pereira, Fred, McTominay and Garner also in the mix too.
 

Keeps It tidy

Hates Messi
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
17,638
Location
New York
We really need to stop calling Bosman transfers frees. Rabiot wants 10M a year giving him that type of wages for say 5 years can be more harmful to the club than say a 40 million deal for someone on much less wages.
 

nikineil

Full Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2013
Messages
694
Location
Portland
Excuse me sir I believe Di Maria was unfairly left out from that list.
Tbf, Di Maria was only that to us. H was literally shooed out of Madrid and plays fairly regularly at PSG. However, I feel we should stay away from bad apples that could ruin a dressing room. Manchester is not famed for its weather.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,149
Location
...
That’s not a bad thing Rabiot being more forward thinking as we’ve lacked that since Carrick was a regular in the team.

I’d be happy with a Herrera-Rabiot-Pogba trio against the smaller teams at home then Herrera-Matic-Pogba in the away games with Pereira, Fred, McTominay and Garner also in the mix too.
I guess, but everyone can’t be in the team to attack. You want defensive protection from one of them at least.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,149
Location
...
We really need to stop calling Bosman transfers frees. Rabiot wants 10M a year giving him that type of wages for say 5 years can be more harmful to the club than say a 40 million deal for someone on much less wages.
Oh, so you think ‘free’ should be literally ‘free’? Bebe was literally a homeless man off he streets and I’m sure even he didn’t play for free. €10m a year will not damage the club at all, he’d probably just about make it into our top 5 earners on that.
 

Keeps It tidy

Hates Messi
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
17,638
Location
New York
Oh, so you think ‘free’ should be literally ‘free’? Bebe was literally a homeless man off he streets and I’m sure even he didn’t play for free. €10m a year will not damage the club at all, he’d probably just about make it into our top 5 earners on that.
But, you are making a huge financial commitment. And it could be worse since it could completely screw up your wage structure.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,149
Location
...
But, you are making a huge financial commitment. And it could be worse since it could completely screw up your wage structure.
Yes, because you are signing a very good football player from PSG. And €10m a year does not screw up our wage structure. And to repeat, this is less a £50m transfer fee.
 

Silas

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2016
Messages
4,688
Location
UK
I'd take him at Chelsea, probably. It's his Mum that is the difficult one, and also his agent :lol:. I'm sure he's decent guy and a good professional.
Not sure if his mom had anything to do with him flat out refusing to be part of France's replacement shortlist for the WC.
 

Keeps It tidy

Hates Messi
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
17,638
Location
New York
Yes, because you are signing a very good football player from PSG. And €10m a year does not screw up our wage structure. And to repeat, this is less a £50m transfer fee.
Because, if it does not work out he becomes really difficult to move and when renewing contracts and signing new players no one would want to take less than what he is making.
 

Fracture90

Full Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2016
Messages
10,360
Location
Serbia
We really need to stop calling Bosman transfers frees. Rabiot wants 10M a year giving him that type of wages for say 5 years can be more harmful to the club than say a 40 million deal for someone on much less wages.
I get what you mean but with the amount of money available and the higher priority holes we need to fill in our team, getting a player the quality of Rabiot on a free transfer might not be such a bad thing to do after all.

I believe we took 40 million + 5 million in wages approach with Fred and so far it isn't looking all that good.
 

Fracture90

Full Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2016
Messages
10,360
Location
Serbia
Tbf, Di Maria was only that to us. H was literally shooed out of Madrid and plays fairly regularly at PSG. However, I feel we should stay away from bad apples that could ruin a dressing room. Manchester is not famed for its weather.
Doing what he did to us is enough in my book to get him a spot on that list mate.
 

Fracture90

Full Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2016
Messages
10,360
Location
Serbia
:D

I don't think he is worth the risk. Why disrupt the harmony that is now present at the club?
You're assuming he's a bad apple in that PSG dressing room, which is fair considering all the drama rumors surrounding him and his mother, but there's absolutely nothing to indicate he'll be a disrupting factor in our dressing room mate.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
I'd take him at Chelsea, probably. It's his Mum that is the difficult one, and also his agent :lol:. I'm sure he's decent guy and a good professional.
He also wants to play in advanced role rather than a no. 6. Perfect for Sarri because Sarri’s no 6 is Jorginho.
 

