Ed Woodward 2019 - Until all Arctic ice melts edition

jem

Full Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
9,257
Location
Toronto
Eh not good enough....I want to hear a Neville rant on him.
I thought Neville did rant on him earlier this season back when Mourinho was in charge. Who knows though...this whole season has been like a bad dream. Think how long ago that loss to Spurs at the beginning of the season was. It feels like ages ago (and not because things are so much better now.)

Edit: here is Neville criticizing those above Mourinho:
 

Fracture90

Full Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2016
Messages
10,360
Location
Serbia
He's basically piggy backing on our name. I'm sure there's a hell of a lot of people that could keep our revenues high, just keep doing what we've been doing for years, collect all the extra money being thrown at us by sponsors/tv/PL/UEFA. What would be a good job is recognising that the football club has no structure. The guy is a CEO and it sounds like we're a shambles behind the scenes. He's doing a very bad job.
I mean he's working for UTD, making money on the account of UTD's fame, popularity and greatness. Isn't that what he's supposed to be doing?

That opening sentence of yours makes no sense.
 

Escobar

Shameless Musketeer
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
30,063
Location
La-La-Land
How incompetent do we look as a footoball club. Years and years later and we're not one step further than after the Moyes debacle. Well, thank god the season is over but I'm not holding my breath for a great summer and a nice, new campaign unless we do not implement a proper, professional structure and appoint people with some bloody knowledge
 

UnitedFan93

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 24, 2018
Messages
577
Or we get worse owners..
Who knows what will happen in the future.

However, one thing is for certain. Right now Manchester United have possibly the worst owners in global sport. The problems that we are seeing at United are mirrored at the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Two sports clubs, both owned by the Glazers and both that have been completely useless in their field for years.

Right now, United is on a constant downward spiral. Falling standards and falling expectations and yet still half a billion in debt. Surely everyone should be demanding change?
 

Tincanalley

Turns player names into a crappy conversation
Joined
Apr 12, 2011
Messages
10,087
Location
Ireland
We need a new kind of campaign- based on historic days in the clubs history- Munich, Matt Busby appointed, day we won Various things, etc. On each day we have a different protest; don’t use official social media. Wear something to game. Stay outside OT and chant. If any of these are successful it shows a way to proceed. Fan power comes from purchasing power. It could be very potent harnessed effectively and imaginatively
 

Coops73

Full Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2013
Messages
3,334
Or we get worse owners..
I think it’d be worth the risk, ok we’ve not hit the lows of a club like Leeds perhaps but the Glazers are slowly but surely killing this club. It’s like watching the worlds slowest car crash, you can see what’s happening but there’s feck all you can do about it.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,029
Who knows what will happen in the future.

However, one thing is for certain. Right now Manchester United have possibly the worst owners in global sport. The problems that we are seeing at United are mirrored at the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Two sports clubs, both owned by the Glazers and both that have been completely useless in their field for years.

Right now, United is on a constant downward spiral. Falling standards and falling expectations and yet still half a billion in debt. Surely everyone should be demanding change?
To be honest I agree
 

pocco

loco
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
22,095
Location
Keep a clean shit tomorrow, United is my final bus
I mean he's working for UTD, making money on the account of UTD's fame, popularity and greatness. Isn't that what he's supposed to be doing?

That opening sentence of yours makes no sense.
My point is quite clear. He's earning a name as being good commercially, but when you look at what he's actually doing, it's really not that impressive. He's taking money that's being thrown at us because of what other men have done before him. Hell, there was even an article not long ago saying that the club feel like they've over saturated themselves with sponsorships and that they're planning on making our name more lucrative again by reigning in the sponsorships. So he's probably mindlessly handed out deals anyway and, actually, not doing that great a job there.

The simple fact that he's destroyed the most successful football club with terrible decisions is the real issue though. Forget sponsorships, because that's a byproduct of our success over Fergie's time. He's done a terrible job.
 

Fracture90

Full Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2016
Messages
10,360
Location
Serbia
My point is quite clear. He's earning a name as being good commercially, but when you look at what he's actually doing, it's really not that impressive. He's taking money that's being thrown at us because of what other men have done before him. Hell, there was even an article not long ago saying that the club feel like they've over saturated themselves with sponsorships and that they're planning on making our name more lucrative again by reigning in the sponsorships. So he's probably mindlessly handed out deals anyway and, actually, not doing that great a job there.

