Jadon Sancho| Staying at Dortmund for now

Status
Not open for further replies.

FFK Norway

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 14, 2019
Messages
78
Supports
Fredrikstad FK and Brighton
The big question is if United will catch up. City and Pool have done so much right for so many years. It's like United became a bear after Sir Ferguson quit. And went into hibernation. And while the rest kept on working time almost stood still for United. I hope people have patience with Solskjær cause he has the right hearth. But it's going to take time.
 

Devil may care

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
35,976
You keep saying the diamond is our best formation but the best football we have played under Ole was 433 in his first 5 or so games. We only went to a diamond to counter attack against Spurs and Arsenal.

You also ignored the part about not having full backs who can offer the width... and Martial and Rashford have shown neither are great when going wide. The heat maps I'm sure you've seen show a pretty clear problem on our right side and your formation isn't going to fix that. Not saying it's any better or worse than 433 but it will create its own problems if we don't have the players to make it work.
We were playing cannon fodder garbage in those games and everyone was buzzing because Mourinho was gone, when reality set in the 4-4-2 diamond became the clear formation to get the best out of our strikers regardless of who is playing, it even got Lukaku back in a lot of fans good graces. Just look at Saturday, we started out with a 4-3-3 trying to play up to Rashford, he got knocked over or dispossessed nearly every time, we changed to the diamond with Mata in behind and had our best spell of the game, as Marcus could then play as the type of striker he actually is and not trying to be one he isn't.

I didn't ignore it, I've been saying for ages we need a top RB regardless of formation, and Shaw has started to offer more in attack in recent weeks, something Ole said they'd been working on. If we get the fullbacks going and a top class false 9/#10 in then the diamond will work well, it already works for us reasonably well despite missing 3 key pieces. The 4-3-3 isn't going to have any sustainability for us unless we buy another striker and return Rashford to the LW to compete with Martial. This whole Martial/Rashford/Sancho videogame idea is never going to work IMO, the pieces are ill fitting.
 

deadrevelz

New Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2016
Messages
1,028
We were playing cannon fodder garbage in those games and everyone was buzzing because Mourinho was gone, when reality set in the 4-4-2 diamond became the clear formation to get the best out of our strikers regardless of who is playing, it even got Lukaku back in a lot of fans good graces. Just look at Saturday, we started out with a 4-3-3 trying to play up to Rashford, he got knocked over or dispossed nearly every time, we changed to the diamonf with Mata ion behind and had our best spell of the game, as Marcus could then play as the type of striker he actually is and not trying to be one he isn't.

I didn't ignore it, I've been saying for ages we need a top RB regardless of formation, and Shaw has started to offer more in attack in recent weeks, something Ole said they'd been working on. If we get the fullbacks going and a top class false 9/#10 in then the diamond will work well, it already works for us reasonably well despite missing 3 key pieces. The 4-3-3 isn't going to have any sustainability for us unless we buy another striker and return Rashford to the LW to compete with Martial. This whole Martial/Rashford/Sancho videogame idea is never going to work IMO, the pieces are ill fitting.
The criticism you have of the forwards not being able to hold the ball up doesn't simply disappear when you play a diamond. Not sure where you are getting that from. Either they learn to do it, or they're not good enough. Modern top level football doesn't allow limited players to excel. We can't always be counter attacking against teams like Wolves, Burnley etc.

Ultimately the formation now is irrelevant. What matters is which players are available to buy and which will be sold. The biggest influence probably won't be full back or right wing but midfield since that is going to see the biggest turnover. And we may not see the final decision until the following season.

Anyway... this is derailing the thread.
 

Devil may care

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
35,976
The criticism you have of the forwards not being able to hold the ball up doesn't simply disappear when you play a diamond. Not sure where you are getting that from. Either they learn to do it, or they're not good enough. Modern top level football doesn't allow limited players to excel. We can't always be counter attacking against teams like Wolves, Burnley etc.

Ultimately the formation now is irrelevant. What matters is which players are available to buy and which will be sold. The biggest influence probably won't be full back or right wing but midfield since that is going to see the biggest turnover. And we may not see the final decision until the following season.

Anyway... this is derailing the thread.
I never said it disappeared, but when you play the diamond it's the false 9/#10 that acts as the attacking fulcrum and the two strikers play off him, which means that Rashford, Martial and Lukaku will all maximize what they are good at. It's basic maths IMO, if you want to play 4-3-3 then you need to buy a top RW and a top #9, if you want to play the 4-4-2 diamond you need a false 9 or #10, one expensive signing rather than two. The midfield issue remains the same in either formation as we need 2 regardless, the only midfield piece that would change anything is if Pogba goes to Real as then the 4-2-3-1 comes back to the table as an option but requires two expensive forward buys the same as the 4-3-3, the difference being we'd have the Pogba money to facilitate the purchases.
 

