Timo Werner

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,234
So he's good enough for Bayern, but not for us, got it.
I don’t believe he is good enough for Bayern but we’ll find out if he goes there
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,234
When you have a player like Rashford, there is absolutely no reason to buy someone like Werner. I'l list some of the reasons below:

1) Rashford is as good a striker, if not better, than Werner:

If you want to talk about Werner of the 16/17 season, when he scored 21 goals (7 assists) in 31 matches, then I can agree that Werner is better than Rashford. If you look at Werner since that season, he has scored just 27 goals in 58 games (13 assists), that Werner is no better than the current Rashford we have, who has shown tremendous potential since Ole has come in (along with his first season under LvG). Had Werner continued his goalscoring form from the 16/17 season onwards, I would consider him being above Rashford, but, given how his form has dropped in the last two seasons (not only for RB Leipzeg but also for Germany) I wouldn't make that same assessment now.

2) Werner is not effective as a winger:

Some people here have compared Werner to Lingard, saying he can play as an effective winger for us. I don't think he is a world class winger and if he is played there he will be nothing more than a stop-gap solution that won't improve the first team by a lot, atleast not enough to make us firm title contendors. We should be looking for more natural wingers for the RW/LW position if we really want to make an impact next season, not people like Werner whose natural position isn't there.

3) We already have a great backup striker in either Lukaku or Rashford:

Depending on your preference, either Lukaku or Rashford will be the starting striker leaving the other on the bench. With that, we have two very good strikers already in the squad and if you want to play a mostly 1 striker formation, you don't need more than that. Werner won't be any better than either of them so it would be a waste of financies that can be used elsewhere.

Frankly, I think the striker position is the least of problems for United looking towards next season. Therefore, using 30-40 mil of our financies for a player of that position would be a waste.
This sums up the situation although personally we should offload Lukaku and bring in another striker who has better movement, link up play and all round game.

Werner isn’t the guy for me and also playing him on the RW isnt the answer, we need a natural RW not yet another CF playing on the wing.
 

Trizy

New Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2014
Messages
12,009
Would much rather have Jovic, he would bring something different.
This! We've enough forwards with poor technical ability in the most important part of the pitch.

Jovic is just great and would suit us down to the ground.
 

Ace of Spades

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
5,201
Not a problem area. We don't need a striker, and I would put my faith in Rashford, Lukaku or even Martial as options for the striker position. Unless we are selling Lukaku, this makes no sense.

Also, I would prefer Jovic if we go for anyone.
 

hasanejaz88

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2017
Messages
5,892
Location
Munich
Supports
Germany
So he's good enough for Bayern, but not for us, got it.
Bayern are in need of a striker given Lewandowski's age and that they don't have a natural replacement (Gnabry is more stop-gap). We have two very good strikers so there is no need for another.
 

Kasper

Full Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
3,582
Supports
Hansa Rostock / Bradford City
Overrated and very one dimensional.
 

CM

Full Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2014
Messages
7,328
Looks like Fjortoft has just thrown our name into the mix for the sake of clicks. The tweet he's responding to doesn't even mention us and there's no reason to sign Werner when we've already got Rashford.
 

deadrevelz

New Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2016
Messages
1,028
If you are already good, there is always the aim to be better. We lost that over the past 5 years
Rashford and Martial will get better if they are played centrally and coached properly. We don't have unlimited funds to slightly improve positions that are well stocked. Unless it's an unmissable player it seems a waste of money to me. We need a 2012 van Persie if we're buying a striker, not another young forward who is similar in style and performance to our other forwards.
 

Web of Bissaka

Full Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2017
Messages
8,553
Location
Losing to Comeback Winning!
I don't mind, our attacks need freshen up. If I have to choose then.. no.

Haven't seen him much, but from the little I've seen (WC and few of his games in German league), he seems to be a speed merchant excel in scoring and at best in counter-attack system where there'll be lots of spaces to exploit. He rarely will get that with us. His finishing or scoring sense is just not that impressive nor does his technique or everything else eg. dribble, pass, ball control, etc etc. Maybe I need to see him perform more.
 

Escobar

Shameless Musketeer
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
30,179
Location
La-La-Land
Rashford and Martial will get better if they are played centrally and coached properly. We don't have unlimited funds to slightly improve positions that are well stocked. Unless it's an unmissable player it seems a waste of money to me. We need a 2012 van Persie if we're buying a striker, not another young forward who is similar in style and performance to our other forwards.
That was not the point of my post though
 

SATA

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
15,204
Location
We all love United
How much would he cost? If it’s about 20-25m, why not? Extra competition for places aren’t bad and will keep every player’s toes up
 

Invictus

Poster of the Year 2015 & 2018
Staff
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
15,255
Supports
Piracy on the High Seas.
 

LuessiT

Full Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
274
What's he like on the wing?
He can do the defensive work of a winger but on offense he's a pure striker. Will run behind defenses so he needs a RB that can occupy the flank on his own.
He's not the worst fit if we keep playing long balls behind the defense but there are better options to solve our RW problem. If Lukaku leaves he'd be a good move for depth though.
 

GazTheLegend

Full Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2014
Messages
3,619
Has been really disappointing for Germany every time I’ve seen him.

I keep expecting this pacey electric forward that Bundesliga fans rate so highly but he just looks like a shit version of Harry Kane every time I watch him play.

Am I wrong, my Bavarian friends?
 

devlinadl

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 24, 2018
Messages
125
How much would he cost? If it’s about 20-25m, why not? Extra competition for places aren’t bad and will keep every player’s toes up
40m euros is the number most often quoted. If there is a bidding war, I can see it going higher
 

Sean_RedDevil

Twitter bot
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Messages
21,364
Location
NYC (Before Manchester+Hamburg)
Bayern are in need of a striker given Lewandowski's age and that they don't have a natural replacement (Gnabry is more stop-gap). We have two very good strikers so there is no need for another.
If Kovac will play his favourite system 3-5-2 next season then Werner to Bayern Munich would make sense......but 4-2-3-1 isn't the right system for him especially at Bayern Munich.
 

hasanejaz88

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2017
Messages
5,892
Location
Munich
Supports
Germany
If Kovac will play his favourite system 3-5-2 next season then Werner to Bayern Munich would make sense......but 4-2-3-1 isn't the right system for him especially at Bayern Munich.
I think a forward line of him, Gnabry, Coman would be quite impressive with quick passing and changing of positions. His early form for Germany did come in a similar formation, though I do agree that he would be better in a 3-5-2 with him and Gnabry as the forwards.