The simple fact that he's destroyed the most successful football club with terrible decisions is the real issue though. Forget sponsorships, because that's a byproduct of our success over Fergie's time. He's done a terrible job.
I don't like the guy and personally blame him for our footballing issues but you're reluctance to give him credit where is due, instead trying to undermine his role in this club making money by saying, "he's just taking the money being thrown at us" is just ridiculous. When we were on top and highly successful we weren't making as much as we were making in the years where we were far away from challenging for the highest honours.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,029
I don't like the guy and personally blame him for our footballing issues but you're reluctance to give him credit where is due, instead trying to undermine his role in this club making money by saying, "he's just taking the money being thrown at us" is just ridiculous. When we were on top and highly successful we weren't making as much as we were making in the years where we were far away from challenging for the highest honours.
Some of that is clearly due to the fact more
Money has come into football. Every club is making more than they ever did
 

Fracture90

Full Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2016
Messages
10,360
Location
Serbia
Some of that is clearly due to the fact more
Money has come into football. Every club is making more than they ever did
Yes, I agree some of it down to the influx of money in football and all sports general.
 

Lord-Rataxes

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2013
Messages
396
Location
Salford
Who knows what will happen in the future.

However, one thing is for certain. Right now Manchester United have possibly the worst owners in global sport. The problems that we are seeing at United are mirrored at the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Two sports clubs, both owned by the Glazers and both that have been completely useless in their field for years.

Right now, United is on a constant downward spiral. Falling standards and falling expectations and yet still half a billion in debt. Surely everyone should be demanding change?
This is absolutely the main problem. The Glazers have only ever been interested in making as much profit as possible from the club. 4th place and a ticket on next season's CL gravy train is the requirement, any trophies that might be won along the way are incidental and just a bonus. Woodward's statement to shareholders about on field success having no impact on off field performance, tells you everything about where the owners priorities lie unfortunately.
 

Patrick08

New Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2018
Messages
5,447
We should organize a protest against Woodward at home against Cardiff.
 

AllezLesDiables

Full Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2012
Messages
1,791
I’m going to venture that you really don’t know what you are talking about. I don’t see anyone here saying Woodward is indispensable. And i doubt anyone even thinks that.
You’re welcome to feel that way, but it’s a terribly ill-informed position.

There are plenty of people who play the well so and so is in x position therefore everyone else is a moron and has no clue.

It doesn’t mean that there aren’t brilliant people in big positions but the opposite assumption is patently false.
 

oz insomniac

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2016
Messages
412
My view is that Woodward isn't doing such a bad job intentionally, but both he and Matt Judge are hopeless negotiators and evaluators of talent and player worth.

That coupled with the passive indifference of the Glazers has culminated in the destruction of the roster and the clubs elite position in the past 6 years. As many have said, look at their other sports franchise, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, to understand that they have no strength other than extracting value.

Woodward and Judge are both bankers, yes with a b, and until there are experienced and high quality football administrators on their positions, it's unlikely anything will change.

Those of us that have followed the club for decades, see no light on the horizon until changes in administration are made, and a change in ownership wouldn't go astray. Some of the blame has to go to Ferguson for letting the club drift in the last few years of his reign to possibly appease the new owners. There was no regeneration of the roster to younger players and his idea of value saw him trapped in his own thinking.

Not a good outlook for at least 3 years, and if Ole doesn't undertake root and branch reform of the roster, or will he is allowed to, uncomfoartable times ahead.
 

smallred

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2006
Messages
1,119
Running the club into the ground.
any yet, seems to still have the support of 1000s of idiot fans who idolise the clown.

Woodward is the reason our club is heading to the gutter, nobody else. its time we take a stand and move him to a non footballing role or else its just going to get worse and worse.
 

ash_86

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
6,337
any yet, seems to still have the support of 1000s of idiot fans who idolise the clown.

Woodward is the reason our club is heading to the gutter, nobody else. its time we take a stand and move him to a non footballing role or else its just going to get worse and worse.
Few 1000's out of 700 million. Doesn’t seem huge.
 

Yakuza_devils

Full Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2016
Messages
2,840
I don't understand why it's so difficult for him to appoint a DOF to assist him to run football side of things in the club which he is clearly fecking shit at.

Every other club is doing this except this clown who still think he is capable of running the biggest football club in the work with his finance background.
 

Grande

Full Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2007
Messages
6,204
Location
The Land of Do-What-You-Will
My view is that Woodward isn't doing such a bad job intentionally, but both he and Matt Judge are hopeless negotiators and evaluators of talent and player worth.