NJM78

New Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
6,345
Location
Cardiff
I think this will be another one of those sagas that doesnt happen. Ole has said he hopes to have his signings ready for pre season and unless we offer a staggering amount I do not see it happening at all. Also how do we know he would even want to join us, he may be close to a few United players but if we have no CL to offer which I believe will be the case why move to us, we look years away from challenging for league never mind the CL.
Is he a boyhood fan of United?
I'm more concerned with keeping our two best players at the club this summer than blowing most of our budget on him when we need about 5 players.
 

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,411
Location
left wing
He won't join us why would he.
Seems unlikely if we miss out on top 4 again (4th time in 6 years). It's become more than a post-SAF blip of bad form for the club now and players around Europe will surely consider whether they want to join an organisation with such evident structural/performance issues.
 

deadrevelz

New Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2016
Messages
1,028
I never said it disappeared, but when you play the diamond it's the false 9/#10 that acts as the attacking fulcrum and the two strikers play off him, which means that Rashford, Martial and Lukaku will all maximize what they are good at. It's basic maths IMO, if you want to play 4-3-3 then you need to buy a top RW and a top #9, if you want to play the 4-4-2 diamond you need a false 9 or #10, one expensive signing rather than two. The midfield issue remains the same in either formation as we need 2 regardless, the only midfield piece that would change anything is if Pogba goes to Real as then the 4-2-3-1 comes back to the table as an option but requires two expensive forward buys the same as the 4-3-3, the difference being we'd have the Pogba money to facilitate the purchases.
Fair enough, maybe in terms of cost cutting you are right. I would prefer to sell Lukaku and buy Sancho and Hudson-Odoi, playing Martial/Rashford in the middle. That will give many options regardless of formation. They can swap positions, interchange, break down defences and counter attack. United should have 4 forwards. This is fantasy anyway, I don't expect us to get both and it's likely we will get neither.

Whatever happens, our new and current players will need to be coached to the highest standard as I feel this is the main reason why our attack fails to spark rather than formation.
 

Devil may care

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
35,976
Fair enough, maybe in terms of cost cutting you are right. I would prefer to sell Lukaku and buy Sancho and Hudson-Odoi, playing Martial/Rashford in the middle. That will give many options regardless of formation. They can swap positions, interchange, break down defences and counter attack. United should have 4 forwards. This is fantasy anyway, I don't expect us to get both and it's likely we will get neither.

Whatever happens, our new and current players will need to be coached to the highest standard as I feel this is the main reason why our attack fails to spark rather than formation.
I'm not a fan of Lukaku, in fact the opposite, but adding 2 more kids to a frontline that already features 2 forwards who are wildly inconsistent isn't going to get us anywhere, that's a forward line that would take 3 to 4 years to even be ready for a challenge, and on top of that neither Rashford or Martial can hold the ball up so we'd have the same difficulty of being just a counter attacking side. To me whatever choice is made for the forward line we need a proven player who can control the attack to help the younger ones we already have, as neither are ready to carry the attack for anything more than a top 4 scramble.

I agree the coaching needs to improve, our general movement off the ball is often not good enough as a collective, and our composure on the ball in all areas of the pitch is not up to scratch either.
 

KingMinger22

City >>> United. Moaning twat
Joined
Aug 2, 2005
Messages
7,245
Location
Chicago
He won't join us why would he.
Not sure if serious?

There are a number of reasons. Firstly and most importantly money and fame. Also with the shite we have on our books, he's guaranteed to start.

I will say that we will need to make a pretty compelling case to show that we are looking to be an elite club again and how we plan to (buy) do it.
 

Treble

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
10,550
Didn't watch the game with Bayern but I guess he didn't have a stormer last night.
 

Treble

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2008
Messages
10,550
Btw, the result last night makes the transfer a little bit more likely as he might want to jump ship. Mind, Dortmuind would still want 120m or something.
 

Trizy

New Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2014
Messages
12,009
The big question is if United will catch up. City and Pool have done so much right for so many years. It's like United became a bear after Sir Ferguson quit. And went into hibernation. And while the rest kept on working time almost stood still for United. I hope people have patience with Solskjær cause he has the right hearth. But it's going to take time.
We've become the biggest joke in football really. We're the biggest, we're the richest, we've the most fans.. blah blah. Football has a short memory and at the moment we're just another Arsenal.