Kostov

Full Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2017
Messages
9,416
Location
Skopje, Macedonia
We really need to stop calling Bosman transfers frees. Rabiot wants 10M a year giving him that type of wages for say 5 years can be more harmful to the club than say a 40 million deal for someone on much less wages.
40 million doesn't even buy you a Fred in this market, not for us at least. And usually when you pay 40-50 pounds for a player, you will pay a wage adequate with the transfer fee you are shelling, unless it a young player and you can structure it in a different way.

Take a look at Fred for example. We paid 52m pounds and he won't be earning less that 100k per week. I've seen figures like 120k per week, combine that with his enormous transfer fee, and the math doesn't lie.
 
Last edited:

davidmichael

Full Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2015
Messages
3,403
I guess, but everyone can’t be in the team to attack. You want defensive protection from one of them at least.
If Rabiot played as a similar defensive midfielder to how Carrick played and also had Herrera alongside him then I’d say that’s plenty of defensive protection, at the moment under Ole we're kind of going with the mantra of ‘a good offence is the best defence’ as we're still no better defensively in terms of personnel yet seem to be conceding less but Matic would still be around too as well as young Garner coming through.
 

beingshe7don

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2016
Messages
2,735
Rabiot will probably end up at Arsenal or Liverpool. Despite his attitude, I think he's a good player... Ole could work his magic with him.... Rabiot, Pogba & Ndombele would make a strong formidable midfield.... Rabiot is a good replacement for Matic and Ndombele could rotate with Herrera and Pogba when required. And the two of them would cost 70m... Would really hate it if he went to Liverpool or City.
 

0le

Full Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2017
Messages
5,806
Location
UK
You're assuming he's a bad apple in that PSG dressing room, which is fair considering all the drama rumors surrounding him and his mother, but there's absolutely nothing to indicate he'll be a disrupting factor in our dressing room mate.
Yeah, that is a good point to be fair.
 

Brophs

The One and Only
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
50,438
You're assuming he's a bad apple in that PSG dressing room, which is fair considering all the drama rumors surrounding him and his mother, but there's absolutely nothing to indicate he'll be a disrupting factor in our dressing room mate.
How's that? All we know about him is that he's been perceived as a problem in the one dressing room he's been in. It's hardly a leap to suggest he might be seen as the same if he moved?
 

Devil may care

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
35,976
How's that? All we know about him is that he's been perceived as a problem in the one dressing room he's been in. It's hardly a leap to suggest he might be seen as the same if he moved?
Didn't he also refuse to be in the French back-up optons for the World Cup?
 

Fracture90

Full Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2016
Messages
10,360
Location
Serbia
How's that? All we know about him is that he's been perceived as a problem in the one dressing room he's been in. It's hardly a leap to suggest he might be seen as the same if he moved?
And we also don't know why's that and what led to that situation, right? Also iirc no one ever stated that he was a problem in the dressing room, he was removed from the team because he will not re-sign with PSG.
 

Owen06

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 29, 2018
Messages
180
He also wants to play in advanced role rather than a no. 6. Perfect for Sarri because Sarri’s no 6 is Jorginho.
Funny he prefers that position,I've watched him a couple of times and he's not really that creative,he just knows how to protect the ball and keep it moving.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,149
Location
...
If PSG wasn’t stupid, they would play him on Tuesday.
 

RC89

Full Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2010
Messages
2,971
Would take on a free so long as his wages aren't prohibitive. Could be a very very smart signing. Genuinely good player at a great age, in a position we sorely lack any quality in depth.
 

Scholsey2004

Full Member
Joined
May 12, 2016
Messages
3,600
He's a very good player but I wouldn't be surprised if it was Manchester city rather than us who were in the mix. Journalists frequently mix us up. Fernandinho is getting past it and rabiot would make a lot of sense for city. We don't need to replace matic, we only signed him last season. I'd certainly take rabiot here but I'm not sure which one of Herrera and matic we'd drop to play him. It'd be harsh on either.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.