That coupled with the passive indifference of the Glazers has culminated in the destruction of the roster and the clubs elite position in the past 6 years. As many have said, look at their other sports franchise, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, to understand that they have no strength other than extracting value.

Woodward and Judge are both bankers, yes with a b, and until there are experienced and high quality football administrators on their positions, it's unlikely anything will change.

Those of us that have followed the club for decades, see no light on the horizon until changes in administration are made, and a change in ownership wouldn't go astray. Some of the blame has to go to Ferguson for letting the club drift in the last few years of his reign to possibly appease the new owners. There was no regeneration of the roster to younger players and his idea of value saw him trapped in his own thinking.

Not a good outlook for at least 3 years, and if Ole doesn't undertake root and branch reform of the roster, or will he is allowed to, uncomfoartable times ahead.
Agree with much of this. Good points. On Fergie, I believe he wanted a structure were the next manager was given equal power as he himself had. The biggest mistake was believing that Moyes could handle such responsibility, or in fact anyone but Fergie. He was also used to a very good working relationship with Gill.

Added to that, I think he overestimated the quality of some of the young players He left: Smalling, Evans, Jones, Welbeck were internationals close to 20 years old at the time. Arguably they’d have progressed better under Fergie as well.

If Woodward is to be our captain at the mast concerning footballing matters much longer, I don’t think it will be easy for Solskjær or anyone else.
 

Yakuza_devils

Full Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2016
Messages
2,840
So no DOF or any structure changes to the club. He has been spouting this same shit for years without any results to back him up.

Next year will be another disappointment, no doubt. Nothing changes really except we have a rookie manager now. So we could be worse than last season.
 

ArjenIsM3

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2015
Messages
5,633
Location
Netherlands
So no DOF or any structure changes to the club. He has been spouting this same shit for years without any results to back him up.

Next year will be another disappointment, no doubt. Nothing changes really except we have a rookie manager now. So we could be worse than last season.
Has he said there will not be a DoF? I don't think so. This is just your regular/mandatory financial update.
 

deafepl

New Member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
2,974
And yet we finished 2nd and decided to build on that by purchasing a 3rd choice goalkeeper, a back up rookie RB and a back up midfielder. All words.

It comes down to Jose and Woodward & scouting team unable to agree on players. Jose wanted Boateng, Pericic, Willian, who cost over 50m each, they were seen as short term fixes.

Thank god, we didn't buy them in summer, because we don't need to fill more pensioners deadwords.
 

fallengt

Full Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
5,543
No single word about restructuring club?
In their mind, club is fine as is. I see
 

Regalia

Full Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
443
And yet we finished 2nd and decided to build on that by purchasing a 3rd choice goalkeeper, a back up rookie RB and a back up midfielder. All words.
This exactly. Giving Jose a new contract then not giving him the team to challenge. Every time this knob Woodhead opens his gob I just want to puke.
 

IrishRick

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2009
Messages
753
Location
Co. Cork
How are we supposed to negotiate smart deals while he keeps spouting off on how loaded we are. Other clubs will now add a 10% premium to the transfer fees and so will those players with wages. For an intelligent business man to be such a moron is weird. Why not say that given that we had budgeted for Champions League football purse strings will be tightened. Sure a lot of fans would panic and say oh no Glazers doing it again but it would allow us negotiating power with other clubs
 

Rooney24

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
8,339
How are we supposed to negotiate smart deals while he keeps spouting off on how loaded we are. Other clubs will now add a 10% premium to the transfer fees and so will those players with wages. For an intelligent business man to be such a moron is weird. Why not say that given that we had budgeted for Champions League football purse strings will be tightened. Sure a lot of fans would panic and say oh no Glazers doing it again but it would allow us negotiating power with other clubs
Understand what you are saying but its pretty standard for clubs to squeeze United for every penny. This has been the case as far back as I can remember.
 

IrishRick

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2009
Messages
753
Location
Co. Cork
Understand what you are saying but its pretty standard for clubs to squeeze United for every penny. This has been the case as far back as I can remember.
Oh obviously. The name Manchester United is enough alone. I just don't get what he hopes to achieve, footballing wise, by stating this. And that's probably the reason. It's a statement to say on pitch is rubbish but look here I still make ye money.Let me keep my job

We are in trouble
 

Rooney24

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
8,339
Oh obviously. The name Manchester United is enough alone. I just don't get what he hopes to achieve, footballing wise, by stating this. And that's probably the reason. It's a statement to say on pitch is rubbish but look here I still make ye money.Let me keep my job

We are in trouble
And while he does he is unlikely to be going anywhere. Thats the reality.