We've had 3 horrible managerial appointments, 3 of them each with contrasting styles thus have 3 completely different type of players in a team which just won't work. (Moyes 2 square pegs, LVG's failed tiki taka style and Jose's tall destroyers).

Who has been a hit of all our signings in recent years? £664m spent and only £150m on quality (Pogba, Shaw, Martial).

It could take 2-3 years of the right players to compete. But in that time we need to not make 1 bad signing. Surely we're due some luck in that regard? Probably the worst time to need to rebuild though with Bayern, Madrid, Us and Chelsea all needing 5+ starters.
 

The holy trinity 68

The disparager
Joined
Apr 10, 2016
Messages
5,798
Location
Manchester
The big question is if United will catch up. City and Pool have done so much right for so many years.
Liverpool before this season finished 6th, 8th, 4th, 4th. Hardly doing so much right for so many years. United finished above them 3 of them seasons and have finished above them more than they have finished above United since SAF retired. United also won a few trophies along the way.

Can’t forget that less than 12 mo tha ago United finished 2nd to their 4th.

People making out like Liverpool are doing amazing compared to us these last few years is total nonsense and kneejerk.

Its a testament to the joke club that they are that United have been in their worst period for 30 years and Liverpool still haven’t won anything and finished below United plenty of times.
 

Patrick08

New Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2018
Messages
5,447
We were playing cannon fodder garbage in those games and everyone was buzzing because Mourinho was gone, when reality set in the 4-4-2 diamond became the clear formation to get the best out of our strikers regardless of who is playing, it even got Lukaku back in a lot of fans good graces. Just look at Saturday, we started out with a 4-3-3 trying to play up to Rashford, he got knocked over or dispossessed nearly every time, we changed to the diamond with Mata in behind and had our best spell of the game, as Marcus could then play as the type of striker he actually is and not trying to be one he isn't.

I didn't ignore it, I've been saying for ages we need a top RB regardless of formation, and Shaw has started to offer more in attack in recent weeks, something Ole said they'd been working on. If we get the fullbacks going and a top class false 9/#10 in then the diamond will work well, it already works for us reasonably well despite missing 3 key pieces. The 4-3-3 isn't going to have any sustainability for us unless we buy another striker and return Rashford to the LW to compete with Martial. This whole Martial/Rashford/Sancho videogame idea is never going to work IMO, the pieces are ill fitting.
Very good analysis. A diamond is definitely more suited to this squad than a 433, also spending big over Sancho is putting huge pressure on a kid who has not played a single game in English league and has still lot more is needed for him to develop. If he is still a top player a year after in Dortmund current stint it would be more suitable to move after him a year later than to have an untested video game front 3. That money should really be used for someone like eriksen who can play anywhere in attacking midfield and also on the right for a year when situations demand while taking off creating burden from pogba's shoulders alone who is inconsistent himself. While having 4 strikers at the club it really doesn't suit us to play a 433 as our first preferred system as having 2 back up strikers to two upfront makes much more sense than spalshing out big on a 18 year old talented kid and expecting miracles from him.
 

breakout67

Full Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2017
Messages
9,050
Supports
Man City
Just get Pepe. We are not suited to play an expansive game, so a lot of Sancho's qualities will be wasted. Sancho when he beats his man looks for runners, we do not support our attackers with runners, rather we put them in situations where they can go through on goal.
 

Cliche Guevara

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
3,790
Location
Inverness
Liverpool before this season finished 6th, 8th, 4th, 4th. Hardly doing so much right for so many years. United finished above them 3 of them seasons and have finished above them more than they have finished above United since SAF retired. United also won a few trophies along the way.

Can’t forget that less than 12 mo tha ago United finished 2nd to their 4th.

People making out like Liverpool are doing amazing compared to us these last few years is total nonsense and kneejerk.

Its a testament to the joke club that they are that United have been in their worst period for 30 years and Liverpool still haven’t won anything and finished below United plenty of times.
I couldn’t agree more with all this!
 

Litch

Full Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2013
Messages
10,221
Liverpool before this season finished 6th, 8th, 4th, 4th. Hardly doing so much right for so many years. United finished above them 3 of them seasons and have finished above them more than they have finished above United since SAF retired. United also won a few trophies along the way.

Can’t forget that less than 12 mo tha ago United finished 2nd to their 4th.

