Why would a loan player attract other players?Im very much in the:
Loan - Good move, high profile player, could attract other players, be good for the younger players to learn from. Not really seen much of him this season but Im sure he could still be a really good player for us this year even if it were for 20-30games max
Buy - Hell no
'Explosive pace' and 8 calf muscle injuries are mutually exclusive.- I think on loan he'd be outstanding.
- Might take him 10 games to get up to speed.
- He's suited to the Premier league where his explosive pace can be exploited best.
- The likes of Robben and Ibrahimovich mostly flopped in La Liga only to explode again as soon as they left. Thierry Henry was by a mile the best player in the PL and looked average when he went to La Liga.
- I don't think the Glazers would consider a loan deal unless they offloaded Alexis first.
So if Messi and ROnaldo came here on loan you dont think other players would like to play with them?Why would a loan player attract other players?
The most impressive right winger at Old Trafford in the last year is David Beckham.According to Ducker, ManUtd are looking to sign experienced Right sided forward. Wonder if it's Bale he was talking about.
Different story when it's some of the best players of all time. Even then, I find it hard to believe that many players would base long-term career decisions around being able to play with a certain player for a single season.So if Messi and ROnaldo came here on loan you dont think other players would like to play with them?
Let's hope the club know how they're going to replace Lukaku's goals when he's sold then because if come deadline day he's gone then Bale on loan wouldn't be such a bad idea then
He would be another Schweinsteiger. Talented or not, he would come and put in a half-arsed effort. I'd clone Lingard (my worst nightmare btw) before I would like to see us sign this half-retired mercenary.Let's hope the club know how they're going to replace Lukaku's goals when he's sold then because if come deadline day he's gone then Bale on loan wouldn't be such a bad idea then
Yeah, let's leave that way.If China or Middle East don't come to their rescue, Madrid are stuck with Bale!
absolutely wonderful news
I have a feeling the reason Zidane keeps him on the bench is because his wages may be related to his appearances.Is he really on 600K a week? I thought we were stupid enough with Sanchez, but Real went one better. Not worth that even if he won them the CL, he isn't Ronaldo or Messi and you could make an argument that even they don't need to be paid that much.
He would be another Schweinsteiger. Talented or not, he would come and put in a half-arsed effort. I'd clone Lingard (my worst nightmare btw) before I would like to see us sign this half-retired mercenary.
Spot on and not good for team spiritSo we have our own bale situation with Sanchez and it would be a good idea to take on another... a player in his situation, he has no hunger left
You can have Zaha tbh.I don't understand why sign Bale when Zaha is available on the market. If Zaha cost around 60M it is a very good price.
That's made up, Perez had a recent interview where he was asked about the wages of our players, he said Ramos is the top earner, and from what we know he earns around 200K pounds.Is he really on 600K a week?
If the story is true, and that's a big if, I doubt Real would care if they get a two window transfer ban. They've bought enough players to last them years.I like how Ole showed middle finger to Madrid they need to sell and easily can have problems with FFP.
But a UCL ban would seriously hurt.If the story is true, and that's a big if, I doubt Real would care if they get a two window transfer ban. They've bought enough players to last them years.