People making out like Liverpool are doing amazing compared to us these last few years is total nonsense and kneejerk.

Its a testament to the joke club that they are that United have been in their worst period for 30 years and Liverpool still haven’t won anything and finished below United plenty of times.
Spot on.
 

soaphroniscuss

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Messages
388
I don't believe Sancho will be of the same quality in Manchester United as in Dortmund. Cause in my opinion the premier league is much better overall than the German league. The teams behind the top 4-6 is much better in England.

And I believe it's a much harder league to stay fit in cause the football is tougher and faster. So I don't think United should pay the numbers people are talking about. Also he's young so if it goes less good than people expect it can make him loose his mojo even worse.

In the end he has had one good season in Dortmund really insane to pay 120£ for someone so little tested .
Clearly you are new to Muppetville :D.

Another poster was talking about us spending 500mil (albeit including sales) this Summer.
 

soaphroniscuss

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Messages
388
Seems unlikely if we miss out on top 4 again (4th time in 6 years). It's become more than a post-SAF blip of bad form for the club now and players around Europe will surely consider whether they want to join an organisation with such evident structural/performance issues.
Agreed. And players already at the club will also start reasoning along the same lines about whether they should stay.
 

Jazz

Just in case anyone missed it. I don't like Mount.
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
30,982
We shouldn't waste time on this lad. Dortmund says they're not selling, let's just move on. It would do him well to have another season under his belt anyway.
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,622
Location
Sydney
We shouldn't waste time on this lad. Dortmund says they're not selling, let's just move on. It would do him well to have another season under his belt anyway.
they usually say they're not selling tbf
 

Jazz

Just in case anyone missed it. I don't like Mount.
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
30,982
they usually say they're not selling tbf
Ok. Just think we shouldn't waste time plus I'm very uncomfortable about getting this kid for so much money. Imagine the pressure the poor lad would be under to perform well immediately? I just think we need to think carefully about this.
 

Darlington Padgett

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 9, 2017
Messages
1,215
We shouldn't waste time on this lad. Dortmund says they're not selling, let's just move on. It would do him well to have another season under his belt anyway.
If his price tag is around 100m this season next season we'll be out of the list of buyers for sure.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,583
Location
india
Just get Pepe. We are not suited to play an expansive game, so a lot of Sancho's qualities will be wasted. Sancho when he beats his man looks for runners, we do not support our attackers with runners, rather we put them in situations where they can go through on goal.
No. Sancho is the elite talent out of the two. Get him. His qualities won't at all be wasted. We need more complete players to help us improve. And he is just that.
 

Jazz

Just in case anyone missed it. I don't like Mount.
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
30,982
If his price tag is around 100m this season next season we'll be out of the list of buyers for sure.
Or he could have a below the par season and his stock goes down. We just can't predict anything. I don't know how strong he is mentally but even then, it would be really difficult for him with that price tag on his head imho.
 

youmeletsfly

New Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2018
Messages
2,528
We shouldn't waste time on this lad. Dortmund says they're not selling, let's just move on. It would do him well to have another season under his belt anyway.
1. Dortmund are a selling club
2. They just did a liverpool in the league, atmosphere will not be that great at the end of the season and their coach might leave, especially given the fact that he does not have that good a relationship with Reus.
3. They always say they won't sell.
4. Dortmund almost went bankrupt not so long ago. They won't miss the opportunity to make 90 mil profit on a kid. It's a good decision from a business point of view, call it a risk reward. If he has a bad season in 2020 they won't get 50 mil on him.
5. They have zero chance of winning anything in Germany so they always look to make a quick profit on players, that is their business model.
6. Sancho had a good season, his agent will ask for a hefty wage increase, that's another risk for 1 more season.

Dunno, I just feel they'll easily sell if someone comes with 100 mil.
 

Rolaholic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2016
Messages
11,161
they usually say they're not selling tbf
True,the likes of Pulisic, Dembele,Hummels, Aubamaeyang, Lewandowski and Gotze weren't for sale according tot heir management until they were shortly after.

Wouldn't take much credence into what they say tbh,if the money is right they'll offload him without protest. It's not like he's German or an academy product
 

ThierryHenry14

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2015
Messages
4,136
Supports
Arsenal
True,the likes of Pulisic, Dembele,Hummels, Aubamaeyang, Lewandowski and Gotze weren't for sale according tot heir management until they were shortly after.

Wouldn't take much credence into what they say tbh,if the money is right they'll offload him without protest. It's not like he's German or an academy product
The issue is they just sold Pulisic, unless they can find replacement for both wingers it is very unlikely they will let Sancho leave this summer.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,109
Location
...
True,the likes of Pulisic, Dembele,Hummels, Aubamaeyang, Lewandowski and Gotze weren't for sale according tot heir management until they were shortly after.

Wouldn't take much credence into what they say tbh,if the money is right they'll offload him without protest. It's not like he's German or an academy product
To be fair, all of those players had certain circumstances. Hummels and Goetze were both release clauses I believe. Lewandowski wasn’t for sale and had to leave on a free, and the other two were eventually for sale at a time that suited Dortmund, not before.
 

do.ob

Full Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
15,622
Location
Germany
Supports
Borussia Dortmund
True,the likes of Pulisic, Dembele,Hummels, Aubamaeyang, Lewandowski and Gotze weren't for sale according tot heir management until they were shortly after.

Wouldn't take much credence into what they say tbh,if the money is right they'll offload him without protest. It's not like he's German or an academy product
I mean Pulisic and Hummels had their contracts running out it was very much obvious that they would either extend or be sold.
Götze activated a release clause (which the club doesn't want to allow anymore).
Lewandowski actually wasn't sold but had to run down his contract.
Aubameyang was officially up for sale the summer before.
Dembele had to go on strike to force a move for almost ~€150m.

Other than that you're spot on of course.
 

Borussin

Full Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2017
Messages
304
Supports
Borussia Dortmund
1. Dortmund are a selling club
2. They just did a liverpool in the league, atmosphere will not be that great at the end of the season and their coach might leave, especially given the fact that he does not have that good a relationship with Reus.
3. They always say they won't sell.
4. Dortmund almost went bankrupt not so long ago. They won't miss the opportunity to make 90 mil profit on a kid. It's a good decision from a business point of view, call it a risk reward. If he has a bad season in 2020 they won't get 50 mil on him.
5. They have zero chance of winning anything in Germany so they always look to make a quick profit on players, that is their business model.
6. Sancho had a good season, his agent will ask for a hefty wage increase, that's another risk for 1 more season.

Dunno, I just feel they'll easily sell if someone comes with 100 mil.

1. Yes that is true, the CEO admits it too.
2. If 'did a Liverpool' means competing for a title this late in the season not many outside the club really thought they would be competing for, then yes, that is also true. Not sure how being 2nd and a couple points back would mean the atmosphere will turn bad.
3. Not always. Depends on circumstances. If players wont re-sign, then, the club will sell and won't hide the fact either. If a player acts like a small child and goes on strike, then yes, they will sell - on their terms.
4. Since then, Dortmund have worked their way back to being a very well run club, and have been a consant presence in European competition for near on a decade, the near bankruptcy serves as a remimder, but not a business model. They will make a big profit on Sancho next summer.
5. Zero chance? Dortmund have won 2 leagues and 2 cups in the past 8 years as well as getting to a CL final that no one expected them to get too, let's not make out the club haven't won anything or can't compete, or won't in the future.
6. He signed a new contract earlier this season, Dortmund don't need to panic and sell him now, they can wait till next summer at least.
 

The Irish Connection

Full Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
2,324
If we can’t get Sancho for a fair price (80m), I would go for jack Clarke at Leeds, reminds me of giggs the way he takes players on, even if he didn’t do brilliant for his first season he would still be an upgrade to our right wing situation.
To be honest, I’ve only seen him play a game and a half this season plus YouTube but I would like us to go for both him and Sancho over the next couple seasons, one now and one next.
Another option would be bale for a good price.
 

RuudTom83

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
5,569
Location
Manc
It would take a substantial amount of Ole’s budget to sign him...meaning Ole might not be able to strengthen in other areas.

Which means putting a lot of eggs in one basket, and I’m just not sure his arrival would translate to success on the pitch.

The only scenario I’d see it happening is if Ole loses Pogba and used the funds on Sancho. Meaning the sale doesn’t come out of his transfer budget.
 

beingshe7don

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2016
Messages
2,735
I've got to admit that I got on the Sancho bandwagon and wanted United to sign him but I think Jadon Sancho needs to prove himself next season to ensure that he's no one season wonder. I'm a little wary of us signing a player who's that young and for such a massive price. I would rather go for someone who's in their early 20s and will substantially improve our right wing immensely from Mata and Lingard. At present, I would consider either Pepe or Lozano. We wouldn't need to break the bank or pay huge wages.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.